Abstract
Fractures of denture base polymer material are one of the most frequent reasons for repair of removable dentures. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of depth alignment of glass fiber reinforcements onto denture base polymer flexural obtained with the “short beam” testing method. The study showed higher values of flexural strength when reinforcements were placed 1mm from specimen surface (130,63 to 158,55MPa) compared to 0,5mm distance from specimen surface (117,83 to 153,68MPa). Specimens tested after polymerization had higher flexural strength values than specimens tested after storage in water, while thermocycled specimens unexpectedly revealed the highest values. It could be concluded that fiber reinforcements should be positioned more than 0,5mm (up to 1mm) from the base surface of dental prostheses since lesser distance would diminish the reinforcing effect.
Kurzfassung
Brüche von Dental-Basispolymerwerkstoffen sind eine der häufigsten Ursachen für die Reparatur von herausnehmbaren Zahnprothesen. Die diesem Beitrag zugrunde liegende Studie hatte zum Ziel, den Einfluß der Tiefenausrichtung von Glasfaserverstärkungen auf das Biegeverhalten von Basispolymeren mittels des Kurzbalken-Testverfahrens zu untersuchen. In der Studie ergaben sich höhere Werte der Biegefestigkeit (130,63 bis 158,55 MPa gegenüber 117,83 bis 153,68 MPa), wenn die Verstärkungen einen statt einem halben Millimeter statt unterhalb der Probenoberfläche eingebracht wurden. Proben, die nach der Polymerisation geprüft wurden, wiesen eine höhere Biegefestigkeit als nach dem Lagern in Wasser auf, während thermozyklierte Proben unerwarteterweise die höchsten Biegefestigkeiten aufwiesen. Es kann angenommen werden, dass Faserverstärkungen mehr als einen halben und bis zu einem Millimeter tief unter der Basisoberfläche von Dentalprothesen eingebracht werden sollten, da geringere Abstände zur Oberfläche den Verstärkungseffekt reduzieren.
References
1 P. K.Vallittu, V. P.Lassila, R.Lappalainen: Evaluation of damage to removable dentures in two cities in FinlandActa. Odontol. Scand.51 (1993), pp. 363–369Search in Google Scholar
2 A. S.Hargreaves: The prevalence of fractured dentures. A surveyBr. Dent. J.126 (1969), pp. 451–455Search in Google Scholar
3 M. S.Beyli, J. A.von Fraunhofer: An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin denturesJ. Prosthet. Dent.46 (1981), pp. 238–241Search in Google Scholar
4 K. H.Chong, J.Chai: Strength and mode of failure of unidirectional and bidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite materialsInt. J. Prosthodont.16 (2003), pp. 161–166Search in Google Scholar
5 C. K.Schreiber: The clinical application of carbon fibre/polymer denture basesBr. Dent. J.137 (1974), pp. 21–2210.1038/sj.bdj.4803230Search in Google Scholar
6 G. S.Solnit: The effect of methyl methacrylate reinforcement with silane-treated and untreated glass fibersJ. Prosthet. Dent.66 (1991), pp. 310–31410.1016/0022-3913(91)90255-USearch in Google Scholar
7 C. K.Schrieber: Polymethylmethacrylate reinforced with carbon fibresBr. Dent. J.130 (1971), pp. 29–3010.1038/sj.bdj.4802623Search in Google Scholar
8 N.Yazdanie, M.Mahood: Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strengthJ. Prosthet. Dent.54 (1985), pp. 543–547Search in Google Scholar
9 D. L.Gutteringe: The effect of including ultra-high-modulus polyetylene fiber on the impact strength of acrylic resinBr. Dent. J.164 (1988), pp. 177–18010.1038/sj.bdj.4806395Search in Google Scholar
10 J.de Boer, S. G.Vermilyea, R. E.Brady: The effect of carbon fiber orientation on the fatigue resistance and bending properties of two denture resinsJ. Prosthet. Dent.51(1984), pp. 119–121Search in Google Scholar
11 K.Ekstrand, I. E.Ruyter, H.Wellendorf: Carbon/graphite reinforced poly (methyl methacrylate): properties under dry and wet conditionsJ. Biomed. Mater. Res.21 (1987), pp. 1065–1080Search in Google Scholar
12 P. K.Vallittu: Comparison of the in vitro fatigue resistance of na acrylic resin removable partial denture reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wiresJ. Prosthodont.5 (1996), pp. 115–12110.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00285.xSearch in Google Scholar
13 P. K.Vallittu: Glass fiber reinforcement in repaired acrylic resin removable dentures: preliminary results of a clinical studyQuintessence Int.28 (1997), pp. 39–44Search in Google Scholar
14 M. A.Freilich, J. P.Duncan, J. C.Meiers, A. J.Goldberg: Preimpregnatedfiber-reinforced prostheses. Part I. Basic rationale and complete-coverage and intracoronal fixed partial denture designs, Quintessence Int.29 (1998), pp. 689–696Search in Google Scholar
15 G.Saygili, S. M.Sahmali, F.Demirel: The Effect of Placement of Glass Fibers and Aramid Fibers on the Fracture Resistance of Provisional Restorative MaterialsOperat. Dent.28 (2003), pp. 80–85Search in Google Scholar
16 P. K.Vallittu: Compositional and weave pattern analyses of glass fibers in dental polymer fiber compositesJ. Prosthodont.7 (1998), pp. 170–176Search in Google Scholar
17 R. H.Mullarky: Aramid fiber reinforcement of acrylic appliancesJ. Clin. Orthod.19 (1985) S. 655–658Search in Google Scholar
18 J.John, S. A.Ganfandhar, I.Shah: Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glassaramid, or nylon fibers, J. Prosthet. Dent.86 (2001) S. 424–7Search in Google Scholar
19 D. L.Gutteridge: Reinforcement of poly (methyl methacrylate) with ultra-highmodulus polyethylene fibreJ. Dent.20 (1992) S. 50–5410.1016/0300-5712(92)90012-2Search in Google Scholar
20 N. H.Ledizesky, C. F.Ho, T.W.Chow: Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibresJ. Prosthet. Dent.68 (1992) S. 934–939Search in Google Scholar
21 D. L.Dixon, L. C.Breeding: The transverse strength of three denture base resins reinforced with polyethylene fibersJ. Prosthet. Dent.67 (1992) S. 417–419Search in Google Scholar
22 N. H.Ledizesky, T. W.Chow, I. M.Ward: The effect of highly drawn polyethylene fibres on the mechanical properties of denture base resinsClin. Mater.6 (1990) S. 209–225Search in Google Scholar
23 N. H.Ledizesky, Y. Y.Cheng, T. W.Chow, I. M.Ward: Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber – properties and denture constructionDent. Mater.9 (1993) S. 128–135Search in Google Scholar
24 Y. Y.Cheng, O. L.Hui, N. H.Ledizesky: Processing shrinkage of heat-curing acrylic resin reinforced with high-performance polyethylene fibresBiomater.14 (1993) S. 775–780Search in Google Scholar
25 D. L.Dixon, K. G.Ekstrand, L. C.Breeding: The transverse strength of three different denture base resinsJ. Prosthet. Dent.66 (1991) S. 510–513Search in Google Scholar
26 P. K.Vallittu: Ultra-high-modulus polyethylene ribbon as reinforcement for denture polymethyl methacrylate. A short communicationDent. Mater.13 (1997) S. 381–38210.1016/S0109-5641(97)80111-XSearch in Google Scholar
27 V.Ramos, D. A.Runyan, L. C.Christensen: The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylateJ. Prosthet. Dent.76 (1996) S. 94–96Search in Google Scholar
28 J. M.Yang, P. Y.Huang, M. C.Yang, S. K.Lo: Effect of MMA-g-UHMWPE grafted fiber on mechanical properties of acrylic bone cementsJ. Biomed. Mater. Res.38 (1997), pp. 361–369Search in Google Scholar
29 K.Tagaki, H.Fujimatsu, H.Usami, S.Ogasawara: Adhesion between high strength and high modulus polyethylene fibers by use of polyethylene gel as an adhesiveJ. Adhesion. Sci. Technol.9 (1996), pp. 869–882Search in Google Scholar
30 J. V.Altieri, C. J.Burstone, A. J.Goldberg, A. P.Petel: Longitudinal clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: A pilot studyJ. Prosthet. Dent.71 (1994), pp. 16–22Search in Google Scholar
31 M. A.Freilich, A. C.Karmarker, C. J.Bustone, A. J.Goldberg: Development and clinical applications of light-polymerized fiberreinforced compositeJ. Prosthet. Dent.80 (1998), pp. 311–318Search in Google Scholar
32 M. R.Rosel: From treating solution to filler surface and beyond. The life history of a silane coupling agentJ. Coat. Technol.50 (1978), pp. 70–82Search in Google Scholar
33 A. E.Ellakwa, A. C.Shortall, P. M.Marquis: Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirest fiber reinforced compositeJ. Prosthet. Dent.88 (2002), pp. 485–490Search in Google Scholar
34 J. J.Soederholm, S.W.Shang: Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silicaJ. Dent. Res.72 (1993), pp. 1050–1054Search in Google Scholar
35 S. R.Finn, G. S.Springer: Delaminations in composite plates under transferse static or impact loads – A modelComp. Struct.23 (1993), pp. 177–190Search in Google Scholar
36 J. G.Williams: Stress analysis of polymersLongmont, London (1973)Search in Google Scholar
37 C. A.Berg, J.Tirosh, M.Israeli: Analysis of short beam bending of fiber reinforced composites – Testing and designAmerican Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1970)Search in Google Scholar
38 O.Hansson: Strength of bond with Comspan Opaque to three silicoated alloys and titaniumScand. J. Dent. Res.98 (1990), pp. 248–25610.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00969.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
39 K. J.Anusavice: Phillips' Science of dental materialsW. B. Saunders Co, 10th ed., Philadelphia (1996).Search in Google Scholar
40 Y.Oshida, A.Hashem, R.el Salawy: Some mechanistic observation on water-deteriorated dental composite resinsBiomed. Mater. Eng.5 (1995), pp. 93–115Search in Google Scholar
41 J. L.Drummond, M. S.Bapna: Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resinDent. Mater.19 (2003), pp. 226–231Search in Google Scholar
42 D.Vojvodic, F.Matejic.ek, Z.Schauperl, K.Mehulic, I.Bagic-C.ukovic, S.Šegovic: Flexural Strength of E-glass Fiber Reinforced Dental Polymer and Dental High Impact Strength ResinStrojarstvo50 (2008), pp. 221–230Search in Google Scholar
43 R.Solecki, J. R.Conant: Advanced Mechanics of MaterialsOxford University Press, New York (2003)Search in Google Scholar
© 2011, Carl Hanser Verlag, München