ارزیابی برخی خصوصیات اکو فیزیولوژیک ذرت S.C 704 در کشت مخلوط افزایشی با گیاه ماش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران

چکیده

اهداف: از آنجایی‌که بهبود استفاده از منابع محیطی در کشت مخلوط یکی از راهکارهای اساسی برای رسیدن به کشاورزی پایدار است، بر این اساس به‌منظور بررسی برخی خصوصیات اکو فیزیولوژیک ذرت S.C 704 در کشت مخلوط افزایشی با گیاه ماش این آزمایش انجام گردید.
 
مواد و روش‌ها: آزمایش بر مبنای طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با شش تیمار و چهار تکرار طی تابستان سال 1397 به‌صورت مزرعه‌ای در منطقه دزفول اجرا گردید. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل نسبت­های مختلف کشت مخلوط افزایشی ذرت- ماش (افزودن 10، 20، 30، 40 و 50 درصد از تراکم مطلوب گیاه ماش به تراکم مطلوب ذرت) و کشت خالص ذرت (شاهد) بود.
 
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که اثر تیمارهای مختلف کشت مخلوط افزایشی ذرت- ماش بر شاخص سطح برگ، دوام سطح برگ، میزان جذب تشعشع، سرعت رشد محصول، تجمع ماده خشک و کارایی مصرف تشعشع معنی­دار بود. اما سرعت رشد نسبی تحت تأثیر معنی­دار تیمارهای آزمایش قرار نگرفت. در این تحقیق، با افزایش تراکم ماش مقادیر صفات مورد ارزیابی در کلیه تیمارهای کشت مخلوط نسبت به کشت خالص ذرت بیشتر شد. در این میان، تیمار کشت مخلوط افزایشی ذرت+40% ماش با بهره­گیری از مقادیر بیشتر شاخص سطح برگ (28/5)، دوام سطح برگ (217 LAI- روز)، جذب تشعشع فعال فتوسنتزی (12/18 مگاژول بر مترمربع در روز)، سرعت رشد محصول (14/30 گرم بر مترمربع در روز) و سرعت رشد نسبی (0838/0 گرم بر گرم در روز) نسبت به دیگر تیمارهای آزمایش بیشترین میزان تجمع ماده خشک (50/1996 گرم بر مترمربع) و به‌تبع آن بالاترین میزان کارایی مصرف تشعشع (91/2 گرم بر مگاژول) را به خود اختصاص داد.
 
نتیجه‌گیری: به‌طور کلی می­توان تیمار ذرت+40% ماش را به‌عنوان بهترین سیستم کشت مخلوط افزایشی ذرت- ماش از نظر بهره‌برداری از منابع محیطی و تولید ماده خشک معرفی نمود.   
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Some Ecophysiological Properties of Maize S.C 704 in Additive Intercropping with Mungbean

نویسنده [English]

  • Hassan Nouriyani
چکیده [English]

Background and Objective:Since improving the efficiency of environmental resources utilization in intercropping is one of the essential strategies for achieving sustainable agriculture, Therefore, in order to assess some ecophysiological properties of maize S.C 704 in additive intercropping with mungbean, an experiment was conducted.
 
Materials and Methods: The experiment was based on randomized complete block design with six treatments and four replications in Dezful region during the summer of 2018. Experimental treatments consisted of different additive intercroppingof maize-mungbean intercropping (adding 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of optimum density of mungbean to optimum maize density) and a pure stand of maize (control).
 
Results: The results showed that the effect of different maize -mungbean additive intercropping treatments on leaf area index, leaf area duration, light absorption, crop growth rate, dry matter accumulation and light use efficiency was significant. But the relative growth rate was not significantly affected by the treatments. In this study, with increasing in mungbean density, the evaluated traits in all intercropping treatments were higher than that of pure maize. However, the additive intercropping treatment of maize+40% mungbean utilized higher leaf area index (5.28), leaf area duration (217 LAI-day), absorption of photosynthetically active radiation (18.12 MJ/m2), Crop growth rate (30.14 g/m2/day) and relative growth rate (0.0838 g/g/day) compared to the other treatments, resulting in the highest dry matter accumulation (1996.50 g/m2) and consequently the highest radiation use efficiency (2.91 g/mJ).
 
Conclusion:In general, maize+40% mungbean treatment can be introduced as the best maize-mungbean additive intercropping system, regarding environmental resources consumption and dry matter production.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Photosynthetically active radiation
  • Maize
  • Leaf area index
  • Light use efficiency
  • Intercropping
Ahmadi M, Mondani F, Khorramivafa M, Mohammadi Gh and Shirkhani A. 2018. The effect of nitrogen on radiation use efficiency and growth indices of maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) under Kermanshah condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 15(4): 885-900. (In Persian).
Alibakhshi E and Mirzakhani M. 2016. Mixed cropping of legumes and maize by the use of urea. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10(3): 567-584. (In Persian).
Awal MA, Koshi H and Ikeda T. 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize-peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 139: 74-83.
Beheshti AR and Behboodifard B. 2010. Dry matter accumulation and remobilization in grain sorghum genotypes (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under drought stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4: 185-189.
Bibi S and Ahmad Khan I. 2016. Impact of weed control techniques on intercropping of mungbean with maize under agro climate condition of Peshawar. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 32(2): 62-69.
Eskandari H and Javanmard A. 2013. Evaluation of forage yield and quality in intercropping patterns of maize and cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 4(23): 101-111. (In Persian).
Fathi Gh. 2010. Effect of density on yield and yield component of mung bean cultivars under Khuzestan climate conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 1(41): 19-27. (In Persian).
Gardner FP, Pearce RB and Mitchell RL. 1985. Physiology of crop plants. Iowa State University Press, USA.
Gholi Nejad A, Yadavi A, Movahhedi Dehnavi M and Farajee H. 2018. The Effect of additive intercropping on yield and yield components of sweet sorn (Zea mays L.var. Saccharata) and mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and weed biomass. Journal of Agroecology, 10(1):.120-134. (In Persian).
Goudriaan J and Van Laar HH. 1994. Modeling potential crop growth processes. Kluwer Academic Press. Dordrecht.
Hosseini R, Galeshi S, Soltani A, Kalateh M and Zahed M. 2014. The effect of nitrogen rate on extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(1): 44-52. (In Persian).
Hunady I and Hochman M. 2014. Potential of legume-cereal intercropping for increasing yields and yield stability for self-sufficiency with animal fodder in organic farming. Czech Journal Genetic Plant Breeding, 50(2): 185-194.
Jahan M, Nassiri Mahallati M, Amiri MB and Ehyayi HR. 2013. Radiation absorption and use efficiency of sesame as affected by biofertilizers inoculation in a low input cropping system. Industrial Crops and Products, 43: 606- 611.
Jones CA and Kiniry JR. 1986. Ceres-Maize: A simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A & M University Press. Texas.
Kaur A, Bedi S, Gill GK and Kumar M. 2012. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers on radiation use efficiency, crop growth and yield in some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Maydica Electronic Publication, 57: 75-82.
Koocheki A, Soltani A and Azizi M. 2003. Physiological plant ecology. Jahad Daneshgahi of Mashhad Press. (In Persian).
Koocheki A, Nassiri Mahallati M, Mondani F, Feizi H and Amirmoradi S. 2009. Evaluation of radiation interception and use by maize and bean intercropping canopy. Journal of Agroecology, 1(1): 13-23. (In Persian).
Koocheki A, Nourbakhsh F and Cheshmi M. 2017. Assessment of yield and use efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus in row intercropping of wheat and canola. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 15(3): 559-574. (In Persian).
Lack Sh, Kermanshahi M and Noryani H. 2016. Variation trend of leaf area index, yield and yield components of green beans (Phaseolous vulgaris L.) by using zinc sulfate and nitrogen. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 9(4): 599-610. (In Persian)
Mansouri L, Jamshidi KH, Rastgo M, Mansoori H and Saba J. 2011. The effect of additive maize-bean intercropping on yield, yield components and weeds in Zanjan conditions. The Proceedings of 4th Iranian Weed Science Congress. Faculty of Agriculture, Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran. 1185-1188. (In Persian).
Mansoori H, Mansoori L, Jamshidi KH, Rastgoo M and Moradi R. 2013. Radiation absorption and use efficiency in additive intercropping of maize and bean in zanjan region. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 3(9): 15-26. (In Persian).
Masomipour A, Torabi B and Rahimi A. 2016. Studying extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency in different cultivars of Safflower under different levels of nitrogen (N) fertilizer. Journal of Crop Production, 9(3): 67-86. (In Persian).
Mehdipour H, Abbasi R and Abbasian A. 2019. Effect of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Cover Crop Density on Seed Yield and Yield Components of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and Weed Control. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(2): 255-266. (In Persian)
Mohammadi V and Rahimi Moghaddam S. 2018. Influence of weed densities and different nitrogen levels on growth indices of corn, red root pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Journal of Agroecology, 9(4): 1084-1098. (In Persian).
Najibnia S, Koocheki A, Nasiri Mahallati M and Porsa H. 2014. Water capture, and use efficiency and productivity in sole and intercropping of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and corn (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(2): 153-163. (In Persian).
Nassiri Mahallati M, Koocheki A and Jahan M. 2011. Radiation absorption and use efficiency in relay intercropping and double cropping of winter wheat and maize. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8: 878- 890. (In Persian).
Nasiri Mahallati M, Koocheki A, Mondani F, Amirmoradi Sh and Feizi H. 2015. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growth indices in strip intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 13(1): 14-23. (In Persian).
Nazari S, Zand E, Asadi S and Golzardi F. 2013. Effect of additive and replacement intercropping series of corn (Zea mays L.) and mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) on yield, yield components and weed biomass. Weed Research Journal, 4(2): 97-109. (In Persian).
Ouma G and Jeruto P. 2010. Sustainable horticultural crop production through intercropping: The case of fruits and vegetable crops: A review. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(5): 1098-1105.
Pahlevanloo P, Rahimizadeh M and Tookalloo MR. 2016. Evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency in intercropping of maize and soybean. Journal of Crops Improvement, 17(4): 967-978. (In Persian).
Punyalue A, Jamjod S and Rerkasem B. 2018. Intercropping maize with legumes for sustainable highland maize production. Mountain Research and Development, 38(1): 35-44.
Raseduzzaman M and Jensen ES. 2017. Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 91: 25-33.
Salemzadeh A, Siyadat SA and Nouriyani H. 2014. Evaluation of agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency and utilization of nitrogen in the canopy additive intercropping Corn-bean in Dezful region. 1st International and 13th Iranian Crop Science Congress, 3th Iranian Seed Science and Technology Conference. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute Karaj, Iran. (In Persian).
Tasneem K, Ashfaq A, Abid H and Ranjha M. 2008. Impact of nitrogen rates on growth, yield, and radiation use efficiency of maize under varying environments. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 45(3): 223-237.
Yavas I and Unay A. 2016. Evaluation of physiological growth parameters of maize in maize legume intercropping system. Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 26: 1680-1687.
Yousef Nia M, Banayan Aval M and Khorramdel S. 2015. Evaluation of radiation use and interception of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and dill (Anethum graveolens L.) intercropping canopy. Journal of Agroecology, 7(3): 412-424. (In Persian)
Zahed M, Galeshi S, Latifi N, Soltani A, Kalate M and Hosseini R. 2013. The effect of nitrogen plant density on extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency in old and new genotypes of safflower. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 11(3): 506-514. (In Persian).
Zhang L, Vander W, Werf L, Bastiaans S, Zhang, B and Spiertz JH. 2008. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research, 107: 29-42.