Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yayınlandı, Yok Olmadı, Ama Etkisi Ne? Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi'nin Araştırma Etkisinin Atıflar Yoluyla Ölçülmesi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 217 - 230, 31.12.2023

Kemal Yayla

https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1368932

Öz

Atıf analizi, bilimsel araştırmanın etkisini değerlendirmek için yaygın olarak kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Bu yöntem, büyük veri analitiğinden yararlanarak akademik etkiyi ölçme, entelektüel ilişkileri belirleme, bilimsel iletişimi haritalandırma ve bilgi alanlarını tanımlama konusunda fikir edinmek için h-index ve dergi etki faktörü gibi ölçümleri kullanır. Bu çalışmada TRDizin'de indekslenen Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi yayınlarının araştırmalara etkisi analiz edilmiştir. Analiz kriterleri olarak ilk alıntıya kadar geçen süre ve disiplinler arası dağıtım seçildi. TRDizin'de 2002-2022 yılları arasında yayınlanan 816 çalışmadan 292'si analize dâhil edilmiştir. Bulgular, indekslenen yayınların yalnızca dörtte birinin alıntı aldığını ve %59'unun kütüphanecilik ve bilgi bilimi dışındaki alanlardan geldiğini ortaya koymuştur. Türk Kütüphanecilik Dergisi'nin, özellikle eğitim ile kütüphane ve bilgi bilimi çalışmalarının kesişiminde, disiplin içinden ve dışından büyük ilgi gören önemli bir ulusal bilgi ihracatçısı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi'nin net bir bilgi ihracatçısı olarak ulusal ölçekte diğer araştırma disiplinlerine katkıda bulunma potansiyelini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Araştırma Etkisi İlk Atıf Zamanı Disiplinler Arası Yayılım

Kaynakça

  • Baltacı, A. (2022). Doçentlik başvuru ve değerlendirme sürecinde yaşanan sorunlar: Fenomenolojik bir araştırma. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 12(2), 313-323. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/higheredusci/issue/72432/1054604
  • Benn, C. R., ve Sanchez, S. F. (2001). Scientific impact of large telescopes. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113(781), 385. https://doi.org/10.1086/319325
  • Bhupatiraju, S., Nomaler, Ö., Triulzi, G., ve Verspagen, B. (2012). Knowledge Flows–Analyzing the Core Literature of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Science and Technology Studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1205-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.011
  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
  • Bolland, M. J., Grey, A., ve Avenell, A. (2022). Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem. Accountability in Research, 29(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933
  • Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J. A., ve Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
  • Bornmann, L., ve Daniel, H.-D. (2010). Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.09.001
  • Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., ve Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
  • Celik, B. (2019). A study on using the university library and reading habits of students: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n4p224
  • Chang, Y.-W. (2013). A comparison of citation contexts between natural sciences and social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 96, 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0956-1
  • Chang, Y.-W., ve Huang, M.-H. (2012). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21649
  • Chen, C., Li, Q., Deng, Z., Chiu, K., ve Wang, P. (2018). The preferences of Chinese LIS journal articles in citing works outside the discipline. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2017-0057
  • Chen, C., ve Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing Knowledge Diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48
  • Cronin, B., ve Pearson, S. (1990). The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16(6), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159001600606
  • De Rond, M., ve Miller, A. N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850
  • Demir, E., Demir, C. G., ve Özdemir, M. Ç. (2017). Akademik yükseltme ve atama sürecine yönelik öğretim üyesi görüşleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1, 12-23. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/higheredusci/issue/61492/918101
  • Demirbilek, M., ve Çetin, M. (2022). Cumhuriyetten günümüze yükseköğretimde akademik yükselme ve atama süreci. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 12(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.810002
  • Ding, J., Liu, C., ve Yuan, Y. (2023). The characteristics of knowledge diffusion of library and information science–from the perspective of citation. Library Hi Tech, 41(4), 1099-1118. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2021-0016
  • Gaona, J. C. G., ve Gonzalez, E. R. V. (2011). Relationship between reading habits, university library and academic performance in a sample of psychology students. Revista De La Educación Superior, 15(157), 55-73. http://publicaciones.anuies.mx/pdfs/revista/Revista157_S1A3EN.pdf
  • Glänzel, W., ve Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53, 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
  • Hancock, C. B. (2015). Stratification of time to first citation for articles published in the Journal of Research in Music Education: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415582008
  • Hayer, C.-A., Kaemingk, M., Breeggemann, J. J., Dembkowski, D., Deslauriers, D., ve Rapp, T. (2013). Pressures to publish: Catalysts for the loss of scientific writing integrity? Fisheries, 38(8), 352-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.813845
  • Hessey, R., ve Willett, P. (2013). Quantifying the value of knowledge exports from librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512442476
  • Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., ve Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. scientometrics, 14(3-4), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020078
  • Lund, B. D. (2020). Do “interdisciplinary” disciplines have an interdisciplinary impact?: Examining citations between educational technology and library and information science journals. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5103-5116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10223-2
  • MacRoberts, M. H., ve MacRoberts, B. R. (2010). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21228
  • Martin, B. R. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy, 5(42), 1005-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.011
  • Martin, B. R. (2016). Editors’ jif-boosting stratagems–which are appropriate and which not? Research Policy, 1(45), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.001
  • Odell, J., ve Gabbard, R. (2008). The interdisciplinary influence of library and information science 1996–2004: A journal-to-journal citation analysis. College & Research Libraries, 69(6), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.69.6.546
  • Patton, R. M., Stahl, C. G., ve Wells, J. C. (2016). Measuring scientific impact beyond citation counts. D-Lib Magazine, 22(9/10), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1045/september2016-patton
  • Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E., Van Vuren, H. G., ve Van Raan, A. F. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54, 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016078331752
  • Schubert, A., ve Glänzel, W. (1986). Mean response time—A new indicator of journal citation speed with application to physics journals. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B, 36, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01599743
  • Si, L., ve Guo, C. (2023). The impact of library and information science knowledge from the perspective of external citations. The Electronic Library, 41(1), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2022-0130
  • Tonta, Y. (2002). Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 1987-2001. Türk kütüphaneciliği, 16(3), 282-320. http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/929/922
  • TRDizin, U. Trd. (2021). Sıkça sorulan sorular. TRDizin. https://trdizin.gov.tr/yardim/
  • Türk Kütüphaneciliği Editörler Kurulu, T. K. E. (2019). Türk kütüphaneciliğinde yeni kayıplar ve yeni gelişmeler…. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 33(2), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.24146/tkd.2019.43
  • Tüselmann, H., Sinkovics, R. R., ve Pishchulov, G. (2015). Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings–a classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis. Omega, 51, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.08.002
  • Van Dalen, H. P., ve Klamer, A. (2005). Is science a case of wasteful competition? Kyklos, 58(3), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2005.00294.x
  • Wang, S., Mao, J., Lu, K., Cao, Y., ve Li, G. (2021). Understanding interdisciplinary knowledge integration through citance analysis: A case study on eHealth. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101214
  • Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W., ve Larsen, B. (2014). A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 101(1), 125-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1423-3
  • Wilson, T. (2020). The transfer of theories and models from information behaviour research into other disciplines. Information Research, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper873
  • Yan, E., Ding, Y., Cronin, B., ve Leydesdorff, L. (2013). A bird’s-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.008
  • Yang, Q., Shen, X., Song, Y., ve Chen, S. (2023). A study of the impact of interdisciplinary citation on the aging of library and information science. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2022-0335
  • Yeheskel, O., ve Shenkar, O. (2009). Knowledge flows in international business: A JIBS citation analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 4(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/14502190910976484
  • Zhai, Y., Ding, Y., ve Wang, F. (2018). Measuring the diffusion of an innovation: A citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23898

Published, Not Perished, But What is the Impact? Measuring the Research Impact of Turkish Librarianship Journal Through Citations

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 217 - 230, 31.12.2023

Kemal Yayla

https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1368932

Öz

Citation analysis is a widely used method for assessing the impact of scientific research. This method uses metrics such as h-index and journal impact factor to gain insight into measuring scholarly impact, identifying intellectual relationships, mapping scholarly communication, and defining knowledge domains by leveraging big data analytics. This study analyzed the impact of the Turkish Librarianship Journal publications indexed in TRDizin on research. Time-to-first citation and interdisciplinary dissemination were selected as the analysis criteria. Of the 816 studies published in TRDizin between 2002 and 2022, 292 were included in analysis. The findings revealed that only a quarter of the indexed publications received citations, and 59% came from fields other than library and information science. It is found that the Turkish Librarianship Journal is a crucial national knowledge exporter, especially at the intersection of education and library and information science studies, drawing significant interest from inside and outside the discipline. These results indicate the potential of the Journal of Turkish Librarianship as a net exporter of knowledge to contribute to other research disciplines on a national scale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Research Impact Time to First Citation Interdisciplinary Dissemination

Kaynakça

  • Baltacı, A. (2022). Doçentlik başvuru ve değerlendirme sürecinde yaşanan sorunlar: Fenomenolojik bir araştırma. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 12(2), 313-323. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/higheredusci/issue/72432/1054604
  • Benn, C. R., ve Sanchez, S. F. (2001). Scientific impact of large telescopes. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113(781), 385. https://doi.org/10.1086/319325
  • Bhupatiraju, S., Nomaler, Ö., Triulzi, G., ve Verspagen, B. (2012). Knowledge Flows–Analyzing the Core Literature of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Science and Technology Studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1205-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.011
  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
  • Bolland, M. J., Grey, A., ve Avenell, A. (2022). Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem. Accountability in Research, 29(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933
  • Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J. A., ve Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
  • Bornmann, L., ve Daniel, H.-D. (2010). Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.09.001
  • Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., ve Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
  • Celik, B. (2019). A study on using the university library and reading habits of students: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n4p224
  • Chang, Y.-W. (2013). A comparison of citation contexts between natural sciences and social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 96, 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0956-1
  • Chang, Y.-W., ve Huang, M.-H. (2012). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21649
  • Chen, C., Li, Q., Deng, Z., Chiu, K., ve Wang, P. (2018). The preferences of Chinese LIS journal articles in citing works outside the discipline. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2017-0057
  • Chen, C., ve Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing Knowledge Diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48
  • Cronin, B., ve Pearson, S. (1990). The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16(6), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159001600606
  • De Rond, M., ve Miller, A. N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850
  • Demir, E., Demir, C. G., ve Özdemir, M. Ç. (2017). Akademik yükseltme ve atama sürecine yönelik öğretim üyesi görüşleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1, 12-23. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/higheredusci/issue/61492/918101
  • Demirbilek, M., ve Çetin, M. (2022). Cumhuriyetten günümüze yükseköğretimde akademik yükselme ve atama süreci. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 12(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.810002
  • Ding, J., Liu, C., ve Yuan, Y. (2023). The characteristics of knowledge diffusion of library and information science–from the perspective of citation. Library Hi Tech, 41(4), 1099-1118. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2021-0016
  • Gaona, J. C. G., ve Gonzalez, E. R. V. (2011). Relationship between reading habits, university library and academic performance in a sample of psychology students. Revista De La Educación Superior, 15(157), 55-73. http://publicaciones.anuies.mx/pdfs/revista/Revista157_S1A3EN.pdf
  • Glänzel, W., ve Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53, 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
  • Hancock, C. B. (2015). Stratification of time to first citation for articles published in the Journal of Research in Music Education: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415582008
  • Hayer, C.-A., Kaemingk, M., Breeggemann, J. J., Dembkowski, D., Deslauriers, D., ve Rapp, T. (2013). Pressures to publish: Catalysts for the loss of scientific writing integrity? Fisheries, 38(8), 352-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.813845
  • Hessey, R., ve Willett, P. (2013). Quantifying the value of knowledge exports from librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512442476
  • Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., ve Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. scientometrics, 14(3-4), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020078
  • Lund, B. D. (2020). Do “interdisciplinary” disciplines have an interdisciplinary impact?: Examining citations between educational technology and library and information science journals. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5103-5116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10223-2
  • MacRoberts, M. H., ve MacRoberts, B. R. (2010). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21228
  • Martin, B. R. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy, 5(42), 1005-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.011
  • Martin, B. R. (2016). Editors’ jif-boosting stratagems–which are appropriate and which not? Research Policy, 1(45), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.001
  • Odell, J., ve Gabbard, R. (2008). The interdisciplinary influence of library and information science 1996–2004: A journal-to-journal citation analysis. College & Research Libraries, 69(6), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.69.6.546
  • Patton, R. M., Stahl, C. G., ve Wells, J. C. (2016). Measuring scientific impact beyond citation counts. D-Lib Magazine, 22(9/10), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1045/september2016-patton
  • Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E., Van Vuren, H. G., ve Van Raan, A. F. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54, 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016078331752
  • Schubert, A., ve Glänzel, W. (1986). Mean response time—A new indicator of journal citation speed with application to physics journals. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B, 36, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01599743
  • Si, L., ve Guo, C. (2023). The impact of library and information science knowledge from the perspective of external citations. The Electronic Library, 41(1), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2022-0130
  • Tonta, Y. (2002). Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 1987-2001. Türk kütüphaneciliği, 16(3), 282-320. http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/929/922
  • TRDizin, U. Trd. (2021). Sıkça sorulan sorular. TRDizin. https://trdizin.gov.tr/yardim/
  • Türk Kütüphaneciliği Editörler Kurulu, T. K. E. (2019). Türk kütüphaneciliğinde yeni kayıplar ve yeni gelişmeler…. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 33(2), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.24146/tkd.2019.43
  • Tüselmann, H., Sinkovics, R. R., ve Pishchulov, G. (2015). Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings–a classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis. Omega, 51, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.08.002
  • Van Dalen, H. P., ve Klamer, A. (2005). Is science a case of wasteful competition? Kyklos, 58(3), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2005.00294.x
  • Wang, S., Mao, J., Lu, K., Cao, Y., ve Li, G. (2021). Understanding interdisciplinary knowledge integration through citance analysis: A case study on eHealth. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101214
  • Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W., ve Larsen, B. (2014). A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 101(1), 125-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1423-3
  • Wilson, T. (2020). The transfer of theories and models from information behaviour research into other disciplines. Information Research, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper873
  • Yan, E., Ding, Y., Cronin, B., ve Leydesdorff, L. (2013). A bird’s-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.008
  • Yang, Q., Shen, X., Song, Y., ve Chen, S. (2023). A study of the impact of interdisciplinary citation on the aging of library and information science. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2022-0335
  • Yeheskel, O., ve Shenkar, O. (2009). Knowledge flows in international business: A JIBS citation analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 4(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/14502190910976484
  • Zhai, Y., Ding, Y., ve Wang, F. (2018). Measuring the diffusion of an innovation: A citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23898
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Bilgi Etkileşimi, İnformetrik
Bölüm Hakemli Makaleler
Yazarlar

Kemal Yayla 0000-0001-9064-611X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Eylül 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Yayla, K. (2023). Yayınlandı, Yok Olmadı, Ama Etkisi Ne? Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi’nin Araştırma Etkisinin Atıflar Yoluyla Ölçülmesi. Bilgi Yönetimi, 6(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1368932
 Kapak Resmi İndir

15529