John Coleman
- Allen, J., S. Hunnicutt and D. Klatt. 1987. From Text to Speech: The MITalk System. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Anderson, J. and C. Jones. 1974. Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics 10, 1--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anderson, S. R. 1976. Nasal Consonants and the Internal Structure of Segments. Language 52.2 326--344.Google Scholar
- Anderson, S. R. 1985.Phonology in the Twentieth Century. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bach, E. 1976. An extension of classical transformational grammar. Problems in Linguistic Metatheory, Proceedings of the 1976 Conference at Michigan State University, 183--224.Google Scholar
- Berwick, R. C. and A. S. Weinberg. 1984. The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: language Use and Acquisition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M. I. T. Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bird, S. and E. Klein. 1990. Phonological Events. To appear in Journal of Linguistics 26 (1).Google Scholar
- Browman, C. P. and L. Goldstein. 1986. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 219--252.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chomsky, N. 1963. Formal Properties of Grammars. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. Galanter, eds. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Vol. II. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Church, K. 1985. Stress Assignment in Letter to Sound Rules for Speech Synthesis. In 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coleman, J. S. and J. K. Local. 1987 forthcoming. Monostratal Phonology and Speech Synthesis. To appear in C. C. Mock and M. Davies (eds.) In press. Studies in Systemic Phonology London: Francis Pinter.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. S. 1989. The Phonetic Interpretation of Headed Phonological Structures Containing Overlapping Constituents. ms. (Currently submitted to Phonology)Google Scholar
- Fourakis, M. S. 1980. A Phonetic Study of Sonorant Fricative Clusters in Two Dialects of English. Research in Phonetics 1, Department of Linguistics, Indiana University.Google Scholar
- Fowler, C. A. 1983. Converging Sources of Evidence on Spoken and Perceived Rhythms of Speech: Cyclic Production of Vowels in Monosyllabic Stress Feet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol. 112, No. 3, 386--412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gay, T. 1977. Articulatory Movements in VCV Sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62, 182--193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gazdar, G. 1987. COMIT ==>* PATR II. In TINLAP 3: Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 3. Position Papers, 39--41. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goldsmith, J. 1976. Autosegmental Phonology. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
- Griffen, T. D. 1985. Aspects of Dynamic Phonology Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4: Current issues in linguistic theory, vol. 37: Benjamins.Google Scholar
- Hertz, S. R. 1981. SRS text-to-phoneme rules: a three-level rule strategy. Proceedings of ICASSP 81, 102--105.Google Scholar
- Hertz, S. R. 1982. From text to speech with SRS. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72(4), 1155--1170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hertz, S. R., Kadin, J. and karplus, K. 1985. The Delta rule development system for speech synthesis from text. Proceedings of the IEEE 73(11), 1589--1601.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hertz, S. R. forthcoming. The Delta programing language: an integrated approach to nonlinear phonology, phonetics and speech synthesis. In J. Kingston and M. Beckman, eds. Papers in Laboratory Phonolgy I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jespersen, O. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Johnson, C. D. 1972. Formal Aspects of Phonological Description, Mouton.Google Scholar
- Kaisse, E. and P. Shaw. 1985. On the Theory of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2, 1--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelly, J. and J. K. Local. 1989. Doing Phonology. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Kiparsky, P. 1973. "Elsewhere" in Phonology. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
- Kiparsky, P. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2, 82--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lapointe, S. 1977. Recursiveness and deletion. Linguistic Analysis 3: 227--265.Google Scholar
- Leben, W. 1973. Suprasegmental Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, M. I. T.Google Scholar
- Levelt, W. J. M. 1976. Formal grammars and the natural language user: a review. In A. Marzollo, ed. Topics in Artificial Intelligence CISM courses and lecture notes no. 256. Springer.Google Scholar
- Local, J. K. 1989. Modelling assimilation in non-segmental rule-free synthesis. To appear in D. R. Ladd and G. Docherty, eds. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mattingly, I. G. 1981. Phonetic Representations and Speech Synthesis by Rule. In T. Myers, J. Laver and J. Anderson, eds. The Cognitive Representation of Speech. North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. D. Reidel.Google Scholar
- Öhman, S. E. G. 1966. Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39, 151--168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perkell, J. S. 1969. Physiology of Speech Production: Results and Implications of a Quantitative Cineradiographic Study Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
- Salomaa, A. 1973. Formal Languages. New York: Academic Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Leeuwen, H. C. 1987. Complementation introduced in linguistic rewrite rules. Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Technology 1987 Vol. 1, 292--295.Google Scholar
- Van Leeuwen, H. C. 1989. A development tool for linguistic rules. Computer Speech and Language 3, 83--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Unification phonology: another look at "synthesis-by-rule"
Recommendations
Unification and transduction in computational phonology
COLING '88: Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1In this paper unification and transduction mechanisms are applied in a new approach to phonological parsing. It is shown that unification in the sense of Kay as used in unification grammars, and transduction, a process deriving from automata theory, are ...
Comments