Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:32:55.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on the “Scorpion-Man” and Pazuzu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

In a recent number of this journal, Theresa Howard-Carter published photographs of the moulded demonic figures on opposing sides of the body of a large grey-ware pottery vessel now in the British Museum (Plate VII). According to her information, this vessel was “acquired by Loftus in 1851 from either Warka or Larsa” and “should date to the beginning of the second millennium”. Equating the creatures depicted with a winged demon carved on a limestone relief from Tell al-Rimah, which she dates to c. 1800 B.C., and which she hypothetically reconstructs on analogy, Howard-Carter identifies the type as “an early or proto-Pazuzu”, concluding that “As for Pazuzu, it is entirely possible that he did not, at this date, have his later unpleasant character, repulsive face or even his name; he stands apart as an accessory to Humbaba in warding off evil spirits”. If correct, this would be a significant contribution to the prehistory of Pazuzu, who has hitherto not been attested before the Late Assyrian period.

In a note of the same volume, however, the present writer has referred to this same vessel, BM 91941, as a “Neo-Assyrian pottery vessel from Nimrud” and identified the moulded figures as representations of the apotropaic “Scorpion-man” of Late Assyrian art. The pot was in fact found by Layard in a fragmentary condition “beneath the fallen bull, at entrance b of the great hall of the North West Palace ” at Nimrud, and is surely, therefore, Late Assyrian, despite these claims to the contrary. The iconography is comparable to that of Late Assyrian art, similar Scorpion-men being portrayed in monumental sculpture both as full-size figures (Plate VIII) and on a smaller scale as copper or bronze furniture fittings (Plate IXa) or in the detailed representation of garment embroidery (Plate IXb). On cylinder seals, the figure admittedly would appear to be first attested in the Akkadian period, and is known at least once in the Middle Assyrian, becoming popular in Late Assyrian times (Plate X).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Iraq 45 (1983), Pl. VIGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid., 72.

3 For a synthesis on the demon, cf. Moorey, P. R. S., Iraq 27 (1965), 33 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar, with textual references, p. 33, n. 6, discussion of functions, pp. 35 ff., and comparison of the varying iconography, passim.

4 Iraq 45 (1983), 93, n. 49Google Scholar.

5 Layard, A. H., The Monuments of Nineveh I (London, 1849), 21, note to Pl. 95 (A): 10 Google Scholar. Layard's illustration (and note) showed clearly that the creatures were on a pot and not, as indeed might appear from the photograph published by Zervos, on a terracotta plaque (cf. Howard-Carter, op. cit., 71, n. 46) ; photographs published by S. Thompson and by Unger, however, show the complete vessel (see references cited in note to Pl. VII below).

6 Cf. also Zervos, Ch., L'Art de la Mésopotamie … (Paris et Londres, 1935)Google Scholar, caption to Pl. 139. Moorey, op. cit., 35, implies that he regards the vessel as Late Assyrian.

7 Cf. also Meuszyński, J., Iraq 38 (1976), Pl. IXa, p. 39, No. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar (relief from the Central Building of Aššurnaṣirpal II at Nimrud); Thompson, R. C., LAAA 18 (1931), Pl. XXVIIGoogle Scholar (Late Assyrian limestone altar from Nineveh, now BM 1930–5–8, 218).

8 That such figures, incorporated into Assyrian furniture, were of copper or bronze is indicated by an actual example (in the form of a bull-man) recently found by bulldozer and now in the Iraq Museum.

9 Hotel Drouot Auction Catalogue, 6–7 November 1972, No. 563. The ultimate origin of the figure may lie in the Early Dynastic III (Ur I) type as represented on an engraved shell plaque from the front of a bull-lyre from Ur: Woolley, C. L., Ur Excavations II (London, 1934), Pl. 105Google Scholar.

10 Postgate, J. N., Iraq 35 (1973), Pl. XVa, b CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Cf. Carnegie, Helena, Catalogue of the Collection of Antique Gems formed by James, 9th Earl of Southesk II (London, 1908), No. Q d 16Google Scholar; Delaporte, L., Catalogue des cylindres orientaux … de la Bibliothèque Nationale (Paris, 1910), Nos. 355, 356, 358 Google Scholar; Delaporte, , Catalogue des cylindres, cachets et pierres gravées de style oriental du Musée du Louvre II (Paris, 1923), Nos. A. 683, 687, 703 Google Scholar; Legrain, L., The Culture of the Babylonians (PBS 14/15, Philadelphia, 1925), No. 584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frankfort, H., Cylinder Seals (London, 1939), Pl. XXXIIIe Google Scholar; Gordon, C. H., Iraq 6 (1939), Pl. 27, No. 84Google Scholar; Porada, Edith, Corpus of Ancient Near Eastern Seals in North American Collections I (Washington D.C., 1948), No. 712Google Scholar; Wiseman, D.J., Cylinder Seals of Western Asia (London, 1959) No. 76Google Scholar; Moortgat, A., Vorderasiatischen Rollsiegel (2te. Aufl.; Berlin, 1966), Nrn. 598, 599, 609, 637 Google Scholar; Hotel Drouot Auction Catalogue, 25 April 1966, No. 104; Forte, Elizabeth Williams, Ancient Near Eastern Seals (Metropolitan Museum, New York, 1976), No. 55Google Scholar; Barnett, R. D., apud Moorey, P. R. S. and Parr, P. (ed.), Archaeology in the Levant: Essays for Kathleen Kenyon (Warminster, 1978), Pl. XXIX, No. 11Google Scholar.

12 Cf. on this last feature Iraq 45 (1983), 93, n. 49Google Scholar.

13 The iconography of Pazuzu is conveniently reviewed by Moorey, , Iraq 27 (1965), 33 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar. Relevant pieces omitted include two clay Pazuzu heads (Klengel-Brandt, , Or NS 37 (1968), 81 ff.Google Scholar—inscribed; Burrell Collection 1837—unpublished); a well-known terracotta bust usually described as an unknown demon but whose iconography and posture certainly suggest Pazuzu (British Museum, A Guide to the Babylonian and Assyrian Antiquities (3rd ed.; London, 1922), 194 Google Scholar, Fig. in text, left—BM 22458); two copper or bronze freestanding figures (Cameron, G. G., Biblical Archaeologist 7 (1944), 33, Fig. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and that published here on Pl. XII); two small copper or bronze crouching statuette-pendants (Margueron, J.-C., Mesopotamia (Archaeologia Mundi, Geneva etc., 1967), Fig. 21Google Scholar; and that published here on Pl. XIIIa); at least one limestone Pazuzu-head (British Museum, loc. cit., Fig. in text, right—BM 22459; possibly also BM 91874, 91876, 93036); a limestone relief plaque (Hall, H. R., Babylonian and Assyrian Sculpture in the British Museum (Paris and Brussels, 1928), Pl. LX: 4, p. 51 Google Scholar— “Bes-like demon mask”); and a mould for a Pazuzu plaque (McCown, D. E. and Haines, R. C., Nippur I (OIP 78, Chicago, 1967), Pl. 143; 3)Google Scholar; for the fibulae, see now Amiran, Ruth, Iranica Antiqua 6 (1966), 88 ff.Google Scholar

14 Moorey, , Iraq 27 (1965), Pl. VIIICrossRefGoogle Scholar; also in CAH Plates to Vol. III (new ed., Cambridge, 1984), 51, Fig. 72Google Scholar.

15 Moorey, So, Iraq 27 (1965), 35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 For the reading of the name here used, see CAD 21 (Z), 165 f.Google Scholar, s.v. “zuqaqīpu”.

17 Cf. for references Iraq 45 (1983), 93, with n. 50Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., with n. 51.

19 The reading [UR.IDIM] in KAR no. 298, obv. 1. 47, based upon correlations between this text and Gurney, O. R., LAAA 22 (1935), 42 Google Scholar ff., as well as new fragments and duplicates.

20 ND 8186B. Cf. for now Oates, D., Iraq 21 (1959), 117, n. 29Google Scholar; Rittig, Dessa, Assyrisch-babylonische Klein-plastik magischer Bedeutung vom 13.-16. Jh. v. Chr. (München, 1977) 65, Nr. 3. 4. 2. (sub “Mann mit Gefäss”)Google Scholar; Green, , Visible Religion 3 (1984), forthcoming, n. 55Google Scholar.

21 Woolley, C. L., JRAS 1926, type 4, p. 694, Pl. XGoogle Scholar; id., Ur Excavations VIII (London, 1965), 94, 104, Pl. 33: U. 6773–4; Buren, E. Douglas Van, Clay Figurines of Babylonia and Assyria (New Haven and Oxford, 1930), 193, No. 952 (4)Google Scholar; id., Foundation Figurines and Offerings (Berlin, 1930,59; Rittig, 78 f., Nrn. 7. 1. 1–2; Abbn. 24–25; Green, , Iraq 45 (1983), 93, n. 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 On the other hand, another foundation figurine from Ur may well be an example of the Scorpion-man: see Appendix.

23 Lambert, W. G., AfO 18 (19571958), 110 f.Google Scholar, obv (?) col. B, ll. 10 f.; Rittig, op. cit., 175 f. On uskāru, cf. AHw III, 1438 Google Scholar. As for the representation of the standard on the relief (Plate XIVa), there is some disagreement about how the head should be restored Reade, Q. E., Iraq 26 (1964), 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; id., BaM 10 (1979), 40; Barnett, R. D., Sculptures from the North Palace of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh (668–627 B.C.) (London, 1976), 43, Pl. XXVI)Google Scholar, but a crescent appears most likely. Reade, , BaM 10 (1979), 40 Google Scholar, has identified this human-leonine hybrid as the urmaḫlīlu, but that Akkadian name in fact belongs to the “Lion-centaur” (Barnett, op. cit., 40, Pl. XX; cf. also Ellis, R. S., apud Ellis, Maria de Jong (ed.), Essays on the Ancient Near East in Memory of Jacob Joel Finkelstein (Memoires of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 19; Hamden, 1977), 74 Google Scholar; Iraq 45 (1983), 93 f., with n. 55Google Scholar).

24 See JRAS 1926, 690, Fig. 28Google Scholar: relationship of boxes housing types 4 and 10 with those housing type 9. For further discussion of reliefs depicting the figure we here regard as an uridimmu, cf. Reade, , Iraq 26 (1964), 5 f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, BaM 10 (1979), 40; Kolbe, D., Die Reliefprogramme religiös-mythologischen Charakters in neu-assy-rischen Palästen (Frankfurt am Main, 1981), 132 ff.Google Scholar

25 Iraq 45 (1983), 93 f.Google Scholar; for the forms of the names here used, cf. Ellis, loc. cit.