Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T08:40:42.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Truth of Heidegger's “Logos”: Hiding in Translation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Nicholas Rand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since late 1987 there has been an energetic, at times impassioned international debate about the relation between Heidegger's political activities and the substance of his works. Putting aside references to the fact or circumstances of Heidegger's involvement with National Socialism, I interpret his 1951 commentary on Heraclitus. This indirect approach sketches an avenue of reading the philosopher's works politically without recourse to historical documents, an avenue that seeks to demonstrate the inherent possibility of a nationalistic stance in Heidegger's text.

Type
Special Topic: The Politics of Critical Language
Information
PMLA , Volume 105 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 436 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abraham, Nicolas, and Torok, Maria. L'ácorce et le noyau. Paris: Flammarion, 1978.Google Scholar
Abraham, Nicolas, and Torok, Maria. The Wolf Man's Magic Word: A Cryptonymy. Trans. Rand, Nicholas. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986.Google Scholar
Alexandre, Charles. Dictionnaire grec-français. Paris: Hachette, 1867.Google Scholar
Blitz, Mark. Heidegger's Being and Time and the Possibility of Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. L'ontologie politique de Martin Heidegger. Paris: Minuit, 1988.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Die politische Ontologie Martin Heideggers. Frankfurt: Syndicat, 1976.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. Dictionnaire átymologique de la langue grecque. Paris: Klincksieck, 1974.Google Scholar
Droz, Jacques. Le romantisme allemand et l'átat. Paris: Payot, 1966.Google Scholar
Farias, Victor. Heidegger et le nazisme. Lagrasse: Verdier, 1987.Google Scholar
Franzen, Winfried. Martin Heidegger. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Hauterive, Grandsaignes. Dictionnaire des racines indoeuropáennes. Paris: Larousse, 1948.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Martin Heidegger: L'œuvre et l'engagement. Paris: Cerf, 1988.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. New York: Harper, 1962.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Entretien avec Der Spiegel.” Le messager europáen 1 (1987): 7–72.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Heraklit. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1979.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Manheim, Ralph. New Haven: Yale UP, 1959.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Logos.” Heidegger, Vorträge 3:4–26.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. On the Way to Language. Trans. Hertz, Peter D. New York: Harper, 1971.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper, 1971. 15–87.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. PlatonsLehre von der Wahrheit. Bern: Francke, 1947.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Uber Abraham a Sancta Clara. Messkirch: Stadtverwaltung, 1964.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Vom Wesen der Wahrheit.” Wegmarken. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1978. 175–200.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Vortäge und Aufsätze. 3 vols. Pfüllingen: Neske, 1967.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. What Is Called Thinking? Trans. Gray, J. Glenn. New York: Harper, 1968.Google Scholar
Herre, Franz. Nation ohne Staat: Die Entstehung der deutschen Frage. Köln: Kiepenhauer Witsch, 1967.Google Scholar
Kajman, Michel. “La polámique autour de la correspondence Beaufret-Faurisson: Heidegger et le fil invisible.” Le monde 22 Jan. 1988: 1 + .Google Scholar
Rand, Nicholas. Le cryptage et la vie des œuvres: Etude du secret dans les textes de Flaubert, Stendhal, Benjamin, Baudelaire, Stefan George, Edgar Poe, Francis Ponge, Heidegger et Freud. Paris: Aubier, 1989.Google Scholar
Rand, Nicholas. “Logos cryptophore.” Cahiers confrontation 8 (1982): 153–65.Google Scholar