Public accountant professional skepticism behavior in improving audit quality: A path analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31106/jema.v20i2.20616Keywords:
Due Professional Care, Professional Skepticism, Behavioral Observations, Audit Quality, AccountabilityAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between behavioral observation responses, namely accountability, due professional care, and professional skepticism, and their collective influence on audit quality within public accounting firms. By highlighting the mediating role of professional skepticism, our study offers a model that integrates cognitive dissonance theory with attribution theory, thereby advancing understanding in the field. Furthermore, this study employs a one-shot study approach with individual auditors as the unit of analysis. Data was collected through surveys administered to auditors working in public accounting firms registered with The Indonesian Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Jakarta. The sample comprised 123 auditors selected via Stratified Random Sampling. Path analysis using the AMOS program was employed for data analysis. The results indicate that when auditors feel a sense of accountability and exercise due professional care, they are more inclined to approach their work with heightened skepticism, positively influencing audit quality. This suggests that accountability and due professional care serve as catalysts for fostering a critical mindset among auditors. Consequently, the combined impact of these factors, along with professional skepticism, significantly contributes to enhancing audit quality, highlighting the interconnectedness of these elements in driving effective auditing practices.
References
Albawwat, I. E., Al-Hajaia, M. E., & Al Frijat, Y. S. (2021). The Relationship Between Internal Auditors' Personality Traits, Internal Audit Effectiveness, and Financial Reporting Quality: Empirical Evidence from Jordan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 797-808. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0797
Arenz, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services, 16th edition. London: Pearson.
Aronmwan, E., Ashafoke, T., & Mgbame, C. (2013). Audit firm reputation and audit quality. Aronmwan, EJ, Ashafoke, TO, & Mgbame, CO (2013). Audit firm reputation and audit quality. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 66-75.
Barzideh, F., & Kheirollahi, M. (2012). Accountability, time pressure and suppression of audit evidence. Journal of Audit Science, 11(45), 4-27.
Cohen, J. R., Dalton, D. W., & Harp, N. L. (2017). Neutral and presumptive doubt perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.003
Collemi, S. (2016, September 16). The Decline in Global Audit Quality. Accounting Today News. http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/audit-accounting/the-decline-in-global-audit-quality-79118-1.html.
Defond, M. L., Zhang, F., & Zhang, J. (2021). Auditing research using Chinese data: what’s next? Accounting and Business Research, 51(6-7), 622-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1746626
Dermarkar, S., & Hazgui, M. (2022). How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 83, 102228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102228
Endrawes, M., Leong, S., & Matawie, K. M. (2023). The moderating effect of culture on the relationship between accountability and professional skepticism. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(2), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2020-0986
Eutsler, J., Norris, A. E., & Trompeter, G. M. (2018). A live simulation-based investigation: Interactions with clients and their effect on audit judgment and professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51880
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Furiady, O., & Kurnia, R. (2015). The effect of work experiences, competency, motivation, accountability and objectivity towards audit quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.042
Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), P1-P10. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50895
Gordon, L. M., & Graham, S. (2006). "Attribution theory". The Encyclopedia of Human Development. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. pp. 142–144. ISBN 978-1-4129-0475-9.
Griffith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., & Kadous, K. (2012). Auditing complex estimates: Understanding the process used and problems encountered. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(2), 73–111. https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1857175.
Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536
Holm, C., & Zaman, M. (2012). Regulating audit quality: Restoring trust and legitimacy. Accounting Forum, 36(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.11.004
Hoos, F., Pruijssers, J. L., & Lander, M. W. (2019). Who’s watching? Accountability in different audit regimes and the effects on auditors’ professional skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3603-6
Hurley, P. J., Mayhew, B. W., & Obermire, K. M. (2019). Realigning auditors' accountability: Experimental evidence. The Accounting Review, 94(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52224
Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45-97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361
Hutabarat, E. C., Arifin, T., & Abrar, A. (2022). How does audit committee moderate the relationship between audit firm size, industry specialization, and the cost of equity capital? A comparison of the Ohlson and Capital Asset Pricing Model. JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 19(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.31106/jema.v19i1.17985
Kamil, N. I. (2015). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness, Knowledge, Tax Penalties and Tax Authorities Services on the Tax Complience:(Survey on the Individual Taxpayer at Jabodetabek & Bandung). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(2), 104-111.
Kim, S., Trotman, K. T., & Fargher, N. (2015). The comparative effect of process and outcome accountability in enhancing professional skepticism. Accounting & Finance, 55(4), 1015–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/ acfi.12084
Krishna, K., & Nadya, F. (2020). The Effect of Independence, Integrity, Professionalism, and Professional Skepticism on the Accuracy of Giving Audit Opinion (The Case of Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 127, 5-10. http://repository.stei.ac.id/631/
Kusumawati, A., & Syamsuddin, S. (2018). The effect of auditor quality to professional skepticsm and its relationship to audit quality. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(4), 998-1008.
Kythreotis, A., & Soltani, M. (2023). Relevance and faithful representation (reliability) of annual and semi-annual financial statements; a trade-off? International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 15(3), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2023.131779
La Torre, M., Botes, V. L., Dumay, J., & Odendaal, E. (2021). Protecting a new Achilles heel: the role of auditors within the practice of data protection. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(2), 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2018-1836
Lamba, R. A., Yohanes, C. S., Lamba, A., & Pattiasina, V. (2020). The effect of auditor independence and ethics on auditor professional skepticism: Its implications for audit quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(8), 383-396.
Louwers, Timothy J., Elaine Henry, Brad J, Reed, & Elizabeth, A, Gordon. (2008). Deficiencies in Auditing Related-Party Transaction: Insights from AAERs. Current Issues in Auditing. 2(2), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia.2008.2.2.A10
Low, K. Y., & Tan, H. T. (2011). Does time constraint lead to poorer audit performance? Effects of forewarning of impending time constraints and instructions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10180
Macnish, K., & Van der Ham, J. (2020). Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice. Technology in society, 63, 101382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101382
Mansur, T. (2007). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Audit Ditinjau dari Persepsi Auditor atas Pelatihan dan Keahlian, Independensi dan Penggunaan Kemahiran Profesional [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/36806
Nasution, D., & Östermark, R. (2020). The impact of auditors’ awareness of the profession’s reputation for independence on auditors' ethical judgment. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1087-1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2018-0117
Oussedik, E., Cline, A., Su, J. J., Masicampo, E. J., Kammrath, L. K., Ip, E., & Feldman, S. R. (2019). Accountability in patient adherence. Patient preference and adherence, 13, 1511-1517. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S213113
Pflugrath, G., Martinov‐Bennie, N., & Chen, L. (2007). The impact of codes of ethics and experience on auditor judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(6), 566-589. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710759389
Phan, T. H., Le, D. T., Le, N. D. Q., Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Research on factors affecting professional skepticism and audit quality: Experiment in Vietnam. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 830–847.
Persellin, J. S., Schmidt, J. J., Vandervelde, S. D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2019). Auditor perceptions of audit workloads, audit quality, and job satisfaction. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52488
Samuji, S. A. B. M., Othman, R. D. B., & Ismail, Z. (2022). Factors affecting tax compliance among cooperatives taxpayers in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting, 7(41), 9-17.
Sorensen, K., & Ortegren, M. (2021). The next best thing: Social presence and accountability’s impact on auditor professional skepticism. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 32(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22484
Ta, T. T., Doan, T. N., Pham, D. C., & Tran, H. N. (2022). Factors affecting the professional skepticism of independent auditors in Viet Nam. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2059043. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2059043
Tandiontong, M. (2016). Audit quality and its measurement. Jakarta: Alfabeta.
Utari, W., Iswoyo, A., Chamariyah, W., Mardiana, F., Rusdiyanto, & Hidayat, W. (2021). Effect Of Work Training, Competency and Job Satisfaction on Employee Productivity: A Case Study Indonesia. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006783
Wahidahwati, W., & Asyik, N. F. (2022). Determinants of auditors ability in fraud detection. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2130165. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2130165
Werner, M., Wiese, M., & Maas, A. (2021). Embedding process mining into financial statement audits. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 41, 100514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100514
Ying, S. X., & Patel, C. (2016). Skeptical judgments and self-construal: A comparative study between Chinese accounting students in Australia and China. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(3), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51491
Zarefar, A., & Zarefar, A. (2016). The Influence of Ethics, experience and competency toward the quality of auditing with professional auditor scepticism as a Moderating Variable. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 828-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.074
Zahmatkesh, S., & Rezazadeh, J. (2017). The effect of auditor features on audit quality. Tékhne, 15(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2017.09.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
