ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 13 of 45
Up
JMBS 2023, 8(1): 100–106
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs08.01.100
Clinical Medicine

Psychological Problems and Main Directions of Preserving the Mental Health of Higher Education Students in Distance Education

Belov O. O.
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to consider the features of the adverse psychological consequences of distance learning for students of higher medical education. Materials and methods. An anonymous online questionnaire and psychodiagnostic examination of 195 students majoring in “Medicine”, “Dentistry” and “Medical Psychology” were conducted, using the Beck Depression Inventory and H. Eysenck's scale of self-assessment of mental states. Results and discussion. It has been established that psychological problems related to distance learning are more common among senior students, and are most common among students majoring in “Medical Psychology”, less common among students majoring in “Medicine” and the least – among students studying dentistry. It was found that the most relevant negative psychological consequences of distance learning are an increase in anxiety: in 21.9% of junior students and in 46.6% of senior students studying in the specialty “Medical Psychology”, in 25.7% and 38.2 % – in the specialty “Medicine”, in 18.2% and 22.6% – in the specialty “Dentistry”; mood deterioration: respectively in 62.65% and 60.0%, in 17.2% and 29.4%, in 9.1% and 22.6%; irritability: 68.8% and 53.3%, 22.9% and 35.3%, 15.1% and 22.6%, respectively; deterioration of communication with others: 46.9% and 46.7%, 22.9% and 17.7%, 21.2% and 25.9%, respectively. Higher levels of depression were found in students majoring in “Medical Psychology”: 7.94 ± 4.40 points and 8.80 ± 4.99 points against 3.77 ± 3.08 points and 4.38 ± 3.06 points for students studying medicine, and 2.70 ± 2.42 points and 3.35 ± 2.42 points for students studying dentistry; anxiety: 6.72 ± 6.59 points and 11.23 ± 4.70 points, 7.37 ± 5.31 points and 9.09 ± 4.83 points, respectively; 6.21 ± 4.87 points and 7.61 ± 4.94 points; frustrations: 8.38 ± 5.17 points and 10.67 ± 5.94 points, respectively; 2.86 ± 3.65 points and 4.59 ± 5.10 points; 1.82 ± 2.49 points and 2.74 ± 3.12 points; and rigidity: 7.53 ± 3.61 points and 8.07 ± 4.24 points, respectively; 4.86 ± 4.56 points and 6.53 ± 4.63 points; 6.55 ± 4.80 points and 6.58 ± 4.33 points. The highest levels of aggressiveness were found in students studying dentistry: 9.36 ± 2.73 points and 8.90 ± 4.07 points against 8.74 ± 3.86 points and 7.97 ± 3.55 points for students studying in the specialty “Medicine” and 5.03 ± 3.86 points and 4.80 ± 3.49 points in the specialty “Medical Psychology”. Among students studying medicine and dentistry, the vast majority showed no signs of depression, while among medical psychology students, 6.3% of examined juniors and 13.3% of seniors showed signs of moderate depression. Signs of severe anxiety were found in 5.9% of senior students majoring in Medicine, in 9.4% of junior students and in 16.7% of senior students of “Medical Psychology”, signs of severe frustration were found in 8.8% of senior students majoring in “Medicine” and 12.5% and 20.2% of students majoring in “Medical Psychology”, respectively. Conclusion. The system of supporting the psychological health of applicants in the conditions of distance education should be comprehensive and should include a rational organization of the educational process, a combination of online and offline forms of education, as well as available psychological assistance

Keywords: distance learning, psychological health, depression, anxiety, psychological assistance

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 267K

References
  1. Gonzalez T, de la Rubia MA, Hincz KP, Comas-Lopez M, Subirats L, Fort S, et al. Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students' performance in higher education. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239490. PMID: 33035228. PMCID: PMC7546684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239490
  2. Yeh CY, Tsai CC. Massive Distance Education: Barriers and Challenges in Shifting to a Complete Online Learning Environment. Front Psychol. 2022;13:928717. PMID: 35859848. PMCID: PMC9291812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928717
  3. Sydorenko TM, Petkun SM, Novak OM. Dystantsiyna osvita: problemy ta perspektyvy [Distance education: problems and prospects]. Innovatsiyna pedahohika. 2021;35:45-48. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-6085/2021/35.8
  4. Mala IB. Dystantsiyne navchannya yak diyevyy instrument upravlinsʹkoyi osvity [Distance learning as an effective tool of management education]. Vcheni zapysky Universytetu «KROK». 2022;2(66):132-151. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2022-66-132-151
  5. Toquero CM. Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: the Philippine context. Pedagog Res. 2020;5:em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
  6. Olivares SLO, Lopez M, Martinez R, Alvarez JPN, Valdez-García JE. Faculty readiness for a digital education model: A self-assessment from health sciences educators. Aust J Technol. 2021;37:116-127. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7105
  7. Durff L, Carter M. Overcoming second-order barriers to technology integration in K-5 schools. J Educ Res Pract. 2019;9:17. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.18
  8. Reimers FM, Schleicher A. A Framework to Guide an Education Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD, 2020. Available from: https://www.aforges.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/framework.pdf.
  9. Polyanska VP, Zvyagolska IM, Derevyanko TV. Pedahohichno-orhanizatsiyni aspekty dystantsiynoho navchannya v medytsyni [Pedagogical and organizational aspects of distance learning in medicine]. Visnyk Ukrayinsʹkoyi medychnoyi stomatolohichnoyi akademiyi. 2021;21(73):137-141. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.21.1.137
  10. Strilchuk LM, Radchenko OM, Ilnytska LA. Dystantsiyne navchannya u medychnomu zakladi vyshchoyi osvity: sotsialʹni ta statevo-vikovi kharakterystyky [Distance learning in a medical institution of higher education: social and gender-age characteristics]. Medychna osvita. 2022;3:94-100. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2022.3.13422
  11. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M. An Invertory for Measuring Depression. Arch General Psychiatr. 1961;4(6):561-571. PMID: 13688369. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
  12. Pshuk NG, Kaminska AO, Stukan LV. Praktikum z psyhodiagnostiki [Practical guide of Psychodiagnostic]. Vinnytsya: VNMU; 2021. s. 34-37. [Ukrainian]
  13. Bailenson JN. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technol Mind Behav. 2021;2. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
  14. Fosslien L, Duffy MW. How to combat zoom fatigue. Harv Bus Rev. 2020;29:1-6.
  15. Dorn E, Hancock B, Sarakatsannis J, Viruleg E. Covid-19 and Education: The Lingering Effects of Unfinished Learning. McKinsey and Company; 2021.
  16. Bullock AN, Colvin AD, Jackson MS. "All Zoomed Out': strategies for addressing Zoom fatigue in the age of COVID-19". In: The Learning Ideas Conference (Cham: Springer), 2021. 2021. p. 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90677-1_6
  17. Peper E, Wilson V, Martin M, Rosegard E, Harvey R. Avoid Zoom fatigue, be present and learn. NeuroRegulation. 2021;8:47-47. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.8.1.47
  18. Kapasia N, Paul P, Roy A, Saha J, Zaveri A, Mallick R, et al Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;116:105194. PMID: 32834270. PMCID: PMC7308748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194
  19. Segbenya M, Anokye FA. Challenges and coping strategies among distance education learners: Implication for human resources managers. Curr Psychol. 2022;29:1-15. PMID: 36340891. PMCID: PMC9617226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03794-5
  20. Bağrıacık Yılmaz A, Karataş S. Why do open and distance education students drop out? Views from various stakeholders. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2022;19(1):28. PMID: 35677599. PMCID: PMC9162795. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00333-x