Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (P-PCNL) reporting checklist

Authors

  • Patrick Juliebø-Jones Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
  • Øyvind Ulvik Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Christian Beisland Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Bhaskar K Somani Department of Urology, University Hospital, Southampton, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.13392

Keywords:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, urolithiasis, paediatric, checklist

Abstract

Objective: To develop a reporting checklist that serves to improve and standardise reporting in studies pertaining to paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods: Based on findings from systematic review of literature, a draft list of items was formulated. By process of review and revisions, a finalised version was established and consensus achieved.

Results: The finalised version of the checklist covers four main sections, which include the following areas: study details, pre-operative, operative and post-operative information. There are 18 further sub-items. Recommendations deemed to be of high importance to include are highlighted in bold.

Conclusion: This practical tool can aid clinicians and researchers when undertaking and reviewing studies on paediatric PCNL. This is highly relevant given the current heterogeneity that exists as well as debate in best practice patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, et al., editors. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. EAU Guidelines Edn Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam; 2022.

Quhal F, Al Faddagh A, Silay MS, et al. Paediatric stone management: innovations and standards. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(4):420–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001004

Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Jones P, et al. Trends of intervention for paediatric stone disease over the last two decades (2000–2015): a systematic review of literature. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(4):306–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.006

Jones P, Rob S, Griffin S, et al. Outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) for stone disease in the paediatric population: results of over 100 URS procedures from a UK tertiary centre. World J Urol. 2020;38(1):213–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02745-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02745-3

Chen Y, Deng T, Duan X, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:189–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1039-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1039-9

Zhao F-Z, Li J, Tang L, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive procedures for 10–20 mm pediatric renal stones – a bayesian network meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(6):771–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.08.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.08.019

Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285(15):1987–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.15.1987

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411

Juliebø-Jones P, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C, et al. Paediatric Ureteroscopy (P-URS) reporting checklist: a new tool to aid studies report the essential items on paediatric ureteroscopy for stone disease. Urolithiasis. 2023;51(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01408-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01408-8

Quiroz YY, Llorens E, Motta G, et al. Ultra-mini Pcnl with clear Petra(R) suction-evacuation access sheath and warming irrigation fluid system (Rocamed(R)) for stone treatment in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(5):750–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.048

Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik O. Current status of thulium fibre laser lithotripsy: an up-to-date review. BJU Int. 2021;128(5):531–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15551

Rashid AO, Amin SH, Al Kadum MA, et al. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex staghorn stones in children. Urol Int. 2019;102(3):356–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000499491

Jones P, Mishra D, Agrawal M, et al. Outcomes of ureteroscopy vs mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric upper urinary tract calculi: comparative nonrandomized outcomes from two tertiary endourology referral centers. J Endourol. 2020;34(7):735–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0172

Shah D, Patil A, Reddy N, et al. A clinical experience of thulium fibre laser in miniperc to dust with suction: a new horizon. World J Urol. 2021;39(7):2727–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03458-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03458-8

Jones P, Hawary A, Beck R, et al. Role of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric stone disease: a systematic review of literature. J Endourol. 2021;35(5):728–35. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0743

Jones P, Bennett G, Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Role of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques-micro and ultra-mini PCNL (<15F) in the pediatric population: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):816–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0136

DiBianco JM, Ghani KR. Precision stone surgery: current status of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(4):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01042-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01042-0

Brown G, Juliebo-Jones P, Keller EX, et al. Current status of nomograms and scoring systems in paediatric endourology: a systematic review of literature. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(5):572–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.08.021

Mourmouris P, Berdempes M, Markopoulos T, et al. Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the current best practice? Res Rep Urol. 2018;10:189–93. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S174396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S174396

Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, Tzelves L, et al. Assessment of single-probe dual-energy lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. World J Urol. 2023. Feb;41(2):551-565 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04278-2 Epub 2023 Jan 19. PMID: 36656331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04278-2

Carlos EC, Wollin DA, Winship BB, et al. In vitro comparison of a novel single probe dual-energy lithotripter to current devices. J Endourol. 2018;32(6):534–40. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0143

Bujons A, Millan F, Centeno C, et al. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with high-power holmium YAG laser in pediatric patients with staghorn and complex calculi. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):253.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.027

Thapa BB, Niranjan V. Mini PCNL over standard PCNL: what makes it better? Surg J (N Y). 2020;6(1):e19–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701225

Dell-Kuster S, Gomes NV, Gawria L, et al. Prospective validation of classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra): international, multicentre cohort study. BMJ. 2020;370:m2917. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2917

Voilette PD, Denstedt JD. Standardizing the reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(1):84–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124213

Grivas N, Thomas K, Drake T, et al. Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: a systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(5):612–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.003

Mishra SK, Ganpule A, Manohar T, et al. Surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2007;23(4):428–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.36718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.36718

Mehmi A, Jones P, Somani BK. Current status and role of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in endourology. Urology. 2021;148:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.022

Ellison JS, Lorenzo M, Beck H, et al. Comparative effectiveness of paediatric kidney stone surgery (the PKIDS trial): study protocol for a patient-centred pragmatic clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e056789. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056789

Dwyer ME, Dwyer JT, Cannon GM, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications is not a statistically reliable system for grading morbidity in pediatric urology. J Urol. 2016;195(2):460–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.071

Published

2023-11-21

How to Cite

Juliebø-Jones, P., Ulvik, Øyvind ., Beisland , C., & Somani, B. K. (2023). Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (P-PCNL) reporting checklist. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 58, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.13392

Issue

Section

Original research article