The Character of J.S.Mill

11 April 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

J.S. Mill introduces a new conception of a person’s character as the control system governing choice of action in, as he thought of it, the human deterministic machine. Did this leave any room for him to think that a person was nevertheless essentially different from the ‘automatons’ of his time? Yes. Mill thought of the human ‘machine’ as featuring ‘feedback’: and, foreshadowing the electronic feedback circuits of early electronic computers, this allowed him to think of human beings as working their way automatically towards Utopia. Mill’s term for what he thinks of as the bit of human ‘machinery’ responsible for ‘deciding’ what action to take is: ‘character’. The Millian ‘control system’ character was taken up widely in the 19th Century and beyond. Illustrative examples: William Temple, Thomas Arnold, Stowe, George Eliot, The Millian sense of character is modified but hardly superseded in subsequent decades.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.