Cambridge Carbon Impact: Evaluating carbon credit claims and co-benefits

09 March 2023, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

While decarbonising economies is a global imperative, offsetting residual emissions remains an essential interim step in avoiding climate breakdown. Carbon credits can be purchased on the voluntary market, but genuine concerns exist as to whether credits, in their current state, will enable the transition to net-zero by 2050. The Cambridge Carbon Impact project seeks to rebuild trust through an independent assessment of carbon credits, using the best methods and data available. By evaluating carbon credits across all dimensions of additionality and risk, and reporting performance through inter-comparable metrics, we aim to clarify concerns, address them where possible and flag them where not, and so allow prospective buyers to make offsets that have the kind of impacts they want. We report the number of credits needed to have the same climate impact as one tonne of CO2 sequestered into geological storage, which we dub one Permanent Additional Carbon Tonne (PACT).

Keywords

Carbon credits
Natural climate solutions
Tropical forest
Peatland
Woodland
Restoration
Conservation
Direct air capture and storage

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.