Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 22 August 2022
Sec. Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.952430

Circulating sex hormones and risk of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peng Hu1,2† Jun Huang3† Yi Lu4† Murui Zheng5 Haiyi Li6 Xueru Duan1 Hai Deng7* Wenjing Zhao8* Xudong Liu2*
  • 1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatrics, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China
  • 4Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, United States
  • 5Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China
  • 6Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
  • 7Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China
  • 8School of Public Health and Emergency Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

Background: Sex hormones are associated with many cardiovascular risk factors, but their effects on atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association of circulating sex hormones with AF risk by pooling available data from observational studies.

Methods: A systematic literature search for pertinent articles with case-control and cohort designs was conducted via five databases up to 7 July 2021. A meta-analysis with six cohort studies was conducted separately on men and women. Adjusted relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was derived by comparing the highest with the lowest levels of a specific sex hormone and by using a random-effect or fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was tested using the I2 statistic and the Q-test.

Results: A total of six cohort studies and four case-control studies were included. In a meta-analysis of cohort studies, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) was associated with a decreased risk of AF in men (RR: 0.729, 95% CI: 0.559–0.952, I2 = 50.0%, P–heterogeneity = 0.157) after combining results from two cohort studies; total testosterone was not associated with any risk of AF in men and postmenopausal women, and AF risk was not associated with estradiol in men after synthesizing available studies.

Conclusion: This study indicates that a higher endogenous DHEAS level was associated with a lower AF risk in men, whereas total testosterone and estradiol were not associated with AF risk. Longitudinal studies with multiple monitoring are needed to further promulgate the relationship between various circulating sex hormones and AF risk.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Its incidence and prevalence increased during the past two decades and will continue to increase in the next 10 years (1, 2). AF is the common cause of cardioembolic stroke and heart-related hospitalizations, resulting in severe mortality and disability (3, 4). Studies from different regions suggested that the incidence of AF increased with advancing age and tended to be higher in men than in women (57); however, compared with men, women showed more severe atypical symptoms and poorer quality of life, as well as a higher risk of adverse events, such as stroke and death associated with AF (8, 9).

Gender-related endogenous sex hormones have gotten much more attention recently and were reported to be associated with cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension (10), obesity (11, 12), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (13, 14). Cardiac myocytes could express estrogen and androgen receptors, indicating that sex hormones might influence ion channels and their expression and finally affect the heart rhythm (15, 16). However, the current epidemiological evidence about the associations of sex hormones with the incidence of AF is inconsistent. For instance, Zeller et al. found that low serum total testosterone (TT) concentration was associated with an increased risk of AF in men (17), while Berger et al. reported a positive association of plasma testosterone level with the incidence of AF in men (18); estradiol produced from testosterone aromatization is linked to AF risk (19), but this was inconsistent with other studies (2022).

Until now, the association of circulating sex hormones with AF risk remains unclear. Thereafter, we conducted this systematic review with meta-analysis in light of MOOSE guidelines (23) to examine the association between circulating sex hormones and AF risk.

Materials and methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

Up to 7 July 2021, five electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG DATA, were searched. The following key words were used: “sex hormone,” “gonadal steroid hormones,” “estrogen,” “oestrogen,” “estradiol,” “oestradiol,” “progestins,” “progestagens,” “progestational hormones,” “progestogens,” “progesterone,” “androgen,” “testosterone,” “dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate,” “follicle stimulating hormone,” “luteinizing hormone,” “prolactin,” “androstenedione,” “sex hormone binding globulin,” “atrial fibrillation,” and “auricular fibrillation.” Details of the search strategy are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Citation and reference tracking through both Scopus and Web of Science were also used to identify studies.

Two researchers (PH and WZ) conducted the literature search independently, reviewed, and identified relevant literature. Disagreements were resolved by group discussions with the third researcher (XL). Studies that met the following criteria were included: (1) case-control studies or cohort studies; (2) the serum or plasm levels of TT, bioavailable testosterone (BT), estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), free dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were detected; (3) published in English or Chinese; (4) effect estimates (including odds ratio, relative risk (RR), and hazard ratio) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported or they can be calculated according to the reported data. Studies were excluded if they were duplicated studies, cross-sectional studies, case reports, animal studies, in vitro and in vivo experiments, reviews, editorials, comments, abstracts, effect estimates were not reported or could not be calculated, and studies in neither English nor Chinese.

Data extraction

Detailed information from each study was extracted, and the information included the first author, publication year, study design, sample size, country in which the study was conducted, age, gender, sex hormone detection method, whether to take samples after fasting, whether to exclude subjects with hormone therapy, confounding factor for multivariable analysis, body mass index, median or mean of follow-up years for the cohort study, effect calculating approach, and specific sex hormone. The effect estimates and 95% CIs for each specific sex hormone obtained from the multivariable model were also extracted.

The quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria for the included cohort studies or case-control studies (24). The maximum total score is nine stars: four stars for selection, two stars for comparability, and three stars for assessment of outcomes or exposures. The studies were classified as high quality (7–9 stars), moderate quality (4–6 stars), and low quality (0–3 stars) in terms of the total scores.

Statistical analysis

A systematic review was conducted among cohort and case-control studies, and the meta-analysis was only conducted among cohort studies as the cause-and-effect timing sequence cannot be determined among case-control studies. The RR was used to uniformly display the pooled effect of cohort studies in this study. A meta-analysis was conducted separately in men and in women to generate the pooled RR for each specific sex hormone. The pooled RR with 95% CI was derived by comparing the highest sex hormone levels with the lowest and by using a random-effect or fixed-effect model. The effect estimates in Magnani’s report (20) were calculated by comparing the lowest and highest categories; hence, the reciprocal of the original effect value was used when the pooled analysis was performed (25). Two articles (17, 20) reported the effect estimates of every one standard deviation change for each specific sex hormone; therefore, this kind of effect estimate was transformed to the effect obtained by comparing the highest with the lowest tertiles, through the approach suggested by Danesh et al. (26). These effect estimates used for pooled analysis were reckoned by multiplying 2.18 with the log-transformed RR (26). Magnani et al. (20) reported the RR stratified by age; thus, we first calculated the overall effect estimates by using the inverse variance method, and thereafter used these overall effect estimates when performing the meta-analysis.

The I2 statistic and the Q-test were used to examine the heterogeneity. The I2 value of more than 50% or P-value from the Q-test of less than 0.1 suggested significant heterogeneity (27). A random-effect model was adopted if there was significant heterogeneity; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was selected. To seek the sources of heterogeneity and to examine the robustness of the main results, subgroup analysis was conducted based on several study characteristics: region (United States, non-United States), age (<63 years, ≥63 years), body mass index (<27.5 kg/m2, ≥27.5 kg/m2), and TT assessment method (radioimmunoassay, others: liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay). A random-effects meta-regression analysis was also conducted to estimate these characteristics for the potential sources of heterogeneity in this study. Repeated analysis was conducted to examine the contribution of each study to the pooled estimates by omitting one study at a time. The publication bias was illustrated by using the funnel plot and Begg’s test. An asymmetric funnel plot or a P-value of Begg’s test of lower than 0.05 was considered to have significant publication bias. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Stata 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, United States).

Results

Systematic review

The flowchart of study selection is shown in Figure 1. A total of 3,979 articles were searched from five databases. Approximately 1,174 articles were excluded for duplication, and 2,780 were excluded after the screening of titles and abstracts. Among the twelve articles retained for further full-text review, two articles focused on the same population and reported similar results to another two articles, respectively; hence, only two recently published articles were selected. Finally, six cohort studies (17, 18, 20, 21, 28, 29) and four case-control studies (22, 3032) were included in this systematic review, and six cohort studies (17, 18, 20, 21, 28, 29) were selected for meta-analysis. The NOS was used to evaluate the quality of studies included (Supplementary Table 2). All selected studies had moderate to high quality, and the quality score for cohort studies ranged from 7 to 9, and for case-control studies, it ranged from 5 to 7.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study selection process. AF, atrial fibrillation; BT, bioavailable testosterone; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; free DHT, free dihydrotestosterone; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin; TT, total testosterone.

The general characteristics of the 10 selected studies are shown in Tables 1, 2, and the main sex hormones measured in the included studies are shown in Tables 3, 4. All four case-control studies were conducted in China (22, 3032); three studies focused on both estradiol and TT, and one study only focused on TT. For included cohort studies, four came from the United States (18, 20, 21, 28), one from the Netherlands (29), and one from Finland (17); four studies in men (17, 18, 20, 21) and three studies in menopausal women (17, 18, 21) focused on TT; two studies in men (20, 21) and one study in post-menopausal women (21) on estradiol; two studies in men on DHEAS (20, 29); one study in men on free DHT (28), one study on BT (21), and one study on SHBG (21); the median or mean of follow-up years of six cohort studies ranged from 9.5 to 13.8 years.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. General characteristics of the included cohort studies.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. General characteristics of the included case-control studies.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Main sex hormones measured in the included cohort studies.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Main sex hormones measured in the included case-control studies.

For all ten studies, the average BMI in men ranged from 24.12 to 28.00 kg/m2, and the average BMI in post-menopausal women varied from 24.08 to 29.00 kg/m2. Among them, four studies (17, 21, 31, 32) excluded the individuals receiving sex hormone therapy, whereas the other six (18, 20, 22, 2830) never did that. For the detection of sex hormones, three cohort studies (17, 21, 28) and three case-control studies (22, 31, 32) collected fasting blood samples. Circulating TT concentration was detected by using radioimmunoassay in three studies (2022), chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay in four studies (17, 3032), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay in one study (28). Estradiol concentration was measured by radioimmunoassay in three studies (2022) and the chemiluminescence method in two studies (31, 32). DHEAS concentration was measured by radioimmunoassay in both studies (20, 29).

Confounders adjusted in each study were different. Age was used as a confounding factor in eight studies (17, 18, 21, 22, 2932), and stratified analysis was conducted by age in two studies (20, 28). Body mass index was used as a confounding factor in seven studies (18, 2022, 28, 29, 31), while the other three (17, 30, 32) did not do this. All six cohort studies used the smoking status as a confounding factor, but four case-control studies did not use smoking status as a confounding factor.

Among the included cohort studies that revealed the associations between TT level and AF risk, in men, one study showed that TT level was associated with increased AF risk (18), two studies showed TT level was associated with decreased risk of AF (17, 20), and one study did not find a significant association between TT level and AF risk (21); in post-menopausal women, two studies found TT level was not significantly associated with AF risk (18, 21), and one study showed that TT level was positively associated with AF risk (17).

The association between estradiol and DHEAS level with AF risk was revealed in two cohort studies, respectively. In men and post-menopausal women, one study showed that estradiol level was not significantly associated with AF risk (21), and in men, one study showed that estradiol level was associated with a lower risk of AF (20). In men and post-menopausal women, one study showed that DHEAS was associated with a decreased risk of AF (29), while one study showed that DHEAS level was not significantly associated with AF risk in men (20). In addition, one study showed that a low level of DHT was associated with an increased risk of AF risk in men (28); one study found that BT level was associated with increased AF risk in men, whereas no association was observed in post-menopausal women (21); one study showed that SHBG was not associated with any AF risk in men and women (21).

Among the included case-control studies, two studies showed that testosterone level was associated with a decreased AF risk in men (30, 32), and one study did not show an association between testosterone level and AF risk in men (22); two studies showed estradiol level was not significantly associated with AF risk in men (22, 32). Only one case-control study was conducted in post-menopausal women and did not find a significant association between testosterone and estradiol levels with AF risk (31).

Meta-analysis of cohort studies

Total testosterone level and atrial fibrillation risk in men

As shown in Figure 2A, TT concentration was not associated with the risk of AF in men when results from four original studies were synthesized (RR: 1.008, 95% CI: 0.799–1.273, I2 = 83.1%, P-heterogeneity < 0.001). Similarly, no significant association was found in any other subgroups stratified by regions, age, body mass index, and TT detection method (Table 5). Sensitivity analysis was repeated four times by omitting one study each time, and no significant change in the pooled results was found (Supplementary Figure 1a and Supplementary Table 3).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forest plots of the association between total testosterone level and risk of atrial fibrillation in men and post-menopausal women by pooling cohort studies. (A) The random-effect model was used to assess the association between total testosterone level and risk of atrial fibrillation in men; (B) fixed-effect model was used to assess the association between total testosterone level and risk of atrial fibrillation in post-menopausal women.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Subgroup analysis for the association of total testosterone and atrial fibrillation risk in men.

Total testosterone level and atrial fibrillation risk in post-menopausal women

As shown in Figure 2B, TT level was not associated with AF risk in post-menopausal women when all three studies were pooled (RR: 1.069, 95% CI: 0.917–1.246), with lower heterogeneity (I2 = 49.1%, P–heterogeneity = 0.140). In sensitivity analysis, the pooled analysis was repeated three times by excluding one study each time, and no significant change was observed (Supplementary Figure 1b and Supplementary Table 3).

Estradiol level and atrial fibrillation risk in men

As shown in Figure 3A, no significant association of circulating estradiol levels with AF risk in men was observed when both studies were pooled (RR: 0.920, 95% CI: 0.663–1.277, I2 = 70.8%, P–heterogeneity = 0.064).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plots of the association between levels of estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and risk of atrial fibrillation by pooling cohort studies. (A) The random-effect model was used to assess the association of estradiol level with atrial fibrillation risk in men; (B) the fixed-effect model was used to assess the association of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate level with atrial fibrillation risk in men.

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate level and atrial fibrillation risk in men

When two cohort (20, 29) studies including 2,431 subjects and 404 AF cases were pooled (Figure 3B), a high level of circulating DHEAS was significantly associated with a decreased AF risk (RR: 0.729, 95% CI: 0.559–0.952), with a lower heterogeneity (I2 = 50.0%, P–heterogeneity = 0.157).

Publication bias

The funnel plots did not show any significant asymmetry (Figure 4). The Begg’s test did not reveal any significant publication bias when examining the associations between TT levels and AF risk in men (P = 0.734) and in post-menopausal women (P = 1.000), the associations between estradiol levels and AF risk in men (P = 1.000), and the association between DHEAS levels and AF risk in men (P = 1.000).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Funnel plots with pseudo 95% confidence limits among cohort studies. (A) The total testosterone level and atrial fibrillation risk in men; (B) total testosterone level and atrial fibrillation risk in post-menopausal women; (C) estradiol concentration and atrial fibrillation risk in men; and (D) dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentration and atrial fibrillation risk in men.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis comprehensively examined the association of AF risk with circulating sex hormones. Based on the synthetization of limited evidence, the pooled results suggested that a higher level of DHEAS was associated with a lower risk of AF in men, whereas the association of AF risk with TT and estradiol was observed in neither men nor post-menopausal women. Similarly, the risk of AF was not associated with serum estradiol in men.

The pooled results in this study indicated that a high DHEAS level was associated with a 27.1% reduced AF risk in men. A negative association between DHEAS level and the risk of heart failure and mortality in both genders was found in a cohort study with 8,143 participants (33). Lower DHEAS concentration was also found to be associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (34, 35) and prognosis (36). Besides, DHEAS was inversely associated with sex-dependent diverse carotid atherosclerosis (3739), and subjects with carotid atherosclerosis were at high risk of developing AF (40). The possible mechanisms may be due to the reason that DHEAS has the property of anti-inflammation (41, 42), which can influence the occurrence of AF (43). A pathological study has shown that the zona reticularis, responsible for most DHEAS production, seems to be more vulnerable to vascular damage (44). DHEAS can inhibit vascular remodeling by reducing neointima formation after vascular injury, thereafter reducing vascular inflammation (38).

The evidence investigating the association between TT level and the risk of AF was contradictory, no matter in the included cohort studies or case-control studies (17, 18, 2022, 30, 32). The meta-analysis of cohort studies showed that AF risk was not associated with TT concentration in men and post-menopausal women, respectively, and AF risk was not associated with estradiol concentration in men in all two case-control studies and one cohort study (21, 22, 32). Similarly, other studies with meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant association of TT and estradiol levels with cardiovascular disease risk in men and post-menopausal women (19, 45, 46). The Framingham Heart Study found that older men with decreased testosterone levels were at an increased AF risk, while Berger et al. found that a higher TT level was associated with an increased risk of AF in men, and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) found that TT level was not associated with AF risk in men. The different results of the studies may be related to the variation in the study populations examined among the studies; the men in the Framingham Heart Study were Caucasian and much older, while the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the MESA included populations of different races. Some important factors in the included studies may also cause the discrepancies, such as different numbers of included participants, the age difference of the participants in the studies, and various follow-up periods in the cohort studies. A recent study showed that after testosterone replacement therapy, the normalization of testosterone levels is associated with decreased AF incidence (47). However, the heterogeneity was relatively high among different studies, so more longitudinal studies with multiple monitoring or studies that include AF as an endpoint in clinical trials are needed to promulgate the association of AF incidence with TT and estradiol concentration.

There were insufficient studies to examine the association between the level of DHT, BT, and SHBG and AF risk. In the Cardiovascular Health Study in the United States with a median follow-up of 9.5 years, Rosenberg et al. found that men with serum-free DHT of less than 0.16 ng/dl were associated with a 1.48-fold risk of AF in men when compared with those with higher levels of DHT (28). By using data from the MESA in the United States and with a median follow-up of 10.9 years, O’Neal et al. examined the roles of serum levels of estradiol, BT, and SHBG in the development of AF (21); when comparing the highest with the lowest tertiles, serum BT was associated with a 32% increased risk of AF in men, whereas no association was observed in post-menopausal women (21); serum estradiol was not associated with AF risk in men and post-menopausal women (21); serum SHBG was not associated with any AF risk in men and women (21). Magnani et al. found that a 1-SD decrease in estradiol was associated with an increased risk of AF in men (20). Different sample sizes, age differences, and different confounding factors that the studies considered may lead to different results. However, these results should be verified in more studies with a delicate and rigorous longitudinal design.

The potential pathophysiology underlying the association between sex hormones and AF is complex. In rats, androgens depress spontaneous depolarization during atrial pacemaking, resulting in acute vasodilation, increased contractility, and an increased sino-atrial recovery time (48). Androgens can lead to a larger response to inotropes in male atria by a post-synaptic increase in intracellular cAMP and are independent of beta-1 adrenoceptors (49). Estrogens are those that drive the sensitivity to catecholamine by downregulating the beta-1 receptors depending on the estrous cycle, in female mice (50). Animal experiments showed that the increased release of atrial natriuretic peptide that resulted from cardiac overload was reduced by testosterone (51). Altered atrial electrophysiology may also provide a possible mechanism for the association between sex hormones and AF. Animal models have shown that atrial electrophysiology is changed via experimental modification of systemic hormones. Compared with controls, orchiectomized rats demonstrated greater repetitive atrial responses with left atrial pacing (52).

There were some limitations in the included studies. Almost all the included studies assessed the levels of circulating sex hormones at a single point in time; however, the longitudinal changes in the circulating level of sex hormones and whether these changes influenced the incidence of AF were unknown. The study by Berger et al. cannot avoid the effects of asymptomatic AF cases that may be missed in an outpatient setting, and false-negative misclassification may have occurred (18). Magnani et al.’s study (20) focused on middle-aged to older men in Europe, which cannot offer generalizability to younger people, women, and other races. The findings of O’Neal et al. (21) and Zeller et al. (17) did not include some important risk factors such as left atrial diameter and thyroid function, which may influence the results. The studies by Zeller et al. (17) and Berger et al. (18) only measured the levels of TT; however, TT includes SHBG and free testosterone, and the change in SHBG levels may cause the change in TT levels. The confounding factors considered in each included study were different, which may also cause the relatively high heterogeneity across the studies. For example, Krijthe et al. (29) and Zeller et al. (17) took total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as two major confounding factors, while the other studies did not; Magnani et al. (20) considered PR interval and significant murmur as potential confounders, while the others did not; Berger et al. (18) included estimated glomerular filtration rate as a potential confounding factor, while the others did not.

The advantage of this study is that different sex hormones were fully considered, and for the first time, a qualitative systematic review with a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted to reveal the relationship between sex hormones and AF. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed successively, and the results indicated the robustness and stability of the main results. Nevertheless, some limitations should be acknowledged in our study. First, specific sex hormones were measured by different methods, which may lead to information bias and thus may affect the consistency of the results; however, sensitivity analysis was repeated by omitting one study each time, and no significant change in pooled results was observed. Second, this study did not differentiate the AF types when doing the meta-analysis, so the effect of sex hormones on different types of AF needs further evaluation. Third, there were only six studies included; only two studies could be pooled to reveal the association of DHEAS and estradiol with AF risk in men, respectively; pooling results from limited evidence may influence the stability of our results to draw strong conclusions on the association between sex hormones and AF risk. Fourth, the potential heterogeneity among the included studies may exist in terms of population source, sample size, and subject characteristics; however, due to the limited data, the subgroup analysis and meta-regression based on these factors could not be performed for TT in women, estradiol in women, and DHEAS in men.

Conclusion

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that a higher endogenous DHEAS level was associated with a lower AF risk in men, whereas no association was observed between TT and estradiol concentration and AF risk. Longitudinal studies with multiple monitoring are needed to further promulgate the relationship between various circulating sex hormones and AF risk.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. The data is available by contacting the corresponding authors or extracting from the original published research.

Author contributions

XL and HD conceived, designed, and supervised the study. PH and WZ searched the data. PH analyzed the data. PH and JH drafted the manuscript. PH, MZ, HD, WZ, HL, YL, and XL reviewed and interpreted the findings. All co-authors provided comments and approved the final version.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFE0208000), the Guangdong Provincial Key R&D Program (No. 2019B020230004), the Medical Science and Technology Research Fund of Guangdong Province (No. A2021129), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou City (No. 202102080404), and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2022A1515010686). The funders had no role in the design, analysis, or writing of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to show our thanks to the authors of the original published research; their achievements are the prerequisites of our study. We would also like to thank Zuyao Yang for his advice in improving the quality of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.952430/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Chugh S, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin E, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. (2014) 129:837–47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. (2021) 16:217–21. doi: 10.1177/1747493019897870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Pistoia F, Sacco S, Tiseo C, Degan D, Ornello R, Carolei A. The epidemiology of atrial fibrillation and stroke. Cardiol Clin. (2016) 34:255–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2015.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Emdin CA, Wong CX, Hsiao AJ, Altman DG, Peters SA, Woodward M, et al. Atrial fibrillation as risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death in women compared with men: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). (2016) 532:h7013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h7013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Stricker BH, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: The Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J. (2006) 27:949–53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Guo Y, Tian Y, Wang H, Si Q, Wang Y, Lip G. Prevalence, incidence, and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation in China: New insights into the global burden of atrial fibrillation. Chest. (2015) 147:109–19. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mandalenakis Z, Von Koch L, Eriksson H, Dellborg M, Caidahl K, Welin L, et al. The risk of atrial fibrillation in the general male population: A lifetime follow-up of 50-year-old men. Europace. (2015) 17:1018–22. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Odening KE, Deiss S, Dilling-Boer D, Didenko M, Eriksson U, Nedios S, et al. Mechanisms of sex differences in atrial fibrillation: Role of hormones and differences in electrophysiology, structure, function, and remodelling. Europace. (2019) 21:366–76. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Westerman S, Wenger N. Gender differences in atrial fibrillation: A review of epidemiology, management, and outcomes. Curr Cardiol Rev. (2019) 15:136–44. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666181205110624

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang L, Szklo M, Folsom AR, Cook NR, Gapstur SM, Ouyang P. Endogenous sex hormones, blood pressure change, and risk of hypertension in postmenopausal women: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. (2012) 224:228–34. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Baglietto L, English DR, Hopper JL, MacInnis RJ, Morris HA, Tilley WD, et al. Circulating steroid hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women in relation to body size and composition. Breast Cancer Res Treat. (2009) 115:171–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0069-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mongraw-Chaffin ML, Anderson CA, Allison MA, Ouyang P, Szklo M, Vaidya D, et al. Association between sex hormones and adiposity: Qualitative differences in women and men in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:E596–600. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ding EL, Song Y, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Liu S. Plasma sex steroid hormones and risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women: A prospective study. Diabetologia. (2007) 50:2076–84. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0785-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kalyani RR, Franco M, Dobs AS, Ouyang P, Vaidya D, Bertoni A, et al. The association of endogenous sex hormones, adiposity, and insulin resistance with incident diabetes in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2009) 94:4127–35. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Goldstein J, Sites CK, Toth MJ. Progesterone stimulates cardiac muscle protein synthesis via receptor-dependent pathway. Fertil Steril. (2004) 82:430–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lizotte E, Grandy SA, Tremblay A, Allen BG, Fiset C. Expression, distribution and regulation of sex steroid hormone receptors in mouse heart. Cell Physiol Biochem Int J Exp Cell Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. (2009) 23:75–86. doi: 10.1159/000204096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zeller T, Schnabel RB, Appelbaum S, Ojeda F, Berisha F, Schulte-Steinberg B, et al. Low testosterone levels are predictive for incident atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke in men, but protective in women - results from the FINRISK study. Eur J Prevent Cardiol. (2018) 25:1133–9. doi: 10.1177/2047487318778346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Berger D, Folsom AR, Schreiner PJ, Chen LY, Michos ED, O’Neal WT, et al. Plasma total testosterone and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Maturitas. (2019) 125:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Vandenplas G, De Bacquer D, Calders P, Fiers T, Kaufman JM, Ouwens DM, et al. Endogenous oestradiol and cardiovascular disease in healthy men: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Heart (Br Cardiac Soc). (2012) 98:1478–82. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Magnani JW, Moser CB, Murabito JM, Sullivan LM, Wang N, Ellinor PT, et al. Association of sex hormones, aging, and atrial fibrillation in men: The Framingham Heart Study. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. (2014) 7:307–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. O’Neal WT, Nazarian S, Alonso A, Heckbert SR, Vaccarino V, Soliman EZ. Sex hormones and the risk of atrial fibrillation: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Endocrine. (2017) 58:91–6. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1385-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lai J, Zhou D, Xia S, Shang Y, Want L, Zheng L, et al. Reduced testosterone levels in males with lone atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. (2009) 32:43–6. doi: 10.1002/clc.20423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, Olkin I, Williamson G, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. (2000) 283:2008–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. (2020). Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed August 19, 2020).

Google Scholar

25. Cooper HM, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation (2019). doi: 10.7758/9781610448864.4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Danesh J, Collins R, Appleby P, Peto R. Association of fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, albumin, or leukocyte count with coronary heart disease: Meta-analyses of prospective studies. JAMA. (1998) 279:1477–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.18.1477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clin Res ed). (2003) 327:557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rosenberg MA, Shores MM, Matsumoto AM, Bůžková P, Lange LA, Kronmal RA, et al. Serum androgens and risk of atrial fibrillation in older men: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Clin Cardiol. (2018) 41:830–6. doi: 10.1002/clc.22965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Krijthe BP, de Jong FH, Hofman A, Franco OH, Witteman JC, Stricker BH, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels and risk of atrial fibrillation: The rotterdam study. Eur J Prevent Cardiol. (2014) 21:291–8. doi: 10.1177/2047487312467903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lian M. Correlation of serum testoterone with male patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Master Dissertation. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University (2015).

Google Scholar

31. Ma J. Association between sex hormone levels and non-valvular atrial fibrillation in postmenopausal women. Gansu: Lanzhou University (2019).

Google Scholar

32. Wei T. Association between sex hormone level and non-valvular atrial fibrillation in midaged and older men. Master Dissertation. Gansu: Lanzhou University (2017).

Google Scholar

33. Jia X, Sun C, Tang O, Gorlov I, Nambi V, Virani SS, et al. Plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and cardiovascular disease risk in older men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2020) 105:e4304–27. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ohlsson C, Labrie F, Barrett-Connor E, Karlsson MK, Ljunggren O, Vandenput L, et al. Low serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly Swedish men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:4406–14. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Shufelt C, Bretsky P, Almeida CM, Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Azziz R, et al. DHEA-S levels and cardiovascular disease mortality in postmenopausal women: Results from the National Institutes of Health–National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:4985–92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Wu TT, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Adi D, Zheng YY, Liu F, et al. Prognostic value of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate for patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. (2017) 6:e004896. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004896

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yoshida S, Aihara K-I, Azuma H, Uemoto R, Sumitomo-Ueda Y, Yagi S, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is inversely associated with sex-dependent diverse carotid atherosclerosis regardless of endothelial function. Atherosclerosis. (2010) 212:310–5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.05.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ii M, Hoshiga M, Negoro N, Fukui R, Nakakoji T, Kohbayashi E, et al. Adrenal androgen dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate inhibits vascular remodeling following arterial injury. Atherosclerosis. (2009) 206:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kanazawa I, Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto M, Yamauchi M, Kurioka S, Yano S, et al. Serum DHEA-S level is associated with the presence of atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrine J. (2008) 55:667–75. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.K07E-130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Willeit K, Pechlaner R, Egger G, Weger S, Oberhollenzer M, Willeit J, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis and incident atrial fibrillation. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc Biol. (2013) 33:2660–5. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Chen CC, Parker CR Jr. Adrenal androgens and the immune system. Semin Reprod Med. (2004) 22:369–77. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-861553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Arlt W, Hewison M. Hormones and immune function: Implications of aging. Aging Cell. (2004) 3:209–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00109.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Schoonderwoerd BA, Smit MD, Pen L, Van Gelder IC. New risk factors for atrial fibrillation: Causes of ‘not-so-lone atrial fibrillation’. Europace. (2008) 10:668–73. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Angeli A, Masera RG, Magri F, Ferrari E. The adrenal cortex in physiological and pathological aging: Issues of clinical relevance. J Endocrinol Invest. (1999) 22:13–8.

Google Scholar

45. Wang H, Li Y, Wang X, Bu J, Yan G, Lou D. Endogenous sex hormone levels and coronary heart disease risk in postmenopausal women: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Prevent Cardiol. (2017) 24:600–11. doi: 10.1177/2047487317693133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Ruige JB, Mahmoud AM, De Bacquer D, Kaufman JM. Endogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease in healthy men: A meta-analysis. Heart (Br Cardiac Soc). (2011) 97:870–5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.210757

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Sharma R, Oni OA, Gupta K, Sharma M, Sharma R, Singh V, et al. Normalization of testosterone levels after testosterone replacement therapy is associated with decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. (2017) 6:e004880. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Sánchez M, Secades L, Bordallo C, Meana C, Rubín JM, Cantabrana B, et al. Role of polyamines and cAMP-dependent mechanisms on 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone-elicited functional effects in isolated right atria of rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. (2009) 54:310–8. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181b6e57f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Velasco L, Sánchez M, Rubín JM, Hidalgo A, Bordallo C, Cantabrana B. Intracellular cAMP increases during the positive inotropism induced by androgens in isolated left atrium of rat. Eur J of Pharmacol. (2002) 438:45–52. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01300-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Kocić I, Gruchała M, Petrusewicz J. Pretreatment of male guinea pigs by 17-beta-estradiol induces hypersensitivity of beta-adrenoceptors in electrically driven left atria. Int J Cardiol. (2008) 129:22–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Deng Y, Kaufman S. The influence of reproductive hormones on ANF release by rat atria. Life Sci. (1993) 53:689–96. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90245-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Tsuneda T, Yamashita T, Kato T, Sekiguchi A, Sagara K, Sawada H, et al. Deficiency of testosterone associates with the substrate of atrial fibrillation in the rat model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2009) 20:1055–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01474.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sex hormones, atrial fibrillation, total testosterone, estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

Citation: Hu P, Huang J, Lu Y, Zheng M, Li H, Duan X, Deng H, Zhao W and Liu X (2022) Circulating sex hormones and risk of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9:952430. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.952430

Received: 25 May 2022; Accepted: 28 July 2022;
Published: 22 August 2022.

Edited by:

Katherine C. Wu, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

Reviewed by:

Stefan Gross, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany
Michael Spartalis, San Raffaele Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

Copyright © 2022 Hu, Huang, Lu, Zheng, Li, Duan, Deng, Zhao and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xudong Liu, xdliu.cn@hotmail.com; Wenjing Zhao, zhaowj@sustech.edu.cn; Hai Deng, doctordh@hotmail.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Download