Damage to the trunk of the left coronary artery is the most dangerous manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis. Mortality with this type of lesions occurs by 3–4 times more often compared to lesions of other segments of coronary arteries. On the basis of previous clinical studies demonstrating advantages of coronary artery bypass grafting over drug therapy in terms of patient survival, coronary artery bypass grafting has long been considered the gold standard for the treatment of these lesions. The purpose of the work was to study the literature data on the evolution and peculiarities of the choice of methods of surgical treatment of coronary heart disease in patients with severe lesions of the trunk of the left coronary artery. Results and discussion. Along with the improvement of endovascular instrumentation, stenting procedures, antithrombotic agents, as well as concomitant drug therapy, percutaneous coronary interventions for lesions of the left trunk are becoming more and more widespread and show favorable clinical results in these patients. This is evidenced by the data of many randomized multicenter studies (SYNTAX, EXCEL). Based on the results of these studies, ESC/EACTS approved the following guidelines for myocardial revascularization in 2018. Percutaneous coronary interventions are indicated in the case of damage to the left trunk with scores on the SYNTAX scale less than 22 – class I, scores on the SYNTAX scale 23–32 – class IIa, and scores on the SYNTAX scale greater than 32 – class III. However, it is worth noting that both the American and the European guidelines recommend a discussion by a team of endovascular surgeons, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons (Heart Team) when choosing a treatment strategy for coronary artery disease patients with lesions of the trunk of the left coronary artery. Since the data of many studies on the treatment of patients with lesions of the trunk of the left coronary artery remain quite contradictory and ambiguous. Conclusion. Current literature data have shown that left coronary artery stenting is a fairly safe procedure, with a high rate of immediate success, low mortality, and few complications, especially in low-risk surgical patients. The use of stents with medical coating made it possible to reduce the frequency of repeated interventions to 10–12%. A number of issues remain, the solution of which would allow optimizing the application of this technique. These include: development of indications for surgical or endovascular treatment of lesions of the left coronary artery trunk, optimization of stenting techniques, assessment of the significance of concomitant pathology in the effectiveness of treatment of patients with lesions of the left coronary artery trunk

Keywords: ischemic heart disease, left coronary artery, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 263K

1. Shevchenko OP, Myshnev OD. Ischemic heart disease. Reafarm; 2005. 416 p.
2. Karpov PC, Pavlyukova EH, Vrublevskyi AB, Chernov VY, Usov VYu. Modern methods of diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis. Byulleten SO RAMN. 2006;2(120):105-117.
3. Cherkavskaya OV. Vnutrysosudystoe ultrazvukovoe yssledovanye koronarnykh arteryi v kompleksnoy dyahnostyke y optymyzatsyi rezultatov endovaskulyarnoho lechenyya yshemycheskoy bolezny serdtsa [Intravascular ultrasound examination of coronary arteries in complex diagnostics and optimization of the results of endovascular treatment of ischemic heart disease]. Abstr. PhDr. (Med.). M; 2000. 198 s. [Russian]
4. Bokeryya LA, Alekyan BH, Buzyashvyly YuY. Immediate and remote results of stenting of the trunk of the left coronary artery in patients with ischemic heart disease. Cardiology. 2006;46(3):4-12.
5. Kalbfleisch H, Hort W. «Quantitative study on the size of coronary artery supplying areas postmortem.» Am Heart J. 1977;94:183-188. PMID: 141876. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(77)80278-0
6. Li M, Zheng X, Liu H, Liu Y. Recurrent syncope attributed to left main coronary artery severe stenosis. Case Rep Med. 2015;2015:782347. PMID: 25685155. PMCID: PMC4312630. doi: 10.1155/2015/782347
7. Karabulut A, Cakmak M. Treatment strategies in the left main coronary artery disease associated with acute coronary syndromes. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015;27(4):272-6. PMID: 26557745. PMCID: PMC4614897. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.03.002
8. Takaro T, Hultgren NH, Lipton MJ, Detre KM. The VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary artery occlusive disease: II subgroup with significant left main lessions. Circulation. 1976;54(Suppl 3):107-117. PMID: 791537
9. European Coronary Surgery Study Group. Prospective randomized study of coronary artery bypass in stable angina pectoris. Second interim report by the European Coronary Surgery Study Group. Lancet. 1980;2:491-495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(80)91829-2
10. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB 3rd, et al. A ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation. 2006 Jan 3;113(1):156-75. PMID: 16391169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.170815
11. Ellis SG, Hill CM, Lytle BW. Spectrum of surgical risk for left main coronary stenosis: benchmark for potentially competing percutaneus therapies. Am Heart J. 1998;135:335-338. PMID: 9489985. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70102-4
12. d'Allones FR, Corbineau H, Le Breton H, Leclercq C, Leguerrier A, Daubert C. Isolated left main coronary artery stenosis: long term follow up in 106 patients after surgery. Heart. 2002 Jun;87(6):544-8. PMID: 12010936. PMCID: PMC1767146. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.6.544
13. Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, Baldi J, Grinfeld L, Martinez J, et al. 81 Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II): 30- day and one-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:51-58. PMID: 11153772. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01052-4
14. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation. 2004 Mar 16;109(10):1244-9. PMID: 14981005. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118474.71662.E3
15. Erglis A, Narbute I, Kumsars I, Jegere S, Mintale I, Zakke I, et al. A randomized comparison of paclitaxeleluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 7;50(6):491-7. PMID: 17678730. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.055
16. Tamburino C, Di Salvo ME, Capodanno D, Palmerini T, Sheiban I, Margheri M, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jan 15;103(2):187-93. PMID: 19121434. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.059
17. Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C, Sheiban I, Margheri M, Vecchi G, et al. Two-year clinical outcome with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in a real-world registry of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis from the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 1;102(11):1463-8. PMID: 19026296. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.030
18. Ramadan R, Boden WE, Kinlay S. Management of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(7):e008151. PMID: 29605817. PMCID: PMC5907594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008151
19. Lee PH, Kwon O, Ahn JM, Lee CH, Kang DY, Lee JB, et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 27;71(8):832-841. PMID: 29471933. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.032
20. Benedetto U, Taggart DP, Sousa-Uva M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Di Franco A, Ohmes LB, et al. New-generation stents compared with coronary bypass surgery for unprotected left main disease: A word of caution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;155(5):2013-2019.e16. PMID: 29338862. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.066
21. Gruentzig AR. Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis. Lancet. 1978 Feb 4;1(8058):263. PMID: 74678. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90500-7
22. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group; 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. PMID: 30165437. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
23. Ellis SG, Tamai H, Nobuyoshi M, Kosuga K, Colombo A, Holmes DR, et al. Contemporary percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: initial results from multicenter registry analysis 1994-1996. Circulation. 1997 Dec 2;96(11):3867-72. PMID: 9403609. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.96.11.3867
24. Tan WA, Tamai H, Park SJ, Plokker HW, Nobuyoshi M, Suzuki T, et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Unprotected Left Main Trunk Percutaneous Revascularization in 279 Patients. Circulation. 2001 Oct 2;104(14):1609-14. PMID: 11581137. doi: 10.1161/hc3901.096669
25. Silvestri M, Barragan P, Sainsous J, Bayet G, Simeoni JB, Roquebert PO, et al. Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: immediate and medium-term outcomes of 140 elective procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1543-50. PMID: 10807458. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00588-X
26. Brigouri C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, Airoldi F, Liistro F, Sgura F, et al. Elective versus provisional pumping in high-risk percutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2003 Apr; 145(4):700-707. PMID: 12679768. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.14
27. Silvestri M, Lefevre T, Labrunie P, Khalife K, Bayet G, Morice MC, et al. The French registry of left main coronary artery treatment: Preliminary results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(6):45-46. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)80196-1
28. Nishikawa H, Nakajima K, Tamai H. ULTRA experiences. Presented at the Complex Catheter Technique 2002 Meeting, Kobe, Japan. 2002.
29. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA, Gardner TJ, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):e340-437. PMID: 15466654. doi: 10.1161/circ.110.14.e340
30. Park SJ, Hong MK, Lee CW, Kim JJ, Song JK, Kang DH, et al. Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Oct;38(4):1054-60. PMID: 11583882. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01491-7
31. Ehara M, Kato O, Ito S. Long term prognosis of percutaneous intervention for the left main coronary artery: how to achieve an outcome as reliable as bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94 (suppl 6A):3E.
32. Lefevre T. Left main stenting. Presented at the Complex Catheter Technique 2002 Meeting, Kobe, Japan. 2002.
33. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1773-80. PMID: 12050336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843
34. Рark SJ, Kim YH, Lee BK, Lee SW, Lee CW, Hong MK, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with bare metal stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;45(3):351-6. PMID: 15680711. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.039
35. Valgimigli M, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT, Aoki J, Granillo GA, McFadden EP, et al. Short- and long- term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of the left main coronary artery disease: insight from the RapamicinEluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registries (RESEARCH and T-RESEARCH). Circulation. 2005 Mar 22;111(11):1383-9. PMID: 15781749. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158486.20865.8B
36. Chieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, Montorfano M, et al. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation. 2005 Feb 15;111(6):791-5. PMID: 15699254. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155256.88940.F8
37. Valgimini M, Malagutti P, Aoki J, Garcia-Garcia HM, Rodriguez Granillo GA, van Mieghem CA, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a combined RESEARCH and T-SEARCH long-term analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):507-14. PMID: 16458128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.040
38. Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Ståhle E, Colombo A, Mack MJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):629-38. PMID: 23439102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5
39. Ahn JM, Roh JH, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee PH, et al. Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2198-206. PMID: 25787197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.033
40. Sardar P, Giri J, Elmariah S, Kolte D, Kundu A, Nairooz R, et al. Meta-Analysis of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1746-1752. PMID: 28400029. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.009
41. Athappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu ME, Ellis S, Whitlow P, Kapadia SR. Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1219-30. PMID: 24355112. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.008
42. Cassese S, Kufner S, Xhepa E, Byrne RA, Kreutzer J, Ibrahim T, et al. Three-year efficacy and safety of newversus early-generation drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease insights from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jul;105(7):57584. PMID: 26689707. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0953-x