The Pattern of Supervision and Action Against Illegal Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i3.932

Authors

  • Debora Debora Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Haposan Siallagan Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Keywords:

Fintech Peer to Peer Lending, Illegal, Regulation

Abstract

The existence of illegal fintech is still a public concern due to the inadequate regulation tools that are able to regulate and take firm action against the existence of illegal fintech. The difficulty faced by regulators in taking action against illegal fintech is because it is difficult to be tracked and illegal entities that have been blocked can easily recreate new illegal fintech entities. This study was conducted by using normative legal research, which was reviewing material law that contains normative legal rules. As the result, there are conclusion namely, first Illegal fintech P2PL actors try to trick the public by resembling the company’s platform name and/or logo, name, and identity color from legal fintech P2PL that has been registered/licensed at the OJK and SWI’s efforts to take action against these fintech P2PL companies are by blocking sites, conducting joint inspections of business activities which assumed as illegal investments, ordering illegal fintech P2PL companies to stop business activities, and improving coordination in handling cases with related agencies. OJK through SWI seeks to stop the chain of Illegal fintech P2PL by routinely coordinating with the Minister of Communication and Information to block illegal services

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Bahder Johan Nasution, (2008), Legal Research Methods, Bandung, Mandar Maju, 200

Schotel, Bas, (2013), Legilation, Empirical Research and Juridical Law, The Theory and Practice of Legislation1.

Satjipto Rahardjo, (2008), Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: CatatanKritistentangPergulatanManusia dan Hukum, PenerbitBuku Kompas, Jakarta

Salim, HS, (2010), Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta, 2010

Sunaryo, (2009), Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Werner Menski, (2016), Perbandingan Hukum dalam Kontesk Global, Sistem Eropa, Asia dan Afrika, Nusa Media, Bandung

Journal

A. Bachman and B. Funk, (2015), Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, No. January 2011

Muchlis, R. (2018). Analisis SWOT Financial Technology (Fintech) Pembiayaan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus 4 Bank Syariah Di Kota Medan). AT-TAWASSUTH: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 1(1), 335-357.

Pramana, I. W. B., Atmadja, I. B. P. S., & Sutama, I. B. P. (2014). Peranan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Mengawasi Lembaga Keuangan Non Bank Berbasis Financial Technology Jenis Peer To Peer Lending. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 2(14).

Santi, E., Budiharto, B., & Saptono, H. (2017). Pengawasan otoritas jasa keuangan terhadap financial technology (peraturan otoritas jasa keuangan nomor 77/pojk. 01/2016). Diponegoro law journal, 6(3), 1-20.

Hidayat, R., Wulandari, H., Cahyaning, Y., Firmansyah, A. D., Hartono, B., Yusril, R., & Rakhmawati, N. A. (2020). Analisa Permasalahan Berbagai Platform Pinjaman Daring (Peer-To-Peer Lending) Dan Penanganannya Di Indonesia. Inspiration: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 10(1), 45-56.

Sitompul, M. G. (2018). Urgensi Legalitas Financial Technology (Fintech): Peer To Peer (P2P) Lending Di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis Unaja, 1(2), 68-79.

Asti, N. P. M. D. P. (2020). Upaya Hukum Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam Mengatasi Layanan Pinjaman Online Ilegal. Acta Comitas, 5(01).

Regulation

POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang layanan Pinjam Meminjam Berbasis Teknologi Informasi

Website

OJK Optimis Inklusi Keuangan RI 90 Persen pada 2024, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20201016074304-83-559042/ojk-optimistis-inklusi-keuangan-ri-90-persen-pada-2024 accessed on 8 June 2021

Galuh Putri Riyanto, JumlahPengguna Internet Indonesia 2021 Tembus 202 Jutaâ€, : https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/02/23/16100057/jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-2021-tembus-202-jutaaccessed on 4 July 2021

Millennia Aulia dan Tri Achya Ngasuko, Dukungan Regulasi Fintech untuk Sektor Keuangan, Badan Kebijakan Fiskal – Kementrian Keuangan, Edition VI 2020, pg. 42-45 https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/download/db16cf23-a162-4c68-b777-b24bd146ff97/Warta%20Fiskal.pdf accessed on 2 August 2021

Abdul Malik, Ini Daftar 206 Fintech Lending Ilegal yang Ditutup Satgas Waspada Investasi pada Oktober, Bareksa accesed on https://www.bareksa.com/berita/belajar-investasi/2020-10-27/ini-daftar-206-fintech-lending-ilegal-yang-ditutup-satgas-waspada-investasi-pada-oktober diakses 2 Juni 2021

Akbar Evandi, SWI: Ada Penurunan Jumlah Blokir Pinjol Ilegal hingga Juli 2021, Bisnis.com https://teknologi.bisnis.com/read/20210715/84/1418235/swi-ada-penurunan-jumlah-blokir-pinjol-ilegal-hingga-juli-2021accessed on 2 August 2021

Harry Chandra Sihombing, Hukum dan Regulasi Startup Fintech di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Peluang, Lesson Learning dari negara lain, accesed on https://www.academia.edu/33812550/Hukum_dan_Regulasi_Startup_FinTech_di_Indonesia_Tantangan_dan_Peluang_lesson_learning_dari_negara_lain accessed on 2 August 2021

OJK, Bahaya Fintech P2PL Ilegal, https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/direktori/fintech/Documents/P2PL%20legal%20vs%20ilegal.pdfaccessedon 2 August 2021

Ahmad Buchori, OJK Sulteng: WaspadaPenawaran Fintech P2PL Ilegal, https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2146198/ojk-sulteng-waspada-penawaran-fintech-lending-ilegal-jelang-hari-rayaaccessedon 2 August 2021

Dinda Aulia Ramadhanty, Waspada Ini 14 Perbedaan Pinjol Legal vs Pinjol Ilegal, Bisnis.com, https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20211021/563/1456591/waspada-ini-14-perbedaan-pinjol-legal-vs-pinjol-ilegal accessed on 25 October 2021

Swisma, Bahas Perlindungan Konsumen Berinvestasi, accesed on https://www.jurnalasia.com/edukasi/bahas-perlindungan-konsumen-berinvestasi-imahmi-usu-seminarkan-economic-law-2017/accessedon 2 August 2021

MajalahEdukasiKonsumen OJK, (Edisi Juni 2017), pg. 7 https://sikapiuangmu.ojk.go.id/FrontEnd/CMS/DetailMateri/375accessedon 9Maret 2021

NoveriusLaoli, SatgasWaspadaInvestasiRilis 14 Kegiatan Usaha TanpaIzin per Januari 2021, https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/diklaim-turun-satgas-waspada-investasi-rilis-14-entitas-ilegal-per-januari-2021accessedon 2 June 2021

Leski Rizkinaswara, Sejak Januari Hingga Juni 2021 Kominfo Tangani 447 Fintech Ilegal, https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/07/sejak-januari-hingga-juni-2021-kominfo-tangani-447-fintech-ilegal/accessedon 2 August 2021

Yosepha Pusparisa, Masalah di Balik PesatnyaPertumbuhan Fintech PinjamMeminjam†https://katadata.co.id/ariayudhistira/analisisdata/608059aa0ace4/masalah-di-balik-pesatnya-pertumbuhan-fintech-pinjam-meminjamaccessedon 2 July 2021

Published

2021-12-13

How to Cite

Debora, D., & Siallagan, H. (2021). The Pattern of Supervision and Action Against Illegal Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i3.932