Articulations of Language and Value(s) in Scholarly Publishing Circuits

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.38148

Keywords:

bibliodiversity, knowledge equity, language, publishing, scholarly communications

Abstract

This paper examines how the use of and preference for the English language in scholarly communication enacts epistemic oppressions on global, regional, and local stages to delegitimize knowledge and knowers active in other languages and epistemological frameworks. Specifically, this paper argues that internationalized languages of economic and metrics-based value interact and intersect with the over-valuation of English, which has detrimental consequences. Four readings of the interplays between language and value in the scholarly ecosystem are presented. As questions of knowledge production, epistemic oppression, and justice are not confined to one discipline or community, each reading engages with the theory and praxis of scholars from local and Indigenous communities, and scholars and practitioners in a range of other areas.

The first reading, Language Has Value, examines the knowledge and value embedded in languages, as well as the implications of monolingualism for global knowledge production and use. Focusing on the publishing industry, Language of Value interrogates the internationalized economic values that shape mainstream approaches to open access and overlook regional situations. Language of Evaluation attends to the symbolic market of research metrics and evaluation criteria that forces researchers to choose between topics that are locally relevant and those deemed important by the mainstream community. These readings are followed, in Language and Value, by lessons learned from established models and tools for knowledge production and dissemination that actively resist intersecting oppressions. The paper closes with a call to the research community to imagine and work for sustainable and equitable approaches to scholarly communication that break open and away from the epistemic enclosures dominating the present system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adame, Fernanda. 2021. “Meaningful Collaborations Can End ‘Helicopter Research.” Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01795-1

Ahmed, Sara. 2013. “Making Feminist Points.” Feministkilljoys, September 11, 2013. https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/

Alamri, Basim. 2021. “Multilingual Scholars’ Experiences in Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 52 (4): 248–272. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.52.4.04

Alatas, Syed Farid. 2003. “Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology 51 (6): 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030516003

Albornoz, Denisse. 2017. “Power and Inequality in Open Science Discourses.” Medium (blog), November 22, 2017. https://medium.com/@denalbz/power-and-inequality-in-open-science-discourses-9d425b0c2b63

Albornoz. 2019. “Reimagining Open Science Through a Feminist Lens.” Medium (blog), February 6, 2019. https://medium.com/@denalbz/reimagining-open-science-through-a-feminist-lens-546f3d10fa65

Alhasnawi, Sami. 2021. “English as an Academic Lingua Franca: Discourse Hybridity and Meaning Multiplicity in an International Anglophone HE Institution.” Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 10 (1): 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2021-2054

Alperin, Juan Pablo. 2019. “Policies and Incentives for Open Scholarly Communication.” ScholCommLab (blog), December 19, 2019. https://www.scholcommlab.ca/2019/12/19/osun-keynote/

Anderson, Jane, and Kimberly Christen. 2019. “Decolonizing Attribution: Traditions of Exclusion.” Journal of Radical Librarianship 5: 113–152. https://journal.radicallibrarianship.org/index.php/journal/article/view/38

Babini, Dominique, and Juan D. Machin-Mastromatteo. 2015. “Latin American Science is Meant to be Open Access: Initiatives and Current Challenges.” Information Development 31 (5): 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915601420

Bali, Maha, Taskeen Adam, Catherine Cronin, Christian Friedrich, Sukaina Walji, and Christina Hendricks. 2018. “Breaking Open: Ethics, Epistemology, Equity, and Power.” In Open at the Margins: Critical Perspectives on Open Education, edited by Maha Bali, Catherine Cronin, Laura Czerniewicz, Robin DeRosa, and Rajiv Jhangiani. Rebus Community. https://press.rebus.community/openatthemargins/chapter/breaking-open-ethics-epistemology-equity-and-power/

Balula, Ana, and Delfim Leão. 2021. “Multilingualism within Scholarly Communication in SSH. A Literature Review.” JLIS.it 12 (2): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12672

Beigel, Fernanda. 2021. “A Multi-Scale Perspective for Assessing Publishing Circuits in Non-Hegemonic Countries.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1845923

Bell, Gloria Jane. 2021. “Gramophone, Masinatahikan – Typewriter, Press, Our Mother(s) Rongue: Reflections on Indigenous (First Nations and Métis) Literacies and Media.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 5 (1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.142

Berger, Monica. 2021. “Bibliodiversity at the Centre: Decolonizing Open Access.” Development and Change 52 (2): 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12634

Bodó, Balázs, Dániel Antal, and Zoltán Puha. 2020. “Can Scholarly Pirate Libraries Bridge the Knowledge Access Gap? An Empirical Study on the Structural Conditions of Book Piracy in Global and European Academia.” PLoS ONE 15 (12): e0242509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242509

Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2002. “Read the Declaration.” https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/

Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2022. “The Budapest Open Access Initiative: 20th Anniversary Recommendations.” https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/

Buranyi, Stephen. 2017. “Is the Staggeringly Profitable Business of Scientific Publishing Bad for Science?” The Guardian, June 27, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Canadian Writing Research Collaboratory. n.d. “Cabaret Commons.” https://cwrc.ca/project/cabaret-commons

Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 2002. A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Chan, Leslie. 2018. “Open Access in the Global South: Perspectives from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network.” Last updated May 3, 2018. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1240505

Chan, Leslie, Angela Okune, Rebecca Hillyer, Denisse Albornoz, and Alejandro Posada (eds.). 2019. Contextualizing Openness: Situating Open Science. University of Ottawa Press.

Chatman, Elfreda. A. 1999. “A Theory of Life in the Round.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50 (3): 207-17.

Christen, Kimberly. 2012. “Does Information Really Want to be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness.” International Journal of Communication 6 (2012): 2870-2893. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1618

Clarivate. n.d.-a “Web of Science Book Evaluation Process and Selection Criteria.” Accessed May 7, 2022. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/web-of-science/core-collection/editorial-selection-process/web-of-science-book-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria/

Clarivate. n.d-b. “Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index Evaluation Process and Selection Criteria.” Accessed May 7, 2022. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/web-of-science/core-collection/editorial-selection-process/web-of-science-conference-proceedings-citation-index-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria

Clarivate. n.d-c. “Web of Science Journal Evaluation Process and Selection Criteria.” Accessed May 7, 2022. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/web-of-science/core-collection/editorial-selection-process/editorial-selection-process/

cOAlition S. n.d. “Why Plan S.” European Science Foundation. https://www.coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/

cOAlition S. 2019. Accelerating the Transition to Full and Immediate Open Access to Scientific Publications. https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/PlanS_Principles_and_Implementation_310519.pdf

Cohen, Erik, Scott A. Cohen, and Victor T. King. 2018. “The Global Permutations of the Western Publication Regime.” Current Issues in Tourism 21 (17): 2035-2051. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1272556

Collection Development and Equity in the Time of Covid-19 Task Force. 2020, June 10. SALALM Resolution: Collection Development in the Time of Covid-19. Seminar on the Acquisition of Latin American Library Materials in North America. https://salalm.org/content.asp?contentid=485

Committee on South Asian Libraries and Documentation. 2020. “CONSALD Statement on Collection Development, Access, and Equity in the Time of COVID-19.” http://www.consald.org/covid.html

Council on East Asian Libraries. 2020. Statement on Collection Development and Acquisition Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: In Collaboration with the North American Coordinating Council on Japanese Library Resources (NCC) and the Society of Chinese Studies Librarians (SCSL). https://www.eastasianlib.org/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/CEAL_Statement_COVID-19_FINAL_2020.8.13.pdf

Crystal, David. 2012. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196970

Curry, Mary Jane, and Theresa M Lillis. 2010. “Academic Research Networks: Accessing Resources for English-Medium Publishing.” English for Specific Purposes 29 (4): 281–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002

Czerniewicz, Laura. 2013. “Inequitable Power Dynamics of Global Knowledge Production and Exchange Must be Confronted Head On.” In Open at the Margins: Critical Perspectives on Open Education, edited by Maha Bali, Catherine Cronin, Laura Czerniewicz, Robin DeRosa, and Rajiv Jhangiani. Rebus Community. https://press.rebus.community/openatthemargins/chapter/repost-inequitable-power-knowledge/

Darnton, Robert. 2007. “‘What is the History of Books?’ Revisited.” Modern Intellectual History 4 (3): 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244307001370

DORA. 2012. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” https://sfdora.org/read/

Dotson, Kristie. 2014. “Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology 28 (2): 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585

Ellenwood, Dave. 2020. ““Information has Value”: The Political Economy of Information Capitalism.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/information-has-value-the-political-economy-of-information-capitalism/

ESAC Initiative. n.d. “Transformative Agreements.” https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/

Escobar, Arturo. 1995. “Introduction: Development and the Anthropology of Modernity.” In Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, 3-20. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2021. Towards a Reform of the Research Assessment System: Scoping Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/707440

Eve, Martin Paul, and Jonathan Gray (eds.). 2020. Reassembling Scholarly Communications. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.001.0001

Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Committee for Public Information, Finnish Association for Scholarly Publishing, Universities Norway and European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. 2019. Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7887059

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. “Introduction.” Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.003.0001

Ge, Meng. 2015. “English Writing for International Publication in the Age of Globalization: Practices and Perceptions of Mainland Chinese Academics in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Publications 3 (2): 43-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020043

Giménez Toledo, Elea, Emanuel Kulczycki, Janne Pölönen, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 2019. “Bibliodiversity – What it is and Why it is Essential to Creating Situated Knowledge.” Impact of Social Sciences (blog), December 5, 2019. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/12/05/bibliodiversity-what-it-is-and-why-it-is-essential-to-creating-situated-knowledge/

Grande, Sandy. 2018. “Refusing the University.” In Toward What Justice?, edited by Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, 47–65. Routledge.

Hanauer, David I., Cheryl L. Sheridan, and Karen Englander. 2019. “Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers.” Written Communication 36 (1): 136–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804821

Haustein, Stefanie, and Leigh-Ann Butler. 2022. “Inequities of Article Processing Charges: How the Oligopoly of Academic Publishers Profits from Open Access.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6557271

Haustein, Stefanie, and Vincent Larivière. 2015. The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects. Springer. https://ost.openum.ca/files/sites/132/2017/06/HausteinLariviereIncentives.pdf

Holmwood, John. 2020. “Open Access, “Publicity,” and Democratic Knowledge.” In Reassembling Scholarly Communications, edited by Martin Paul Eve & Jonathan Gray, 181-91. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0019

Hudson, Maui. 2021. “Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Equitable and Inclusive Digital Future.” In A Digital New Deal: Visions of Justice in a Post-Covid World, edited by Sohel Sarkar and Amay Korjan. 40-47. IT for Change.

Huskisson, Mark. 2023. “Guest Post – Scholarly Publishing as a Global Endeavor: Leveraging Open Source Software for Bibliodiversity.” The Scholarly Kitchen (blog). February 16, 2023. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/02/16/guest-post-scholarly-publishing-as-a-global-endeavor-leveraging-open-source-software-for-bibliodiversity/

International Assembly of Independent Publishers. 2014. International Declaration of Independent Publishers 2014, To Promote and Strengthen Bibliodiversity Together. https://www.alliance-editeurs.org/IMG/pdf/international_declaration_of_independent_publishers_2014-6.pdf

Irawan, Daspata Erwin, Bambang Priadi, Lusy Tunik Muharlisiani, Sandersan Onie, and Zulidyana Dwi Rusnalasari. 2020. “Indonesia Publishes the Most Open-Access Journals in the World: What it Means for Local Research.” The Conversation, October 6, 2020. http://theconversation.com/indonesia-publishes-the-most-open-access-journals-in-the-world-what-it-means-for-local-research-147421

Irawan, Dasapta Erwin, Juneman Abraham, Rizqy Amelia Zein, Ilham Akhsanu Ridlo, and Eric Kunto Aribowo. 2021. “Open Access in Indonesia.” Development and Change 52 (3): 651–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12637

Japan Science and Technology Agency. 2022. Implementation Guidelines: JST Policy on Open Access to Research Publications and Research Data Management. https://www.jst.go.jp/EN/about/openscience/guideline_openscience_en_r4.pdf

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2011. “Accommodating (to) ELF in the International University: English as a Lingua Franca.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (4): 926–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.011

Knowledge Equity Lab, and SPARC. 2021. “Knowledge By Whom? For Whom?” Unsettling Knowledge Inequities (podcast audio), February 23, 2021. http://openresearch.community/posts/the-inaugural-issue-of-the-unsettling-knowledge-inequities-podcast-discusses-equity-and-inclusion

Kovach, Margaret. 2009. “Epistemology and Research: Centring Tribal Knowledge.” In Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations and Contexts, 55-74. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kovach, Margaret. 2019. “Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks: Can the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage be a Guide for Recognizing Indigenous Scholarship within Tenure and Promotion Standards?” AlterNative 15(4): 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180119887185

Kumar, Neha, and Naveena Karusala. 2020. “Braving Citational Justice within Human-Computer Interaction.” Medium (blog), November 11, 2020. https://nehakumar.medium.com/braving-citational-justice-within-hci-5b43c1436fbc

Kwon, Diana. 2022. “The Rise of Citational Justice: How Scholars are Making References Fairer.” Nature 603: 568-571. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00793-1

Larivière, Vincent, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon. 2015. “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.” PloS One 10 (6): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Li, Mengyang, and Rui Yang. 2019. “China’s English-Language Journals in Human and Social Sciences.” International Higher Education 99: 25–6. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.99.11667

Lillis, Theresa, and Mary Jane Curry. 2006. “Professional Academic Writing by Multilingual Scholars: Interactions with Literacy Brokers in the Production of English-Medium Texts.” Written Communication 23 (1): 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305283754

Liu, Fang, Guangyuan Hu, Li Tang, and Weishu Liu. 2018. “The Penalty of Containing More Non-English Articles.” Scientometrics 114 (1): 359–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2577-6

Local Contexts. n.d. “About Local Contexts.” https://localcontexts.org/about/about-local-contexts/

MacLeod, Lorisia (James Smith Cree Nation). 2021. “More Than Personal Communication: Templates For Citing Indigenous Elders and Knowledge Keepers.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 5 (1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.135

Mboa Nkoudou, Thomas Hervé. 2020. “Epistemic Alienation in African Scholarly Communications: Open Access as a Pharmakon.” In Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathon Gray, 25–40. Massachusetts: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0006

Middle Eastern Librarians Association. 2020, June 22. “MELA Statement on Collection Development, Access, and Equity in the Time of COVID-19.” https://www.mela.us/2020/06/22/mela-statement-on-collection-development-access-and-equity-in-the-time-of-covid-19/

MITLibraries. 2018. “Grand Challenges Keynote: Anasuya Sengupta.” YouTube video, 1:14:35. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bshxssV_3Pc

Mignolo, Walter D. 1995. The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

MoChridhe, Race. 2019. “Linguistic Equity as Open Access: Internationalizing the Language of Scholarly Communication.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 45 (4): 423–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.006

Moed, Henk F. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.

Montenegro, María. 2019. “Subverting the Universality of Metadata Standards: The TK Labels as a Tool to Promote Indigenous Data Sovereignty.” Journal of Documentation 75 (4): 731–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2018-0124

Nixon, Robert. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

Nyamnjoh, Francis. B. 2010. “Open Access and Open Knowledge Production Processes: Lessons from CODESRIA.” The African Journal of Information and Communication 10: 67–72. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-15ef0f049e

OCSDNet. n.d. “Open Science Manifesto.” Last updated May 28, 2017. https://ocsdnet.org/manifesto/open-science-manifesto/

OpenDOAR. n.d. “OpenDOAR Statistics.” https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/view/repository_visualisations/1.html

Patin, Beth, Melinda Sebastian, Jieun Yeon, and Danielle Bertolini. 2020. “Toward Epistemic Justice: An Approach for Conceptualizing Epistemicide in the Information Professions.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science Technology 57 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.242

Pho, Phuong D., and Thi M.P. Tran. 2016. “Obstacles to Scholarly Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Case Study of Vietnamese Scholars.” Publications 4 (3): 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030019

Research Data Alliance International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group. 2019. CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. The Global Indigenous Data Alliance. GIDA-global.org

Roh, Charlotte, Harrison W. Inefuku, and Emily Drabinski. 2020. “Scholarly Communications and Social Justice.” In Reassembling Scholarly Communications, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray, 41-52. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0007

Salami, Minna. 2020. Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach for Everyone. Amistad.

Salter, Matthew. 2022. “Guest Post — Open Access in Japan: Tapping the Stone Bridge.” The Scholarly Kitchen (blog). May 4, 2022. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/05/04/guest-post-open-access-in-japan-tapping-the-stone-bridge/

Santos, Joana Viera, and Paulo Nunes Da Silva. 2016. “Issues with Publishing Abstracts in English: Challenges for Portuguese Linguists’ Authorial Voices.” Publications 4 (2): 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020012

Scott, Brendan. 2001. “Copyright in a Frictionless World: Toward a Rhetoric of Responsibility.” First Monday 6 (9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v6i9.887

Shearer, Katherine, and Arianna Becerril-García. 2021. “Decolonizing Scholarly Communications through Bibliodiversity.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4423997

Shearer, Katherine, Leslie Chan, Iryna Kuchma, and Pierre Mounier. 2020. “Fostering Bibliodiversity in Scholarly Communications: A Call for Action.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3752923

Solovova, Olga, Joana V. Santos, and Joaquim Veríssimo. 2018. “Publish in English or Perish in Portuguese: Struggles and Constraints on the Semiperiphery.” Publications 6 (2): 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6020025

SPARC. 2021. 2021 Update: SPARC Landscape Analysis and Roadmap for Action. https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021-Landscape-Analysis-101421.pdf

STM. 2021. STM Global Brief 2021 – Economics and Market Size. An STM report supplement. https://www.stmassoc.org/2022_08_24_STM_White_Report_a4_v15.pdf

Svenonius, Elaine. 2000. “Information Organization.” In The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 1-14. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Tian, Mei, Yan Su, and Xin Ru. 2016. “Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals.” Publications 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020009

Tomuschat, Christian. 2017. “The (Hegemonic?) Role of the English Language.” Nordic Journal of International Law 86 (2): 196–227. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08602003

Tuana, Nancy. 2006. “The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women’s Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance.” Hypatia 21 (3): 1-19. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/199105

Turner, Joan. 2018. On Writtenness: The Cultural Politics of Academic Writing. Bloomsbury Academic.

Vega, Paula Clemente. 2018, December 10. “Open Access, the Global South and the Politics of Knowledge Production and Circulation: An Open Insights interview with Leslie Chan.” The Open Library of Humanities. https://www.openlibhums.org/news/314/

Vessuri, Hebe, Jean-Claude Guédon, and Ana María Cetto. 2014. “Excellence or Quality? Impact of the Current Competition Regime on Science and Scientific Publishing in Latin America and its Implications for Development.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 647–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113512839

World Intellectual Property Organization. 2020. Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_933_2020.pdf

Younas, Ahtisham, Sergi Fàbregues, Angela Durante, and Parveen Ali. 2021. “Providing English and Native Language Quotes in Qualitative Research: A Call to Action.” Nursing Open 9 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1115

Zhang, Lin, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 2020. “The New Research Assessment Reform in China and its Implementation.” Scholarly Assessment Reports 2 (1), 1-7. https://www.scholarlyassessmentreports.org/articles/10.29024/sar.15/

Zin-Maung-Maung-Thein, and Khin Zaw. 2021. “Parachute Research is Another Ethical Problem for Myanmar Amber.” Nature Ecology and Evolution 5 (6): 707. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01472-6

Zuboff, Shoshanna. 2019. “Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action.” New Labor Forum 28 (1): 10-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461

Downloads

Published

2023-04-20

How to Cite

Shi, Julie. 2023. “Articulations of Language and Value(s) in Scholarly Publishing Circuits”. Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship 9 (April):1-33. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.38148.