Freeports, elites, and loopholes: A socio-spatial exploration of the globalized geographies of contemporary art trade using the TPSN-heuristic

Michael Krell; Frank Meyer

doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2024.02.02

Authors

Michael Krell https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8751-2274
Frank Meyer https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-1914

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2024.02.02

Keywords:

globalization, art, art trade, art market, TPSN, systematic literature analysis

Abstract

The globalized trade in artworks has undergone significant changes since the end of the Cold War: While its former Western centres, such as New York and London, continue to dominate the discourse on high price segments with well-attended art fairs and influential auction houses, new actors challenge these former major players, new customers push into the market, and inflationary price increases have been recorded in recent years. From the perspective of systematic geographical research, however, this field of economically globalized trade has been largely neglected so far. With the help of a systematic literature analysis, this article examines the existing knowledge on the globalized art market across disciplines and systematises it with the help of the so-called TPSN model along the spatial categories of territory, place, scale, and network. Based on this analysis, we developed five core findings of the globalized art market that can serve as a foundation for future geographical research projects.

References

Adam G (2014) Big bucks. The explosion of the art market in the twenty-first century. Farnham & Burlington.

Adam G (2017) Dark side of the boom. The excesses of the art market in the twenty-first century. London.

Aerne A (2021) The creation of a global market for Colombian contemporary art through valuation and match-making. Poetics 86: 1–14.

Angelini F, Castellani M, Zirulia, L (2022) Overconfidence in the art market: A bargaining pricing model with asymmetric disinformation. Economia Politica 39: 961–988.

Antras P (2020) Conceptual aspects of global value chains. World Bank Economic Review 34: 551–574.

Archer A (2020) Materialising markets. The agency of auctions in emergent art genres in the global south. Arts 9: 1-14.

Archer A (2022) Chinese contemporary art in the global auction market. Leiden & Boston.

Aspers P (2005) Status and standard markets in the global garment industry. MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/10. Cologne.

Assaf A (2018) Testing for bubbles in the art market. An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling 68: 340–455.

Banks P (2018) The rise of Africa in the contemporary auction market. Myth or reality? Poetics 71: 7–17.

Beckert J, Rössel J (2013) The price of art. Uncertainty and reputation in the art field. European Societies 15: 178–195.

Belina B (2017) Raum. Zu den Grundlagen eines historisch-geographischen Materialismus. Münster.

Belina B (2020) Scale und die Stadt. Belina B, Naumann M, Strüver A (eds) Handbuch Kritische Stadtgeographie: 53–57. Münster.

Boll D (2005) Der Kampf um die Kunst. Handel und Auktionen positionieren sich am Kunstmarkt. Kassel.

Boll D (2011) Art for sale. A candid view of the art market. Ostfildern.

Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D (2016) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne.

Brandellero A (2022) How art market actors experience market emergence in an unequal field. Placing Brazilian contemporary art in the global art market. Consumption Markets & Culture 25: 525–545.

Brenner N (2019) New urban spaces. Urban theory and the scale question. New York, NY.

Brones S, Moghadam A (2016) New markets and territories for art in the cities of the global south. Introduction. Geographies et cultures 97: 1–8.

Brown K (2022) Art markets, epistemic authority, and the institutional curation of knowledge. Cultural Studies 37: 626–646.

Castells M (1999) Space flow – der Raum der Ströme. Bollmann S (ed) Kursbuch Stadt. Stadtleben und Stadtkultur an der Jahrtausendwende: 39–81. Stuttgart.

Cinefra J, Garay U, Mibille C, Perez E (2019) The determinants of art prices. An analysis of Joan Miro. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion 32: 373–391.

Christie’s (2017) Salvator Mundi - The rediscovery of a masterpiece. Chronology, conservation, and authentication. http://www.christies.com/features/Salvator-Mundi-timeline-8644-3.aspx

Codignola F (2006): Global markets and contemporary Art. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management 6: 73–93.

Dörry S, Hesse M (2022) Zones and zoning: Linking the geographies of freeports with ArtTech and financial market making. Geoforum 134: 165–172.

Cudny W, Comunian R, Wolanuik, A (2020) Arts and creativity. A business and branding strategy for Lodz as a neoliberal city. Cities 100: 1–10.

Dagirmanjian A (2019) Laundering the art market. A proposal for regulating money laundering through art in the United States. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 29: 687–728.

Dicken P (2015) Global shift. Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC.

Fasche M (2017) Making value and career building in the creative economy. Evidence from contemporary visual art. Cham.

Frank S, Frank A (2021) A neural network looks at Leonardo’s (?) Salvator Mundi. Leonardo 54: 619–624.

Grinstead E (2021) Global art market in the aftermath of COVID-19. A case study on the United Arab Emirates. Arts 10: 1–20.

Haisch T, Menzel M-P (2022) Temporary markets. Market devices and processes of valuation at three Basel art fairs. EPA: Economy and Space 55: 237–254.

Hart C (1998) Doing a literature review. Releasing the social science research imagination. Thousand Oaks.

Harvey D (2007) Räume der Neoliberalisierung. Zur Theorie der ungleichen Entwicklung. Hamburg.

Hest F van, Vermeylen F (2015) Has the art market become truly global? Evidence from China and India. Been W, Arora P, Hildebrandt M (eds) Crossroads in New Media, Identity and Law. The Shape of Diversity to Come: 177–196. New York & London.

Jessop B, Brenner N, Jones M (2008) Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 389–401.

Jones M, Jessop B (2010) Thinking State/Space Incompossibly. Antipode 42: 1119–1149.

Khandekar N (2019) Globalization and Warli Tribal Art. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH 7: 116–121.

Klerman, D, Shortland A (2022) The transformation of the art market: Law, norms, and institutions. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 23: 219–242.

Koldehoff S, Timm T (2020) Kunst und Verbrechen. Berlin.

Kurz K (2016) The power balance in the contemporary art market. Artists, dealers and collectors. Campbell C, Ma J (eds) Looking Forward, Looking Back. Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing. Proceedings of the 2013 World Marketing Congress: 547–550. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.

Leitner H, Sheppard E (2002) ‚The city is dead, long live the net‘. Harnessing European interurban networks for a neoliberal agenda. Antipode 34: 495–518.

Lewis B (2019) The last Leonardo. New York, NY.

MacKay J (2022) Art world fields and global Hegemonies. International Studies Quarterly 66: 1–12.

MacKinnon D, Cumbers A (2019) An introduction to economic geography. Globalisation, uneven development and place. London & New York, NY.

Massay D (1991) A global sense of place. Marxism Today 38: 24–29.

McAndrew C (2023) The art market 2023. Basel & Zürich.

McNulty T (2014) Art market research. A guide to methods and sources. Jefferson, NC.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altmann DG (2009) Preferred reporiung items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6: 1–6.

Newman M, Gough D (2020) Systematic reviews in educational research. methodology, perspectives and application. Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M, Bedenlier S, Bond M, Buntins K (eds) Systematic reviews in educational research. methodology, perspectives and application: 3–22. Wiesbaden.

Okoli C (2015) A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37: 879–910.

Painter J (2010) Rethinking territory. Antipode 42: 1090–1118.

Pasquinelli C, Sjöholm J (2015) Art and resilience. The spatial practices of making a resilient artistic career in London. City, Culture and Society 6: 75–81.

Post E, Calvao F (2020) Mythical islands of value. Free ports, offshore capitalism, and art capital. Arts 9: 1–19.

Prinz, A L (2022) The concentration of power in the market for contemporary art. An empirical analysis of ArtReview’s “Power 100”. SN Business and Economics 2.

Quemin A (2006) The hierarchy of countries in the contemporary art world and market. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 17: 35–57.

Quesenberry LG, Sykes B (2008) Leveraging the internet to promote fine art. Perspectives of art patrons. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 38: 121–140.

Quinones Vila C (2021) On the borderline. using national and international legal frameworks to address the traffic of pre-columbian antiquities between Mexico and the United States. Santander Art and Culture Law Review 2: 51–76.

Ressing M, Blettner M, Klug S (2009) Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen. Teil 6 der Serie zur Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 106: 456–463.

Reyburn S (2022) Five years since the $450m Salvator Mundi sale. A first-hand account of the nonsensical auction.

Sack R (1983) Human territoriality. A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73: 55-74.

Schultheis F, Single E, Köfeler R, Mazzurana T (2016) Art unlimited? Dynamics and paradoxes of a globalizing art world. Bielefeld.

Schwarzkopf S, Backsell J I (2021) The nomos of the freeport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 39: 328–346.

Smith N (1995) Remaking scale. competition and cooperation in prenational and postnational Europe. Eskelinen H, Snickars F (eds): Competitive European peripheries. Berlin, 59–74.

Swyngedouw E (1997) Neither global nor local. ‚glocalization‘ and the politics of scale. Cox K (eds) Spaces of globalization. reasserting the power of the local: 137–166. New York, NY.

Tuan YF (1974) Space and place. Humanistic perspective. Progress in Geography 6: 211–252.

Turner P, Turner S (2006) Place, sense of place, and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15: 204–217.

Unidroit (International Institute for the Unification of Private Law) (1995) convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural objects. Rome.

Velthuis O (2005) Talking prices. Symbolic meanings of prices on the market for contemporary art. Princeton, NJ.

Velthuis O (2012) Introduction. The contemporary art market between stasis and flux. Lind M, Velthuis O (eds) Contemporary art and its commercial markets. A report on current conditions and future scenarios: 17–52. Berlin.

Velthuis O (2013) Globalization of markets for contemporary art. Why local ties remain dominant in Amsterdam und Berlin. European Societies 15: 290–308.

Velthuis O, Baia Curioni S (2015) Making markets global. Velthuis O, Baia Curioni S (eds) Cosmopolitan Canvases. The globalization of markets for contemporary art: 1–30. Oxford.

Vogl G (2013) Kunst als Geldanlage. Sicherer Hafen oder Glücksspiel? Wertentwicklung und Marktauftritt von Artefakten. Wien.

Weeks S (2020) A freeport comes to Luxembourg, or, Why those wishing to hide assets purchase fine art. Arts 9: 1–15.

While A (2003) Locating art worlds. London and the making of Young British art. Area 35: 251–263.

Yogev T, Grund T (2012) Network dynamics and market structure. The case of art fairs. Sociological Focus 45: 23–40.

Zarobell J (2022) New geographies of the biennial. Networks for the globalization of art. GeoJournal 87: 2505–2523.

Zhang X, Xie M, Huang G (2022) Connecting Chinese cities with the global performing arts market. The geographies of performing-arts consumption in China. Urban Geography 43: 387–408.

Zorloni A (2013) The economics of contemporary art. Markets, strategies, and stardom. Berlin & Heidelberg.