Cybersickness Response among Nursing Students in using  Virtual Reality: A Pre-Experimental Study

Noviani Megatami; Iqbal Pramukti; Raini Diah Susanti

doi:10.24198/jnc.v6i2.44310

Cybersickness Response among Nursing Students in using Virtual Reality: A Pre-Experimental Study

Noviani Megatami, Iqbal Pramukti, Raini Diah Susanti

Abstract

The rapid growth of information and communication technology, such as virtual reality, affects students’ learning outcomes and their success in providing health services in the future. However, prolonged use of immersive technology could lead to health problems due to repetitive interaction with hardware devices, resulting in a sensory conflict called cybersickness. This study aimed to identify the cybersickness response among nursing students in using virtual reality. This research used a pre-experiment design, and a total of 49 nursing students participated. The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire was used to assess cybersickness and physiological responses. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The median post-test values for the three components (nausea, oculomotor, disorientation) in cybersickness were 28.7; 45.5; 83.6; and 606.1, respectively. We found statistically significant differences in cybersickness between pre- and post-intervention periods (p < .001). Heart rate and body temperature increased significantly (p < .001; p < .001, respectively), while in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased (p < .001). According to the findings, using VR as an alternative learning media could initiate cybersickness on a certain level. Thus, the physiological response would be different for each participant.

Keywords

Cybersickness, Physiological response, Virtual Reality (VR)

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bockelman, P., & Lingum, D. (2017). Factors of cybersickness. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 714, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58753-0_1

Cahan, A., Ben-Dov, I. Z., & Bursztyn, M. (2012). Association of heart rate with blood pressure variability: Implications for blood pressure measurement. American Journal of Hypertension, 25(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2011.230

Chang, E., Kim, H. T., & Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1658–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351

Dhabhar, F. S., Malarkey, W. B., Neri, E., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Stress-induced redistribution of immune cells—From barracks to boulevards to battlefields: A tale of three hormones–Curt Richter Award Winner. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1345-1368.

Gallagher, M., & Ferrè, E. R. (2018). Cybersickness: A multisensory integration perspective. Multisensory Research, 31(7), 645–674. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20181293

Gavgani, A. M., Nesbitt, K. V., Blackmore, K. L., & Nalivaiko, E. (2017). Profiling subjective symptoms and autonomic changes associated with cybersickness. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 203, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2016.12.004

Guna, J., Geršak, G., Humar, I., Krebl, M., Orel, M., Lu, H., & Pogačnik, M. (2020). Virtual reality sickness and challenges behind different technology and content settings. Mobile Networks and Applications, 25(4), 1436–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01373-w

Kim, Y. S., Won, J., Jang, S.-W., & Ko, J. (2022). Effects of cybersickness caused by head-mounted display–based virtual reality on physiological responses: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Serious Games, 10(4), e37938. https://doi.org/10.2196/37938

Nesbitt, N. &. (2018). Cybersickness. In Digital Diseases (pp. 15–52). Peter Lang AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9_252-1

Palmisano, S., Allison, R. S., & Kim, J. (2020). Cybersickness in head-mounted displays is caused by differences in the user’s virtual and physical head pose. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.587698

Passig, D., Tzuriel, D., & Eshel-Kedmi, G. (2016). Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D Immersive Virtual Reality environments. Computers and Education, 95, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.009

Rebenitsch, L., & Owen, C. (2021). Estimating cybersickness from virtual reality applications. Virtual Reality, 25(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00446-6

Sevinc, V., & Berkman, M. I. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of Simulator Sickness Questionnaire and its variants as a measure of cybersickness in consumer virtual environments. Applied Ergonomics, 82(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102958

Trahan, M. H., Smith, K. S., & Talbot, T. B. (2019). Past, present, and future: Editorial on virtual reality applications to human services. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1587334

Werrlich, S., Lorber, C., & Nguyen, P. (2018). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality: Interaction, navigation, visualization, embodiment, and simulation. In 10th International Conference, VAMR (pp. 15-20).

Yu, J., Chung, Y., Lee, J. E., Suh, D. H., Wie, J. H., Ko, H. S., Park, I. Y., & Shin, J. C. (2019). The educational effects of a pregnancy simulation in medical/nursing students and professionals. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1589-8

Zwart, D. P., Goei, S. L., Noroozi, O., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2021). The effects of computer-based virtual learning environments on nursing students’ mathematical learning in medication processes. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00147-x