Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 13, 2011

Gas-liquid slug formation at a rectangular microchannel T-junction: A CFD benchmark case

  • Rafael Santos EMAIL logo and Masahiro Kawaji
From the journal Open Engineering

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is an important tool for development of microfluidic systems based on gasliquid two-phase flow. The formation of Taylor slugs at microchannel T-junctions has been studied both experimentally and numerically, however discrepancies still exist because of difficulties in correctly representing experimental conditions and uncertainties in the physics controlling slug flow, such as contact line and velocity slip. In this paper detailed methods and results are described for the study of Santos and Kawaji [1] on the comparison of experimental results and numerical modeling. The system studied consisted of a rectangular microchannel Tjunction nominally 100 μm in hydraulic diameter, used to generate Taylor slugs from air-water perpendicular flow. The effect of flow rates on parameters such as slug length, velocity slip, void fraction and two-phase frictional pressure drop were studied. Numerical simulation was performed using FLUENT volume-of-fluid (VOF) model. It is proposed in this paper that this microfluidic problem be taken up by researchers in the field as a benchmark case to test other numeric codes in comparison to FLUENT on the prediction of micro-scale multiphase flow, and also to model in more detail the experimental system described to obtain greater accuracy in prediction of microfluidic slug formation.

[1] Santos R.M., Kawaji M., Numerical modeling and experimental investigation of gas-liquid slug formation in a microchannel T-junction, INT J MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2010, 4, 314–323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.11.00910.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.11.009Search in Google Scholar

[2] Dai L., Cai W., Xin F., Numerical study on bubble formation of a gas-liquid flow in a T-Junction microchannel, CHEM ENG TECHNOL., 2009, 32, 1984–1991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ceat.20090035110.1002/ceat.200900351Search in Google Scholar

[3] van der Graaf S., Nisisako T., Schroën C.G.P.H., van der Sman R.G.M., Boom R.M., Lattice Boltzmann simulations of droplet formation in a T-Shaped microchannel, LANGMUIR, 2006, 22, 4144–4152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la052682f10.1021/la052682fSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Gupta A., Kumar R., Effect of geometry on droplet formation in the squeezing regime in a microfluidic Tjunction, MICROFLUID NANOFLUID., 2010, 8, 799–812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0513-710.1007/s10404-009-0513-7Search in Google Scholar

[5] Brauner N., Moalem-Maron D., Identification of the range of small diameter conduits, regarding two-phase flow pattern transition, INT. COMMUN. HEAT MASS TRANSFER, 1992, 19, 29–39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0735-1933(92)90061-L10.1016/0735-1933(92)90061-LSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Akbar M.K., Plummer D.A., Ghiaasiaan S.M., On gas-liquid two-phase flow regimes in microchannels, INT. J. MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2003, 29, 855–865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(03)00043-010.1016/S0301-9322(03)00043-0Search in Google Scholar

[7] Garstecki P., Fuerstman M.J., Stone H.A., Whitesides G.M., Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction — scaling and mechanism of break-up, LAB CHIP, 2006, 6, 437–446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b510841a10.1039/b510841aSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Kawahara A., Chung P.M.-Y., Kawaji M., Investigation of two-phase flow pattern, void fraction and pressure drop in a microchannel, INT J MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2002, 28, 1411–1435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00037-X10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00037-XSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Qian D., Lawal A., Numerical study on gas and liquid slugs for Taylor flow in a T-junction microchannel, CHEM ENG SCI., 2006, 61, 7609–7625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.07310.1016/j.ces.2006.08.073Search in Google Scholar

[10] Freire S., Wheeler A.R., Proteome-on-a-Chip: Mirage, or on the Horizon?, LAB CHIP, 2006, 6, 1415–1423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b609871a10.1039/b609871aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Fiddes L., Young E.W.K., Kumacheva E., Wheeler A.R., Flow of Microgel Capsules through Topographically Patterned Microchannels, LAB CHIP, 2007, 7, 863–867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b703297h10.1039/b703297hSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Cabral J.T., Hudson S.D., Microfluidic approach for rapid multicomponent interfacial tensiometry, LAB CHIP, 2006, 6, 427–436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b511976f10.1039/b511976fSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Feng X., Yi Y., Yu X., Pang D-.W., Zhang Z-.L., Generation of water-ionic liquid droplet pairs in soybean oil on microfluidic chip, LAB CHIP, 2009, 10, 313–319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b918167a10.1039/B918167ASearch in Google Scholar

[14] Takei G., Nonogi M., Hibara A., Kitamori T., Kim H-.B., Tuning microchannel wettability and fabrication of multiple-step Laplace valves, LAB CHIP, 2007, 7, 596–602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b618851f10.1039/b618851fSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Fu T., Ma Y., Funfschilling D., Zhu C., Li H.Z., Squeezing-to-dripping transition for bubble formation in a microfluidic T-junction, CHEM ENG SCI., 2010, 65, 3739–3748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.03.01210.1016/j.ces.2010.03.012Search in Google Scholar

[16] Yun J., Lei Q., Zhang S., Shen S., Yao K., Slug flow characteristics of gas-miscible liquids in a rectangular microchannel with cross and T-shaped junctions, CHEM ENG SCI., 2010, 65, 5256–5263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.06.03110.1016/j.ces.2010.06.031Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hwang D.J., Choi T.Y., Grigoropoulos C.P., Liquidassisted femtosecond laser drilling of straight and three-dimensional microchannels in glass, APPL. PHYS. A, 2004, 79, 605–612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2547-810.1007/s00339-004-2547-8Search in Google Scholar

[18] Matsuo S., Tabuchi Y., Okada T., Juodkazis S., Misawa H., Femtosecond laser assisted etching of quartz: microstructuring from inside, APPL. PHYS. A, 2006, 84, 99–102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00339-006-3603-310.1007/s00339-006-3603-3Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hoffman R.L., A study of the advancing interface, Part I: interface shape in liquid-gas systems, J. COLLOID INTERFACE SCI., 1975, 50, 228–241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(75)90225-810.1016/0021-9797(75)90225-8Search in Google Scholar

[20] Fluent, FLUENT 6.2 documentation, Fluent Incorporated, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA, 2006 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kawahara A., Sadatomi M., Kumagae K., Effect of gas-liquid inlet/mixing conditions on two-phase flow in microchannels, PROGR MULTIPHASE FLOW RES., 2006, 1, 197–204, (in Japanese) http://dx.doi.org/10.3811/pmfr.1.19710.3811/pmfr.1.197Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lockhart R.W., Martinelli R.C., Proposed correlation of data for isothermal two-phase, two-component flow in pipes, CHEM ENG PROG., 1949, 45, 39–48 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Chisholm D., A theoretical basis for the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation for two-phase flow, INT J HEAT MASS TRANSFER, 1967, 10, 1767–1778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(67)90047-610.1016/0017-9310(67)90047-6Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2011-10-13
Published in Print: 2011-12-1

© 2011 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 25.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13531-011-0038-1/html
Scroll to top button