skip to main content
10.3115/991719.991773dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Application of the Direct Memory Access paradigm to natural language interfaces to knowledge-based systems

Published:22 August 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the use of the Direct Memory Access (DMA) paradigm in a practical natural language interface. Advantages and disadvantages of DMA in such applications are discussed. The DMA natural language interface 'DM-COMMAND' described in this paper is being used for development of a knowledge-based machine translation system at the Center for Machine Translation (CMT) at Carnegie Mellon University.

References

  1. Becker, J. D. (1975) The phrasal lexicon In 'Theoretical issues in natural language processing'. Proceedings of the workshop of the ACL. Eds. Schank, R. C. and Nash-Webber, B. N. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Berg, G (1987) A Parallel Natural Language Processing Architecture with Distributed Control. In 'Proceedings of the CogSci-87'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bookman, L. A. (1987) A Microfeature Based Scheme for Modelling Semantics. In 'Proceedings of the IJCAI-87'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Charniak, E. (1983) Passing Markers: A theory of Contexual Influence in Language Comprehension. Cognitive Scince 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Charniak, E and Santos, E. (1987) A Connectionist Context-Free Parser Which is not Context-Free, But Then It is Not Really Connectionist Either. In 'Proceedings of the CogSci-87'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Charniak, E (1986) A neat theory of marker passing. In 'Proceedings of the AAAI-86'Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cullingford, R. E. and Booth, S. L. (1985) How to make a natural-language interface robust. GIT-ICS-85/27, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahlman, S. E. (1983) NETL: A system for represent and using real-world knowledge. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Granger, R. H., Eiselt, K. P.(1984) The parallel organization of lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic inference processes In 'Proceedings of the First Annual Workshop on Theoretical issues in Conceptual Information Processing'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hahn, U. and Reimer U. (1983) world expert parsing: An approach to text parsing with a distributed lexical grammar. Technical Report, Universitat Konstanz, West Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirst, G. and Chamiak, E. (1982) Word Sense and Slot Disambiguation. In 'Proceedings of AAAI-82'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirst, G. (1984) A Semantic Process for Syntactic Disambiguation. In 'Proceedings of AAAI-84'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lytinen S. (1984) The organization of knowledge in a multilingual, integrated parser. Ph.D. thesis Yale University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mitamura, T., Musha, H., Kee, M. (1988) The Generalized LR Parser/Compiler Version 8.1: User's Guide, ed. Tomita, MCMU-CMT-88-MEMO. Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Norvig, P. (1987) Inference in Text Understanding. In 'Proceedings of the AAAI-87'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nyberg, E. H. (1988) The FRAMEKIT User's Guide Version 2.0. CMU-CMT-MEMO, Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Quillian, M. R. (1968) Semantic Memory. In 'Semantic Information Processing', ed. Minsky, M. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Quillian, M. R (1969) The teachable language comprehender. BBN Scientific Report 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Riesbeck, C. (1975) Conceptual Analysis. In 'Conceptual Information Processing' ed. Schank, R. C. North Holland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Riesbeck, C. (1986) From Conceptual Analyzer to Direct Memory Access Parsing: An Overview. In 'Advances in Cognitive Science 1' ed. Sharkey, N. E. Ellis Horwood.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Riesbeck, C. and Martin, C. (1985) Direct Memory Access Parsing. Yale University Report 354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Small, S., Cottrell, G. and Shastri, L. (1982) Toward connectionist parsing. In 'Proceedings of the AAAI-82'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomabechi, H. (1987a) Direct Memory Access Translation. In 'Proceedings of the IJCAI-87'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tomabechi, H. (1987b) Direct Memory Access Translation: A Theory of Translation. CMU-CMT-87-105, Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomabechi, H. and Tomita, M., Manuscript. The Integration of Unification-based Syntax/Semantics and Memory-based Pragmatics for Real-Time Understanding of Noisy Continuous Speech Input.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomita, M. and Carbonell. J. (1987) The Universal Parser Architecture for Knowledge-Based Machine Translation. In 'Proceedings of the IJCAI-87'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Waltz, D. L. and Pollack, J. B. (1984) Phenomenologically plausible parsing. In 'Proceedings of the AAAI-84'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Waltz, D. L. and Pollack, J. B. (1985) Massively Parallel Parsing: A Strongly Interactive Model of Natural Language Interpretation. Cognitive Science 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Application of the Direct Memory Access paradigm to natural language interfaces to knowledge-based systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        COLING '88: Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
        August 1988
        440 pages
        ISBN:963 8431 56 3

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 August 1988

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader