Indexed in MEDLINE, SCI & KoreaMed
pISSN 1011-8934   eISSN 1598-6357
Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Weekly
    J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 23;38(41):e314. English.
    Published online Sep 13, 2023.
    https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e314
    © 2023 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
    Original Article

    Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination During Preconceptional and Preclinical Pregnancy Period: A National Population Study

    Eunseon Gwak,1 Taemi Kim,2 Ju-Young Shin,3 Nam-Kyong Choi,4 Seungbong Han,5 Ji Yeon Lee,6 Young June Choe,7 and Seung-Ah Choe1
      • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
      • 2Department of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
      • 3Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
      • 4Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
      • 5Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
      • 6Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
      • 7Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
    • Address for Correspondence: Seung-Ah Choe, MD, PhD. Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea. Email: seungah@korea.ac.kr
    Received May 16, 2023; Accepted June 15, 2023.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Background

    We aimed to assess the risk of maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and early abortive outcomes after the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination during the preconceptional period and preclinical pregnancy, which are likely to be inadvertent vaccination.

    Methods

    We used data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID19-National Health Insurance Service cohort from December 2020 to December 2021. The vaccinated pregnant women were matched to unvaccinated pregnant controls at a 1:4 ratio. The risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 14 days of infection were analyzed to assess its effectiveness. For safety measures, the adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of early abortive outcomes for the first COVID-19 vaccination during the preconceptional and preclinical periods were calculated considering covariates. We compared the risk of early abortion between mRNA and viral vector vaccines.

    Results

    The overall COVID-19 vaccination rates during the preconceptional period and preclinical pregnancy were 3.1% (6,662/215,211) and 2.6% (5,702/215,211), respectively. The cumulative incidence of ICU admission within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6/100,000 in the unvaccinated group, whereas there were no ICU admissions in the vaccinated groups. The risks of early abortive outcomes were not significantly different between the preconceptional vaccination group and the unvaccinated group (aRR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.99–1.10) or between preclinical pregnancy vaccination and their matched controls (1.02; 95% CI, 0.96–1.08). mRNA and viral vector vaccines have shown similar risks for early abortive outcomes and miscarriages.

    Conclusion

    Our findings have provided compelling evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination prior to and during early pregnancy. Further research is required to extend the safety and efficacy profiles of COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women and their babies.

    Graphical Abstract

    Keywords
    SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Vaccination; Safety; Pregnancy

    INTRODUCTION

    Pregnant women are at risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Compared with pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection, those with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are more likely to give preterm births, be admitted to intensive care, and receive mechanical ventilation.1, 2, 3 COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women effectively reduces the risk of morbidity and has a safety profile comparable to that in non-pregnant women.4 Despite reassuring clinical data, vaccine hesitancy remains in women planning pregnancy, especially with concerns regarding the risk of miscarriage and congenital anomalies in their babies.5, 6 This hinders pregnant women from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, thus missing opportunities to prevent serious SARS-CoV-2 infections. While more than 120 countries and territories have recommended COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women,7 globally, the estimated vaccination coverage rate among them has staggered at 18.8–37.0%.8

    Safety concerns have been cited as a reason for the low COVID-19 vaccination coverage in this population, with most vaccinations occurring before the confirmation of pregnancy or late in pregnancy.9, 10 Although studies from the U.S. and Europe have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women, real-world data from Asian countries are limited.11 Moreover, the findings of prior safety studies on pregnant women suffer from methodological limitations, including differences in the baseline risk of pregnancy outcomes, uncertain fetal status at the time of vaccination, and the sample size required to detect differences across populations and vaccine platforms.12

    In South Korea, COVID-19 vaccination has been recommended for pregnant women since October 2021; however, the vaccination rate remains low.13, 14 Given that a large proportion of pregnant women were vaccinated during the preconceptional period or before the confirmation of pregnancy,15 investigating the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination during these periods is crucial. Universal health insurance data linked to the vaccine registry database provides a unique opportunity to provide real-world evidence of COVID-19 and the effectiveness and safety profile of pregnant women in Korea. This study aimed to assess the association between COVID-19 vaccination during preconception and before confirmation of pregnancy and the occurrence of miscarriage or severe maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection using national population data linked to the immunization registry.

    METHODS

    Data

    We used the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-National Health Insurance Service (K-COV-N) cohort data, established by linking the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) data to information on COVID-19 infection and vaccination provided by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/). Because the NHIS covers all the essential antenatal care services for 97% of the population of South Korea, these data capture almost all the information on demographics, health check-ups, and medical conditions, including nationwide pregnancy.16 The K-COV-N database provides individual data on SARS-CoV-2 infection cases between October 2020 and December 2021, and on COVID-19 vaccination between December 2020 and December 2021. We retrieved data on women aged 20−44 years with a valid pregnancy eligible for the study based on the presence of both pregnancy and treatment codes for first-trimester obstetric ultrasonography (T1US) from February 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021 (Supplementary Fig. 1). In South Korea, two rounds of T1US are covered by the NHIS when conducted within 11 weeks of gestation17 and the first T1US is commonly conducted at approximately 6 weeks of gestation, following the guidelines.18 We excluded those with the last menstrual period (LMP) between August 2021 and December 2021, when a period of 20 gestational weeks could be incompletely observed. Because we used T1US as a landmark, where the observation of the outcome of interest started, pregnancy loss before T1US and those first vaccinated after T1US were excluded. When we analyzed the incidence of severe COVID-19, patients with a history of COVID-19 infection during the preconceptional and preclinical periods were excluded. To analyze COVID-19 vaccination and early abortive outcomes, including miscarriage, we restricted our analysis to women without documented SARS-CoV-2 infection within the 20th gestational week.

    Preconceptional and preclinical COVID-19 vaccination

    We divided the vaccinated pregnant women into two groups: 1) a preconceptional vaccination group, defined as those first vaccinated within six months before LMP, and 2) a preclinical vaccination group, defined as first vaccinated between LMP and T1US (no vaccination in the preconceptional period). The vaccination of the preconceptional period was defined as within six months of the LMP based on evidence indicating that COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against severe disease remained for six months.19 Because the presence of an intrauterine pregnancy can be confirmed only after the first T1US, the period between the LMP and the examination was regarded as preclinical. We used information on the type of vaccine (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 as mRNA vaccines and ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S as viral vector vaccines) first administered during the preconceptional and preclinical pregnancy periods to compare the risk of early abortive outcomes per vaccine type.

    Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and early abortive outcomes

    We analyzed the effectiveness of preconception and preclinical COVID-19 vaccinations in pregnant women by assessing the risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection detected on intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect COVID-19 infection in South Korea during the study period. The K-COV-N cohort database included all COVID-19-positive cases regardless of their hospitalization status. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was defined as admission to the ICU during the clinical pregnancy (between T1US and the end of pregnancy). Patients admitted to the ICU were identified based on their treatment codes.

    The safety of preconception and preclinical COVID-19 vaccination was evaluated for early abortive outcomes, defined as the end of pregnancy before 20 weeks of gestation. The early abortive outcomes included miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, and artificial abortion. Miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and molar pregnancy were identified based on the diagnostic codes that included ‘O02,’ ‘O03,’ ‘O04,’ ‘O07,’ and ‘O08.’ Artificial abortion was defined as the surgical removal of gestational materials before 20th weeks of gestation with no diagnostic codes for early abortive outcomes and identified with the presence of treatment codes for uterine dilatation and evacuation. Given that ectopic and molar pregnancies and artificial abortions are less likely to be affected by preclinical pregnancy vaccination, we further assessed the association between vaccination and miscarriage, excluding other abortive outcomes.

    Covariates

    Our model included the age of the women at the time of vaccination, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic status, and season of conception. We assessed individual socioeconomic status using the information on income decile ranking, employment, presence of disabilities, and residence in the Seoul capital area. The Seoul capital area includes Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi-do, where half of the South Korean residents live and have better social infrastructure than other provinces. Variables were selected based on prior knowledge of the risk factors for severe COVID-19 morbidities, early abortive outcomes, and availability in the K-COV-N database.20, 21, 22 The employment status of the women was coded based on the NHIS subscription type, which specified employees. The K-COV-N database contains individually linked decile household income data. For analytical convenience, the household income levels of the individual data were divided into four groups (1st [lowest], 10–30%; 2nd, 40–60%; 3rd, 60–80%, and 4th [highest], 80–100%) for analytical convenience. Information on employment (yes or no) and residential area (at the district level) was coded based on the type of insurance subscription.

    Statistical analysis

    When analyzing early pregnancy outcomes, defining risk exposure simply by vaccination during pregnancy can lead to an erroneous estimation of survival probability.23 Furthermore, in the analysis of pregnancy outcomes, the survival time of patients with early abortive outcomes was not clinically meaningful. Given that the decision to COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is affected by gestational age, the probability of COVID-19 immunization during pregnancy cannot be considered consistent over gestational age. To minimize the time-dependency of COVID-19 vaccination during early pregnancy, the date of T1US was used as a landmark from which the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and early abortive outcomes were examined (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1
    Concept of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination during preconceptional and preclinical pregnancy periods and the first T1US as a landmark. The time of T1US was used as a landmark where the observation of the outcome of interest starts.
    T1US = first-trimester obstetric ultrasonography, LMP = last menstrual period.

    Women who did not receive any vaccinations during the preconception and pregnancy periods were used as controls. Given the low vaccination rate in pregnant women, we matched the vaccinated groups to unvaccinated controls in a 1:4 ratio based on age, income, BMI, and season of conception. In the effectiveness study, we analyzed the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and ICU admission within 14 days of infection. Because the incidence of ICU admission was extremely low in all groups, we calculated the adjusted odds ratios only for SARS-CoV-2 infection. To evaluate safety, we estimated the adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of early abortive outcomes and miscarriage for the first vaccination during preconceptional and preclinical periods, adjusting for individual covariates. We separately analyzed the risk of miscarriage, a subgroup of early abortive outcomes. We then compared the risk of early abortive outcomes and miscarriages between the mRNA and viral vector vaccines for each period. The BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines were combined into a single mRNA vaccine because all women under 30 years of age received the Moderna vaccine following the country’s immunization policy. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

    Ethics statement

    This study was approved by the Korea University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and no informed consent was required from patients due to the nature of public data from NHIS (IRB No. KUIRB-2022-0165-01).

    RESULTS

    The overall COVID-19 vaccination rates during preconceptional and preclinical pregnancy periods were 3.1% (6,662/215,211) and 2.6% (5,702/215,211), respectively. In the eligible population, 24,524 women in the control group were matched with 6,131 (92%) women who were first vaccinated during the preconception period. For the preclinical period analysis, 21,136 controls were matched to 5,284 women who were first vaccinated with LMP and T1US. When comparing cases and matching controls, vaccination during the preconceptional or preclinical period was associated with a higher probability of living in the Seoul capital area (51.5% in preconceptional and 51.2% in preclinical pregnancy vs. 45.2% and 46.8% in matched controls, respectively) and employment (78.5% and 65.5% vs. 61.8% and 56.8%, respectively) during pregnancy (Table 1). Among the vaccinated women, those first vaccinated during the preconceptional period were more likely to receive the ChAdOx1 vaccine and were vaccinated in spring than those first vaccinated during preclinical pregnancy (Supplementary Table 1). Most women were vaccinated with ChAdOx1 (70.6%) during the preconceptional period, whereas the majority were vaccinated with mRNA vaccines (70.7%) during the preclinical pregnancy period.

    Table 1
    Demographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women according to COVID-19 vaccination during preconceptional and preclinical pregnancy periods with their matched controls, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID19-National Health Insurance Service cohort data

    In the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and ICU admission within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the cumulative incidences of SARS-CoV-2 infection with no vaccination, preconceptional vaccination, and preclinical vaccination were 157, 210, and 316 per 100,000 pregnant women, respectively (Table 2). The cumulative incidence of ICU admission within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6/100,000 pregnant women who received no COVID-19 vaccination throughout the preconception period and during pregnancy. There were no ICU admission cases in the preconceptional period or the preclinical pregnancy vaccination groups. No deaths occurred within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the study population. The odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection were generally lower when vaccinated during the preconceptional or preclinical pregnancy periods, although the differences were not statistically significant (Supplementary Table 2). When comparing the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection for viral vector vaccines with those for mRNA vaccines, the adjusted risk estimates were generally imprecise because of the extremely low incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Supplementary Table 3).

    Table 2
    SARS-CoV-2 infection and ICU admission within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection, according to COVID-19 vaccination during the preconceptional period and preclinical pregnancy, and no vaccination, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID19-National Health Insurance Service cohort data

    Early abortive outcomes occurred in 20.7% (5,090/24,524) of the unvaccinated women and 21.6% (1,326/6,131) of the vaccinated women during the preconception period (Table 3). The incidence of miscarriage was similar between the two groups (18.7% vs. 18.9%). The risks of early abortive outcomes (aRR, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.10) and miscarriage (1.04; 95% CI, 0.98–1.10) were not significantly different between the preconceptional vaccination group and control. When comparing women who received the preclinical vaccination with their matched controls, the early abortion rates were 20.8% (4,406/21,136) in the unvaccinated control group and 21.3% (1,128/5,284) in the vaccinated group. The risk of abortive outcomes (1.02; 95% CI, 0.96–1.08) and miscarriage (1.01; 95% CI, 0.95–1.07) for preclinical vaccination were close to null. When comparing the risk of early abortive outcomes among vaccinated women, those first vaccinated with mRNA, ChAdOx1, and Ad26.COV2.S during the preconception period experienced early abortion outcomes in 20.7%, 21.5%, and 22.9% of the cases, respectively. For the first vaccination during preclinical pregnancy, the early abortion rates in women receiving mRNA, ChAdOx1, and Ad26.COV2.S were 20.8%, 22.0%, and 20.8%, respectively. The miscarriage rates were 18.0%, 20.4%, and 18.9% for mRNA, ChAdOx1, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines, respectively. When compared with mRNA vaccines, ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S showed similar risks of early abortive outcomes and miscarriage in both periods.

    Table 3
    Adjusted relative risk of early abortive outcomes and miscarriage by coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination and the type of vaccine during the preconceptional and preclinical periods

    DISCUSSION

    In a national population cohort of Korean women, we observed that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was comparable between women who were vaccinated during the preconceptional or preclinical pregnancy period and those who were never vaccinated. Although this event was rare, there were no cases of ICU admission after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated group. The risks of early abortive outcomes and miscarriage were not significantly different between the vaccinated and never-vaccinated groups. The risks were similar across the types of vaccines, regardless of preconceptional or preclinical pregnancy periods. Although the findings are limited by the low number of severe SARS-CoV-2 infections to analyze the risk, our study provides reassuring evidence of the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pre- or early pregnancy, which are likely inadvertent vaccinations.

    The protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy has been reported previously. The pooled effectiveness of the vaccine against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections after the second dose was 89.5%.24 A recent meta-analysis showed a reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization among fully vaccinated pregnant women.25 The close-to-null association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination in our study could be due to the substantially lower incidence of ICU admission and vaccination rates in early pregnancy in South Korean pregnant women than in other populations.

    Our finding of a comparable risk of early pregnancy loss is consistent with previous reports. Despite methodological heterogeneity, studies have shown that miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and stillbirth risks in vaccinated pregnant women are not higher than those in non-vaccinated.26, 27, 28 Notable differences in methodologies between the previous study and our study include the inclusion of preconceptional vaccination and a considerable proportion of vaccinations with AstraZeneca. If we had included only those who were vaccinated during pregnancy, including in the second trimester, our estimation of vaccine effectiveness could have been higher. Furthermore, risk estimates would have moved toward null because of the potential disadvantages of viral vector vaccines.29 Given that uncertainties remain regarding the timing of pregnancy loss and bias determination from the self-selection of vaccinated groups, more reproducible methodologies to assess vaccination safety during pregnancy would need to be developed.

    Despite the current guidance from leading health organization recommendations requiring COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and growing evidence of the effectiveness and safety of vaccination,30, 31, 32, 33 the reported COVID-19 immunization rate among pregnant women remains low compared with other high-risk populations, ranging from 6.8% to 68.7%.8 In a sample of pregnant women in the United States, 61.0% received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, and 54.3% completed their primary series as of April 2022.34 In 2021, 32.7% of pregnant women in a UK cohort received at least one COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy.35 Considering the global disparities in COVID-19 vaccination rates, especially in pregnant women,36 further research should focus on strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccination uptake during pregnancy.

    The interpretation of our findings requires caution owing to some limitations. First, using the NHIS claims data, pregnancy outcomes based on the diagnostic and treatment codes might have been misclassified in some of our populations. Because the overall incidence of miscarriage was reported to be 10–20%, the comparable incidence of miscarriage in our study population supports the validity of our estimation. Second, we could not delineate the impact of partial and complete vaccination in the population because the general incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination rates were extremely low to conduct a stratified analysis. When the database was extended to a more recent timeframe, where the vaccination rate during pregnancy was higher than ours, we would be able to analyze vaccine effectiveness against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    We observed a comparable risk of early abortive outcomes in women exposed to COVID-19 vaccination during pre- and early pregnancy with women who were never vaccinated. Further research is required to determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and their offspring.

    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

    Supplementary Table 1

    Types and dose of first COVID-19 vaccination during preconception and preclinical pregnancy, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID19-National Health Insurance Service cohort data

    Click here to view.(38K, doc)

    Supplementary Table 2

    aOR of SARS-CoV-2 infection by the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination status during preconceptional and preclinical pregnancy period

    Click here to view.(30K, doc)

    Supplementary Table 3

    aORs of SARS-CoV-2 infection by coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination type during preconceptional and preclinical pregnancy period

    Click here to view.(36K, doc)

    Supplementary Fig. 1

    Selection flow of study population in the analysis of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination and early abortive outcomes

    Click here to view.(200K, doc)

    Notes

    Funding:This research was supported by grants from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety from 2022–2025 (22183MFDS433) and SK Bioscience Co., Ltd (Q2208741).

    Disclosure:Seung-Ah Choe received research funding from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of South Korea and participated in an advisory committee meeting for Moderna Inc.

    Author Contributions:

    • Conceptualization: Choe SA.

    • Data curation: Gwak E, Kim T.

    • Formal analysis: Gwak E.

    • Methodology: Han S, Choe YJ.

    • Project administration: Kim T.

    • Writing - original draft: Choe SA, Gwak E.

    • Writing - review & editing: Choi NK, Shin JY, Lee JY.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This study used the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) and National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) databases for policy and academic research (KDCA-NHIS-2022-1-587). The conclusions of this study are not related to this institution.

    References

      1. Khalil A, von Dadelszen P, Draycott T, Ugwumadu A, O’Brien P, Magee L. Change in the incidence of stillbirth and preterm delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020;324(7):705–706.
      1. Lokken EM, Huebner EM, Taylor GG, Hendrickson S, Vanderhoeven J, Kachikis A, et al. Disease severity, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal deaths among pregnant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225(1):77.e1–77.14.
      1. Woodworth KR, Olsen EO, Neelam V, Lewis EL, Galang RR, Oduyebo T, et al. Birth and infant outcomes following laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy - SET-NET, 16 jurisdictions, March 29-October 14, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69(44):1635–1640.
      1. Ellington S, Olson CK. Safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis 2022;22(11):1514–1515.
      1. Murphy J, Vallières F, Bentall RP, Shevlin M, McBride O, Hartman TK, et al. Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):29.
      1. Sutton D, D’Alton M, Zhang Y, Kahe K, Cepin A, Goffman D, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant, breastfeeding, and nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021;3(5):100403
      1. Berman Institute of Bioethics & Center for Immunization Research, Johns Hopkins University. COVID-19 maternal immunization tracker (COMIT). [Updated 2023]. [Accessed March 15, 2023].
        www.comitglobal.org.
      1. Galanis P, Vraka I, Siskou O, Konstantakopoulou O, Katsiroumpa A, Kaitelidou D. Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10(5):766.
      1. Favre G, Maisonneuve E, Pomar L, Winterfeld U, Daire C, Martinez de Tejada B, et al. COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in pregnancy: results of the Swiss COVI-PREG registry, an observational prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022;18:100410
      1. Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, DeSilva M, Vesco KK, Ackerman-Banks C, Zhu J, et al. Receipt of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy and preterm or small-for-gestational-age at birth - eight integrated health care organizations, United States, December 15, 2020-July 22, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71(1):26–30.
      1. Meaney-Delman DM, Ellington SR, Shimabukuro TT. On preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. reply. N Engl J Med 2021;385(16):1536.
      1. Badell ML, Dude CM, Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. BMJ 2022;378:e069741
      1. Lee HJ. In: Do They Need COVID-19 Vaccination?: 230,000 Unvaccinated Pregnant Women in South Korea. Seoul, Korea: Seoul Newspaper; 2021.
      1. Ahn KH, Kim HI, Lee KS, Heo JS, Kim HY, Cho GJ, et al. COVID-19 and vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic analysis using Korea National Health Insurance claims data. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2022;65(6):487–501.
      1. Han AR, Lee D, Kim SK, Choo CW, Park JC, Lee JR, et al. Effects and safety of COVID-19 vaccination on assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy: a comprehensive review and joint statements of the KSRM, the KSRI, and the KOSAR. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2022;49(1):2–8.
      1. Kyoung DS, Kim HS. Understanding and utilizing claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) database for research. J Lipid Atheroscler 2022;11(2):103–110.
      1. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Insurance system policy for reimbursement of ultrasound No. 2021-183. [Updated 2021]. [Accessed March 31, 2023].
        https://www.hira.or.kr/rc/insu/insuadtcrtr/InsuAdtCrtrPopup.do?mtgHmeDd=20210701&sno=6&mtgMtrRegSno=0012.
      1. Jeong BD, Won HS. Screening ultrasonography in pregnancy. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58(11):1003–1010.
      1. Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, Andrews N, Araos R, Goldberg Y, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet 2022;399(10328):924–944.
      1. Kim CB, Choe SA, Kim T, Kim MH, Ryu J, Oh JW, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal occupational status: a national population-based study in South Korea. J Occup Health 2023;65(1):e12380
      1. Weschenfelder F, Zöllkau J, Schohe A, Pecks U, Groten T, Schaefer-Graf U, et al. Obesity during pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19-case series of the registry study “COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study” (CRONOS-Network). J Clin Med 2023;12(6):2089.
      1. Örtqvist AK, Magnus MC, Aabakke AJ, Urhoj SK, Vinkel Hansen A, Nybo Andersen AM, et al. Severe COVID-19 during pregnancy in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023;102(6):681–689.
      1. Hernández-Díaz S, Huybrechts KF, Chiu YH, Yland JJ, Bateman BT, Hernán MA. Emulating a target trial of interventions initiated during pregnancy with healthcare databases: the example of COVID-19 vaccination. Epidemiology 2023;34(2):238–246.
      1. Prasad S, Kalafat E, Blakeway H, Townsend R, O’Brien P, Morris E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Nat Commun 2022;13(1):2414.
      1. Tormen M, Taliento C, Salvioli S, Piccolotti I, Scutiero G, Cappadona R, et al. Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BJOG 2023;130(4):348–357.
      1. Ciapponi A, Berrueta M, P K Parker E, Bardach A, Mazzoni A, Anderson SA, et al. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2023;41(25):3688–3700.
      1. Kharbanda EO, Haapala J, DeSilva M, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vesco KK, Naleway AL, et al. Spontaneous abortion following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. JAMA 2021;326(16):1629–1631.
      1. Magnus MC, Gjessing HK, Eide HN, Wilcox AJ, Fell DB, Håberg SE. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and first-trimester miscarriage. N Engl J Med 2021;385(21):2008–2010.
      1. Karrow NA, Shandilya UK, Pelech S, Wagter-Lesperance L, McLeod D, Bridle B, et al. Maternal COVID-19 vaccination and its potential impact on fetal and neonatal development. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9(11):1351.
      1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. COVID-19 vaccination considerations for obstetric–gynecologic care. [Updated 2023]. [Accessed April 10, 2023].
        https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/covid-19-vaccination-considerations-for-obstetric-gynecologic-care.
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 vaccines while pregnant or breastfeeding. [Updated 2022]. [Accessed April 10, 2023].
        https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html.
      1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. COVID-19 vaccines, pregnancy and breastfeeding FAQs. [Updated 2022]. [Accessed April 10, 2023].
        https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-pregnancy-and-women-s-health/vaccination/covid-19-vaccines-pregnancy-and-breastfeeding-faqs/.
      1. World Health Organization. Questions and Answers: COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2022.
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu, Tdap, and COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women – United States, April 2022. Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023.
      1. Mhereeg M, Jones H, Kennedy J, Seaborne M, Parker M, Kennedy N, et al. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: views and vaccination uptake rates in pregnancy, a mixed methods analysis from SAIL and the Born-In-Wales Birth Cohort. BMC Infect Dis 2022;22(1):932.
      1. Zavala E, Krubiner CB, Jaffe EF, Nicklin A, Gur-Arie R, Wonodi C, et al. Global disparities in public health guidance for the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. BMJ Glob Health 2022;7(2):e007730
    MeSH Terms
    Abortion, Spontaneous
    COVID-19 Vaccines
    COVID-19*
    Cohort Studies
    Female
    Humans
    Incidence
    Insurance, Health
    Intensive Care Units
    Korea
    Pregnancy*
    Pregnant Women
    RNA, Messenger
    Respect
    SARS-CoV-2
    Vaccination*
    Vaccines
    Metrics
    Share
    Figures
    slide

    1 / 1

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    ORCID IDs
    Funding Information
    PERMALINK