Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Department of Pathology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

Background & Objective: The Milan system of classification of the salivary gland lesions came up with an aim to establish a universal reporting protocol. The aim of this study was to classify the fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) cases of salivary gland according to the Milan system.
Methods: All the cases presenting with salivary gland lesion for FNAC were considered. The clinical data was recorded. Cytology findings were analyzed according to the Milan System. Histopathological correlation was made wherever available.
Results: A total of 100 cases of salivary gland lesions were collected and categorized according to the Milan system. They were correlated with histopathology in 45 cases. The patients’ age varied from 2-85 years. Parotid gland was the most commonly affected. Category 1 (non-diagnostic) comprised of three cases. Category 2 (non-neoplastic) had 40 cases. In category 4a (benign) there were 43 cases, and the most common lesion was pleomorphic adenoma. Category 5 (suspicious of malignancy) comprised of 3 cases. Category 6 (malignant) comprised of 11 cases and the most common lesion was mucoepidermoid carcinoma. In category 2, the cytological findings of 5 cases were concordant with histopathology while, 2 were discordant. In category 4a (benign), 20 cases were concordant, and 3 cases were discordant (2 cases were mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 1 was adenoid cystic carcinoma on histology). The risks of malignancy in NN, AUS, benign, SOM, and malignant were 33.3, 2.5, 0, 7, 66.6, and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion: Milan system of reporting salivary gland cytopathology may have great potential of escalating clinical communication and may guide appropriate treatment.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Lawal AO, Adisa AO, Kolude B, Adeyemi BF. Malignant salivary gland tumors of the head and neck region: a single institutions review. Pan Afr Med J.2015;20:121. [DOI:10.11604/pamj.2015.20.121.3458] [PMID]
  2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Tumors of Salivary Gland. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Washington DC;1996:135-371.
  3. Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Curao MP et al., Fifty years of cancer incidence: CI5 I-IX. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2918-27. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.25517] [PMID]
  4. Speight PM, Barrett AW. Salivary gland tumours. Oral Dis. 2002;8(5):229-40. [DOI:10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.02870.x] [PMID]
  5. Sandhu VK, Sharma U, Singh N, PuriA. Cytological spectrum of salivary gland lesions and their correlation with epidemiological parameters. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21:203-10. [DOI:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_61_17] [PMID] []
  6. Colella G, Cannavale R, Flamminio F, Foschini MP. Fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:2146-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.064] [PMID]
  7. Jain R, Gupta R, Kudesia M, Singh S. Fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of salivary gland lesions: A study with histologic comparison. Cytojournal. 2013;10:5
  8. Schindler S, Nayar R, Dutra J, Bedrossian CW. Diagnostic challenges in aspiration cytology of the salivary glands. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2001;18:124-46.
  9. Chakrabarti S, Bera M, Bhattacharya PK, Chakrabarty D, Manna AK, Pathak S. Study of salivary gland lesions with fine needle aspiration cytology and histopathology along with immunohistochemistry. J Indian Med Assoc. 2010;108:833-6.
  10. Ashraf A, Shaikh AS, Kamal F, Sarfraz R, Bukhari MH. Diagnostic reliability of FNAC of salivary gland swellings: A comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol.2010;38:499‑4 [DOI:10.1002/dc.21211] [PMID]
  11. Singh A, Haritwal A, Murali BM. Correlation between cytology and histopathology of the salivary gland. Australas Med J. 2011;4:66‑71. [DOI:10.4066/AMJ.2011.518] [PMID] []
  12. Chakrabarti S, Bera M, Bhattacharya PK, Chakrabarty D, Manna AK, Pathak S, et al. Study of salivary gland lesions with fine needle aspiration cytology and histopathology along with immunohistochemistry. J Indian Med Assoc. 2010;108:833‑6.
  13. Rajwanshi A, Gupta K, Gupta N, Shukla R, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R, et al. Fine‑needle aspiration cytology of salivary glands: Diagnostic pitfalls- revisited. Diagn.Cytopathol. 2006;34: 580‑4. [DOI:10.1002/dc.20353] [PMID]
  14. Tyagi R. Dey P. Diagnostic problems of salivary gland tumors. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:495‑509 [DOI:10.1002/dc.23255] [PMID]
  15. Tahoun N, Ezzat N. Diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls of preoperative fine needle aspiration cytology in salivary gland lesions. J Egyp Natl Canc Inst. 2008;20:358‑8.
  16. Amita K, Rakshitha HB, Singh A, Shankar SV. Evaluation of accuracy of milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology: Review of morphology and diagnostic challenges in each category. J Cytol. 2020;37:18-25. [DOI:10.4103/JOC.JOC_191_18] [PMID]
  17. Rossi ED, Faquin WC, Baloch Z, Barkan GA, Foschini MP, PusztaszeriM,et al. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology Analysis and suggestions of initial survey. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125:757‑66. [DOI:10.1002/cncy.21898] [PMID]
  18. Mukundapai M, Sharma N,PatilA,GopalC.Fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions: A revised classification based on "Milan system"- 4 years experience of tertiary care cancer center of South India. J Cytol. 2020;37:12-7 [DOI:10.4103/JOC.JOC_68_18] [PMID]
  19. Gaikwad VP, Anupriya C, Naik LP. Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology- An experience from Western Indian Population. J Cytol. 2020;37:93-8. [DOI:10.4103/JOC.JOC_156_19] [PMID] []
  20. Rohilla M, Singh P, Rajwanshi A, Gupta N, Shrinivasan R, Dey P. Three year cytohistological correlation of salivary gland FNA cytology at a tertiary center with the application of Milan system for risk stratification. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125:767-75 [DOI:10.1002/cncy.21900] [PMID]
  21. Das DK, Petkar MA, Al‑ Mane NM, Sheikh ZA, Mallik MK, Anim JT. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of swellings in the salivary gland regions: A study of 712 cases. Med Princ Pract. 2004;13:95‑06. [DOI:10.1159/000075637] [PMID]
  22. Nguansangiam S, Jesdapatarakul S, Dhanarak N, Sosrisakorn K. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions:Routine diagnostic experience in Bangkok, Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:1583‑8. [DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.4.1583] [PMID]
  23. Geethalakshmi U, Rupashree S, Babu KR. Study of Histopathological Diversity in Salivary Gland Lesions. J Med Sci Health. 2021;7(2):1-7. [DOI:10.46347/jmsh.2021.v07i02.011]
  24. Chandrakoshi G, Sanjuna D, Patidar A, Singh N. Cytomorphological features of salivary gland lesions based on the Milan system of reporting in a tertiary care center. Asia J Med Sci. 2022;13(8):226-230 [DOI:10.3126/ajms.v13i8.44001]
  25. Mishra S, Ray S, Sengupta M, Sengupta A. A cytohistological correlation in salivary gland swelling with special reference to the proposed Milan system. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;62:379-83 [DOI:10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_662_17] [PMID]
  26. Viswanathan K, Sung S, Scognamiglio T, Yang GCH, Siddiqui MT, Rao RA The role of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A 5- year institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(8):541-551. [DOI:10.1002/cncy.22016] [PMID]
  27. Tahoun N, Ezzat N. Diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls of preoperative fine needle aspiration cytology in salivary gland lesions. J Egyp Natl Canc Inst. 2008;20:358‑8.
  28. Griffith CC, Schmidt AC, Pantanowitz L, Monaco SE. A pattern based risk stratification scheme for salivary gland cytology: A multi-institutional, inter observer variability study to determine applicability. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125:776-5. [DOI:10.1002/cncy.21906] [PMID]
  29. Kotwal M, Gaikwad S, Patil R, Munshi M, Bobhate S. FNAC of salivary gland‑A useful tool in preoperative diagnosis or a cytopathogist"s riddle. J Cytol. 2007;24:85‑8. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9371.42078]
  30. Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Fine‑needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. III. Cytologic and histologic correlation of 75 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma: Review and experience at the Institute Curie with emphasis on cytologic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;17:36‑41. [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199707)17:13.0.CO;2-N]
  31. Allison DB, Smith AP,An D, Miller JA, Shafique K et al.Assessing the diagnostic accuracy for pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor by employing the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: An international, multi-institutional study. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 ;129(1):43-52. [DOI:10.1002/cncy.22391] [PMID]
  32. Jayaram G, Dashini M. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary glands: An analysis of 141 cases. Malays J Pathol. 2001;23:93‑100.
  33. Abilash SC, Khan DM, Devi SLS. Correlation of Milan System of Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology with Histopathology: Two-year Institutional Experience. J Basic Clin Appl Health Sci. 2022;5(2):29-33. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10082-03156]
  34. Zahra Maleki , Carla Saoud , Kartik Viswanathan , Irem Kilic , Erkka Tommola et al. Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology in pediatric patients: An international, multi-institutional study Cancer Cytopathol. 2022;130(5):370-80. [DOI:10.1002/cncy.22556] [PMID]
  35. Negi S, Mardi K, Sood S, Gupta N, Mohindroo NK, Kumar M, et al. Cyto-histological correlation of salivary gland lesions- a prospective study in a tertiary care institute. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022;10:425-30. [DOI:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220286]
  36. Modi S, Agrawal V, Bhake A. Assessment of Milan system for reporting salivary gland pathology cytodiagnostic appraisal. J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ. 2021;16:475-9. [DOI:10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_236_21x]