Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2023 April;89(4) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2023 April;89(4):273-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Anestesiologica 2023 April;89(4):273-8

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16771-4

Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Impact of the presence of a humanoid robot in the anesthesia visit waiting room on patient’s satisfaction: the PEPPER before-after study

Romain BRONNERT, Claire NICOLLEAU, Guillaume BOUHOURS, Calliope BUTRULLE, Emmanuel RINEAU, Sigismond LASOCKI

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Angers, University of Angers, Angers, France



BACKGROUND: The quality of information during a medical visit, such as a preoperative anesthesia visit, impacts patient’s satisfaction. New digital supports, including humanoid robots, have been recently proposed to provide medical information to patients. We aimed to assess whether the presence of a PEPPER humanoid robot, programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery and placed in the waiting room for a preoperative anesthesia visit, can improve patient overall satisfaction.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, before-after study. French-speaking adult patient global satisfaction (rated from 0 to 10) was measured after a scheduled preoperative anesthesia visit (for orthopedic, abdominal, urologic surgeries or for endoscopy), by direct interview with a research person, before modification of usual practices (information leaflets and brochure were given to the patients prior to the visit), and after the implementation in the waiting room of a PEPPER humanoid robot programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery through short videos, designed by a group of healthcare workers and patients.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients (237 [80%] ASA I-II) were included, 179 before and 117 after periods. Patient global satisfaction was not different (8.9±1.6 vs. 9.0±1.4/10, for before and after periods, P=0.53). However, the satisfaction on the information about risks was significantly improved in the after period (8.5±2.3 vs. 9.1±1.4/10, P=0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a humanoid PEPPER robot in the waiting room did not improve patient’s global satisfaction about anesthesia visit.


KEY WORDS: Anesthesia; Medicine; Patient satisfaction

top of page