Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:11:26.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contending with Contemporaneity: A Reply to Kintigh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Dewar*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-2176

Abstract

While Kintigh's (1994) proposed modifications of the methods I described in 1991 for estimating the mean number of simultaneous occupations and mean use span of occupations have certain strengths and weaknesses, they do offer a viable alternative approach. However, I show here that the original and revised methods derive from a different conception of settlement-pattern processes.

Resumen

Resumen

Kintigh (1994) propuso modificaciones de los métodos que yo describí en 1991 para estimar el número promedio de ocupaciones simultáneas y el promedio de tiempo de uso de ocupaciones. Mientras que sus propuestas tienen ciertos puntos fuertes tanto como débiles, ésas ofrecen un procedimiento alternativo práctico. No obstante, aquí yo demuestro que los métodos originales y aquéllos revisados se derivan de una concepción diferente de los procesos de patrón de asentamiento

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Dewar, R. E. 1991 Incorporating Variation in Occupation Span into Settlement-Pattern Analysis. American Antiquity 56 : 604620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintigh, K. W. 1994 Contending with Contemporaneity in Settlement-pattern Studies. American Antiquity 59 : 143148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. R., Kintigh, K. W., and Gregg, S. A. 1983 Archaeological Settlement Pattern Data from the Chalco, Xochimilco, Ixtapalapa, Texcoco, and Zumpango Regions, Mexico. Technical Report No. 14. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar