Effect of a novel coating material on the microleakage of glass hybrid restoration in primary teeth – An in vitro study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Glass ionomer restorations are widely employed in the field of pediatric dentistry. There is a constant demand for a durable restoration that remains functional until exfoliation. This study aimed to measure and compare the effect of a novel coating material (EQUIA Forte Coat) on the microleakage of glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte HT) in primary teeth. Material and method: Thirty cavitated (class-II) primary molars were allocated randomly into two groups based on the coat application; uncoated (control) and coated group (experimental). Cavities were prepared by the use of a ceramic bur (CeraBur) and restored with EQUIA Forte HT with or without applying a protective coat (EQUIA Forte Coat). Samples went through the thermocycling process and dipped in 2% methylene blue dye before being sectioned through the center of the restoration. Microleakage was evaluated digitally using software and a camera connected to a stereomicroscope (30 x magnification) to assess dye penetration of the sectioned samples at both the occlusal and gingival marginal levels. Results: There was a significant difference between the coated and uncoated groups at both occlusal (p=.029) and gingival margin sites (p=.001). Conclusion: Higher microleakage values were associated with the uncoated group compared to the coated one. The application of a protective coating to the restorations is an efficient approach to decrease the microleakage of the restorations that can be usefully adopted in clinical practice.
Received date: 10-04-2022
Accepted date: 03-06-2022
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
Publication Dates
References
Duangthip, D., Chu, C.H. Challenges in oral hygiene and oral health policy. Front Oral Health. 2020; 1: 575428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2020.575428
Kazeminia, M., Abdi, A., Shohaimi, S., et al. Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children’s worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Face Med. 2020; 16(1):1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00237-z
Gaintantzopoulou, M.D., Gopinath, V.K., Zinelis, S. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21(4): 1063-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1848-6
Ardeshana, A., Bargale, S., Karri, A., et al. Evaluation of Caries Excavation Efficacy with Ceramic Bur and Hand Excavation in Primary Teeth: An Experimental Study. J. South Asian Assoc Pediatric Dent. 2020; 3: 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3054
Ali, A.S., EL-Malt, M.A., Mohamed, E.A. A Comparative Evaluation of EQUIA Forte Microleakage Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2019; 6(3): 249-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2019.6774.1065
Sharafeddin, F., Shoale, S., Kowkabi, M. Effects of different percentages of microhydroxyapatite on microhardness of res-in-modified glass-ionomer and zirconomer. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; (6): e805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53668
Wiegand, A., Buchalla, W., Attin, T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake char-acteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(3): 343-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
Ilie, N., Hickel, R., Valceanu, A.S., et al. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16(2):489-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0525-z
Brkanović, S., Ivanišević, A., Miletić, I., et al. Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(4): 755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040755
Jia, S., Chen, D., Wang, D., et al. Comparing marginal microleakage of three different dental materials in veneer restoration using a stereomicroscope: an in vitro study. Br Dent J. 2017; 3(1):1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.10
Fathy, D., El-Tekeya, M., Bakry, N.S., et al. Microleakage evaluation of composite restoration following caries removal using ceramic bur in primary teeth (an in vitro study). Alex Dent J. 2021; 46: 169-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2020.42081.1099
Kitsahawong, K., Seminario, A.L., Pungchanchaikul, P., et al. Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0127
Majeed, M.A. Microleakage evaluation of a silorane-based and methacrylate-based packable and nanofill posterior compo-sites (in vitro comparative study). Tikrit J Dent Sci. 2012; 1(2): 19-26.
Ali, A.H., Thani, F.B., Foschi, F., et al. Self-limiting versus rotary subjective carious tissue removal: A randomized controlled clinical trial—2-year results. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 2738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092738
Daub, J., Berzins, D.W., Linn, B.J., et al. Bond strength of direct and indirect bonded brackets after thermocycling. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(2): 295-300.
Donmez, N., Siso, S.H., Usumez, A. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in class V cavities etched by Er: YAG laser with different pulse modes. J Laser Health Acad. 2013; 1: 6-10.
Sooraparaju, S.G., Kanumuru, P.K., Nujella, S.K., et al. A comparative evaluation of microleakage in class v composite res-torations. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 685643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/685643
Dhingra, V., Taneja, S., Kumar, M., et al. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: E9-E15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/12-349-L
Habib, S.I., Yassen, A.A., Bayoumi, RE. Influence of Nanocoats on the Physicomechanical Properties and Microleakage of Bulk-fill and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22(1): 62-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3020
Hafez, M.A., Elkateb, M., El Shabrawy, S., et al. Microleakage evaluation of composite restorations following papain-based chemo-mechanical caries removal in primary teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017; 41: 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-41.1.53
Sharafeddin, F., Yousefi, H., Modiri, S., et al. Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts Using two Adhesives after ging. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013; 14: 90-5.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry reference manual. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 2008.
Vishnurekha C, Annamalai S, Baghkomeh P.N, et al. Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29(6): 744-748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17
Mousavinenasab, S.M., Jafary, M. Microleakage of composite restorations following chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal. Front Dent. 2004: 1(4): 12-7.
Valeri, A. In Vitro Wear of Glass-Ionomer Containing Restorative Materials: (Doctoral dissertation, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 2021.
Kielbassa, A.M., Oehme, E.P., Shakavets, N., et al. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. J Dent. 2021; 105: 103554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103554
Basso, M., Brambilla, E., Benites, M.G., et al. Glassionomer cement for permanent dental restorations: a 48-months, mul-ti-centre, prospective clinical trial. Stoma Edu J. 2015; 2(1): 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25241/stomaeduj.2015.2(1).art.1
Gopinath, V.K. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass iono-mer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017; 35(3): 238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_17_17
Alwan, S.Q., Al-Waheb, A.M. Effect of Nano-Coating on Microleakage of Different Capsulated Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021; 15(4): 2674-2684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i4.17109