Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:40:48.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Jurisprudence of Uncertainty

Review products

Sunstein Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. xiv + 290 pages. $29.95 cloth; $18.95 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Keith J. Bybee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review Essays
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , 2001 , pp. 943 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bybee, Keith J. (2000) “The Political Significance of Legal Ambiguity: The Case of Affirmative Action,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 263–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Leif H. (1985) Contemporary Constitutional Lawmaking: The Supreme Court and the Art of Politics. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, William W. III (1991) “The Development of Modern American Legal Theory and the Judicial Interpretation of the Bill of Rights,” in Lacey, M. J. and Haakonssen, K., eds., A Culture of Rights: The Bill of Rights in Philosophy, Politics, and Law, 1791 and 1991. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. (1999) “Law and Sports Officiating: A Misunderstood and Justly Neglected Relationship,” 16 Constitutional Commentary 293–313.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas C. (1983) “Langdell's Orthodoxy,” 45 Univ. of Pittsburgh Law Rev. 1–53.Google Scholar
Jeffries, John C. Jr. (1994) Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Levi, Edward H. (1949) An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. (1988a) “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’,” in Lindblom, C. E., Democracy and Market System. Oslo: Norwegian Univ. Press. (Originally published in 1959, 19 Public Administration Rev. 78-88.).Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. (1988b) “Still Muddling, Not Yet Through,” in C. E. Lindblom, Democracy and Market System. Oslo: Norwegian Univ. Press. (Originally published in 1979, 39 Public Administration Rev. 517-26.).Google Scholar
Maveety, Nancy (1996) Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: Strategist on the Supreme Court. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Peretti, Terri Jennings (1999) In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald R. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin (1997) A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William (1988) “Legal Realism Now,” 76 California Law Rev. 465–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1999) One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Richard A. (1961) The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert (1959) “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law,” 73 Harvard Law Rev. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Bush v. Gore 2000 U.S. LEXIS 8430 (2000).Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Dred Scott v. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1857).Google Scholar
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 438 U.S. 265 (1978).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar