مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

در باره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

داوران

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافتی نشریه

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

تاثیر بازی های ملی بر انسجام تیمی و نقش میانجی گری آن بر شاخص های ناکارآمدی ورزشکاران رشته های برخوردی و غیربرخوردی

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم ورزشی دانشگاه اردکان

2 گروه آموزش تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

3 دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران. ایران

4 گروه رفتار حرکتی، گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزش، دانشگاه یزد

5 گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات تهران

چکیده

اهداف: هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر سابقه و تجربة بازی‌های ملی بر انسجام تیمی و تعدیل ویژگی‌های رفتاری ناکارآمد ورزشکاران رشته‌های برخوردی و غیربرخوردی بود.
مواد و روش ها: تعداد 75 ورزشکار رشتۀ برخوردی و 114ورزشکار رشتۀ غیر برخوردی در این پژوهش حضور داشتند. همچنین از دو پرسشنامة خلق‌و‌خوی برونل و محیط گروهی کارن که میزان انسجام گروهی را در دو بعد انسجام تکلیف و انسجام اجتماعی ‌ارزیابی می‌کردند استفاده گردید. به‌ منظور تجزیه ‌و تحلیل داده‌ها پس از کلموگروف اسمیرنوف(05/0p≥) و اطمینان از توزیع طبیعی دادها، آزمون تی تک‌نمونه، آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک‌طرفه و ضریب همبستگی پیرسون در سطح05/0 P≤ استفاده گردید.
یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری در خرده مقیاس‌های تنش، توان بازی و سردرگمی بین ورزشکاران رشته‌های برخوردی و غیر برخوردی وجود دارد. همچنین سابقه و تجربة حضور در تیم‌های ملی از مهمترین فاکتورهای تأثیر‌گذار بر انسجام تیمی بودند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج پژوهش پیشنهاد می‌کند ضمن شناسایی رفتارهای کارآمد و ناکارآمد ورزشکاران، آموزش استفاده از استراتژی‌های کنترل خلقیات منفی توسط روانشناسان ورزشی در برنامه‌های تمرینی گنجانده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of National Games on Team Cohesion and Its Mediating Role on the Inefficiency Indicators of collision and non-collision athletes

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojtaba Dehestani Ardakani 1
  • Morteza Pourazar 2
  • Beheshteh Eghbali 3
  • hossein samadi 4
  • nashmin azizidarabkhani 5

1 Department of Sport Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran.

2 Department of Physical Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Physical Education, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Yazd University,

5 Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Human Sciences, Tehran University of Science and Research

چکیده [English]

Objectives: Purpose of the present paper was to investigate the impact of national games on team cohesion and its mediating role on the inefficiency indicators of collision and non-collision athletes.
Methods&Materials: 75 people of contact athletes and 114 people of noncontact athletes were participated in the study. Brunel's mood questionnaire and Carron group environment (GEQ) scale for assessing group cohesion in two dimension of obligation cohesion and social cohesion were used. In order to analyze the data, one-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used at the P≤0.05 level.
Results: Results showed a significant difference in tension, game ability, and confusion subscale among collision and non-collision athletes. Also, antecedent and experience in national teams were the most important factors on team cohesion.
Conclusions: results suggests that besides recognizing efficient and inefficient behaviors, training use of negative moods could be applied by sport psychologist at exercise programs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Contact Athlete
  • disturbance
  • Indices of inefficiency
  • Stress
  • tiredness
مراجع
  1. Andrew, M., Lane, P. C., Terry Matthew, J., & Stevens, S. B. (2004). Mood responses to athletic performance in extreme environments. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 886–897.
  2. Aubke, F., & Wober, K. (2014). Knowledge sharing in revenue management teams: Antecedents and consequences of group cohesion. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 149-157.
  3. Benson, A.J., Šiška. P., Eys, M., Priklerovád, S., & Slepičkab, P. (2016) A prospective multilevel examination of the relationship between cohesion and team performance in elite youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 27, 39–46.
  4. Beedie, C. J., Terry, P. C., & Lane, A. M. (2000). The Profile of Mood States and Athletic Performance: Two meta-analyses. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 12, 49-46.
  5. Bosselut, G.. McLaren, C.D., Eys, M.A. & Heuzé, J.P. (2012). Reciprocity of the relationship between role ambiguity and group cohesion in youth interdependent sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 341–348.
  6. Besharat, M., Ghahremani, M., & Naghiporgivi, B. (2014). The predictive role of self-regulation and impulsivity in sports success comparing collision and non-collision sports. Journal of Motor Behavior, (8), 131-146. (In Persian).
  7. Benedict, C., & Parker, T. M. (2014). Baseline concussion testing: A comparison between collision, contact, and non-contact sports. Honors Projects. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/honorsprojects.
  8. Chang, C., Margot Putukian, Giselle Aerni, Alex Diamond, Gene Hong, Yvette Ingram, Claudia Reardon, and Andrew Wolanin. 2020. Mental health issues and psychological factors in athletes: Detection, management, effect on performance and prevention: American Medical Society for Sport.
  9. Cairney, J., Clark, H. J., Kwan, M. Y. W., Bruner, M., & Tamminen, K. (2018). Measuring sport experiences in children and youth to better understand the impact of sport on health and positive youth development: designing a brief measure for population health surveys. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 446.
  10. Carron, A.V., Bry, S.R., Eys, M.A.  (2002). Team cohesion & team success in sport. Journal of Sport Science, 20(2), 119-26.
  11. Chung, M., Embi, M. Z., & Fauzee, O. (2011). The influence of coach leadership style towards cohesiveness among high school team sports athletes. Paper presented at the Education and Development Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
  12. Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 333-345.
  13. Demareva, V., & S Polevaya, S. (2014). Type A and B personalities from a psychological perspective. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94, 120–261.

 

 

  1. Erikstad, M. K., Martin, L. J., Haugen, T., & Høigaard, R. (2018). Group cohesion, needs satisfaction, and self-regulated learning: A oneyear prospective study of elite youth soccer players' perceptions of their club team. Psycholgy of Sport and Exercise, 39, 171-178.
  2. Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Exercise and personality: A review and critidue of definitions, concepts and theory. European Psychological, 18, 12-23.
  3. Hoseen Nezhad, A., Sadeghi Brogerdi, S., & Shabazi, M. (2018). The relationship between emotional intelligence and sports orientation of male athletes in collision and non-collision disciplines. Journal of Research in Sports Management and Movement Behavior, 8(15), 9-17. (In Persian).
  4. Hasanah, U., & Refanthira, N. (2019). Human problems: Competitive anxiety in sport performer and various treatments to reduce it. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 395, 144-148.
  5. Jones, M. V. (2003). Controlling emotions in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 14, 229–252.
  6. Kristjánsdóttir, H., Erlingsdóttir, A. V., Sveinsson, G., & Saavedra, J. M. (2018). Psychological skills, mental toughness and anxiety in elite handball players. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 125-130.
  7. Kao, S. F., Tsai, C. Y., Schinke, R., & Watson, J. C. (2019). A cross-level moderating effect of team trust on the relationship between transformational leadership and cohesion. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(24), 2844-2852.
  8. Khanjani1, M., Bararzadeh, M., & Forghani Ozrudi, M. B. (2014). Relaxation practice influence on mood competitive agitation in female Karate fighter. International Journal of Sport Studies, 4(1), 67-71. (In Persian).
  9. Khosravi Shirin, M. A., Haghayegh Sayed, A. (2017). Comparison of personality characteristics and personality types of contact and non- contact sport majors. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 18(4), 21-34. (In Persian).
  10. Le, K., Donnellan, M. B., & Conger, R. (2014). Personality development at work: Workplace conditions, personality changes, and the corresponsive principle. Journal of Personality, 82, 44-56.

 

  1. Lowther, J., & Lane, A.M. (2003). Relationships between mood, cohesion and satisfaction with performance among soccer players. Athletic Insight, 4(2), 126-142.
  2. Maxwell, J. P, Grant, S., & Lipki, S. (2005). Further validation of the propensity for angry driving scale in British drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 213–224.
  3. F., Heydarinejad. S., & Shetabbushehri. S. N. (2018). The relationship between the leadership style of coaches, group cohesion and competitive anxiety in Women's Futsal Premier League. Sport Management Studies, 10(47), 185-204. (In Persian).
  4. Pieter, W., Wong, R. S. K., & Ampongan, C. (2006). Mood and experience as correlates of performance in young Filipino taekwondo athletes. Acta Kinesiologiae Tartuensis, 11.
  5. Pears, D. (2007). Cognitive component of competitive state anxiety in semiprofessional soccer: A case stud. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 42, 15-19.
  6. Sokhtezary, S., Farzan, F., & Doosti, M. (2019). Comparison of personality characteristics of athletic and non-athletic students of medical sciences universities in the country. Special issue of Humanities and Health, 1(28), 38-47. (In Persian).
  7. Skinner, N., & Brewer, N. (2004). Adaptive approaches to competition: Challenge appraisals and positive emotion. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 283–305.
  8. Scott, V. B., Jr. Stiles, K., Raines, D., & Koth, A. (2002). Mood, rumination and mood awareness in the athletic performance of collegiate tennis players. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 457-468.
  9. Terry, P.C., Dinsdale, S. L., Karageorghis, C. I., & Lane, A. M. (2006). Use and perceived effectiveness of pre-competition mood regulation strategies among athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 314-328.
  10. Trninić, V., Trninić, M., & Penezić, Z. (2016). Personality differences between the players regarding the type of sport and age. Acta Kinesiologica, 10(2), 69-74.
  11. Thelwell, R. C., Lane, A. M., & Weston, N. J. V. (2007). Mood states, self-set goals, self-efficacy and performance in academic examinations. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 673-583.

 

 

 

  1. Vann, B., Scott Jr., Renee D. R., & Raines, D. (2003). Emotive writing moderates the relationship between mood awareness and athletic. North American Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 311-324.
  2. Wilson, D., Bennett, E. V., Mosewich, A. D., Faulkner, G. E., & Crocker, P. R. (2019). The zipper effect: Exploring the interrelationship of mental toughness and self-compassion

 

among Canadian elite women athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, (40), 61-70.

  1. Wong, R. S. K., Yung, J. S., & Pieter, W. (2006). Mood and performance in young malaysian karateka. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(CSSI), 54-59.       

 

 

 

 

 

 

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 12، شماره 45
مهر 1402
صفحه 127-140
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 13 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 آذر 1402
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار