نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت صنعتی،دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

چکیده

هدف این مقاله، طراحی الگوی بهبود عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط صنایع غذایی استان گیلان است تا مدیران و تصمیم گیران با شناخت عوامل، چالش‌ها و پیامدهای مدنظر به سمت بهبود عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط صنایع غذایی گام بردارند. مقاله حاضر از منظر هدف در زمره‌ی تحقیقات کاربردی، از منظر ماهیت در زمره‌ی پژوهش اکتشافی- توصیفی و بر مبنای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات در زمره‌ی مطالعات میدانی قرار می‌گیرد. این مقاله از نوع تحقیقات کیفی است  که با روش داده بنیاد، از طریق سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی مدلی پاردایمی متشکل از شش بخش ایجاد شد. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نظریه داده بنیاد موجب شکل‌گیری 13 طبقه اصلی، 29 مقوله‌ی اصلی و248 مفهوم شد. شش طبقه‌ی اصلی مدل پارادایمی داده بنیاد با استفاده از کدگذاری نظری به شکل: پدیده محوری (بهبود عملکرد پایدار)، شرایط علی (بقای سازمان، الزام اجتماعی و محیطی، کسب مزیت رقابتی)، شرایط زمینه‌ای (عوامل محیطی، عوامل سازمانی)، شرایط مداخله‌گر (عوامل محیطی، عوامل سازمانی)، راهبردها (سطح کلان، سطح سازمان) و درنهایت پیامدهای اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی ناشی از دستیابی به بهبود عملکرد پایدار با پیاده‌سازی راهبردهای مدنظر به وجود آمدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Model for Sustainable Performance Improvement of Small and Medium-sized Food Industry Companies in Guilan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Morteza Saeidi 1
  • Mostafa Ebrahimpour Azbari 2
  • MohammadRahim Ramazanian 2

1 Master of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, Gilan University, Rasht, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Gilan University, Rasht, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this article is to design a model for improving the sustainable performance of small and medium food companies in Guilan Province. The aim is to provide managers and decision-makers with insights into the factors, challenges, and consequences associated with enhancing the sustainable performance of these companies in the current business environment. The article falls under the category of applied research in terms of its purpose, exploratory-descriptive research in nature, and field studies based on data collection. It is classified as qualitative research. The Grounded Theory method was employed to create a paradigm model, progressing through three stages of open, axial, and selective coding. The results of data analysis using Grounded Theory led to the identification of 13 main floors, 29 main categories, and 248 concepts. The paradigm model, developed through theoretical coding, encompasses six main classes: pivotal phenomenon (sustainable performance improvement), causal conditions (organizational survival, social and environmental obligation, gaining competitive advantage), contextual conditions (environmental factors, organizational factors), interfering conditions (environmental factors, organizational factors), and strategies (macro level, organizational level). Finally, the economic, social, and environmental consequences of achieving sustainable performance improvement were derived through the implementation of these strategies.
Introduction
The increasing societal focus on sustainability necessitates attention to improving sustainable performance in small and medium-sized companies. Today, achieving a competitive edge and attracting customers goes beyond operational or financial superiority. In the contemporary business landscape, companies are expected to demonstrate responsibility and consider future generations in their activities. SMEs play a pivotal role in the industrial growth of developing economies globally. Enhancing communication and information flow in small and medium-sized companies can lead to more efficient processes and cost reduction. To thrive in the current business environment, SMEs must adopt emerging technologies to improve their sustainable performance. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy, which involve the use of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, can be instrumental in achieving sustainable performance in these companies. The synergy between Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy methods positively contributes to enhancing sustainable performance. Given that small and medium industries are significant drivers of economic growth in regions like Guilan province, improving the sustainable performance of companies in this sector can have a substantial impact on preserving and maintaining environmental aspects. With the rapid growth of technology and the advancement of Industry 4.0, SMEs are recognized as vital economic foundations contributing to the development and economic growth of societies. It is crucial to investigate and conduct research in the field of Industry 4.0 and the circular economy to improve the sustainable performance of small and medium-sized companies. A conscious analysis of the benefits and challenges of Industry 4.0 on SMEs allows for a better understanding of the needs and opportunities within this sector. Examining the effectiveness and utilization of new technologies in the processes and organizational structures of small and medium companies can lead to increased efficiency, cost reduction, improved quality, enhanced decision-making processes, and expanded market presence.

Literature Review

Performance, in a broad sense, can be defined in accordance with the concept of quality and an organization's ability to achieve internal and external goals. It is important to note that performance encompasses multiple dimensions. Sustainability, on the other hand, is a multidimensional concept that presents a significant challenge in our time. It involves the understanding and management of economic, social, and environmental performance simultaneously. Researchers argue that if the current population and economic growth rates persist, the utilization of the planet's natural resources will surpass its capacity. This issue gives rise to environmental protection concerns, which are addressed under the umbrella of sustainable development. Sustainable development is defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. In a broader sense, a sustainable development strategy entails creating harmony among humans and between humans and nature. It implies that sustainability requires a societal approach that manages the environmental perspective alongside the economic perspective in the progress of development and performance improvement. In the present era, there is an expectation from customers and members of society for companies and organizations to be responsible and consider future generations in their activities and operations. Prioritizing the future generation in activities signifies a positive step towards sustainable performance and demonstrates the organization's commitment to a sustainable global economy. While the concept of sustainability is easily understood, operationalizing and concretely expressing it poses challenges. Decision-makers in industries need to evaluate and review their operations considering both internal and external effects. Optimal decisions can only be made when the social, economic, and environmental consequences are taken into account.

Methodology

The Research falls under the category of applied research in terms of its purpose, exploratory-descriptive research in nature, and field studies based on data collection. Grounded theory, a qualitative research approach, is particularly well-suited for exploratory research seeking to theorize or identify patterns. It employs open, axial, and selective coding methods for data analysis. This approach, introduced by Strauss and Corbin in 1990, is based on the three-stage coding process of open, axial, and selective (or theoretical) coding. In this regard, it utilizes the logical paradigm or diagrammatic representation of the theory created. Research based on the grounded theory approach, employing a systematic strategy, culminates in the development of hypotheses and statements that may specify the relationships between classes in the axial coding paradigm.

Discussion and Results

The central category identified is Sustainable Performance Improvement. Two dimensions associated with this central category are Industry 4.0 and the circular economy. The most crucial factors influencing sustainable performance improvement are categorized into three groups: organizational survival (including profitability and maintaining market share), social and environmental requirements (such as attracting public support, considering future generations, and managing limited resources), and gaining competitive advantage (encompassing both temporary and sustainable competitive advantages). These factors contributing to sustainable performance improvement are further classified into two categories: environmental factors and organizational factors. Environmental factors involve challenges such as environmental instability, legal factors, and political factors, while organizational factors encompass financial and cost considerations, along with human resources. Strategies for achieving desirable outcomes are outlined at both the macro level (involving government and industrial estate company activities related to consortium formation, culture, and education) and the organizational level. Small and medium-sized food industry companies are encouraged to pursue innovation, creativity, value chain knowledge, and professional structure to create favorable benefits for themselves. The final segment of the sustainable performance improvement model outlines economic, social, and environmental consequences. Key consequences at the economic level include company development, sustainable profitability, and sustainable productivity. At the social level, consequences encompass the welfare of workers and the social responsibility of the organization. The most critical consequence at the environmental level is the achievement of a sustainable environment.

Conclusion

To design a model for enhancing the sustainable performance of small and medium-sized companies, the grounded theory methodology with the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin was employed. This involved conducting interviews with experts to gather the necessary conceptual codes. Following the systematic approach, data analysis utilized three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The design of the model adhered to the paradigm model of this approach, incorporating six dimensions: the central category, causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Circular Economy
  • Industry4.0
  • Small and Medium Companies in the Food Industry
  • Sustainable Performance
  1. ابراهیم­پور ازبری، مصطفی، اکبری، محسن، جعفری، زهرا. (1397). تأثیر ارتباط دانشگاه و صنعت بر عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط با میانجی‌گری نوآوری، کنفرانس ملی مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع ایران، اصفهان. https://doi.org/10.22054/jims.2017.8119
  2. ابراهیم پور ازبری، مصطفی، مرادی، محمود، مؤمنه، محسن. (1396). نقش فشار مشتری و نوآور بودن بر فعالیت‌های مدیریت زنجیره تأمین پایدار و مزیت رقابتی پایدار. مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، دوره 15، شماره 47، ص 121-150. ‌https://civilica.com‌/doc/831142
  3. ا‌لیاسی، مهدی، محمدی، مهدی، فرتاش، کیارش، موسوی، محمد، محسنی، مصطفی، پور عسگری، پدرام. (1398). اقتصاد چرخشی: مسیر حرکت به سمت توسعه پایدار. نشر دانش‌بنیان فناوران.
  4. تقی زاده، محمدرضا، فرهادی، فرهاد، مؤمنی، منصور، سجادی، مجتبی. (1398). ارائه چارچوبی برای پایداری زنجیره تأمین چابک صنعت آجر استان اصفهان با استفاده از نظریه داده‌بنیاد. اندیشه آباد. دوره 18، شماره 18، ص 27-44.

خسروبیگی، رضا، شایان، حمید، سجاسی، حمدالله، صادقلو، طاهره. (1390). سنجش و ارزیابی پایداری در مناطق روستایی با استفاده از تکنیک تصمیم‌گیری چندمتغیره فازی- تاپسیس. پژوهش‌های روستایی. دوره 2، شماره 5، ص 151-185. SID. https:‌//‌sid.ir/paper/375172/fa

  1. رضایی، جلال، پاکروان، بایرام. (1396). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی موانع موجود در توسعه بنگاه‌های کوچک و متوسط. کنفرانس ملی تحقیقات علمی در جهان مدیریت، حسابداری، حقوق و علوم اجتماعی. دوره 2. https://sid.ir/paper/897037/fa
  2. سپه پناه، مرجان، موحدی، رضا. (1394). کارآفرینی پایدار رویکردی نو در کشاورزی. کارآفرینی در کشاورزی. دوره 2، شماره 1، ص 19-36.
  3. شرفی، لیلا، رضایی، روح اله، میرک زاده، علی، کرمی، اسماعیل. (1398). طراحی مدل پایداری کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط کشاورزی در استان کرمانشاه. پژوهش‌های ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی. دوره 2، شماره 46.
  4. طلوعی، علی، متقی، هایده، شفیعیان، رضا. (1389). طراحی و تبیین مدل پایداری برنامه‌های بهبود فرآیند بر اساس عوامل تقویت‌کننده پایداری. بصیرت (مدیریت). دوره 17، شماره 45.
  5. عارف، محمد، جعفرنژاد، ایمان، کیانی، آرزو. (1398). ارائه چارچوب مناسب ارزیابی بنگاه‌ها و شهرک‌های صنعتی برای پیاده‌سازی مؤلفه‌های بنیادین انقلاب صنعتی چهارم و توسعه سرمایه‌گذاری. دانش سرمایه‌گذاری. دوره 8، شماره 31، ص 23-48. https://sid.ir/paper/386291/fa
  6. فرهادی، فرهاد، تقی زاده یزدی، محمدرضا، مومنی، منصور، و سجادی، سیدمجتبی. (1398). ارایه چارچوبی برای پایداری زنجیره تامین چابک صنعت آجر استان اصفهان با استفاده از نظریه داده بنیاد. اندیشه آماد، 18(69 )، 27-44. https://sid.ir‌/paper/380259/fa
  7. قلمی، علیرضا، عبدالوند، نیما، رجایی، سعید. (1397). بررسی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه پایدار با رویکرد به‌کارگیری سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی. پژوهش‌های مدیریت در ایران. دوره 22، شماره 1.
  8. محمدلو، حمید، فضلی، صفر، محمدنژاد، سپیده. (1396). انتخاب فناوری پاک و نوآوری سبز، راهکاری برای بهبود عملکرد زیست‌محیطی صنایع کوچک و متوسط. توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی. دوره 15، شماره 30.
  9. معصومی، رسول، صالح نژاد، حسن، ذبیحی، علی. (1397). شناسایی متغیرهای مؤثر بر میزان گزارشگری پایداری شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. دانش حسابرسی. دوره 18، شماره 70، ص 195-221. https://sid.ir/paper/511127/fa
  10. نسترن، مهین، قاسمی، وحید، هادیزاده، صادق. (1392). ارزیابی شاخص‌های پایداری اجتماعی با استفاده از فرایند تحلیل شبکه. جامعه­شناسی کاربردی، دوره 51، شماره 3، ص 155-173.
  11. Creswell, J.W. (2015). Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research.
  12. P, Budhwar. P. (2020). Circular Economy to Enhance Sustainability of Small and Medium sized Enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment. 29(5). https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌bse.2492
  13. M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, p. 119869. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2019.119869
  14. S, Jabbour.C, Filho.M, Roubaud.M. (2018). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1), 273-286. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s10479-018-2772-8
  15. Kamble, S. S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2023). Analysing the role of Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy practices in improving sustainable performance in Indian manufacturing organisations. Production Planning and Control, 34(10), 887-901. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1080/‌‌09537287.2021.1980904
  16. S, Gunasekaran.A, Dhone.N.C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1319-1337. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1080/‌‌00207543.2019.‌1630772
  17. R, Rajesh. S, Dwivedi. Y. (2020). Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, p.124063. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1016/‌‌j.jclepro.2020.124063
  18. R, Singh. R.K, Shankar. R. (2015). Critical success factors for implementation of supply chain management in Indian small and medium enterprises and their impact on performance. IIMB Management Review, 27(2), 92-104. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1016/‌‌j.iimb.‌2015.03.001
  19. Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6(1), 1–10. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1016/‌‌j.jii.2017.04.005
  20. S, Mangla.S.K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117(1), 168-179. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1016/‌‌j.psep.2018.04.018
  21. McDowall, W., Geng, Y., Huang, B., Barteková, E., Bleischwitz, R., Türkeli, S., & Doménech, T. (2017). Circular economy policies in China and Europe. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 651–661 https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1111/‌‌jiec.12597.
  22. Muller, J. (2019). Assessing the barriers to Industry 4.0 implementation from a workers perspective. IFAC-Papersonline, 52(3), 2189-2194. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌‌10.1016/‌‌j.ifacol.2019.11.530
  23. M, Longo.M, Zanni.S (2020). Circular economy in Italian SMEs: a multi-method study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 245(1). 811-821. https:/‌‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2019.118821
  24. A, Bilberg. A, Bogers. M, Madsen. E.S. (2014).The smart factory: exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia Engineering, 69(1), 1184-1190. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.proeng.2014.03.108
  25. Roman D J, Osinski M, Erdmann R H. (2017). The construction process of grounded theory in administration. Contaduríay Administración, 62(3), 985-1000. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.cya.2016.06.012
  26. R.K, R. Kumar.R.f (2020). Strategic issues in supply chain management of Indian SMEs due to globalization: an empirical study. Benchmark, 27(3), 913-932. https:/‌‌/‌‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌BIJ-09-2019-0429
  27. Strauss A.L. & Corbin, J.M. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th edition, Thousand Oaks, California; 1995.
  28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
  29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
  30. Thames, L, Schaefer, D. (2016). Software defined Cloud Manufacturing for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 52, 12-17. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.procir.2016.07.041
  31. J, Volek. T, Novotna. M. (2019). Factors Introducing Industry 4.0 to SMES. Social scences, 26(1). https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌socsci8050130
  32. Yadav, S, Singh, S. P. (2020). Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.152, p. 104505. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.resconrec.2019.104505