Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 364
Оценка читателей: голосов 0
1. Albrecht, M. von 2004: Istoriya rimskoy literatury [A History of Roman Literature]. Vol. II. Moscow.
2. Альбрехт, М. фон. История римской литературы. Т. 2. М.
3. Andreev, Yu.V. 1990: Poeziya mifa i proza istorii [Poetry of Myth and Prose of History]. Leningrad.
4. Андреев, Ю.В. Поэзия мифа и проза истории. Л.
5. Arena, V. 2012: Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
6. Arena, V. 2021: Liberty and the rule of law. In: P. Cartledge, C. Atack (eds.), A Cultural History of Democracy in Antiquity. Vol. I. London–New York–Oxford–New Delhi–Sydney, 37–56.
7. Balmaceda, C. 2020: Libertas in early Latin authors. In: C. Balmaceda (ed.), Libertas and Res Publica in the Roman Republic: Ideas of Freedom and Roman Politics. Leiden–Boston, 33–54.
8. Barchiesi, A. 1997: The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.
9. Balsley, K. 2010: Between two lives: Tiresias and the law in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Dictynna – Revue de poétique latine 7, 13–31.
10. Balsley, K. 2011: Truthseeking and truthmaking in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 1. 163–245. Law and Literature 23/1, 48–70.
11. Bowditch, Ph. L. 1994: Horace’s poetics of political integrity: epistle 1.18. American Journal of Philology 115/3, 409–426.
12. Brown, S.A. 2005: Ovid: Myth and Metamorphosis. London.
13. Brunt, P.A. 1988: The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.
14. Casali, S. 2006: The art of making oneself hated: rethinking (Anti-)Augustanism in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. In: R. Gibson, S. Green, A. Sharrock (eds.), The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris. Oxford, 216–234.
15. Coleman, K.M. 1990: Tiresias the judge: Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.322–38. Classical Quarterly 40/2, 571–577.
16. Crook, J.A. 1967: Law and Life of Rome (Aspects of Greek and Roman Life). London.
17. Danilov, E.S. 2017: [Securitas in “Panegyrici Latini”]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury [Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies] 3, 81–89.
18. Данилов, Е.С. Securitas в «Panegyrici Latini». ПИФК 3, 81–89.
19. Davis, P.J. 1999: Ovid’s Amores: a political reading. Classical Philology 94/4, 431–449.
20. Davis, P.J. 2016: Freedom of speech in Virgil and Ovid. In: P. Mitsis, I. Ziogas (eds.), Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin–Boston, 183–198.
21. Devine, A.M. 1978: A Study of the Aristocratic Ideal and the Theme of Moral Decline in Latin Love Elegy. PhD thesis. Hobart.
22. Drinkwater, M.O. 2013: Militia amoris: fighting in love’s army. In: T.S. Thorsen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge, 194–206.
23. Durov, V.S. 2000: Istoriya rimskoy literatury [A History of Roman Literature]. Saint Petersburg.
24. Дуров, В.С. История римской литературы. СПб.
25. Eckerman, Ch. 2016: Freedom and slavery in Vergil’s eclogue 1. Wiener Studien 129, 257–280.
26. Feldherr, A. 2010: Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton–Oxford.
27. Fraenkel, E. 1957: Horace. Oxford.
28. Galinsky, K. 1975: Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley–Los Angeles.
29. Galinsky, K. 2006: Vergil’s uses of “libertas”: texts and contexts. Vergilius 52, 3–19.
30. Galinsky, K. 2017: [Augustan literature and Augustan “ideology”: an ongoing reassessment]. Shagi / Steps 3/4, 151–167.
31. Галински, К. Августовская литература и августовская «идеология»: пересмотр оценок. Шаги / Steps 3/4, 151–167.
32. Gebhardt, U.C.J. 2009: Sermo Iuris: Rechtssprache und Recht in der augusteischen Dichtung. Leiden–Boston.
33. Hollis, A.S. 1994: Rights of way in Ovid (Heroides 20.146) and Plautus (Cur-culio 36). Classical Quarterly 44/2, 545–549.
34. Janan, M. 2001: The Politics of Desire: Propertius IV. Berkeley–Los Ange-les–London.
35. Johnston, P.A. 2006: Turnus, horses, and “libertas”. Vergilius 52, 20–31.
36. Kenney, E.J. 1969: Ovid and the law. Yale Classical Sudies 21, 241–263.
37. Kenney, E.J. 1970: Love and legalism: Ovid, Heroides 20 and 21. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 9/4, 388–414.
38. Kennedy, D.F. 1992: “Augustan” and “Anti-Augustan”: reflections on terms of reference. In: A. Powell (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London, 26–58.
39. Knabe, G.S. 1993: [Rome of Titus Livy – image, myth and history]. In: E.S. Golubtsova (ed.) Tit Livy, Istoriya Rima ot osnovaniya goroda [The History of Rome from Its Foundation]. Vol. III. Moscow, 590–655.
40. Кнабе, Г.С. Рим Тита Ливия – образ, миф и история. В кн.: Е.С. Голубцова (ред.) Тит Ливий, История Рима от основания города. Т. 3. М., 590–655.
41. Kudryavtseva, T.V. 2015: [Peace plea and opposition to war in the Roman poetry of the Civil wars epoch]. Mnemon. Issledovaniya i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira [Mnemon. Research and Publications on the History of the Ancient World] 15, 329–339.
42. Кудрявцева, Т.В. Призывы к миру и критика войны в римской поэзии эпохи гражданских войн. Мнемон. Исследования и публикации по истории античного мира 15, 329–339.
43. Lefèvre, E. 1998: Vergil as a republican: Aeneid 6.815–35. In: H.P. Stahl (ed.), Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London, 101–118.
44. Lowrie, M. 2009: Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford–New York.
45. Lowrie, M. 2010: Vergil and founding violence. In: J. Farrell, M.C.J. Putnam (eds.), A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition. Malden (MA)–Oxford, 391–403.
46. Makhlayuk, A.V. 2019: [The space of the Roman world in “the Res gestae divi Augusti”]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 79/3, 653–677.
47. Махлаюк, А.В. Пространство римского мира в “Res gestae divi Augusti”. ВДИ 79/3, 653–677.
48. Mazurek, T. 1997: Self-parody and the law in Horace’s “Satires” 1.9. Classical Journal 93/1, 1–17.
49. McGinn, Th.A.J. 2001: Satire and the law: the case of Horace. Cambridge Classical Journal 47, 81–102.
50. McGowan, M.M. 2009: Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. Leiden–Boston.
51. Mezheritskiy, Ja.Yu. 2016: “Vosstanovlennaya respublika” imperatora Avgusta [Emperor Augustus’ “Restored Republic”]. Moscow.
52. Межерицкий, Я.Ю. «Восстановленная республика» императора Августа. М.
53. Milnor, K. 2005: Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. New York.
54. Moreva-Vulikh, N.V. 2000: Rimskiy klassitsizm: tvorchestvo Vergiliya, lirika Goratsiya [Roman Classicism: Virgil’s Works, Horace’s Lyrics]. Saint Petersburg.
55. Морева-Вулих, Н.В. Римский классицизм: творчество Вергилия, лирика Горация. СПб.
56. Osherov, S.A. 1983: [Ovid’s lyrics and epic]. In: S.V. Shervinskiy (ed.), Ovidiy, Lyubovnye elegii. Metamorfozy. Skorbnye elegii [Ovid. Amores. Metamor-phoses. Tristia]. Moscow, 3–22.
57. Ошеров, С.А. Лирика и эпос Овидия. В кн.: С.В. Шервинский (ред.), Овидий, Любовные элегии. Метаморфозы. Скорбные элегии. М., 3–22.
58. Pavlock, B. 1998: Daedalus in the labyrinth of Ovid's “Metamorphoses”. Classical World 92/2, 141–157.
59. Pavlock, B. 2009: The Image of the Poet in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Madison.
60. Pokrovskiy, M.M. 1907: Ocherki po rimskoy istorii i literature [Essays on Roman History and Literature]. Saint Petersburg.
61. Покровский, М.М. Очерки по римской истории и литературе. СПб.
62. Rich, J.W., Williams, J.H.C. 1999: Leges et iura P.R. Restituit: a new aureus of Octavian and the settlement of 28–27 B.C. Numismatic Chronicle 159, 169–213.
63. Schmidt, E.A. 2001: The meaning of Vergil’s “Aeneid”: American and German approaches. Classical World 94/2, 145–171.
64. Segal, Ch. 1989: Orpheus: The Myth of the Poet. Baltimore–London.
65. Shtaerman, E.M. 1985: [From citizen to subject]. In: E.S. Golubtsova (ed.), Kul’tura drevnego Rima [Culture of Ancient Rome]. Vol. I. Moscow, 22–105.
66. Штаерман, Е.М. От гражданина к подданному. В кн.: Е.С. Голубцова (ред.), Культура древнего Рима. Т. 1. М., 22–105.
67. Shumilin, M.V. 2015: [Political context of Roman poetry]. Shagi / Steps 1/1, 213–222.
68. Шумилин, М.В. Политический контекст римской поэзии. Шаги / Steps 1/1, 213–222.
69. Smith, R.A. 2006: Books in search of a library: Ovid’s “response” to Augustan “Libertas”. Vergilius 52, 45–54.
70. Tatum, W.J. 1998: Ultra legem: law and literature in Horace, Satires II.1. Mnemosyne 51/6, 688–699.
71. Tokarev, A.N. 2011: Stanovlenie ofitsial’noy ideologii printsipata imperatora Avgusta [Formation of the Official Ideology of the Emperor Augustus’ Principate]. Kharkiv.
72. Токарев, А.Н. Становление официальной идеологии принципата императора Августа. Харьков.
73. Tronskiy, I.M. 1988: Istoriya antichnoy literatury [A History of Ancient Literature]. Moscow.
74. Тронский, И.М. История античной литературы. М.
75. Usov, D.A. 2021: [Libertas as interpreted by Ovid: freedom or willfulness?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8. Istoriya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8. History] 4, 3–18.
76. Усов, Д.А. Libertas в трактовке Овидия: свобода или своеволие? Вестник Московского университета. Серия 8. История 4, 3–18.
77. VerSteeg, R., Barclay, N. 2003: Rhetoric and law in Ovid’s Orpheus. Law and Literature 15/3, 395–420.
78. Von der Osten, D.E. 2006: The cult of the goddess “Libertas” in Rome and its reflection in Ovid’s poetry and Tibullan love elegy. Vergilius 52, 32–44.
79. Wirszubski, Ch. 1968: Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.
80. Wyke, M. 1989: Mistress and metaphor in Augustan elegy. Helios 16, 25–47.
81. Ziogas, I. 2016: Orpheus and the law: the story of Myrrha in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Law in Context 34/1, 24–41.
82. Ziogas, I. 2021: Law and Love in Ovid: Courting Justice in the Age of Augustus. Oxford.