Anti- and Pro-Oxidant Properties of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Functionalized with Gallic Acid

M. M. Sozarukova; Созарукова М. М.; E. V. Proskurnina; Проскурнина Е. В.; I. V. Mikheev; Михеев И. В.; L. A. Polevoy; Полевой Л. А.; A. E. Baranchikov; Баранчиков А. Е.; V. K. Ivanov; Иванов В. К.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23600834

Anti- and Pro-Oxidant Properties of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Functionalized with Gallic Acid

Authors: Sozarukova M.M.¹, Proskurnina E.V.², Mikheev I.V.³, Polevoy L.A.¹, Baranchikov A.E.¹, Ivanov V.K.¹^,3
Affiliations:
1. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Research Centre for Medical Genetics
3. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Issue: Vol 68, No 8 (2023)
Pages: 1126-1134
Section: НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ И НАНОМАТЕРИАЛЫ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-457X/article/view/136420
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600834
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MZAJQY
ID: 136420

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Cerium oxide sols functionalized with gallic acid (GA) in various molar ratios (CeO2@GA, 1 : 1, 1 : 2, and 2 : 1) were synthesized for the first time. The antioxidant activity of the obtained nanomaterials towards alkylperoxyl radicals was analyzed by the luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence assay. It was shown that CeO2@GA composites possess different types of redox activity, combining antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties. It was found that the redox activity of CeO2@GA composites is largely due to the ligand, gallic acid. Meanwhile, the immobilization of gallic acid on the surface of cerium dioxide nanoparticles leads to a decrease in its antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities. This effect is most pronounced in the case of the 2 : 1 CeO2@GA sol, in which the antioxidant and pro-oxidant capacities of gallic acid have decreased by 40 ± 3 and 58 ± 9%, respectively.

Keywords

nanozymes, cerium dioxide nanoparticles, gallic acid, chemiluminescence, redox activity

References

Fornaguera C., García-Celma M.J. // J. Pers. Med. 2017. V. 7. № 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm7040012
Sur S., Rathore A., Dave V. et al. // Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects. 2019. V. 20. P. 100397.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100397
Chakraborty A., Boer J.C., Selomulya C. et al. // Bioconjug. Chem. 2018. V. 29. № 3. P. 657.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00455
Silvestri B., Vitiello G., Luciani G. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. V. 9. № 43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b11839
Vecchione R., Luciani G., Calcagno V. et al. // Nanoscale. 2016. V. 8. № 16. P. 8798. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR01192F
Rocha L.S.R., Simões A.Z., Macchi C. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2022. V. 12. № 1. P. 3341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07200-9
Olszowy M. // Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019. V. 144. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.039
Martins N., Barros L., Ferreira I.C.F.R. // Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016. V. 48. P. 008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.008
Vuolo M.M., Lima V.S., Maróstica Junior M.R. // Bioact. Compd. Elsevier, 2019. P. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814774-0.00002-5
Strlič M., Radovič T., Kolar J. et al. // J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002. V. 50. № 22. P. 6313. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025636j
Lima V.N., Oliveira-Tintino C.D.M., Santos E.S. et al. // Microb. Pathog. 2016. V. 99. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.08.004
Karimova N.V., Luo M., Sit I. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2022. V. 126. № 2. P. 190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c07333
Shah S.T., A Yehya W., Saad O. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2017. V. 7. № 10. P. 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7100306
Martakov I.S., Shevchenko O.G., Torlopov M.A. et al. // J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019. V. 199. P. 110782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.110782
Deligiannakis Y., Sotiriou G.A., Pratsinis S.E. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012. V. 4. № 12. P. 6609. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301751s
Mittal A.K., Kumar S., Banerjee U.C. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014. V. 431. P. 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.06.030
Daduang J., Palasap A., Daduang S. et al. // Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 2015. V. 16. № 1. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.1.169
Moreno-Álvarez S.A., Martínez-Castañón G.A., Niño-Martínez N. et al. // J. Nanoparticle Res. 2010. V. 12. № 8. P. 2741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0060-x
Wu Y.-Z., Tsai Y.-Y., Chang L.-S. et al. // Pharmaceuticals. 2021. V. 14. № 11. P. 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14111071
Shcherbakov A.B., Reukov V.V., Yakimansky A.V. et al. // Polymers (Basel). 2021. V. 13. № 6. P. 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060924
Popov A.L., Popova N., Gould D.J. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. № 17. P. 14367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b19658
Singh S. // Biointerphases. 2016. V. 11. № 4. P. 04B202. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4966535
Singh K.R., Nayak V., Sarkar T. et al. // RSC Adv. 2020. V. 10. № 45. P. 27194. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA04736H
Jiang D., Ni D., Rosenkrans Z.T. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019. V. 48. № 14. P. 3683. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00718G
Созарукова М.М., Шестакова М.А., Теплоногова М.А. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 4. С. 554.
Filippova A.D., Sozarukova M.M., Baranchikov A.E. et al. // Molecules. 2023. V. 28. № 9. P. 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093811
Sozarukova M.M., Proskurnina E.V., Ivanov V.K. // Nanosyst. Physics, Chem. Math. 2021. V. 12. № 3. P. 283. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2021-12-3-283-290
Sozarukova M.M., Proskurnina E. V., Popov A.L. et al. // RSC Adv. 2021. V. 11. № 56. P. 35351. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA06730C
Sheng J., Wu Y., Ding H. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2023. P. 2211210. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202211210
Ma Y., Tian Z., Zhai W. et al. // Nano Res. 2022. V. 15. № 12. P. 10328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4666-y
Wang G., Zhang J., He X. et al. // Chinese J. Chem. 2017. V. 35. № 6. P. 791. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.201600845
Иванов В.К., Усатенко А.В., Щербаков А.Б. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2009. Т. 54. № 10. С. 1596.
Popov A.L., Popova N.R., Tarakina N.V. et al. // ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018. V. 4. № 7. P. 2453. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00489
Celardo I., Pedersen J.Z., Traversa E. et al. // Nanoscale. 2011. V. 3. № 4. P. 1411. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00875c
Ciccarese F., Raimondi V., Sharova E. et al. // Antioxidants. 2020. V. 9. № 3. P. 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9030211
Yang Y., Sun W. // Nanoscale Adv. 2022. V. 4. № 17. P. 3504. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NA00222A
Saif-Elnasr M., El-Ghlban S., Bayomi A.I. et al. // Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2023. V. 740. P. 109594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2023.109594
Shcherbakov A.B., Teplonogova M.A., Ivanova O.S. et al. // Mater. Res. Express. 2017. V. 4. № 5. P. 055008. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa6e9a
Alekseev A.V., Proskurnina E.V., Vladimirov Y.A. // Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 2012. V. 67. № 3. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027131412030029
Vorokh A.S. // Nanosyst. Physics, Chem. Math. 2018. P. 364. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2018-9-3-364-369
Mokkelbost T., Kaus I., Grande T. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2004. V. 16. № 25. P. 5489. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm048583p
Popović Z.V., Grujić-Brojčin M., Paunović N. et al. // J. Nanoparticle Res. 2015. V. 17. № 1. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2859-y
Ramasamy V., Vijayalakshmi G. // Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016. V. 42. P. 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2015.10.026
Diaconeasa Z., Barbu-Tudoran L., Coman C. et al. // Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015. V. 20. P. 10679.
Barth A. // Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2000. V. 74. № 3–5. P. 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6107(00)00021-3
Singh R., Singh S. // Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces. 2015. V. 132. P. 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.05.005
Zhao Y., Li H., Lopez A. et al. // ChemBioChem. 2020. V. 21. № 15. P. 2178. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000049
Kumar A., Das S., Munusamy P. et al. // Environ. Sci. Nano. 2014. V. 1. № 6. P. 516. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EN00052H
Yen G.-C., Duh P.-D., Tsai H.-L. // Food Chem. 2002. V. 79. № 3. P. 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00145-0
Badhani B., Sharma N., Kakkar R. // RSC Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 35. P. 27540. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA01911G
Sakagami H., Satoh K. // Anticancer Res. 1997. V. 17. № 1A. P. 221.
Lu Z., Nie G., Belton P.S. et al. // Neurochem. Int. 2006. V. 48. № 4. P. 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2005.10.010
Wright J.S., Johnson E.R., DiLabio G.A. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001. V. 123. № 6. P. 1173. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja002455u
Yoshiki Y., Okubo K., Akiyama Y. et al. // Luminescence. 2000. V. 15. № 3. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-7243(200005/06)15:3<183::AID-BIO584>3.0.CO;2-V
Kumamoto M., Sonda T., Nagayama K. et al. // Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2001. V. 65. № 1. P. 126. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.65.126
Chaudhari U.R., Rao B.M. // Z. Phys. Chem. 1989. V. 270O. № 1. P. 412. https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-1989-27048
Estevez A., Ganesana M., Trentini J. et al. // Biomolecules. 2019. V. 9. № 10. P. 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9100562