Current Issues

Korea Society for Naval Science and Technology - Vol. 7 , No. 1

[Paper List]


[ Article ]
Journal of the KNST - Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 84-91
Abbreviation: KNST
ISSN: 2635-4926 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2022
Received 17 Feb 2022 Revised 11 Mar 2022 Accepted 28 Mar 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31818/JKNST.2022.03.5.1.84
계층화 분석법을 활용한 잠수함 전술훈련 장비 성능개량 효과 측정에 관한 연구
이전우¹ ; 김기태²^{, *}

1해군 5급/해군전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처 소요분석과 기뢰전/상륙함전력 소요분석담당

2해군 중령/해군전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처 소요분석과장
A Study on the Measuring of Performance Improvement Effectiveness for Submarine Tactical Training Equipment Using AHP
Jonu Lee¹ ; Kitae Kim²^{, *}
1Civilian official (5th grade), ROK NAVY/System Analysis Center, ROK Naval Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group

2CDR, ROK Navy/System Analysis Center, ROK Naval Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group

Correspondence to : ^*Kitae Kim System Analysis Center, ROK Naval Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group 663, Gyeryongdae-ro, Sindoan-myeon, Gyeryong-si, Chungcheongnam-do 32800, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-42-553-7250 E-mail: navystar52@naver.com
© 2022 Korea Society for Naval Science & Technology

초록

우리나라는 삼면이 바다인 반도 국가이며, 해양 의존도가 매우 높다. 해군은 해양안보를 위하여 다양한 전력을 운용하고 있으며, 특히, 잠수함은 핵심전력이다. 잠수함 전술훈련은 실제 잠수함과 유사하게 구현한 전술훈련 장비를 활용하여 수행한다. 본 연구에서는 잠수함 전술훈련 장비를 대상으로 계층화 분석법을 이용하여 성능개량 효과를 측정하였다. 효과를 측정하기 위한 계층구조를 작성하고, 쌍대비교법 기반의 전문가 설문을 통해 효과요소별 가중치를 산출한 후 잠수함 전술훈련 장비의 구성품별 성능개량 효과를 측정하였다. Level 3 - Level 4의 18개 속성에 대한 최종적인 복합 가중치를 산출하였으며, 전술훈련체계-팀웍훈련-전술 효과요소가 가장 높게 산출되었다. 성능개량 잠수함 전술훈련 장비의 효과지수는 현재 대비 약 1.74배 우수한 것으로 측정되었다.

Abstract

Korea is a peninsula country with three sides of the sea, and it is highly dependent on the sea. ROK Navy operates a variety of forces for marine security, and submarines are the core force. Submarine tactical training is carried out using tactical training equipment implemented similarly to an actual submarine. In this study, the performance improvement effectiveness was measured using Analytic Hierarchy Process for submarine tactical training equipment. A hierarchical structure for measuring the performance improvement effectiveness was developed, and weights of criteria were calculated by expert surveys and pair-wise comparisons. In addition, the combat effectiveness of submarine tactical training equipment was synthesized and compared. Complex weights were calculated for the 18 criteria of level 3 – level 4, and the tactical training system-teamwork training-tactics was calculated the highest. The effect index of performance improved submarine tactical training equipment was measured to be about 1.74 times better than the current one.


Keywords: Submarine, Tactical Training, Performance Improvement, Analytic Hierarchy Process 키워드: 잠수함, 전술훈련, 성능개량, 계층화 분석법

References


1.	Cho, K. H., A Study on the Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness for the New Generation Multiple Launcher Rocket System Using AHP & Parametric Estimating, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2010, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 84-90.
2.	Jolene, M., Eric, R. L., Joshua, T., Alfred, T. D., Daniel, Q., John, G., Kenneth, R., Curt, W., and Mark, B., An Analysis of the Open Architecture Warfare System Domain Model for Surface Time Critical Targets, Master’s Thesis, California, USA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2007.
3.	Jung, W. S., Lee, J. Y., and Kim, Y. H., An Assessment of Combat Effectiveness for C4I System Considering Network Effect, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2010, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 23-32.
4.	Kang, S. C., A Study on the Analysis of Combat Effectiveness of the Ground Tactical C4I Systems Using AHP, Master’s Thesis, Seoul, Korea: Korea National Defense University, 2001.
5.	Kim, K. T. and Jeon, G. W., Efficiency Evaluation for Battleships by using AHP & DEA Model. Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, 2007, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 68-91.
6.	Kim, K. T. and Lim, Y. J., A Study on the Measuring of Combat Effectiveness for Naval Frigates Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2021, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 9-16.
7.	Korea Research Institute for defense Technology Planning and Advancement, Dictionary of Defense Scientific and Technical Terms, 2018.
8.	Lee, I. H., 5-year plan for shipping reconstruction and Established Ocean Promotion Corporation, Maritime Korea, 2018, Vol. 543, pp. 20-21.
9.	Lee, J. M., Jeong, C. Y., and Lee, J. Y., The Combat Effectiveness Analysis of Attack Helicopter Using Simulation and AHP, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2010, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 63-70.
*10.*	Lee, M. H., Moon, H. K., and Park, C. W., Development of Defense Simulation Model for Ground Weapon System Effectiveness Analysis, Proceedings of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2002, pp. 131-136.
*11.*	Lee, S. Y. and Lee, J. Y., A Study on the Assessment of Force Improvement Effectiveness of KNTDS, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 2001, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 56-75.
*12.*	Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 5-year plan for shipping reconstruction, 2018.
*13.*	Ministry of Government Legislation, Act on Organization of National Armed Forces, Ver. 10821(3), 2011.
*14.*	Park, S. K. and Lee J. Y., A Study on the Assessment of Power Improvement Effectiveness of Corps Level C4I System Applied to Integrated Fire Operation, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 2003, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 8-27.
*15.*	ROK Navy Headquarters, Naval doctrine, 2017.
*16.*	ROK Navy Submarine Flot 9, Understanding of Submarines(100 Q&A), 2014.
*17.*	ROK Navy Submarine Force Command, Instructions of Combat Preparation, 2020.
*18.*	Saaty, T. L., Decision Making for Leaders; The Analytic Hierarchy Process Decisions in an Complex World, RWS Publications, 1982.
*19.*	Saaty, T. L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback : The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, 2001.
*20.*	Song, Y. I. and Lee, G. L., A Study on the Improvement Effectiveness of Ship Combat System by Using the Simulation Model, Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, 2009, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 74-93.