The effect of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Samuel Ask Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8385-5130
  • Kristina Schildmeijer Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-674X
  • Viktor Kaldo Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden; Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-5279
  • Amanda Hellström Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-9552

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24204

Keywords:

cancer, meta-analysis, psychosocial interventions, sexual health, systematic review, pelvic cancer

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore and evaluate the effect of psychosocial interventions in improving sexual health outcomes among post-treatment patients with pelvic cancer.

Methods: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pelvic cancer survivors; psychosocial interventions; studies with a control group and measures of sexual health. Five databases were searched for literature along with an inspection of the included studies’ reference lists to extend the search. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2 tool. Standardised mean difference (SMD) with a random effects model was used to determine the effect size of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancers.

Results: Thirteen studies were included, with a total number of 1,541 participants. There was a large heterogeneity regarding the type of psychosocial intervention used with the source found in a leave one out analysis. Six studies showed statistically significant improvements in sexual health, while three showed positive but non-significant effects. The summary effect size estimate was small SMD = 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05 to 0.42, p = 0.01).

Discussion: There is limited research on psychosocial interventions for sexual health in pelvic cancer patients. There are also limitations in the different pelvic cancer diagnoses examined. Commonly, the included articles examined physical function rather than the whole sexual health spectrum. The small effect sizes may in part be due to evaluation of psychosocial interventions by measuring physical dysfunction. Future research should broaden sexual health assessment tools and expand investigations to more cancer types.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Cancer prevention and control in the context of an integrated approach [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2023 Sep 08]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB140/B140_31-en.pdf

WHO. World Health Organization. Global health estimates: leading causes of death 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 08]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB140/B140_31-en.pdf

Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–1075.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3

Odeo S, Degu A. Factors affecting health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020;26(8):1997–2010.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155220959414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155220959414

Roussin M, Lowe J, Hamilton A, Martin L. Factors of sexual quality of life in gynaecological cancers: a systematic literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(3):791–805.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06056-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06056-0

Traa MJ, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Den Oudsten BL. Sexual (dys)function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(1):19–27.

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr133

Bessa A, Martin R, Häggström C, Enting D, Amery S, Khan MS, et al. Unmet needs in sexual health in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review of the evidence. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):64.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00634-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00634-1

Evans Webb M, Murray E, Younger ZW, Goodfellow H, Ross J. The supportive care needs of cancer patients: a systematic review. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36(5):899–908.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01941-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01941-9

Flynn KE, Reese JB, Jeffery DD, Abernethy AP, Lin L, Shelby RA, et al. Patient experiences with communication about sex during and after treatment for cancer. Psychooncology. 2012;21(6):594–601.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1947

Falk SJ, Dizon DS. Sexual health issues in cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36(1):150981.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.150981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.150981

Robinson BB, Bockting WO, Rosser BR, Miner M, Coleman E. The sexual health model: application of a sexological approach to HIV prevention. Health Educ Res. 2002;17(1):43–57.

https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.1.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.1.43

World Health Organization. Defining sexual health - report of technical consultation on sexual health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006 [cited 2023 Sep 08]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/sexual-health

Mitchell KR, Lewis R, O’Sullivan LF, Fortenberry JD. What is sexual wellbeing and why does it matter for public health? Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(8):e608–13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00099-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00099-2

Krouwel EM, Albers LF, Nicolai MPJ, Putter H, Osanto S, Pelger RCM, et al. Discussing sexual health in the medical oncologist’s practice: exploring current practice and challenges. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35(6):1072–1088.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01559-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01559-6

Wennerberg C, Schildmeijer K, Hellström A, Ekstedt M. Patient experiences of self-care management after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;50:101894.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101894

Barbera L, Zwaal C, Elterman D, McPherson K, Wolfman W, Katz A, et al. Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(3):192–200.

https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3583

Treanor CJ, Santin O, Prue G, Coleman H, Cardwell CR, O’Halloran P, et al. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6(6):Cd009912.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2

Kang HS, Kim HK, Park SM, Kim JH. Online-based interventions for sexual health among individuals with cancer: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):167.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2972-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2972-6

Kim JH, Yang Y, Hwang ES. The effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions focused on sexuality in cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(5):E32–E42.

https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000212

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 15]. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Programme CAS. CASP randomised controlled trial checklist 2021 [cited 2023 Sep 15]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Randomised-Controlled-Trial-Checklist/CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable-Form.pdf

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. [cited 2023 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/

Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48.

https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Wittmann D, Mehta A, Bober SL, Zhu Z, Daignault-Newton S, Dunn RL, et al. TrueNTH Sexual Recovery Intervention for couples coping with prostate cancer: randomized controlled trial results. Cancer. 2022;128(7):1513–1522.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34076

Field AP, Gillett R. How to do a meta-analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010;63(Pt 3):665–694.

https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733

Viechtbauer W. Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005;30(3):261–293.

https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030003261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030003261

Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10(1):101–129.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS, Eton DT, Schulz R. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol. 2003;22(5):443–452.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.443

Schover LR, Canada AL, Yuan Y, Sui D, Neese L, Jenkins R, et al. A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer. 2012;118(2):500–509.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26308

Chambers SK, Ferguson M, Gardiner RA, Aitken J, Occhipinti S. Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(5):1025–1034.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3095

Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Schover L, Nielsen L, Zajdlewicz L, Clutton S, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a couples-based sexuality intervention for men with localised prostate cancer and their female partners. Psychooncology. 2015;24(7):748–756.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3726

DuHamel K, Schuler T, Nelson C, Philip E, Temple L, Schover L, et al. The sexual health of female rectal and anal cancer survivors: results of a pilot randomized psycho-educational intervention trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(3):553–563.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0501-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0501-8

Li J, Huang J, Zhang J, Li Y. A home-based, nurse-led health program for postoperative patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;21:174–180.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.009

Mohammadi Z, Maasoumi R, Vosoughi N, Eftekhar T, Soleimani M, Montazeri A. The effect of the EX-PLISSIT model-based psychosexual counseling on improving sexual function and sexual quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(11):9117–9126.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07332-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07332-8

Penedo FJ, Traeger L, Dahn J, Molton I, Gonzalez JS, Schneiderman N, et al. Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention improves quality of life in Spanish monolingual Hispanic men treated for localized prostate cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Med. 2007;14(3):164–172.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000188

Robertson J, McNamee P, Molloy G, Hubbard G, McNeill A, Bollina P, et al. Couple-based psychosexual support following prostate cancer surgery: results of a feasibility pilot randomized control trial. J Sex Med. 2016;13(8):1233–1242.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.013

Schofield P, Gough K, Pascoe M, Bergin R, White K, Mileshkin L, et al. A nurse- and peer-led psycho-educational intervention to support women with gynaecological cancers receiving curative radiotherapy: The PeNTAGOn randomised controlled trial – ANZGOG 1102. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(3):785–793.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.016

Skolarus TA, Metreger T, Wittmann D, Hwang S, Kim HM, III RLG, et al. Self-management in long-term prostate cancer survivors: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15):1326–1335.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01770

Karlsen RV, Bidstrup PE, Giraldi A, Hvarness H, Bagi P, Lauridsen SV, et al. Couple counseling and pelvic floor muscle training for men operated for prostate cancer and for their female partners: results from the randomized ProCan Trial. Sex Med. 2021;9(3):100350.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100350

Olkin I, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA. GOSH – a graphical display of study heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(3):214–223.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1053

Sousa Rodrigues Guedes T, Barbosa Otoni Gonçalves Guedes M, de Castro Santana R, Costa da Silva JF, Almeida Gomes Dantas A, Ochandorena-Acha M, et al. Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):11921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911921

Stulz A, Lamore K, Montalescot L, Favez N, Flahault C. Sexual health in colon cancer patients: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2020;29(7):1095–1104.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5391

Sörensson M, Asplund D, Matthiessen P, Rosenberg J, Hallgren T, Rosander C, et al. Self-reported sexual dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(5):500–512.

https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14907

Seguin L, Touzani R, Bouhnik AD, Charif AB, Marino P, Bendiane MK, et al. Deterioration of sexual health in cancer survivors five years after diagnosis: data from the French National Prospective VICAN Survey. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11): 3453.

https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113453

Priviero F, Webb C. Biology of iatrogenic sexual dysfunction in men and women survivors of cancer. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(8):366–371.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.017

Wan SW, Chng YJD, Lim SH, Chong CS, Pikkarainen M, He HG. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of web-based psychosocial interventions among patients with colorectal cancer. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(7):1883–1896.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15258

Lamberink HJ, Vinkers CH, Lancee M, Damen JAA, Bouter LM, Otte WM, et al. Clinical trial registration patterns and changes in primary outcomes of randomized clinical trials from 2002 to 2017. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(7):779–782.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1551

De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):911–912.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17034-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17034-7

Trinquart L, Dunn AG, Bourgeois FT. Registration of published randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):173.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1168-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1168-6

Lin L, Aloe AM. Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2021;40(2):403–426.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8781

Published

2024-04-29

How to Cite

Ask, S., Schildmeijer, K. ., Kaldo, V. ., & Hellström, A. (2024). The effect of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncologica, 63(1), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24204

Funding data