تأثیر فرآوری‌های شیمیایی همراه با پخت رطوبتی- حرارتی-تشعشعی دانه جو پولکی شده بر ویژگی‌های فیزیکی و شیمیایی، و بخش‌بندی پروتئین و کربوهیدرات‌ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه علوم دامی ، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

این آزمایش به منظور بررسی تأثیر عمل‌آوری دانه کامل جو (B) با عصاره‌های چوبک (Ap)، رازیانه (Pv)، اسید مالیک (Ma) و یا اسیدلاکتیک (La) همراه با فرآوری فیزیکی بخارپز- پولکی (SF) یا بخارپز- تشعشعی مادون قرمز-پولکی (SIF) بر ویژگی‌های فیزیکی، ترکیب شیمیایی و بخش‌بندی پروتئین و کربوهیدرات‌های دانه انجام شد. عمل‌آوری‌های شیمیایی دانه عبارت بودند از: دانه جو بدون افزودنی (B0)، دانه جو فرآوری شده با Ap و Ma (BApMa)، دانه جو عمل‌آوری شده با Ap و La (BApLa)، دانه جو عمل‌آوری شده با Pv و Ma (BPvMa)، دانه جو عمل شده با Pv و La (BPvLa) که هر کدام با یکی از روش‌های فیزیکی SF یا SIF همراه شدند. ویژگی‌های فیزیکی شامل جرم توده ای، ظرفیت نگهداری آب، جرم حجمی و حجم تحت تأثیر تیمارهای آزمایشی قرار گرفتند (05/0P<). نتایج نشان داد که غلظت مواد مغذی (به جز نشاسته و قندهای محلول) دانه‌های فرآوری شده به طور معنی‌داری تحت تأثیر روش‌های شیمیایی و فیزیکی استفاده شده در این آزمایش قرار گرفت (05/0P<). بخش‌های پروتئین حقیقی محلول، پروتئین حقیقی نامحلول و پروتئین غیر قابل هضم در ویرایش 5/6 سیستم CNCPS دارای تفاوت معنی دار در بین تیمارهای آزمایشی بودند (05/0P<). بخش‌بندی کربوهیدرات‌های دانه جو نشان داد که غلظت مجموع کربوهیدرات‌ها، کربوهیدرات‌های غیر الیافی، الیاف محلول، الیاف قابل هضم و الیاف غیر قابل هضم در بین تیمارهای آزمایشی متفاوت و معنی دار بود (05/0P<). در روش SF غلظت‌های مجموع کربوهیدرات‌ها، کربوهیدرات‌های غیر الیافی و الیاف محلول در دانه‌های فرآوری شده به طور معنی داری کمتر از دانه‌های فرآوری شده به روش SIF بودند (05/0P<). نتایج این آزمایش نشان داد که عمل‌آوری دانه جو با افزودنی‌های گیاهی و شیمیایی، همراه با فرآوری فیزیکی SF یا SIF بر غلظت مواد مغذی و بخش‌های پروتئین و کربوهیدرات دانه را تغییر می دهد که از نظر ارزش غذایی دانه حائز اهمیت است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Chemical Processing Through Steam Flaking or Steam Infrared Flaking of Barley Grain on Physical and Chemical Properties, and Protein and Carbohydrates Fractionation.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Honarmand
  • Seyed Alireza Vakili
  • Mohsen Danesh Mesgarani
  • Abdolmansour Tahmasebi
Department of Animal Science,Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction Barley grain is the main feed for cattle in many regions of the world. The digestibility of barley grain is restricted by its fibrous shell and intact pericarp. The extent and rate of digestion of ruminal carbohydrates and barley grain can be manipulated through processing. Barley processing can be a valuable tool to optimize the production of lactating dairy cows. The application of combinations of heat, moisture, time and mechanical action may influence the quality of processed barley grains. Micronization is a rapid thermal treatment (30-90 s) using infrared radiation and has great application potential in the feed industry due to simple construction and operation. It has been demonstrated in a number of experiments that organic acids, including lactic acid and malic acid, alter the chemical composition and nutritional value of cereals. Essential oils are naturally occurring plant products that are rich in chemical composition and have various biological properties. The interactions between starch and phenolic compounds have attracted increasing attention in recent years. The aim of this study was developed to determine the impact of chemical processing through steam flaking or steam-infrared flaking of barley grain on physical and chemical properties, and protein and carbohydrate fractionations.



Materials and methods The ethanolic Foeniculum vulgare(Pv) or Acanthophyllum (Ap) extract were prepared by dissolving 100 g of dried and ground Pv or Ap in 500 mL of 96% v/v ethanol/water and shaking for 72 h. Then, the extracts were filtered through a Whatman No. 1 paper (Whatman Ltd., Maidstone, England). The residual solvent of the ethanolic extract was removed using a rotary evaporator. Distilled water was added to barley grain at a ratio of 10% by weight and mixed completely, Then treated with 1% Lactic acid (La) or 1% malic acid (Ma). The samples were then treated with 5% solution of Ap or Pv. Subsequently, processed grains were steamed for approximately 35 min at 96 °C. Steam cooked grains were then divided in 2 groups, which one of those was exposed under an infrared radiation for 55 seconds(SIF). All cooked grain were then flacked (SF) passing through a designed flaker machine. physical properties (Giger-Reverdin., 2000) and chemical composition (AOAC, 2012 of the samples were then performed in. Crude protein was calculated as N×625; NDF and ADF contents were determined as proposed by Van Suste et al, (1991). Starch was evaluated by anthrom and sulfuric acid (Rose et al., 1991). The bulk density was determined by weighting of 100 ml of the samples. Water holding capacity was determined using a method described by Robertson, J.A., and Eastwood (1998). The grain density was defined as the ratio of the mass of the grain to the particle volume occupied by the sample (Aghajani et al., 2012). Crude protein and carbohydrate fractionations were performed according to Higgs et al (2015). Carbohydrates were divided into five fractions based on different degradation rates in the rumen: A4 (water soluble carbohydrates or sugar), B1 (starch), B2 (soluble fiber), B3 (digestible fiber), and CC (ingestible fiber).



Results and discussion All the Physical properties of the processed barley grain were significantly affected by chemically and physically methods applied in this study (P < 0.05). The highest bulk density and water holding capacity were shown in both SF and SIF processing. The results of this study indicated that the contents of CP, ADF, NDF, EE,Ash, amylose and amylopectine were significantly affected by the chemically and physically processing (P< 0.05). The CP content of the grains treated with Ap and Ma had higher compared with that of Pv and La. In addition, NDF concentration of the grains processed by SF method was greater than that of SIF (P < 0.05). Both CP and NDF content of the processed grain were higher for (SIFBApMa) and (SIFBApLa) rather than those of the other treatments (P< 0.05). The soluble true protein, insoluble true protein and indigestible protein fractions of the processed grain were affected by both chemically and physically processing methods (P < 0.05). The soluble true protein fraction in the grain treated by Ap was greater than that of the Pv. The indigestible protein fraction increased in Pv treatments compared the Ap treatments. Significant differences were found between the processed grains regarding the total carbohydrates, Non fiber carbohydrates, soluble fiber, digestible fiber and Indigestible fiber carbohydrate fractions (P<0.05). The carbohydrates, Non fiber carbohydrates and soluble fiber carbohydrate fractions were greater (P< 0.05) in the SIF than those of SF method. Digestible fiber and Indigestible fiber fractions were lower (P< 0.05) in La than Ma tratments.



Conclusion Our results demonstrate that processed barley grain with organic acids( Malic acid or Lactic acid) and using extracts of Acanthophyllum or Foeniculum vulgare accumpany through physical processing ( steam flaking or steam- infrared -flaking) make an improvement in nutritional value of the grain. In this study, bulk density and water holding capacity were greater in steam flaking rather than steam-infrared-flaking method. Regarding the CP fractionations, processed barley grain with Acanthophyllum extract through steam-infrared-flaking displayed significant alter in the fractions. Lactic acid processed grain through steam-infrared-flaking showed an enhancedment in both non fiber carbohydrates and soluble fiber concentration of the grain. Present data showed a positive impact of both chemically and physically methods applied in barely grain, however, further investigation regarding protein and carbohydrate molecular responses are needed to be evaluated.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Barley grain
  • Chemically
  • Physically
  • Protein
  • Carbohydrate
CAPTCHA Image

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 09 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 05 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 09 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 09 مهر 1402