نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران
2 استاد علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار گروه مدیریت اطلاعات، مؤسسه استنادی پایش علم و فناوری جهان اسلام (ISC)، شیراز، ایران.
4 استاد، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه شاهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Purpose: Today, researchers face challenges in their scientific collaboration and in the convergence of results with other researchers. The present study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the accuracy of identification and the contribution of the researcher’s real participation in the convergence of multi-authored article writing by aerospace researchers with the three-dimensional CAWH. Author associativity is a concept that is closely related to scientific collaboration and multi-authored papers. Scientific participation has been created by increasing the complexity of knowledge and the demand for more specialization and interdisciplinary skills in research. Aerospace researchers and specialists are responsible for scientific and industrial research and activity in the field of aerospace and the two categories of technology development and support and guidance of researchers in this field. Aerospace is a multi-oriented, strategic, and dynamic industry that has many capacities in generating wealth, economic development, improving the competitiveness of countries on the international scene, creating employment, and exporting. In various fields of study, many indicators have been introduced for observation, monitoring, and quantitative and qualitative evaluation of researchers’ publications, and various indicators have been introduced accordingly.
Methodology:
The research is of an applied type with an analytical approach. To evaluate the increase in the accuracy of identifying the author’s real contribution in the published article using a composite measure that can examine more than one dimension, the research outputs of aerospace researchers have been studied. Based on the data available under the term "Engineering, Aerospace" in WOSCC, the data of English articles from 1945 to 2021 were extracted. Data extraction has been done on 2022 February 4, Friday. The current research community includes all aerospace researchers from 1945 to 2021, including 153,994 records indexed in the WOSCC. The total number of authors was 161,156, of whom 154,450 researchers with specific names (without sampling) were examined. The total number of citations is 2617712. Data extracted from the science website during the research period were analyzed. In this research, 2 tools or "MiMFa Scraper" were used to obtain a part of the detailed information of each author, and another part was used to match the gage information with PHP Hypertext Preprocessor. This tool is considered a part of the DataLab software. Ravar PreMap software was also used to homogenize the data. To normalize the data, the codes written in the DataLab software were used. Excel 2016 was also used. Extract data from different websites using PHP. The CAWH measure is defined as the average number of weighted citations based on co-author credit for a researcher.
Findings: Results of the H-weighted co-authorship index showed that "Florian Menter" (from ANSYS Germany GmbH), "Chae M. Rhie" (from Raytheon Technologies USA), "Philippe R. Spalart" (from Boeing), "Edward F. Crawley" (from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and then "Irving S. Reed" (from University of Southern California) are in the first to fifth ranks of the top researchers based on the CAWH index. This measure was used to calculate the level of participation of each author in writing a multi-author article.
Conclusion: The approach of paying attention to the participation of researchers in writing articles will be useful and effective for researchers and scientific communities. Paying attention to the participation of researchers in writing the article allows them to display their contributions and achievements in a fair and transparent manner. This approach helps researchers obtain their scientific credit and reputation properly and have a more competitive advantage in scientific communities. In research teams, the impact of this measure will improve cooperation and division of work and more fairly determine the rights and benefits of each team member. This approach encourages active collaboration and increases the productivity of research teams. It helps research organizations and universities conduct a more accurate scientific evaluation of people and allocate resources based on fair share and participation. This approach can improve transparency and trust in research organizations. Therefore, it can help develop a culture of participation and cooperation in scientific communities. This approach can create healthy and justice-oriented competition in science and improve the quality of research. The evaluation provides readers and scientific audiences with detailed information about the authors and colleagues who participated in the research. This approach gives readers the insight to better evaluate the contribution and expertise of the article’s authors and to trust the results and citations of the article more. In general, paying attention to the participation of researchers in writing articles helps the scientific process and the development of science. This approach provides direction for justice, transparency, cooperation, and improving the quality of research in scientific communities and creates a suitable environment for scientific development and progress, which can be evaluated and improved by the index presented in this research.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)