JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |
YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Minerva Anestesiologica 2023 April;89(4):273-8
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16771-4
Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Impact of the presence of a humanoid robot in the anesthesia visit waiting room on patient’s satisfaction: the PEPPER before-after study
Romain BRONNERT, Claire NICOLLEAU, Guillaume BOUHOURS, Calliope BUTRULLE, Emmanuel RINEAU, Sigismond LASOCKI ✉
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Angers, University of Angers, Angers, France
BACKGROUND: The quality of information during a medical visit, such as a preoperative anesthesia visit, impacts patient’s satisfaction. New digital supports, including humanoid robots, have been recently proposed to provide medical information to patients. We aimed to assess whether the presence of a PEPPER humanoid robot, programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery and placed in the waiting room for a preoperative anesthesia visit, can improve patient overall satisfaction.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, before-after study. French-speaking adult patient global satisfaction (rated from 0 to 10) was measured after a scheduled preoperative anesthesia visit (for orthopedic, abdominal, urologic surgeries or for endoscopy), by direct interview with a research person, before modification of usual practices (information leaflets and brochure were given to the patients prior to the visit), and after the implementation in the waiting room of a PEPPER humanoid robot programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery through short videos, designed by a group of healthcare workers and patients.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients (237 [80%] ASA I-II) were included, 179 before and 117 after periods. Patient global satisfaction was not different (8.9±1.6 vs. 9.0±1.4/10, for before and after periods, P=0.53). However, the satisfaction on the information about risks was significantly improved in the after period (8.5±2.3 vs. 9.1±1.4/10, P=0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a humanoid PEPPER robot in the waiting room did not improve patient’s global satisfaction about anesthesia visit.
KEY WORDS: Anesthesia; Medicine; Patient satisfaction