Spinal surgery and the risk of reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study based on Swedish spine and hip arthroplasty registers

Authors

  • Ted Eneqvist Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm
  • Louise Persson Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm
  • Emma Kojer Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
  • Linus Gunnarsson Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
  • Paul Gerdhem Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-7163

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.35228

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Fusion, Hip, Implants, Osteoarthritis, Spinal stenosis, Spine, Surgery

Abstract

Background and purpose: Studies suggest increased revision risk of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in individuals with lumbar spinal fusion, but studies including non-fused individuals are lacking. We aimed to investigate whether individuals undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery with or without fusion are at an increased risk of reoperation before or after THA.
Patients and methods: The Swedish Spine Register and the Swedish arthroplasty register were searched from 2000 through 2021. Chi-square, Kaplan–Meier and binary multivariate logistic regression were used to compare reoperation rates up to 10 years after THA surgery.
Results: 7,908 individuals had undergone lumbar spinal stenosis surgery (LSSS) (fusion n = 1,281) and THA. LSSS before THA compared with THA-only controls was associated with a higher risk of THA reoperations: 87 (2%) out of 3,892 vs. 123 (1%) out of 11,662 (P < 0.001). LSSS after THA compared with THA-only controls was not associated with a higher risk of reoperation, confirmed by Kaplan– Meier analyses and binary multivariate logistic regression. Mortality was lower in individuals undergoing both LSSS and THA, regardless of procedure order. There was no difference in THA reoperations in individuals who had undergone LSSS before THA without fusion or with fusion. The individuals who had undergone LSSS after THA with fusion had an increased risk of THA reoperation compared with those without fusion.
Conclusion: LSSS with or without fusion before THA is associated with an increased risk of THA reoperation. Spinal fusion increased the risk of reoperation of THA when performed after THA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Prather H, Van Dillen L R, Kymes S M, Armbrecht M A, Stwalley D, Clohisy J C. Impact of coexistent lumbar spine disorders on clinical outcomes and physician charges associated with total hip arthroplasty. Spine J 2012; 12: 363-369. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.002

Eneqvist T, Nemes S, Brisby H, Fritzell P, Garellick G, Rolfson O. Lumbar surgery prior to total hip arthroplasty is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-b: 759-65. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-0577.r2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0577.R2

Singh J A, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland J D. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol 2019; 46: 1134-40. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170990

Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ 2016; 352: h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6234

Chavarria J C, Douleh D G, York P J. The hip-spine challenge. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103: 1852-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01728

Onggo J R, Nambiar M, Onggo J D, Phan K, Ambikaipalan A, Babazadeh S, et al. Comparable dislocation and revision rates for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with subsequent or prior lumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur Spine J 2021; 30: 63-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06635-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06635-w

Buckland A J, Puvanesarajah V, Vigdorchik J, Schwarzkopf R, Jain A, Klineberg E O, et al. Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 585-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0657.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0657.R1

Perfetti D C, Schwarzkopf R, Buckland A J, Paulino C B, Vigdorchik J M. Prosthetic dislocation and revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in lumbar fusion patients: a propensity score matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1635-40 e1631. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.029

Sing D C, Barry J J, Aguilar T U, Theologis A A, Patterson J T, Tay B K, et al. Prior lumbar spinal arthrodesis increases risk of prostheticrelated complication in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 227-232 e221. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.069

Austevoll I M, Hermansen E, Fagerland M W, Storheim K, Brox J I, Solberg T, et al. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 526-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100990

Forsth P, Olafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstrom F, Fritzell P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513721

Fritzell P, Hägg O, Gerdhem P, Abbott A, Skarvinge C, Parai C, et al. Swespine årsrapport 2022. Uppföljning av ryggkirurgi utförd i Sverige år 2021. För Svensk Ryggkirurgisk förening [in Swedish]. Available from: https://swespine.se/page.aspx?id=12&lang=1. 2022.

W-Dahl A, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Mohaddes M, Carling M, Sundberg M, et al. Årsrapport 2022: Svenska Ledprotesregistret [in Swedish]. Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/slr/r/Svenska-Ledprotesregistret-rsrapport-2022_SE-2--BkxW4idh1s.pdf.2022.

Eneqvist T, Bulow E, Nemes S, Brisby H, Garellick G, Fritzell P, et al. Patients with a previous total hip replacement experience less reduction of back pain following lumbar back surgery. J Orthop Res 2018; 36: 2484-90. doi: 10.1002/jor.24018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24018

Eftekhary N, Shimmin A, Lazennec J Y, Buckland A, Schwarzkopf R, Dorr L D, et al. A systematic approach to the hip–spine relationship and its applications to total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B: 808-16. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1188.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1188.R1

Sultan A A, Khlopas A, Piuzzi N S, Chughtai M, Sodhi N, Mont M A. The impact of spino-pelvic alignment on total hip arthroplasty outcomes: a critical analysis of current evidence. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 1606-16. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.021

Forsth P, Svedmark P, Noz M E, Maguire G Q, Jr, Zeleznik M P, Sanden B. Motion analysis in lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a feasibility study of the 3DCT technique comparing laminectomy versus bilateral laminotomy. Clin Spine Surg 2018; 31: E397-E402. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000677

Lener S, Schmolz W, Abramovic A, Kluger P, Thome C, Hartmann S. The effect of various options for decompression of degenerated lumbar spine motion segments on the range of motion: a biomechanical in vitro study. Eur Spine J 2023; 32: 1358-66. doi: 10.1007/s00586-02307587-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07587-7

Eneqvist T, Bulow E, Nemes S, Brisby H, Fritzell P, Rolfson O. Does the order of total hip replacement and lumbar spinal stenosis surgery influence patient-reported outcomes: an observational register study. J Orthop Res 2021; 39: 998-1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24813

Barrett J, Losina E, Baron J A, Mahomed N N, Wright J, Katz J N. Survival following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1965-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02440

Lie S A, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I, Gjessing H K, Vollset S E. Mortality after total hip replacement: 0–10-year follow-up of 39,543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 19-27. doi: 10.1080/00016470052943838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470052943838

Paavolainen P, Pukkala E, Pulkkinen P, Visuri T. Causes of death after total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide cohort study with 24,638 patients. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 274-81. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.30774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.30774

Chen Y C, Huang W C, Chang H K, Lirng J F, Wu J C. Long term outcomes and effects of surgery on degenerative spinal deformity: a 14-year national cohort study. J Clin Med 2019; 8. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040483

Published

2024-01-18

How to Cite

Eneqvist, T., Persson, L., Kojer, E., Gunnarsson, L., & Gerdhem, P. (2024). Spinal surgery and the risk of reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study based on Swedish spine and hip arthroplasty registers. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.35228