Robust Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to Pertussis in Adults After a First Acellular Booster Vaccination

Introduction: To reduce the pertussis disease burden, nowadays several countries recommend acellular pertussis (aP) booster vaccinations for adults. We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of a first adult aP booster vaccination at childbearing age.

Methods: In 2014, healthy adults aged 25–29 years (n = 105), vaccinated during infancy with four doses of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine, received a Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and aP) booster vaccination. Blood samples were collected longitudinally pre-booster, 2 and 4 weeks, and 1 year and 2 years post-booster. Tdap vaccine antigen-specific antibody levels and memory B- and T-cell responses were determined at all time points. Antibody persistence was calculated using a bi-exponential decay model.

Results: Upon booster vaccination, the IgG levels specific to all Tdap vaccine antigens were significantly increased. After an initial rapid decline in the first year, PT-IgG antibody decay was limited (15%) in the second year post-booster. The duration of a median level of PT-IgG ≥20 IU/mL was estimated to be approximately 9 years. Vaccine antigen-specific memory B- and T-cell numbers increased and remained at high levels although a significant decline was observed after 4 weeks post-booster. However, Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokine production remained above pre-booster levels for 2 years.

Conclusion: The Tdap booster vaccination in wP-primed Dutch adults induced robust long-term humoral and cellular immune responses to pertussis antigens. Furthermore, PT-IgG levels are predicted to remain above the presumed protective cut-off for at least 9 years which might deserves further attention in evaluating the current recommendation to revaccinate women during every new pregnancy.

Introduction

The incidence of clinical pertussis cases strongly declined after the introduction of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines in infant national immunization programs (NIP) in the 1940 and 1950s (1). Despite a consistently high vaccination coverage, an increase in numbers of pertussis cases is observed in many countries and in all age groups (2–5). Consequently, in addition to pre-school acellular pertussis (aP) booster vaccinations, several countries have implemented aP booster vaccinations for adolescents and adults (6–8). Furthermore, to protect unvaccinated infants against pertussis, pregnant woman are advised to receive maternal aP booster vaccination in more than 25 countries (9–11).

Waning immunity after vaccination and natural infection as well as the switch from wP to aP vaccines in the primary infant vaccination series are thought to have contributed to the pertussis resurgence (12–14). The switch from wP to aP vaccines for infants occurred in January 2005 in the Netherlands, which is rather late compared with other high-income countries. After an aP vaccination in adults, low pertussis antibody levels, and in particular low anti-pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies, that are considered the most protective against clinical B. pertussis symptoms, have been observed already within 1 year (15, 16). These studies were, however, conducted in a period with a presumed lower circulation of B. pertussis (late 1990s) in comparison to the past decades (17, 18).

Nowadays, increased circulation of B. pertussis might allow for more natural boosting of the immune system, and affect antibody kinetics as well as cellular immunity after an adult aP booster vaccination. We aimed to evaluate the long-term immunogenicity of a first adult aP booster vaccination at childbearing age. A bi-exponential antibody decay model was used to predict the duration of antibody persistence to PT after vaccination. This study provides valuable information for the improvement of adult and maternal pertussis vaccination programs.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

In this phase IV, longitudinal intervention study, healthy Dutch adults 25–29 years of age were recruited to receive a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccination. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy at the start of the study; present severe disease or medical treatment that might interfere with study results; an adverse event after previous vaccinations; other pertussis vaccinations than those given according to the Dutch NIP; diphtheria and/or tetanus vaccination in the past 5 years; plasma products received in the past 6 months; any vaccination in the last month and/or antibiotic use or fever (≥38°C) in the 2 weeks before study enrollment. Written informed consent was obtained at the start of the study. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee North Holland (METC-NH, Alkmaar, the Netherlands) and registered at the European clinical trials database (2013-005355-32) and the Dutch trial register (www.trialregister.nl; NTR4494).

Vaccination Background

All participants had received the Dutch diphtheria, tetanus, whole-cell pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus combination vaccine (National institute for Public Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands) according to the then NIP at 3, 4, 5, and 11 months of age. In this study, the participants received a Tdap booster vaccine (Boostrix™, GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium). The vaccine contained 8 µg PT and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), 2.5 µg pertactin (Prn), ≥2 IU diphtheria toxoid (Dd), and ≥20 IU tetanus toxoid (Td).

Blood Samples

Serum samples were collected just before, 14 days (±2 days), 28 days (±2 days), 1 year (±2 weeks), and 2 years (±2 weeks) after the Tdap booster vaccination. Sera were stored at −20°C until analysis. From a randomly selected subset of 60 participants, additional blood was sampled in vacutainer cell preparation tubes containing sodium citrate (Becton Dickinson (BD) Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). PBMCs were isolated within 16 h, and stored at −135°C as described previously (19).

Serological Analysis

PT-, FHA-, and Prn-specific IgG and IgA, and Dd- and tetanus toxin (TT)-specific IgG antibody concentrations were quantified using the fluorescent-bead-based multiplex immunoassay (MIA) as described (20–22). To express pertussis-IgG and IgA concentrations in international units (IU) per mL, the WHO international standard (pertussis antiserum first international standard, 06/140, NIBSC) was used. A PT-IgG concentration of 20 IU/mL was used as an arbitrary cut-off for protection (23) and 50 IU/mL to indicate an infection with pertussis in the preceding years (17, 20). An IgA concentration ≥1 IU/mL was used as seropositive.

From 42 longitudinal samples, the PT- and Prn-IgG avidity was determined using the MIA with minor modifications (24), using 1.5 M (for PT) and 2.5 M (for Prn) ammonium thiocyanate (NH₄SCN). The geometric mean avidity index (GMAI) was expressed as the percentage of antibodies that remained bound to PT- or Prn-conjugated beads after NH₄SCN treatment in comparison to untreated (PBS) samples.

Flow Cytometry

The absolute numbers of circulating B-cells and B-cell subsets were determined in 60 paired samples before and 2 weeks after the booster vaccination with a lyse-no-wash protocol using TruCOUNT tubes (BD Biosciences). The fluochrome-conjugated antibodies CD19(J3-119)-PE-Cy7 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), CD27(M-T271)-BV421, IgD(IA6-2)-FITC (both from Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and CD38(HB7)-APC-H7 (BD Biosciences) were used. Samples were measured using a LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The B-cell population in PBMCs before and after culture was determined using CD19-PerCPCy5.5 (BD Biosciences), and samples were measured on a FacsCanto flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FACSDiva™ v8 (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo v10 (FlowJo company, Ashland, OR, USA) with a gating strategy as described (25).

Antigen-Specific B- and T-cell Responses

From 30 participants, vaccine antigen-specific B- and T-cell responses were determined. For B-cell responses, PBMCs were polyclonally stimulated for 5 days after which the number of specific IgG memory B-cells/10⁵ CD19⁺ cells was determined in PT-, FHA-, Prn-, and Td-specific ELISpot assays (19). Per participant, samples of different time points were determined simultaneously. Lower limit of quantification was 0.5 spots/10⁵ CD19⁺ cells.

For T-cell responses, PBMCs were stimulated for 5 days with PT (heat inactivated), FHA, Prn, Dd, or Td after which supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C (26). Unstimulated and pokeweed mitogen-stimulated cells served as negative and positive controls, respectively. The cytokines interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) (Th1), interleukin-13 (IL-13) (Th2), IL-17 (Th17), and IL-10 (Treg) were quantified in the supernatants using an in-house MIA developed according to de Jager et al. (27) and calibrated against the Bio-Plex cytokine assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Geometric mean concentrations with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for vaccine antigen-specific IgG, IgA, and cytokine concentrations. Numbers of vaccine antigen-specific memory B-cells are reported as geometric mean values/10⁵ CD19⁺ cells. The mean percent reduction of the IgG concentrations was calculated between the different time points after vaccination. The kinetics of IgG antibody levels was determined with a bi-exponential decay model as described (28).

Normal distribution of (log-transformed) data was confirmed prior to each analysis. Differences between time points were tested with paired sample t-tests (normal distributed data) or with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests (not normally distributed data). Correlations between variables were determined with Spearman correlations and linear regression analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant (two-sided test). Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v7 (GraphPad Software) and SPSS statistics v24 (IBM).

Results

Study Baseline Characteristics

At the start of the study in April 2014, 105 participants received a Tdap booster vaccination (Figure 1). 2 years after the booster, 90.6% (96/106) of the participants completed all study visits and ≥100 blood samples had been collected at every time point. Mean age at the start of the study was 27.6 ± 1.4 years and 34% was male (36/106).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flow-chart of study enrollment. Schematic overview of the recruitment, enrollment, and the follow-up of the study participants. At the start of the study, Dutch participants 25–29 years of age received a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis booster vaccination. Blood samples were collected before (T0), 2 weeks (T1), 4 weeks (T2), 1 year (T3), and 2 years (T4) after the booster vaccination. *143 potential participants were excluded because the target for inclusion was achieved.

IgG and IgA Antibody Kinetics After the Tdap Booster Vaccination

Before the Tdap booster vaccination, IgG levels against PT, FHA, and Prn were low (Figure 2 and Table 1), although 7% (7/105) of the participants had a PT-IgG level ≥50 IU/mL. 1 and 2 years post-booster, this percentage increased to respectively 78% (79/101) and 71% (71/100) of the participants. Following the Tdap booster vaccination, the IgG levels increased for all vaccine antigens and remained higher at all time points compared with pre-booster levels (p-values <0.01) (Figure 2 and Table 1). Surprisingly, 8% (8/105) of the participants did not show a PT-IgG level ≥20 IU/mL at any of the time points. The IgG levels for diphtheria and tetanus were above the protective level pre-booster for most individuals and IgG levels increased upon the booster, but started to decline already after 2 weeks post-booster and progressed to decline significantly after 1 and 2 years post-booster (p-values <0.01) (Figure 2). The reduction in vaccine antigen-specific IgG varied between 41 and 66% in the first year, but was more limited (15–25%) during the second year post-booster (Table 1). Overall, the PT-IgG levels were similar between males and females, but 7/8 participants who did not have arbitrarily protective PT-IgG levels in the first month post-booster were females. At 2 years post-booster, more females showed PT-IgG levels under the protective cut-off (21/66 females, 32%) compared with males (8/34 males, 24%).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Reverse cumulative distribution curves of IgG levels before and after a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccination. (A) pertussis toxin (PT), (B) filamentous hemagglutinin, (C) pertactin, (D) diphtheria toxoid, and (E) tetanus toxin specific IgG levels (IU/mL) in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age before (pre; black lines), 2 weeks (red lines), 4 weeks (green lines), 1 year (blue lines), and 2 years (orange lines) after a first Tdap booster vaccination. Note, black line represents the cut-off for protection (PT 20 IU/mL (suggestive), diphtheria and tetanus 0.01 IU/mL).

TABLE 1

Table 1. IgG geometric mean concentrations (IU/mL) with 95% confidence intervals following a first adult tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis booster vaccination and percent reduction^a of IgG antibody levels.

According to the bi-exponential model, the median PT-IgG level was predicted to remain above 20 IU/mL for approximately 9 years (Figure 3). Median duration of protection against diphtheria and tetanus both >0.01 IU/mL (29, 30) was predicted to approximately last 16 and 93 years, respectively post-booster.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Predicted levels of pertussis toxin (PT)-specific IgG levels (IU/mL) after a first adult tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis booster vaccination in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age using a bi-exponential model. Note, solid bold line represents the median, solid lines represents the 95% predicted interval (95% PI), and dotted line represents a PT-IgG concentration of 20 IU/mL.

The avidity (GMAI) of the PT-IgG antibodies was significantly higher for 2 and 4 weeks of post-booster compared with pre-booster (p-values <0.01), while no differences were observed in the GMAI of Prn-IgG antibodies (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Avidity of pertussis toxin (PT)- and Prn-IgG antibodies. (A) PT and (B) pertactin avidity index in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age before (pre), 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after a first tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis booster vaccination. Note, black lines represents the geometric mean percentage with 95% confidence interval, ^#p-value <0.01 compared with pre-booster levels.

Seropositive PT-IgA levels were observed in 85% (89/105) of the participants pre-booster, and in 99% (103/104) of the participants 2 weeks post-booster (Figure 5A). 2 and 4 weeks post-booster, the IgA levels for all three pertussis antigens had increased, but declined subsequently within the first year post-booster (p-values <0.001) (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. IgA antibody levels before and after a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccination. (A) Pertussis toxin (PT), (B) filamentous hemagglutinin, and (C) pertactin (Prn)-specific IgA levels (IU/mL) in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age before (pre), 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 1 year after a first Tdap booster vaccination. Note, black lines represent the geometric mean concentration with 95% confidence interval. Each time point was significantly different compared with other time points.

B-cell Responses After the Tdap Booster Vaccination

At 2 weeks post-booster, the absolute numbers of circulating B-cells and plasma-, naïve-, and memory-B-cell subsets had increased significantly compared with pre-booster numbers, except for natural effector B-cell numbers (Figure 6). Pre-booster, detectable numbers of vaccine antigen-specific circulating memory B-cells were observed in just a few participants (Figure 7). Following Tdap, the numbers of the vaccine antigen-specific memory B-cells/10⁵ CD19⁺ cells had increased significantly at all time points compared with pre-booster values, except for PT and Prn 2 years post-booster, but numbers had declined significantly between 4 weeks and 1 year post-booster (Figure 7). A correlation was observed between the numbers of specific memory B-cells at 2 weeks versus the specific IgG levels at 1 year and 2 years post-booster for PT and Prn (r = 0.64 and 0.58 for PT and r = 0.65 and 0.66 for Prn, respectively; p-values <0.01) (Figure 8).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Absolute numbers of B-cell and B-cell subsets before (circles) and 2 weeks after (triangles) a first tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis booster vaccination in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age. Gating of populations (all SSC^low): B-cell: CD45⁺CD19⁺; translational: CD45⁺CD27⁻CD38⁺; plasmablast: CD45⁺CD27⁺CD38⁺; naïve mature: CD45⁺CD27⁻IgD⁺CD38^dim; natural effector: CD45⁺CD27⁺IgD⁺CD38^dim; CD27⁻ memory: CD45⁺CD27⁻IgD⁻CD38^dim; CD27⁺ memory: CD45⁺CD27⁺IgD⁻CD38^dim. Note, black solid line represents the geometric mean numbers with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, *p-value <0.05.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. Numbers of memory B-cells before and after a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccination. The numbers of (A) pertussis toxin, (B) filamentous hemagglutinin, (C) pertactin, and (D) tetanus toxoid-specific IgG-producing memory B-cells/100,000 CD19⁺ cells in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age before (pre), 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years after a first Tdap booster vaccination. Note, black solid line represents the geometric mean number, $ indicates significant increase compared with numbers pre-booster (p-value <0.05) and # indicates significant decrease compared with previous time point(s) post-booster (p-value <0.05).

FIGURE 8

Figure 8. Correlation between IgG and memory B-cells. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) between the numbers of IgG-specific memory B-cells/105 CD19⁺ cells (x-axis) at 2 weeks post-booster and the specific IgG levels in IU/mL (on the y-axis) at 1 year post-booster (A,C) and at 2 years post-booster (B,D) for pertussis toxin; (A,B) and for pertactin; (C,D). p = p-value.

T-Cell Cytokine Responses After the Adult Tdap Booster Vaccination

In general, the production of IFN-γ, IL-13, and IL-17 cytokines increased significantly at all time points post-booster vaccination compared with pre-booster values (Figure 9; Figure S1 in Supplementary Material). Similar levels were observed at 2 and 4 weeks and again at 1 year and 2 years following Tdap (data 4 weeks and 2 years post-booster not shown). Pertussis-specific IFN-γ production and FHA-specific IL-13 production decreased significantly between 2 weeks and 1 year post-booster (Figure 9). Only low pertussis-specific IL-10 production was observed both pre- and post-booster (data not shown).

FIGURE 9

Figure 9. Cytokine levels of stimulated T-cells before and after a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccination. (A) Interferon-gamma, (B) interleukin-13, and (C) IL-17 cytokine concentrations (pg/mL) in the supernatants of T-cells stimulated with heat inactivated pertussis toxin (PT) (circles), filamentous hemagglutinin (squares), or pertactin (Prn) (triangles) in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age before 2 weeks and 1 year after a first Tdap booster vaccination. Note, black lines represents the geometric mean concentration; *p-value < 0.05.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that systemic IgG levels against the pertussis vaccine antigens PT, FHA, and Prn persisted at higher levels for at least 2 years after a first adult aP booster vaccination in young Dutch adults 25–29 years of age, who had been primed in infancy with whole-cell pertussis vaccine. A limited antibody decay was observed during the second year post-booster with antibody levels against PT above 20 IU/mL in at least 70% of the participants and an estimated median duration of protection for about 9 years. The numbers of PT- and Prn-specific B-cells observed at 2 weeks post-booster correlated with the corresponding IgG antibody levels after 1 year and 2 years. Furthermore, the booster enhanced Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokine production for at least 2 years.

Using the same vaccine antigen dose, the adult Tdap booster vaccination in this study induced 1.5–4 times higher PT-IgG levels compared with previous studies (15, 31, 32), which were conducted between 1997 and 2002 in a period with presumed lower circulation of B. pertussis than nowadays (17, 18). Our participants were, therefore, most likely more frequently exposed to B. pertussis. This is underlined by the fact that the majority of our participants showed pre-booster PT-IgA levels, that further increased post-booster. IgA responses are not induced by aP vaccines in infants (22), but exposure to B. pertussis induces systemic pertussis-specific IgA-producing memory B-cells in children and adults (22, 33). Therefore, the presence of IgA antibodies pre-booster and their rise post-booster may result from the activation of pre-existing pertussis-specific memory B-cells induced by previous B. pertussis contact in life, indicative of enhanced B. pertussis circulation nowadays. Together, the high pertussis circulation, compared to a population that is not or only minimally boosted with pertussis infections, alters pertussis immunity with enhanced antibody levels and cellular immunity upon a booster vaccination.

Using a bi-exponential antibody decay model with the arbitrarily defined level of protection of ≥20 IU/mL (23), the median duration of protective PT-IgG levels in our study was estimated to last up to 9 years after the Tdap booster. Although a power function decay model can also be used to determine antibody persistence, this model results in even more prolonged antibody persistence (34). Therefore, we prefer to use the more conservative bi-exponential model. We need to point out that the young adults in our study have been primed with wP vaccines during infancy, as is the case for the majority of the current adult Dutch population.

In this study, the highest pertussis-specific IgG levels were seen at day 14 post-booster followed by a slight decrease at day 28. In line with this, Halperin et al. reported increased IgG levels from day 7 with a peak around day 14 (35), and Kirkland et al. reported comparable IgG levels at 2 and 4 weeks, both after a Tdap booster (36), though using lower vaccine antigen concentrations compared with our study (35, 36). Other pertussis booster studies measured serological responses from 4 weeks post-booster onward (15, 37–39). Since peak IgG levels will be missed with sample collections from 4 weeks onward, vaccine antibody responses could be measured already around day 14 post-booster.

The higher IgG responses upon Tdap vaccination due to presumed recall of memory B-cells induced by a previous B. pertussis infection is reflected by the high numbers of pertussis-specific IgG memory B-cells after the booster, and the significantly higher absolute numbers of recirculating B-cell subsets. In line with this, Hendrikx et al. found similar numbers of PT-specific memory B-cells in pre-adolescents after a second aP booster vaccination. In contrast, post-booster numbers of FHA- and Prn-specific memory B-cells were higher in adults, probably a result of more natural boosting compared with pre-adolescents. The numbers of pertussis-specific circulating memory B-cells, a month after vaccination of adolescents correlate with antibody levels a year post vaccination suggesting that memory B-cells at least partly will differentiate into plasma cells upon vaccination (40). Although the homing of the pertussis-specific memory B-cells normally occurs quickly, waning circulating IgG levels during the second year was limited, probably by the presence of long-lived plasma cells in the bone-marrow. Others found no correlation between circulating memory B-cells and antibody levels for diphtheria and tetanus in steady state conditions. This suggests that peripheral memory B cells and antibody-secreting plasma cells may partly represent independently regulated cell populations and may play different roles in the maintenance of protective immunity (41). The induction of memory B-cells and long-lived plasma cells by the adult booster vaccination might contribute to long-term protection against pertussis.

In agreement with other studies, the adult booster vaccination resulted in increased levels of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines (42, 43). However, Huygen et al. did not find increased Th1 levels upon the same vaccination in pregnant women or their age-matched controls (38). Also, a pre-adolescent Tdap booster in children 9 years of age did not enhance T-cell responses (44), which we explained at the time by the high pre-booster levels already induced by a booster vaccination 5 years earlier. So far, just one study investigated the influence of pertussis priming vaccines on adult T-cell responses after a Tdap booster vaccination (43). That study showed a general Th2-dominated immune response after an aP booster in adults primed with aP vaccines during infancy, while wP-primed adults showed a Th1 dominated response (43). Since Th1 cells are essential for bacterial clearance and associated with protection (45), the increased pertussis-specific Th1 levels observed in our wP-primed adults post-booster, could possibly confer protection against pertussis, while this may be less in aP-primed adults with a Th2-dominated response.

The increase in the number of pertussis-related deaths in infants during the epidemic of 2010 in California (10) and that of 2012 in the UK (11), led to the implementation of maternal pertussis booster vaccinations (9). Maternal aP vaccinations are very effective in preventing pertussis in infants in the time window from birth until their first routine pertussis immunization, even with low anti-PT antibody levels at 2 months of age (<15 IU/mL) (46–48). In several countries, pregnant women are advised to be vaccinated during every pregnancy (38, 49). The persistence of high PT-IgG antibody levels reported here could indicate that the repeated administration of a Tdap booster vaccination might not be necessary for the majority of pregnant women. IgG antibody kinetics after an aP booster vaccination in pregnant women should be studied in more detail. Also, attention must be paid to potential non-responders to aP vaccinations, since these comprise 10% (7/70) of our female study participants.

The switch from wP to aP vaccines during infancy in 2005, will bring the first Dutch aP-primed cohort reaching the age of 18 years in 2023. However, other countries have already used aP vaccines in the infant immunization program for more than two decades. Since protection against clinical pertussis wanes faster after priming with aP vaccines compared with wP vaccines (50), women at childbearing age primed with aP vaccines, may experience the consequences of less longer persistence of pertussis-specific antibodies after booster vaccination. Therefore, the effectiveness of adult and maternal Tdap vaccinations and antibody persistence deserves further study, accounting for previous vaccinations and current B. pertussis exposure in the population.

To conclude, we showed a robust immune response and persistence of high pertussis IgG antibody levels after a Tdap booster vaccination in Dutch adults 25–29 years of age. These adults have been primed with wP vaccines during infancy and might benefit from the booster vaccine by an elevated immune response to pertussis. Maternal aP vaccination is currently the best strategy to protect newborns from pertussis. Long-term follow-up of antibody levels in women vaccinated with aP during pregnancy could elucidate the necessity to vaccinate during every pregnancy. In addition, Tdap booster responses in growing cohorts of aP-primed individuals reaching childbearing age should be further investigated.

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent was obtained at the start of the study. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee North Holland (METC-NH, Alkmaar, the Netherlands) and registered at the European clinical trials database (2013-005355-32) and the Dutch trial register (www.trialregister.nl; NTR4494).

Author Contributions

SL, GB, and A-MB were involved in the conception, planning, study design, and participant enrollment. SL, DR, MLB, MJB, and PG performed laboratory analysis. SL and AM performed statistical analysis. SL, ES, GB, and A-MB interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. All authors agreed to submit for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

SL, DR, M-LZ-B, MB, PG, AM, GB, and A-MB have no conflicts of interest. ES declares to have received grant support for vaccine studies from Pfizer and GSK.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all participants in this study and the nurses of PreMeo for performing the clinical procedures. Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Tom Wolfs (UMC Utrecht) for acting as the independent physician during this study. From the national institute of public health and the environment (RIVM), we thank Peter Schuurman and Marjan Kuijer for their excellent assistance in the measurements of the blood samples and Deborah Kleijne, Renée van Boxtel, Anke Smits, and Rogier Bos for their assistance in the clinical procedures.

Funding

This work was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Health.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00681/full#supplementary-material.

References

1. Davis SF, Strebel PM, Cochi SL, Zell ER, Hadler SC. Pertussis surveillance – United States, 1989-1991. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ (1992) 41(8):11–9.

Google Scholar

2. van der Maas NA, Mooi FR, de Greeff SC, Berbers GA, Spaendonck MA, de Melker HE. Pertussis in the Netherlands, is the current vaccination strategy sufficient to reduce disease burden in young infants? Vaccine (2013) 31(41):4541–7. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Campbell P, McIntyre P, Quinn H, Hueston L, Gilbert GL, McVernon J. Increased population prevalence of low pertussis toxin antibody levels in young children preceding a record pertussis epidemic in Australia. PLoS One (2012) 7(4):e35874. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Jackson DW, Rohani P. Perplexities of pertussis: recent global epidemiological trends and their potential causes. Epidemiol Infect (2013) 142(4):672–84. doi:10.1017/S0950268812003093

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Wensley A, Hughes GJ, Campbell H, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Young N, et al. Risk factors for pertussis in adults and teenagers in England. Epidemiol Infect (2017) 145(5):1025–36. doi:10.1017/S0950268816002983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Schwartz KL, Kwong JC, Deeks SL, Campitelli MA, Jamieson FB, Marchand-Austin A, et al. Effectiveness of pertussis vaccination and duration of immunity. CMAJ (2016) 188(16):E399–406. doi:10.1503/cmaj.160193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Clark TA, Bobo N. CDC update on pertussis surveillance and Tdap vaccine recommendations. NASN Sch Nurse (2012) 27(6):297–300. doi:10.1177/1942602X12452443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Recommended Immunisations for Pertussis. (2015). Available from: http://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu/Pages/Scheduler.aspx (Accessed: 12 December, 2015).

Google Scholar

9. Agentschap Zorg, Gezondheid, Zwangerschap en vaccinaties. Een Vroege Bescherming Voor Je Baby. (2017). Available from: https://www.vlaanderen.be/nl/gezin-welzijn-en-gezondheid/kinderen/vaccinatie-tegen-kinkhoest-voor-zwangere-vrouwen-en-volwassenen (Accessed: 15 June, 2017).

Google Scholar

10. Winter K, Glaser C, Watt J, Harriman K, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Pertussis epidemic – California, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2014) 63(48):1129–32.

Google Scholar

11. Donegan K, King B, Bryan P. Safety of pertussis vaccination in pregnant women in UK: observational study. BMJ (2014) 349:g4219. doi:10.1136/bmj.g4219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Cherry JD. Why do pertussis vaccines fail? Pediatrics (2012) 129(5):968–70. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2594

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Burns DL, Meade BD, Messionnier NE. Pertussis resurgence: perspectives from the working group meeting on pertussis on the causes, possible paths forward, and gaps in our knowledge. J Infect Dis (2014) 209(Suppl 1):S32–5. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit491

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mooi FR, Van Der Maas NA, De Melker HE. Pertussis resurgence: waning immunity and pathogen adaptation – two sides of the same coin. Epidemiol Infect (2014) 142(4):685–94. doi:10.1017/S0950268813000071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Le T, Cherry JD, Chang SJ, Knoll MD, Lee ML, Barenkamp S, et al. Immune responses and antibody decay after immunization of adolescents and adults with an acellular pertussis vaccine: the APERT study. J Infect Dis (2004) 190(3):535–44. doi:10.1086/422035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McIntyre PB, Turnbull FM, Egan AM, Burgess MA, Wolter JM, Schuerman LM. High levels of antibody in adults three years after vaccination with a reduced antigen content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine. Vaccine (2004) 23(3):380–5. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.05.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. de Greeff SC, de Melker HE, van Gageldonk PG, Schellekens JF, van der Klis FR, Mollema L, et al. Seroprevalence of pertussis in the Netherlands: evidence for increased circulation of Bordetella pertussis. PLoS One (2010) 5(12):e14183. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Barkoff AM, Grondahl-Yli-Hannuksela K, He Q. Seroprevalence studies of pertussis: what have we learned from different immunized populations. Pathog Dis (2015) 73(7):ftv050. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftv050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Buisman AM, de Rond CG, Ozturk K, Ten Hulscher HI, van Binnendijk RS. Long-term presence of memory B-cells specific for different vaccine components. Vaccine (2009) 28(1):179–86. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. van der Lee S, Stoof SP, van Ravenhorst MB, van Gageldonk PGM, van der Maas NAT, Sanders EAM, et al. Enhanced Bordetella pertussis acquisition rate in adolescents during the 2012 epidemic in the Netherlands and evidence for prolonged antibody persistence after infection. Euro Surveill (2017) 22(47). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.47.17-00011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. van Gageldonk PG, van Schaijk FG, van der Klis FR, Berbers GA. Development and validation of a multiplex immunoassay for the simultaneous determination of serum antibodies to Bordetella pertussis, diphtheria and tetanus. J Immunol Methods (2008) 335(1–2):79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2008.02.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Hendrikx LH, Ozturk K, de Rond LG, de Greeff SC, Sanders EA, Berbers GA, et al. Serum IgA responses against pertussis proteins in infected and Dutch wP or aP vaccinated children: an additional role in pertussis diagnostics. PLoS One (2011) 6(11):e27681. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027681

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Long SS, Welkon CJ, Clark JL. Widespread silent transmission of pertussis in families: antibody correlates of infection and symptomatology. J Infect Dis (1990) 161(3):480–6. doi:10.1093/infdis/161.3.480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hendrikx LH, Berbers GA, Veenhoven RH, Sanders EA, Buisman AM. IgG responses after booster vaccination with different pertussis vaccines in Dutch children 4 years of age: effect of vaccine antigen content. Vaccine (2009) 27(47):6530–6. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Berkowska MA, Driessen GJ, Bikos V, Grosserichter-Wagener C, Stamatopoulos K, Cerutti A, et al. Human memory B cells originate from three distinct germinal center-dependent and -independent maturation pathways. Blood (2011) 118(8):2150–8. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-04-345579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. van der Lee S, Kemmeren JM, de Rond LGH, Ozturk K, Westerhof A, de Melker HE, et al. Elevated immune response among children 4 years of age with pronounced local adverse events after the fifth diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J (2017) 36(9):e223–9. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000001620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. de Jager W, te Velthuis H, Prakken BJ, Kuis W, Rijkers GT. Simultaneous detection of 15 human cytokines in a single sample of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol (2003) 10(1):133–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

28. van Ravenhorst MB, Marinovic AB, van der Klis FR, van Rooijen DM, van Maurik M, Stoof SP, et al. Long-term persistence of protective antibodies in Dutch adolescents following a meningococcal serogroup C tetanus booster vaccination. Vaccine (2016) 34(50):6309–15. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Galazka AM. The Immunological Basis for Immunisation. Diphtheria. Geneva: World Health Organization (1993).

Google Scholar

30. Galazka AM. The Immunological Basis for Immunisation. Tetanus. Geneva: World Health Organization (1993).

Google Scholar

31. Grimprel E, von Sonnenburg F, Sanger R, Abitbol V, Wolter JM, Schuerman LM. Combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and polio vaccine (dTpa-IPV) for booster vaccination of adults. Vaccine (2005) 23(28):3657–67. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.02.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Turnbull FM, Heath TC, Jalaludin BB, Burgess MA, Ramalho AC. A randomized trial of two acellular pertussis vaccines (dTpa and pa) and a licensed diphtheria-tetanus vaccine (Td) in adults. Vaccine (2000) 19(6):628–36. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00252-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. van Twillert I, Bonacic Marinovic AA, Kuipers B, van Gaans-van den Brink JA, Sanders EA, van Els CA. Impact of age and vaccination history on long-term serological responses after symptomatic B. pertussis infection, a high dimensional data analysis. Sci Rep (2017) 7:40328. doi:10.1038/srep40328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Teunis PF, van Eijkeren JC, de Graaf WF, Marinovic AB, Kretzschmar ME. Linking the seroresponse to infection to within-host heterogeneity in antibody production. Epidemics (2016) 16:33–9. doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2016.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Halperin BA, Morris A, Mackinnon-Cameron D, Mutch J, Langley JM, McNeil SA, et al. Kinetics of the antibody response to tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine in women of childbearing age and postpartum women. Clin Infect Dis (2011) 53(9):885–92. doi:10.1093/cid/cir538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kirkland KB, Talbot EA, Decker MD, Edwards KM. Kinetics of pertussis immune responses to tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine in health care personnel: implications for outbreak control. Clin Infect Dis (2009) 49(4):584–7. doi:10.1086/603555

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Mertsola J, Van Der Meeren O, He Q, Linko-Parvinen A, Ramakrishnan G, Mannermaa L, et al. Decennial administration of a reduced antigen content diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine in young adults. Clin Infect Dis (2010) 51(6):656–62. doi:10.1086/655825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Huygen K, Cabore RN, Maertens K, Van Damme P, Leuridan E. Humoral and cell mediated immune responses to a pertussis containing vaccine in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Vaccine (2015) 33(33):4117–23. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kovac M, Rathi N, Kuriyakose S, Hardt K, Schwarz TF. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a decennial booster dose of a combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus booster vaccine (dTpa-IPV) in healthy adults. Vaccine (2015) 33(22):2594–601. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hendrikx LH, Felderhof MK, Ozturk K, de Rond LG, van Houten MA, Sanders EA, et al. Enhanced memory B-cell immune responses after a second acellular pertussis booster vaccination in children 9 years of age. Vaccine (2011) 30(1):51–8. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Amanna IJ, Carlson NE, Slifka MK. Duration of humoral immunity to common viral and vaccine antigens. N Engl J Med (2007) 357(19):1903–15. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa066092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Livingston KA, Jiang X, Stephensen CB. CD4 T-helper cell cytokine phenotypes and antibody response following tetanus toxoid booster immunization. J Immunol Methods (2013) 390(1–2):18–29. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2013.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bancroft T, Dillon MB, da Silva Antunes R, Paul S, Peters B, Crotty S, et al. Th1 versus Th2 T cell polarization by whole-cell and acellular childhood pertussis vaccines persists upon re-immunization in adolescence and adulthood. Cell Immunol (2016) 30(4–305):35–43. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2016.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Schure RM, de Rond L, Ozturk K, Hendrikx L, Sanders E, Berbers G, et al. Pertussis circulation has increased T-cell immunity during childhood more than a second acellular booster vaccination in Dutch children 9 years of age. PLoS One (2012) 7(7):e41928. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Allen AC, Mills KH. Improved pertussis vaccines based on adjuvants that induce cell-mediated immunity. Expert Rev Vaccines (2014) 13(10):1253–64. doi:10.1586/14760584.2014.936391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Campbell H, Ribeiro S, Kara E, Donegan K, et al. Effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in England: an observational study. Lancet (2014) 384(9953):1521–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60686-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Dabrera G, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Campbell H, Ribeiro S, Kara E, et al. A case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in protecting newborn infants in England and Wales, 2012-2013. Clin Infect Dis (2015) 60(3):333–7. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hardy-Fairbanks AJ, Pan SJ, Decker MD, Johnson DR, Greenberg DP, Kirkland KB, et al. Immune responses in infants whose mothers received Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Pediatr Infect Dis J (2013) 32(11):1257–60. doi:10.1097/INF.0b013e3182a09b6a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Omer SB. Maternal immunization. N Engl J Med (2017) 376(25):2497. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1509044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Klein NP, Bartlett J, Fireman B, Baxter R. Waning Tdap effectiveness in adolescents. Pediatrics (2016) 137(3):e20153326. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar