Email this article 
Framing analysis of Anies Baswedan as an Indonesian presidential candidate in the sacrificial cow numbered 024 case
Abstract
Background: The news coverage from Detik.com and Kompas.com regarding the sacrificial cow numbered 024, associated with Anies as a presidential candidate for 2024, presents an intriguing subject. These media outlets differ in their ideologies. Purpose: This study aims to examine the framing of Anies as a 2024 presidential candidate in the news coverage of Detik.com and Kompas.com during the Eid al-Adha moment in 2022. As each moment during a Political Year holds the potential to influence public opinion and impact the electability of political figures, understanding the framing strategies employed by the media is crucial. Method: This research utilizes a qualitative approach, analyzing ten news articles from Detik.com and two news articles from Kompas.com. The analysis includes an examination of titles, news content, and accompanying pictures or photos, employing Robert Mathew Entman’s framing analysis model. Results: Detik.com and Kompas.com adopt different perspectives in framing the news about Anies. Detik.com presents news in two directions, where some articles suggest that the existence of cow number 024 is merely coincidental, while others imply a connection between the incident and political issues. In contrast, Kompas.com employs a single form of framing, portraying it as a political symbol. Conclusion: It can be concluded that Kompas.com’s coverage is relatively limited and less accommodating compared to Detik.com. However, Kompas.com presents Anies’ reporting as a form of “political language,” positioning him as a potential “dark horse” in the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election. Implications: This study sheds light on the construction of meaning and public opinion towards Anies, influenced by the news consumed by individuals. The media’s framing of Anies plays a significant role in shaping public perception and impacting public opinion regarding his candidacy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adriyanto, S. (2018). Konstruksi Berita pasca pelantikan gubernur baru Dki Jakarta Anies Baswedan – Sandiaga Uno Periode 2017-2022. 2022.
Blagus, N., & Žitnik, S. (2018). Social media comparison and analysis: The best data source for research? 2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2018.8406662
Boulianne, S. (2018). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186
Crilley, R., & Gillespie, M. (2019). What to do about social media? Politics, populism, and journalism. Journalism, 20(1), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807344
El Damanhoury, K., & Garud-Paktar, N. (2022). Soft power journalism: a visual framing analysis of covid-19 on xinhua and voa’s instagram pages. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1546–1568. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1957969
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Erdal, M. B., Fitzmaurice, M., Ivanova, M., & Karl, E. (2022). Documentation of qualitative data collection (Vol. 2022, Issue October). file:///D:/TUGAS/Referensi Mendeley/BUKU teknik dokumentasi.pdf
García-Orosa, B., López-García, X., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2020). Journalism in digital native media: Beyond technological determinism. Media and Communication, 8(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2702
Gondwe, G. (2020). How ‘qualitable’ is qualitative research in communication studies? examining the pragmatic use and acceptance in media studies. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1991, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562046
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
Harder, R. A., Paulussen, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). Making sense of twitter buzz. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 933–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1160790
Hart, C. (2023). Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155071
Hypestat. (2023). Traffic summary. Hypestat.Com.
Indonesia, P. (1999). Undang-undang (UU) No. 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Kim, K. (2019). The hostile media phenomenon: testing the effect of news framing on perceptions of media bias. Communication Research Reports, 36(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1555659
Kulkarni, V., Ye, J., Skiena, S., & Wang, W. Y. (2018). Multi-view models for political ideology detection of news articles. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2018, 3518–3527. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1388
Kusnandar, V. (2022). Survei: Anies Baswedan raih elektabilitas tertinggi di simulasi pilpres. Databoks.Katadata.Com.
Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). News framing effects on what? In News Framing Effects. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208077-3
LSIN. (2021). Rilis hasil survei nasional lsin elektabilitas capres parpol.
Maćkiewicz, J. (2020). Interpretative frame as a research tool in media studies. Studia Medioznawcze. 21(3), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.33077/uw.24511617.ms.2020.3.251
Nwakpu, E. S., Ezema, V. O., & Ogbodo, J. N. (2020). Nigeria media framing of coronavirus pandemic and audience response. Health Promotion Perspectives, 10(3), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2020.32
Pintak, L., Bowe, B. J., & Nazir, S. J. (2016). Mediatization in Pakistan: Perceptions of media influence on a fragile democracy. Journalism, 19(7), 934–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916663624
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden.
Schulze, H. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925
Similarweb. (2022). Top Website Ranking. https://www.similarweb.com/top-websites/indonesia/category/news-and-media/
Susánszky, P., Kopper, Á., & Zsigó, F. T. (2022). Media framing of political protests–reporting bias and the discrediting of political activism. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(4), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2061817
Tarish, A. H., Abdalhakeem, S. H., & Al Hasani, S. (2022). American media framing of Bush, Obama, and Trump speeches. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2115245
Tosepu, Y. A. (2018). Media baru dalam komunikasi politik (komunikasi politik i dunia virtual). Jakad Media Publishing.
Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2019). News frame analysis: an inductive mixed-method computational approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145
Zulkarnain. (2022). Analisi framing pemberitaan pemanggilan Anies Baswedan oleh kpk diharian Kompas.com. Jagakarsa, 5(3), 248–253.
Digital Object Identifier
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v11i1.46725Dimension Citation Metrics Badge
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aditya Dwi Putra Bhakti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aditya Dwi Putra Bhakti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:
2.png){kind=small}
Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:
Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)
Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: jurnal.kajian.komunikasi@unpad.ac.id | jurnalkajiankomunikasiunpad@gmail.com
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by:
