Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T08:40:42.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religious Dissent, Women's Rights, and the Hamburger Hochschule fuer das weibliche Geschlecht in mid-nineteenth-century Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Catherine M. Prelinger
Affiliation:
Assistant editor of The Papers of Benjamin Franklin and visiting lecturer in Yale College, New Haven, Connecticut.

Extract

The German women's movement, like so much else that was progressive in modern German history, had its origins during the decade culminating in the revolution of 1848. An important and neglected source of German feminism may be found in the radical separatist congregations which appeared in both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant communions during those years. Historical interest in early German feminism has centered almost exclusively on Louise Otto-Peters, partly because of her extraordinary contribution and partly because her personal involvement gives continuity to the women's movement, linking the activities of the 1840s with the founding of the Allgemeiner Deutscher Frauenverein in 1865, the association which signals the birth of the modern campaign for women's rights in Germany. Religious radicalism on the other hand was stifled in all of its organized manifestations during the reaction of the 1850s. Little survived to remind future feminists of its seminal importance to their cause. Yet Louise Otto-Peters herself felt that the nonconforming religious movement offered the single most important manifestation of female emancipation in pre-revolutionary Germany.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An earlier version of this article was originally presented as a paper at the second annual Conference on Women's History sponsored by the Berkshire Conference and Radcliffe College in Cambridge, Massachusetts, October 25–27, 1974. I wish to thank Mr. Kayser of the Staatsnnd Universitätsbibliothek and Mr. Plog of the Staatsarchiv in Hamburg for their assistance in locating the materials on which this article is based.

1. Louise Otto-Peters quoted in Twellmann, Margit, Die deutsche Frauenbewegung, ihre Anfänge end erste Entwicklung 1884–1889, Marburger Abhandlungen zur politischen Wissenschaft, 17, 2 vols. (Meissenheim am Glan, 1972), 2Google Scholar (Quellen): 5–6.

2. Holden, Catherine Magill [Prelinger], “A Decade of Dissent in Germany: An historical Study of the Society of Protestant Friends and the German-catholic Church 1840–1850” (Ph. D. diss., Yale University, 1954).Google Scholar

3. Rosenberg, Hans, Rudolf Haym und die Anfänge des klassichen Liberalismus (Munich and Berlin, 1933), p. 12.Google Scholar See also idem., “Theologischer Rationalismus und vormärzlicher Vulgarliberalismus,” Historische Zeitschrift 141 (1930): 491541.Google Scholar

4. Bretschneider, Carl Gottlieb, Für die Deutsch-Katholiken: Fin Votum (Jena, 1845)Google Scholar; Rohr, Johann Friedrich, Die gute Sache des Deutschkatholicismus (Weimar, 1845)Google ScholarGervinus, Georg, Die Mission der Deutsch-Katholiken (Heidelberg. 1845)Google Scholar; Springer, Anton, Friedrich Chrisioph Dahlmann, 2 vols. (Leipzig, 18701872), 2:186.Google Scholar

5. Hofferriehter, Theodor, Die kirchliche Bewegung: Briefe an seine Freunde (Breslau and Steinau, 18471848), pp. 6465.Google Scholar

6. Rouge, JohannesAnfruf an die deutschen Männer and Frauen nebst Grundstimmungen der freien Kirche (Hamburg, 1850) p. 5.Google Scholar

7. “Die christkatholische Gemeinde Breslaus an die übringen Gemeinden des schlesischen Provinzialverbandes,” in Für christkatholisches Leben. Materialen zur Geschichte der chriskatholischen Kirche (hereafter cited as FCL), ed., Ottomar Behnsch, 6 vols. (Breslau, 18451848), 2:344.Google Scholar

8. A point documented in my “The German-catholic Church: From National Hope to Regional Reality,” a paper read before the sixth annual, meeting cf the Consortium on Revolutionary Europe 1750–1850, Athens, Georgia, 13–14 02 1976.

9. Rouge, Johannes, Maria, oder: Dic Stellung der Frauen der alten und neuen Zeit. Eine Erwiderung auf das Rundschreiben des Papstes wegen dringender Verchreng der Maria (Hamburg, 1849)Google Scholar also idem., “Grundbestimmungen und Verfassung der Vereine deutscher Frauen.” Archiv: Emilie Wüstenfeld Nachlass, Familienarchive, Staatsarchiv Hamburg; idem and Bertha Rouge, Letter to “Geehrte Freundiunen,” 27 May1851, Paulsenstiftschule 26, Staatsarchiv Hamburg.

10. Ronge, , Aufruf, p. 15.Google Scholar

11. Ronge, , Maria, pp. 1314.Google Scholar

12. Ronge, , quoted in Twellmann, , Die deutsche Frauenbewegung, 2:6.Google Scholar

13. Review of Heinrch Thiel, , Der Inhalt des Deutschkatholicismns. in FCL, 2:344.Google Scholar

14. “Die schlesische Kirchenprovinz,” in FCL, 2: 333.Google Scholar

15. Kampe, Ferdinand, Geschichte der religiösen Bewegung der neuen Zeit, 4 vols. in 2 (Leipzig, 1852), 3:149, 163Google Scholar; “Deutschkatholische Gemeinden,” Allgemeine Kirchen-Zeitung (hereafter cited as AKZ) 25 (1846): 830.Google Scholar

16. R., , “Aus Hirschberg,” in FCL, 1:274275Google Scholar; Kampe, , Geschichte, 3:182Google Scholar; Nachrichten, Weitereüber die Anfänge einer deutsch-katholischen Kirche.” AKZ 25 (1846): 1557.Google Scholar

17. This becomes clear in Ronge's Aufruf, where on the one hand he describes the theory of the free congretation and, on the other, delineates the responsibilities of the women of the congregation; see especially p. 16.

18. Weitere Nachrichten”, AKZ 24 (1845): 1577Google Scholar: Präsidialschreiben”, AKZ 25 (1846): 425426Google Scholar; Valentin, Veit, Geschichte der deutschen Revolution von 1848–1849, 2 vols. (Berlin, 19301931), 1: 149.Google Scholar

19. Die Sache der Deutschkatholiken in Königreich Sachsen”, AKZ 25 (1846): 412414Google Scholar; Deutsch-katholische Gemeinden: WürttembergAKZ 25 (1846): 419429Google Scholar: Geschicht, . “liche Grundzüge über die Eutstchung der christkatholischen Gemcinde in Heidelberg”, in FCL 5: 140142Google Scholar; “Deutsch-katholische Gemeinden: Kurhessen” AKZ 25 (1846): 417418Google Scholar: “Patent, die Bildung neuer Religiousgesellschaften betreffend”, AKZ 26 (1847): 505509Google Scholar: Kampe, , Geschichte, 4: 325.Google Scholar

20. Otto-Peters quoted in Twellmann. Die deutsche Frauenbewegung, 2:56Google Scholar; Schmidt, Auguste and Rösch, Hugo, Louise Otto-Peters … ein Lebensbild (Leipzig, n.d.), pp. 2831Google Scholar; Twellmann, , Die deutsche Frauenbewegung, 1:911Google Scholar; Lange, Helene, Entwicklung und Stand des höheren Mädchenschulwesen in Deutschland (Berlin, 1893), pp. 813Google Scholar; Rethwisch, G., Lehmann, R., Bäumer, G.. Die höheren Lehranstalten und das Mädchenschulwesen im deutschen Reich (Berlin, 1904), pasaim.Google Scholar

21. Archiv: Emilie Wüstenfeld Nachlass, Familienarchive, Staatsarchiv Hamburg; Kayser, Rudolf, “Die deutsch-katholisiche Bewegung in Hamburg.” Zeitschrif des Vereins für Hamburgische Geschichte (hereafter cited as ZVHG) 26 (1925): 147168Google Scholar; Kortmann, Maria, Emilic Wüstenfeld: Eine Hamburger Bügerin (Hamburg, 1927), pp. 1827Google Scholar; Kortmann, , “Aus den Anfängen sozialer Frauenarbeit,” Frau. Monatschrift für das gesamte Frauenleben unserer Zeit 20 (1913): 427.Google Scholar

22. Weigelt, Georg, Christliche und humane Menschenliebe: Zur Erinnerung an Frau Emilie Wüstenfeld (Hamburg, 1875), pp. 3233.Google Scholar

23. Kortmann, , Emilie Wüstenfeld. pp. 2627Google Scholar; Krohn, Helga, Die Juden in Hamburg 1806–1850: Ihre soziale kulturelle und politiche Entwicklung während der Emanzipationszeit, Hamburger Studien zur neueren Gesehichte, 9 (Hamburg, 1967), p. 56.Google Scholar

24. Kortmann, , Emilie Wüstenfeld, p. 29.Google Scholar

25. Fröbel, Karl and Fröbel, Johanna, Hochschulen für Mädchen und Kindergarten als Glieder einer vollständigen Bildungsanstalt, welche Erzichung für Familie und Unterrichu der Schule verbindet, nebst Briefen über diesen Gegenstand als Programm zu den Pläne der Hochschule für das weibliche Geschlecht in Hamburg (Hamburg, 1849), pp. 16, 14.Google Scholar

26. Ibid., p. 34; Kortmann, , Emilie Wüstenfeld pp. 3536Google Scholar; Twellmann, , Die deutche Frauenbewegung, 2:47.Google Scholar This difference between the senior Fröbel's Presumed contribution to women's emancipation and that of his nephew Karl is nct always recognized in distinguished modern Fröbel scholarship, for example, Heiland, Helmut, Literatur und Trends in der Fröbelforschung: Ein kritischer Literaturbericht über Quellen und Sekundärliteratur (Weinheim, 1972), pp. 122123.Google Scholar Friedrich Fröbel believed that kindergarten teaching was a good preparation for motherhood and would introduce the young woman to th possibilities of early childhood education carried out in the home. Karl Fröbel and his wife, on the other hand, saw kindergarten teaching as an alternative to precipitous marriage and as an appropriate vocation for the single woman.

27. von Meysenbug, Malwida, Memorien einer Idealistin. Volksausgabe (Berlin and Leipzig. 1907), p. 301;Google ScholarKayser, Rudolf. “Malwida von Meysenbugs Hamburger Lehrjahre,” ZVHG 28 (1927); 123.Google Scholar

28. Kortmann, , “Aus den Anfäugen,” p. 428Google Scholar; Meysenbug, , Memoiren, p. 300.Google Scholar

29. Kortmann, , “Aus den Anfägen, ” p. 428Google Scholar; idem., Emilie Wüstenfeld, p. 37.

30. Meysenbug, , Memoiren, pp. 302307Google Scholar; Fröbel, , Hochschule, p. 57.Google Scholar

31. Meysenbug, , Memoiren, p. 304;Google ScholarKayser, , “Deutsch-katholische Bewegung,” p. 121.Google Scholar

32. Charlotte Paulsen to Amalie Sieveking, 8 May 1844: 8 January 1845; 15 May 1849; 15 November 1849; Briefe an Amalie Sieveking; Kayser, Rudolf, “Charlotte Paulson,” Hamburgische Geschichtes- und Heimatsblätter 1 (1926): 41, 39Google Scholar; Wohlwill, Anna, “Charlotte Paulsen,” Jahresbericht der Schule des Paulsenstifts, 1900, pp. 68.Google Scholar

33. Bredel, Willi, Unter Türmen und Masten (Berlin and Weimar, 1968), pp. 138140Google Scholar; Kayser, “Malwida von Meysenbugs Hamburger Lehrjahre,” p. 123.Google Scholar

34. Kampe, , Geschichte, 3:157; 2:114.Google Scholar

35. Meysenbug, , Momoiren, pp. 117120Google Scholar; Althaus, Theoder, the Zukunft des Christenthums (Darmstadt, 1847), p. 180.Google Scholar

36. Meysenbug, , Memoiren, pp. 172175Google Scholar; translation from Elsa von Lyons, Meysenbug, Rebel in Bombazine, Memoirs of Malwida von Meysenbug, ed. Adams, Mildred (New York, 1936), p. 55.Google Scholar

37. Meysenbug, , Memoiren, p. 293Google Scholar; Wegele, Dora, “Malwida von Meysenbug and Theodor Althaus: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der vormärzliche Domokratie,” in Deutscher Staat … Friedrich Meinecke … dargebracht (Munich and Berlin, 1922).Google Scholar

38. Meysenbug, , Memoiren, p. 268.Google Scholar

39. Ibid., pp. 332–333; Kayser, , “Deutsch-katholische Bewegung.” p. 161Google Scholar; Magnus-Hausen, Frances, “Ziel und Weg in der deutschen Fraucnbewegung des XIX. Jahrhunderts,” in Deutscher Staat, p. 201.Google Scholar

40. Niedergericht B 1226 Acta in Sachen Herrn Dr juris Carl Petersen mandati nomine C. J. F. Traun Klägers contra Herrn Drem. Biesterfeld maudati noie. Bertha Traun geb. Meyer, Beklagten, Staatsarchiv Hamburg; Niedergericht B 1301 Acta in Sachen Marie Emilie Wüstenfeld geb. Capelle, Klägerin, cantra Bernhard Julius Wüstenfeld Beklagten; Kayser, , “Deutsch-katholische Bewegung,” p. 159Google Scholar; Kortmann, , Emilie Wüstenfeld, p. 40.Google Scholar

41. Meysenbug, , Memoiren, pp. 371396.Google Scholar Malwida's record of self-denial in the service of integrity was already impressive. She had recently declined the offer of an income from a royal trust in Electoral Hesse, an appointment she owed to her father, because she would have had to renounce her affiliation with the free congregation and return to the Lutheran confession. Ibid., pp. 307–309. There was a bitter irony in her emigration to England To assuage her mother's fears, Malwida had relinquished her wish to emigrate to America the previous year. Julius Fröbel, as a gesture of protection from his own American exile, had offered to marry her, but her mother was scandalized and her sister denounced her as an “emancipierte Fran.” Moned, Gabriel, ed., “Briefe von Malwida von Meysenbug an ihre Matter, Hamburg, 1850–52”, Deutsche Revuc 30 (1905): 217226, 229241, 344353Google Scholar; 3 (1906): 359–370: 33 (1908): 48–58, 202–214, 316–325.

42. von Meysenbug, Malwida, “Frauen,” in Individualitäten, 2d ed. (Berlin and Leipzig, 1902)Google Scholar; idem., Im Anfang war die Liebe: Briefe an ihre Pflegetochter, 2d ed. (Munich. 1926)Google Scholar; idem., Letters of Romain Rolland and Malwida von Meysenbug 1890–91, tr. Wilson, T. J. (New York, 1933)Google Scholar; Binder, ElsaMalwida von Meysenbug und Friedrich Nietzsche … mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres Verhältnisses zur Stellung der Frau (Berlin, 1917)Google Scholar; Treiber, Wilhelm. Malwida von Meysenbug und das Erziehungsproblem (Erlangen, 1938)Google Scholar; Jhann Ronge and Bertha (Traun) Ronge, A Practical Guide to the English Kindergarten 4th ed. (London, 1871)Google Scholar; Schurz, Karl, “Jünglingsjahre in Deutschland (Berlin and Leipzig, 1921), pp. 264265Google Scholar and pasim; works on Wüstenfeld and Paulsen previously cited.

43. Holborn, Hajo, A History of Modern Germany 1840–1945 (New York, 1969), p. 114.Google Scholar

44. Schramm, Percy Ernst, Hamburger Biedermeier (Hamburg, 1962), pp. 102121.Google Scholar