THE COMPARISON STUDY ON TWO-TYPES OF STUDENTS` PERSONALITY: SANGUINE AND PHLEGMATIC TOWARD THEIR ENGLISH SPEAKING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i4.p443-452Abstract
The study is an attempt to find out the difference between Sanguine and Phlegmatic personality toward their speaking ability. The design in this study was comparative analysis design. The samples of this study were 44 students from Faculty of Law. Personality test was carried out to decide whether the students were categorized to the group of Sanguine or Phlegmatic. Furthermore, the researcher used personal description for monologue speaking technique for testing the students speaking skills. The data were analyzed by using t-test formula to investigate whether there was significant difference result between the Sanguine and the Phlegmatic students in their speaking skill. From the result of the study, it could be concluded that there was no significant different result between the Sanguine and the Phlegmatic students toward their speaking skill. It means, there were not any better students in speaking between both Sanguine and Phlegmatic students. Those two personalities, the Sanguine and the Phlegmatic students could perform better English speaking skill through their own personal way.
Keywords: Â Comparison Study, Sanguine, Phlegmatic, Speaking Ability
References
Amberg, J. S., & Vause, D. J. (2009). American English: History, Structure, And Usage (Pp. 1-10). Cambridge, Ma: Cambridge University Press.
Arsjad, M. G., & Mukti, U. S. (1988). Pembinaan Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga.
Brown, H.D. (1994). Teaching By Principles: An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching By Principle An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman
Ewen, B.R. (2003). An Introduction To Theories Of Personality, Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates Publishers.
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions Of Personality (Vol. 5). Transaction Publishers.
Feist, J., & Feist, G.J. (2008). Theories Of Personality, Seventh Edition. New York: The Mcgraw-Hills Companies.
Hall, C.S., & Linzey, G. (1987). Theories Of Personality. 3rd Ed. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kasschau, R. A., & Maxwell, C. B. (1985). Psychology, Exploring Behavior: Teacher's Guide With Tests. Prentice-Hall.
Lestari, A., Sada, C., & Suhartono, L. (2013). Analysis On The Relationship Of Extrovert–Introvert Personality And Students' Speaking Performance (Doctoral Dissertation, Tanjungpura University).
Littauer, F. (2012). After Every Wedding Comes A Marriage. Harvest House Publishers.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Task For The Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Okal, B. O., Ambuyo, B. A., & Amukowa, D. N. (2012). The Functionality Of Four Temperaments And Communication Theories Towards The Realisation Of Peaceful General Elections In Kenya. Journal Of Sociological Research, 3(1), 55-66.
Rakhmanina, L., & Yuneva, Y. (2018). The Application Of Instagram Activity To Improve Studentsmotivation In English Speaking. Edu-Ling: Journal Of English Education And Linguistics, 2(1), 49-59.
Rakhmat, J. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: Pt Remaja Rosdakarya.
Larsen, R., & Buss, D. M. (2009). Personality Psychology. Chennai: Mcgraw-Hill Publishing.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2011). Temperament As An Indicator Of Language Achievement. Online Submission, 5(4), 33-52.
Tarigan, D. (1992). Materi Pokok Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia I Buku Ii. 4 Modul 1-6.
