بررسی تاثیرات مگامال‌ها بر روی محدوده‌های پیرامونی (نمونه موردی: لاله پارک، ستاره باران و ایپک پالاس شهر تبریز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنراسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد طراحی شهری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنراسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

از اواخر دهه 50 میلادی ساخت مگامال‌ها در شهرها رواج یافته‌است. مگامال‌ها در شهرهای مختلف پاسخگوی نیازهای مادی و اجتماعی شهروندان می‎باشند. مگامال‌ها علاوه بر تامین نیازهای شهروندان حوزه پیرامونشان را نیز تحت تاثیر قرار می‌دهند و باعث ایجاد تغییرات در قیمت اراضی، الگوی فعالیت‌ها و کاربری‌ها می‌شوند. این اثرات می‌توانند در بخش‌های مختلف شهر با توجه به ویژگی‌های آن منطقه متفاوت باشند. به عنوان مثال ساخت مگامال‌ها در بخش‌های مختلف شهر می‌تواند باعث افزایش یا کاهش قیمت زمین شود. به همین منظور 3 مگامال در شهر تبریز که در بخش‌های مختلف شهر قرار گرفته‌اند مورد سنجش واقع شدند. سوال اصلی پژوهش عبارت است از «مگامال‌های شهر تبریز چگونه محدوده پیرامون خود را تحت تاثیر قرار می‌دهند؟». با توجه به سوال مطرح شده، روش پژوهش از نوع کمی بوده و دارای رویکرد قیاسی- فرضیه‌ای است. دراین پژوهش قیمت اراضی مسکونی به عنوان متغیر تحقیق مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته‌است. با توجه به متغیر پژوهش روش گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی می‌باشد. در پژوهش حاضر ابتدا روند تغییرات قیمت اراضی مسکونی شهر تبریز با استفاده از تکنیک‌های تحلیل روندخطی، موران و کریجینگ مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. سپس به کمک تکنیک‌های کنترل-مداخله و تحلیل روند خطی، اثرات اقتصادی هریک از نمونه‌ها بر روی محدوده پیرامونشان با توجه به متغیر پژوهش مورد سنجش قرار گرفتند. نتایج حاصل شده حاکی از آن است که مگامال‌ها به لحاظ اقتصاد زمین برمحدوده پیرامونشان تاثیر مثبت دارند؛ و شدت تاثیر آنها در مناطق با ارزش شهری نسبت به مناطق کم ارزش بیشتر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Effects of Megamalls on the Surrounding Areas (Case Studies: Laleh Park, Setareh Baran and Ipac Palace Megamalls in Tabriz

نویسندگان [English]

  • Javad Imani Shamloo 1
  • Mohammad Reza Ezzatimehr 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University
2 Master of Urban Design, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Since the late 50s, the construction of megamalls has become popular in cities. Megamalls in different cities respond to the material and social needs of citizens, and in addition to meeting the needs of citizens, they also affect the area around them and cause changes in the price of land, the pattern of activities, and uses. The intensity of these effects can be different in different parts of the city according to their characteristics. In recent years, in the metropolis of Tabriz, various steps have been made in different parts of the city. For this purpose, in the present research, to investigate the aforementioned issue, three megamalls in different parts of Tabriz city have been selected and their effects have been measured. Therefore, the main question of the research is "how do the megamalls of Tabriz city affect their surroundings?" To answer the main question of the research, first, by using the techniques of a linear trend, Moran and Kriging, different parts of Tabriz city were categorized in terms of land price (valuable, relatively valuable, relatively low valuable, and low valuable). Then the location of each of the megaprojects is determined on the Moran and Kriging maps. Finally, to assess the effects of each of the samples on their surrounding area we applied the residential land price variable, control-intervention techniques, and trend analysis.
Materials and Methods
This research is quantitative and has a comparative-hypothetical approach. Megamalls have a significant impact on the spatial evolution of the surrounding area. In this research, the land price variable has been used to measure the effect of these properties on the surrounding area in different spatial value areas. According to the general trend of the research, first by using the techniques of linear trend analysis, Moran and Kriging in GIS software, the change in the trend of land prices in the city of Tabriz and the classification of different parts of Tabriz in terms of spatial value (valuable, relatively valuable, relatively low value and low value) were identified. In the second part of the article, the location of each of the goods was precisely determined on the Kriging and Moran maps. Moreover, to assess the effects of each of the samples on their surrounding area regarding the variable price of residential land during the years 2004 to 2021, control intervention and trend analysis techniques were applied.
Findings
According to the analysis, the price of land in the east of Tabriz city has the highest value and, it has the lowest value in the west and northwest. Further, according to the analysis of the linear trend of land prices for the intervention and control areas of megamalls, it was proved that the construction of three megamalls had a positive effect on the increase in land prices. However, the intensity of these effects was different in the surrounding areas as Laleh Park has made its surrounding lands relatively valuable and has an effective role in the price growth compared to Star Baran and Ipak Palace. On the other hand, Setareh Baran, which is built on more valuable land than Ipak Palace, has a greater impact on the value of its surrounding land than Ipak Palace. It should be noted that the slope of land value increase in the intervention areas is higher than in the control areas.
Conclusion
The main goal of the research was to investigate the effect of megamalls on their surrounding area. For this purpose, first, the price of land in Tabriz city was investigated from the years 2004 to 2021. Then, according to the techniques of a linear trend, Moran, and Kriging, price classification was analyzed in the city of Tabriz. According to the analysis, the price of land in the east of Tabriz city has the highest value and, in the west and northwest,
 it has the lowest value. According to the analysis of the linear trend of land prices for the intervention and control areas of megamalls, it was proved that the construction of three megamalls had a positive effect on the increase in land prices, but the intensity of these effects was different on the surrounding areas so that Laleh Park on the lands It is made relatively valuable and has an effective role in the price growth of its range compared to Star Baran and Ipak Palace. On the other hand, Setareh Baran, which is built on more valuable land than Ipak Palace, has a greater impact on the value of its surrounding land than Ipak Palace. It should be noted that the slope of land value increase in the intervention areas is higher than in the control areas. As a result, it can be acknowledged that the megamalls built in the valuable parts of the city have a greater impact on their surrounding area than the megamalls built in the less valuable parts of the city.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Changes in Land Prices
  • Impact Assessment
  • Megamall
  • Surrounding Area
  • Tabriz
  1. Gholami Gohra M, Noori M, Bakhtiar Nasrabadi A. Comparative assessment of the spatial qualities of megamalls from the point of view of space users (case study: City Center Megaproject and Jahannama Citadel in Isfahan metropolis). Haft Hesar environmental studies 2020; 10(36): 97-116. [in persian]. https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=202889
  2. Kheyroddin R, Omidi Bahremand M. The Impact of Urban Mega-Project on Housing Price in Adjacent Neighborhoods (Case Study: Sadr Multi-layered Highway, Tehran). IUESA 2017; 5 (17) :13-29. [in persian].URL: http://iueam.ir/article-1-608-fa.html
  3. Nouri S, Rafiyan M. Measuring the qualitative effects of the implementation of urban megaprojects on the promotion of the local economy (case study: Martyrs Lake of the Persian Gulf located in the 22nd district of Tehran). Soffeh 2015; 26(2): 105-122. [in persian] http://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100310.html
  4. Kennedy L. The politics and changing paradigm of megaproject development in metropolitan cities. Habitat International. 2014. 45;163-168. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.001.
  5. Wilhelmsson M, Long R. Impacts of shopping malls on apartment prices: the case of Stockholm. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research.2020;5:29-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.30672/njsr.95437
  6. Hameli K. The role of shopping malls in consumer’s life: A pilot study with Kosovar consumer. Istanbul University, Social Sciences Institute. 2017. 503-522
  7. Kunc J, Tonev P, Szczyrba Z, Frantál B. Shopping centres and selected aspects of shopping behaviour (brno, the czech republic). Geographia technica. 2012;16(2): 39-51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259332506_Shopping_centres_and_selected_aspects_of_shopping_behaviour_Brno_the_Czech_Republic.
  8. Fasli M, Riza M, Erbilen M. The assessment and impact of shopping centers: case study lemar. Open House International. 2016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-04-2016-B0013.
  9. Kazemi A, Amir Ebrahimi M.Typology of commercial complexes in Tehran. Cultural Studies and Communication, 2018; 15(56): 11-43. [in persian].doi:10.22034/jcsc.2019.37352.
  10. Dridea CR, Sztruten GG, Antonovici CȘ. Mega Mall Experience–Major Trend in Tourism and Leisure. Romanian Economic and Business Review. 2016. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v11y2016i4.1p74-79.html.
  11. Zheng L. Research on the impact of mega-projects on carrying capacity of cities taking the first-line project of the West-East gas pipeline as an example. Journal of Management Science and Engineering. 2020;5(3):195-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2020.08.001.
  12. Moradi Birgani N, Khanizadeh A. “The effect of commercial goods on social interactions (case example: Shiraz Persian Gulf business-entertainment complex)”. Memarishenasi. 2020; 15:1-9. [in persian]. https://www.sid.ir/paper/526323/fa.
  13. Zhang L, Zhou J, Hui EC, Wen H. The effects of a shopping mall on housing prices: A case study in Hangzhou. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 2019;23(1):65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.6360.
  14. Sirpal R. Empirical modeling of the relative impacts of various sizes of shopping centers on the values of surrounding residential properties. Journal of Real Estate Research. 1994;9(4):487-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1994.12090766.
  15. Forouhar A, Hasankhani M. The effect of Tehran metro rail system on residential property values: A comparative analysis between high-income and low-income neighbourhoods. Urban studies. 2018;55(16):3503-24. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098017753089.
  16. Merriamwebster online dictionary.2022. https://www.merriam-webster.com/.
  17. Ahour I, Mousavi S, Mousavi S. Investigating the role of cable transportation as a means of urban public transportation in reducing traffic in big cities. Geographical study of the environment.2014; 26: 0-131. [in persian]. https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=202889.
  18. Adepteconomic. Economic Impact Assessment.2019. https://adepteconomics.com.au/.
  19. DSD. “Economic Impact Assessment Guideline, State of Queensland”, Department of State Development.2017. StateDevelopment, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning.
  20. SGSEconomic&Planning. Economic Impact Assessment of Land Use Opportunities at Manchester Road, Auburn. 2017. http://www.sgsep.com.au/.
  21. Forouhar A. Estimating the impact of metro rail stations on residential property values: evidence from Tehran. Public transport. 2016;8(3):427-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0144-9.
  22. Bowes DR, Ihlanfeldt KR. Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. Journal of urban Economics. 2001;50(1):1-25. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2001.2214.
  23. Forouhar A, Van Lierop D. If you build it, they will change. Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2021;14(1):949-73. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1795.
  24. Agostini CA, Palmucci GA. The anticipated capitalisation effect of a new metro line on housing prices. Fiscal studies. 2008;29(2):233-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00074.x 
  25. Hacıevliyagil N, Drachal K, Eksi IH. Predicting house prices using DMA method: evidence from Turkey. Economies. 2022;10(3):64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/economies10030064
  26. Haider M, Miller EJ. Effects of transportation infrastructure and location on residential real estate values: application of spatial autoregressive techniques. Transportation Research Record. 2000;1722(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.3141%2F1722-01.
  27. Mohammad SI, Graham DJ, Melo PC. The effect of the Dubai Metro on the value of residential and commercial properties. Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2017;10(1):263-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.750.
  28. Hess DB, Almeida TM. Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. Urban studies. 2007;44(5-6):1041-68. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00420980701256005.
  29. Martínez LM, Viegas JM. Effects of transportation accessibility on residential property values: Hedonic Price Model in the Lisbon, Portugal, metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record. 2009;2115(1):127-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2115-16.
  30. Dogan E, Stupar A. The limits of growth: A case study of three mega-projects in Istanbul. Cities. 2017; 60:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.013.
  31. Ooi JT, Sim LL. The magnetism of suburban shopping centers: do size and Cineplex matter? Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 2007; 25(2): 111-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635780710733816.
  32. Zhang L, Zhou J, Hui EC-m. Which types of shopping malls affect housing prices? From the perspective of spatial accessibility. Habitat International. 2020; 96:102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102118.
  33. Yu T-H, Cho S-H, Kim SG. Assessing the residential property tax revenue impact of a shopping center. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 2012;45(3):604-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11146-010-9292-x.
  34. Shieh E, Hajiani M. The Impact of Megamalls on the Neighborhood Identity in Tehran Case study: Atlas Mall. Journal of studies on Iranian Islamic city. 2019; 9(36): 69-79. [in persian] https://www.sid.ir/paper/361328/en.
  35. Study.com.Trend line. 2022. https://study.com/learn/lesson/trend-line-formula-examples.html.
  36. Peer. Calculating Local Moran. community.esri.com. 2021. https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/calculating-local-moran-s-i/td-p/1060890
  37. Arc map. How kriging work. desktop.arcgis.com. https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/3d-analyst-toolbox/how-kriging-works.htm#:~:text=Kriging%20is%20a%20multistep%20process,directional%20bias%20in%20the%20data.
  38. Imani Shamloo J, Rafieian M. Spatial Segregation in Tehran: A Curse of an Oil-Led Economy in the Context of Globalization. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2022;148(2):05022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000827. 
  39. Bohman H, Nilsson D. The impact of regional commuter trains on property values: Price segments and income. Journal of transport geography. 2016 1; 56:102-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.09.003.