1. Home
  2. Vol 2, No 2 (2021)
  3. Zera

Increasing student identity in preventing student aggressive behavior

Arga Dian Zera(1*), Firman Firman(2), Yanuar Kiram(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

The low self-identity of students causes aggressive behavior. The phenomenon of aggressive behavior is the act of attacking others directly or indirectly to hurt others both physically and psychologically. Aggressiveness among adolescents is increasing from year to year, based on data released by the Central Statistics Agency, in 2007 it was recorded that 3145 adolescents aged ? 18 years of age became criminals and continued to increase to 3280 in 2007, and 4123 in 2008. Self-identity is one of the factors that influence the emergence of aggressive behavior. The purpose of this study is to describe the self-identity of students at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Padang City. This research uses descriptive analysis. The sample of this study was 114 students who were taken using purposive sampling technique. The instrument used was "Self-identity scale in preventing aggressiveness" with a reliability value of 0.881. The results showed that: (1) the aspect of Identity diffusion was in the medium category with a percentage of 67%; (2) Identity foreclosure aspects are in the medium category with a percentage of 39%; (3) the Identity aspect of the moratorium is in the low category with a percentage of 45%; and (4) Identity achievement is in the low category with a percentage of 41.2%. The results of the study generally show that the students' self-identity is in the medium category with a percentage of 71.1% and it needs to be improved in order to prevent aggressive behavior.

References

K. P. A. I. (2016). Tabulasi data kasus per-tahun: rincian data kasus berdasarkan kluster perlindungan [Internet]. Diakes pada : http://bankdata.kpai.go.id/tabulasidata/data-kasus-per-tahun/rincian-datakasus-berdasarkan-klasterperlindungan-anak-2011-2016.

Agustriana, N. (2018). Pengaruh metode edutainment dan identitas diri terhadap keterampilan sosial anak. Al Fitrah, 2(1), 216–228.

Aji. (2013). Kasus tawuran pelajar Jakarta terus meningkat. Diakses melalui http://www.tribunnews.com/metropolitan/2013/12/22/kasus-tawuran-pelajar-jakarta-terus-meningkat-tahun-ini, pada 29 Desember 2018.

Alhadi, S., Purwadi, & Muyana, S. (2017). Memahami perilaku agresif siswa di sekolah. 288–294.

Arif, M., Situmorang, N. Z., & Tentama, F. (2019). Bentuk-bentuk perilaku agresif pada remaja. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Magister Psikologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, (1992), 299–304.

Aulya, A., Ilyas, A., & Ifdil. (2016). Perbedaan perilaku agresif siswa laki-laki dan siswa perempuan. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(1), 92–97.

Berdibayeva, S., Garber, A., Ivanov, D., Satybaldina, N., Smatova, K., & Yelubayeva, M. (2016). Identity crisis’ resolution among psychological correction of deviant behavior of adolescents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.077

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Amerika: Sage Publications.

Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2012). Identity formation in educational settings: a contextualized view of theory and research in practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 240–245.

Hayati, R., Firman, & Marsidin, S. (2015). Efektivitas layanan informasi menggunakan pendekatan role playing untuk mengurangi agresivitas siswa. Konselor, 2(1), 1–6.

Herawati, A. A., Nirwana, H., & Syahniar. (2018). The students ’ aggressiveness in senior high school b ased on gender. PROCEEDING International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology, 346–352.

Hidayah, N., & Huriati. (2016). Krisis identitas diri pada remaja “identity crisis of adolescences.” Sulesana, 10(1), 49–62.

Hidayat, H., Yusri, Y., & Ilyas, A. (2015). Profil siswa agresif dan peranan guru bk. Konselor, 4(4), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.24036/02015446472-0-00

Irianto, A., Aimon, H., Nirwana, H., & Prasetia, A. T. (2018). Populasi komunikasi interpersonal antara orang tua dan anak remaja serta identitas diri remaja: Studi di Bina Keluarga Remaja Parupuk Tabing.Populasi, 26(1), 16–25.

Karneli, Y., Firman, & Netrawati. (2019). Upaya guru bk/konselor untuk menurunkan perilaku agresif siswa dengan menggunakan konseling kreatif dalam bingkai modifikasi kognitif perilaku. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.24036/fip.100.v18i2.430.000-000

Kothari, C. R. (1990). Research methodology methods and technique. Jaipur (India).

Maslikan. (2018). Keefektifan konseling kelompok realita untuk sekolah menengah pertama. PERSPEKTIF Ilmu Pendidikan, 32(2), 107–115.

Morsunbul, U. (2015). The effect of identity development, self-esteem, low self-control and gender on aggression in adolescence and emerging adulthiood. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(61), 99–116.

Muttaqin, D., & Ekowarni, E. (2016). Pembentukan identitas remaja di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 231–247.

Nengsih, N., Firman, F., & Iswari, M. (2015). Pengaruh layanan bimbingan kelompok terhadap perencanaan arah karier siswa SMA Pembangunan Laboratorium Universitas Negeri Padang.

Nurmina. dkk. (2003). Penelitian Penanggulangan Tindakan Kekerasan dan Agresivitas pada Remaja di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Sumatera Barat: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Balitbang) Kerjasama dengan Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Padang.

Pratama, R., Syahniar, S., & Karneli, Y. (2016). Perilaku agresif siswa dari keluarga broken home. Konselor, 5(4), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.24036/02016546557-0-00

Rahayu, G., Nirwana, H., & Netrawati. (2021). Uncovering the identity conditions of high school students. International Journal of Applied Counseling and Social Sciences, 02(01), 27–33.

Rahma, F. M., Sumi, L., & Faizah. (2019). Hubungan tiga tipe kepribadian neurotik (karen horney) dengan kenakalan remaja pada siswa kelaS X Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 3 Malang.

Ramdhanu, C. A., Sunarya, Y., & Nurhudaya. (2019). Faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi identitas diri. Journal of Innovative Counseling : Theory, Practice & Research, 3(1), 7–17. Retrieved from https://journal.umtas.ac.id/index.php/innovative_counseling/article/download/380/234/

Retnowuni, A., & Linda Yani, A. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku agresif pada remaja yang tinggal di Pesantren. Journal of Holistic Nursing Science, 6(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.31603/nursing.v6i1.2406

Sagarmatha, G., & Karneli, Y. (2020). Relatioship of authoritary parents patterns (authoritarian parenting style) towards aggressive student’ behavior and its implications in counseling and counseling services. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24036/00303kons2020

Siswoyo, & Yuliansyah. (2017). Hubungan antara confused identity dengan perilaku agresif remaja pada siswa SMP Negeri 22 Kelas VII Palembang. Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 2(1), 75–83.

Sriwahyuningsih, V., Yusuf, A. M., & Daharnis. (2016). Hubungan prasangka dan frustrasi dengan perilaku agresif remaja. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 2(2), 38–51.

Wulandari, A. P., Firman, & Solfema. (2020). Pengembangan panduan bimbingan kelompok dalam peningkatan determinasi diri ( self determination ). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 175–184.

Zulaiha, Husen, M., & Bakar, A. (2019). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Perilaku Agresif Pada Siswa.Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bimbingan dan Konseling, 4(1), 77–82.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/005428ijaccs
10.24036/005428ijaccs

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 298 times
PDF : 86 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.