ارائه الگوی تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی در شرایط محیطی پرسرعت

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

امروزه تصمیم­‌گیری در سازمان­‌ها بخصوص در محیط­های پرسرعت به امری چالش‌­برانگیز و دشوار تبدیل شده است و در صورت عدم وجود الگوی مناسب برای این منظور، سازمان‌­ها به مخاطرات زیادی روبرو هستند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه الگوی تصمیم­‌گیری راهبردی برای مدیران صنعت بانکداری در شرایط محیطی پر سرعت انجام شد. به منظور انجام این پژوهش از روش کیفی استفاده شد و مشارکت­‌کنندگان این پژوهش متشکل از 15 نفر از مدیران و خبرگان حوزه بانکداری بودند که با استفاده از نمونه­‌گیری نظری از سه بانک انتخاب شدند و مورد مصاحبه عمیق قرار گرفتند. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد صنعت بانکداری برای اینکه بتواند به یک الگوی تصمیم­‌گیری راهبردی در محیط­‌های پرسرعت دست پیدا کند و این مدل بتواند تمامی نیازهای سازمان را در زمینه تصمیم­‌گیری راهبردی برطرف کند، نیاز دارد تا شرایطی اعم از علّی، زمینه‌­ای و تعدیل‌گر را ایجاد کرده و با توجه به فرایندها و راهبردهای مورد نظر، الگوی تصمیم­‌گیری راهبردی را ایجاد کرده و به واسطه آن بتواند به عملکرد بهتری در سازمان دست پیدا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a strategic decision-making pattern in a fast-paced environment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vahid Khashei 1
  • Mehdi Ebrahimi 1
  • Shahram Khalilnezhad 2
  • Mikhak Jafari 3
1 Assistant Professor , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Teheran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD Candidate, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

  Introduction: Decision making in organizations particularly in the fast-paced environments is posing a difficult challenge, which in the absence of a suitable algorithm would confront the establishments with an array of perils. The aim’s paper is to developing a strategic decision making algorithm for banking sector managers facing fast-paced environments.
  Methodology: The research method is qulatative one. The subjective multi-case methodology applied to fifteen participants selected through theoretical sampling from the population of managers and experts. The sampe include three different banks.  Data gather by subjected to semi structured interviewing.
  Results and Discussion: To forming, a model of the strategic decision-making, three inclusive fields of context, method and consequences is necessary. The results of the present study showed that in order for banks to be able to make strategic decisions in high-speed environments, they must consider three main areas: decision contexts, the process required to make a decision, and the consequences of the decision. Organizations, especially banks, need special conditions such as dynamic components of the organization, balance between stability and flexibility, coordination of organizational components, and the like, which were identified in the present study. The present study also showed that decision-making agility and decision-making reliance on information and analysis is one of the background conditions required to succeed in developing and implementing a strategic decision-making model for banking industry managers in high-speed environmental conditions. The study was consistent with the results of the research of Nimand et al. (2021) and confirmed the findings of the study. Among other areas related to the creation of strategic decision-making model in high-speed environments by banks, the present study emphasized the issue of decision-making process. The structure of strategic decision-making was one of the factors that had a great impact on creating a strategic decision-making model in high-speed environments. In other words, the agility of the structure along with the support of senior management, the competence of decision-makers, as well as continuous evaluation of changes and measures such as communication development, growth and development of services and its diversity scope leads to this. The organization will be able to innovate in its strategic decision-making processes in high-speed environments, and this will eventually lead to the creation of a new and good model for strategic decision-making in high-speed environments. This part of the study was in line with the findings of the study conducted by Kamal (2021) and confirmed the findings of this study. Another area that was examined and identified in the present study regarding the strategic decision-making model in high-speed environmental conditions, which was also the last comprehensive theme of the present study, was the outcome. The most important things that can be mentioned in this area are: effective and dynamic strategic management system, decision-making integrity, structured decision-making process and the like. Among the issues that can be considered by adopting a strategic decision-making approach in the banking industry and in high-speed environmental conditions are issues such as helping to increase elite selection and retention and cultivation of elites, spreading the culture of strategic thinking in the organization and especially the banking industry mentioned the creation of a common vision in the organization and collective values and the like. It should be noted that this part of the results of the present study was also consistent with the findings of the research of Bamgartner et al. (2021), because the findings of the present study in this section showed that the banking industry can in high-speed environmental conditions. To take action in such a way that the results of these actions will ultimately lead to the success of the organization, requires a strong strategic decision-making framework, and this system must be established throughout the organization as soon as possible.
  Conclusion: An organization to have a strategic decision-making model, managers must simultaneously pay attention to the context, process and outcome. Regarding the background conditions, the most important issues are the support of senior management, the competence of decision-makers, the structure of the decision-making process, and the existence of a common vision in the organization, mastering the vision of the organization and applying the dimensions of human resource management. Organizations should identify all the requirements and provide the conditions in such a way that they are in the most dynamic state possible. Regarding strategic decision-making processes, it can be said that managers in the banking industry should take action such as forward-looking action, continuous learning, maintaining and developing communications, strategic alliances, continuous evaluation of changes, adopting alternative strategies, developing discourse rules, strategic foresight and Put structure agility on their agenda and know that organizational results depend on these. Finally, the most important things that the managers of the banking industry should consider in their agenda regarding the consequences of strategic decision-making in high-speed environmental conditions are: using the results of strategic decision-making to improve the organization and trying to develop strategic decision-making. Advancing the core goals that all of these materials will ultimately lead to improved organizational performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Strategic decision making
  • Banking industry
  • Fast paced environment
  • Contextual decision making conditions
  • Strategic decision making method
  1. Abuhashesh, M., Al-Khasawneh, M., Al-Dmour, R., & Masa’Deh, R. (2019). The impact of Facebook on Jordanian consumers’ decision process in the hotel selection. IBIMA Business Review, 1-16. DOI: 10.5171/2019.928418
  2. Alipour, L., Nargesian, A., Budlaei, H., & Mohammadi Moghadam, Y. (2020). Presentation of electronic human resource management model in banking industry. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 8(4), 69-82. Doi: 10.30473/ipom.2020.50327.3929. [in Persian]
  3. Aravopoulou, E., Branine, M., Stone, M., Mitsakis, F. V., & Paul, G. (2018). Strategic decision-making process (SDMP) in times of crisis: Evidence from Greek banks. Journal of Business & Retail Management Research, 12(4), 26-36. DOI: 10.24052/JBRMR/V12IS04/ART-03
  4. Baumgartner, S., & Peter, M. K. (2021). Strategic Foresight and Innovation Management: A Comparative Study. International Swiss Banks Pub.
  5. Boudlaie, H., & Kenarroodi, M. (2020). A qualitative study of gamification based recruitment process in start ups. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 29(96), 121-148. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2020.47159.3434. [in Persian]
  6. Boudlaie, H., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Shamsi, S., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Garcia-Perez, A. (2020). Designing a human resource scorecard: An empirical stakeholder-based study with a company culture perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation. 16. 113-147. 10.7341/20201644.
  7. Boudlaie, H., Kenarroodi, M., Ebadi, H., & Bahmani, A. (2021). Digital human resource management: an approach to creating organizational agility in the public sector in the digital economy Era (A Study on the Public Sector Banking Network in Iran). Journal of Public Administration, 13(4), 766-785. doi: 10.22059/jipa.2022.333338.3051 . [In Persian]
  8. Boudlaie, H., Nik, B. K., & Kenarroodi, M. (2020). The impact of corporate social responsibility and internal marketing on employee turnover intentions with the mediating role of organizational commitment. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 4, 121. http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v4i1.104
  9. Boudlaie, H., Shahidi, A., Kenarroodi, M., & Keshavarz Nik, B. (2020). A qualitative study of customer experiences in the retail industry. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 8(1), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v8i1.103
  10. Boudlaie, H., Keshavarz Nik, B., & Kenarroodi, M. (2020). Identification and ranking of compensation strategies for oil distribution companies. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 3(1), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v3i1.78
  11. Boudlaie, H., Kenarroodi, M., & Keshavarz Nik, B. (2020). Studying the content characteristics of New Technology-Based Firms. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 3(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v3i1.77
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  13. K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of management Journal 32(3), 543-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/256434
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021a). strategy in nascent markets and entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Management: State of the Field and Its Future, 169. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190090883.003.0010
  15. Gholipoor, P., & Mozaffari, M. (2020). Designing a strategic foresight model in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 14(2-4), 292-313. 10.1504/IJFIP.2020.111254
  16. Haralayya, B. (2021). How digital banking has brought innovative products and services to India. Journal of Advanced Research in Quality Control and Management, 6(1), 16-18.
  17. Hauser, A., Eggers, F., & Güldenberg, S. (2020). Strategic decision-making in SMEs: effectuation, causation, and the absence of strategy. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 775-790.
  18. Joneidi Jafari, M., & NiliPourTabataba’i, S. A. (2017). Corporate foresight and its effect on innovation, strategic decision making and organizational performance (case study: Iranian banking industry). Foresight-The journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy, 19(6), 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-07-2017-0035
  19. Kamal, A. (2021). Strategic decision making: the innovation and implementation of a new sourcing solution. In Cases on Critical Practices for Modern and Future Human Resources Management,15-41. IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5820-1.ch002
  20. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211
  21. Mabika, V. (2020). Strategic decision-making in high velocity environments: A case study assessment of Amlogy GmbH in the Augmented Reality Industry (Bachelor's thesis, Università Ca'Foscari Venezia).
  22. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy‐making and environment: the third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304
  23. Morgan, T., Anokhin, S. A., Song, C., & Chistyakova, N. (2019). The role of customer participation in building new product development speed capabilities in turbulent environments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0549-9
  24. Niemand, T., Rigtering, J. C., Kallmünzer, A., Kraus, S., & Maalaoui, A. (2021). Digitalization in the financial industry: A contingency approach of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic vision on digitalization. European Management Journal, 39(3), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.008
  25. Nooraie, M. (2008). Decision magnitude of impact and strategic decision‐making process output: The mediating impact of rationality of the decision‐making process. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810865102
  26. Vlas, C. O., See, E., & Chaudhary, R. (2020). Smart Power, Innovation, and Firms’ Valuation in High-Velocity Environments. In Academy of Management Proceedings. 1, 12613). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.12613abstract
  27. Yang, S. Y., & Tsai, K. H. (2019). Lifting the veil on the link between absorptive capacity and innovation: The roles of cross-functional integration and customer orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.006