طراحی بوم‌سازگان نوآوری تجهیزات الکترونیک قدرت در ایران: به‌سوی حکمرانی عمومی جدید

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری سیاست گذاری علم و فناوری ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران ، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

3 عضو هیئت‌علمی، گروه پژوهشی برنامه‌ریزی و بهره‌برداری سیستم‌های قدرت، پژوهشگاه نیرو، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

تجهیزات الکترونیک قدرت به‌مثابه یک نوآوری در تغییر ساختار سنتی شبکه برق و ظهور شبکه‌های هوشمند نقش به­سزایی دارند. مبتنی بر ابرانگاره حکمرانی عمومی جدید ، از شروط لازم تحقق نوآوری‌های تجهیزات الکترونیک قدرت، توجه به رویکرد مبتنی بر همکاری است که از شاخص‌ترین مصادیق آن بوم‌سازگان نوآوری است. پژوهش حاضر با توجه به ضرورت شکل‌گیری بوم‌سازگان نوآوری تجهیزات الکترونیک قدرت در کشور و فقدان پژوهش منسجم در این خصوص به طراحی این بوم‌سازگان می‌پردازد. روش پژوهش مبتنی بر علم طراحی است. در فاز شناخت ابعاد نظری و منتخبی از اسناد، گزارش‌ها و مصاحبه‌های منتخب بررسی شد. در فاز پیشنهاد مفاد 23 مصاحبه انجام‌یافته با خبرگان به همراه اسناد بالادستی منتخب بر اساس تحلیل محتوای کیفی قیاسی و مبتنی بر یک ماتریس مقوله‌بندی ساختار نیافته کدگذاری و مقوله‌بندی شد. در فاز توسعه، خروجی فاز پیشنهاد در یک پنل خبرگی متشکل از 15 نفر از خبرگان حوزه تجهیزات الکترونیک قدرت بررسی و نهایی شد. در فاز ارزیابی، خروجی فاز توسعه با استفاده از سه ابزار شامل ارزیابی مطلوبیت مؤلفه‌ها، پنل خبرگی و معیارهای سنجش پژوهش‌های کیفی ارزیابی و مورد تائید قرار گرفت و در فاز جمع‌بندی، مبتنی بر یافته ها ، دلالت‌ها و پیشنهادات پژوهش حول محور طراحی بوم‌سازگان نوآوری تجهیزات الکترونیک قدرت طرح شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing Innovation Ecosystem of Power Electronic Devices in Iran: Towards New Public Governance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed rahimi 1
  • hamed dehghanan 2
  • alireza sheikhi-fini 3
1 Ph.D. Student at the Department of Information Technology Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Allameh Tabatabai University. Tehran. Iran
3 Faculty Member, Power Systems Operation and Planning Research Department, Niro Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

As an innovation, power electronic devices plays a significant role in changing the paradigm of the traditional power grid structure and the emergence of smart grids. Based on the new public governance paradigm (NPG), one of the necessities for the emergence of power electronic device innovations is to pay atten`1tion to collaborative approaches such as innovation ecosystems. Considering the necessity of building power electronic devices innovation ecosystems in the country and the lack of coherent research in this regard, the present research designs this ecosystem to empower policymakers in their efforts to analyze ecosystems across relevant categories and to develop an informed strategy.The research method was based on Design Science Research methodology (DSR). In the Awareness phase, theoretical dimensions and related documents/reports were reviewed. In the Suggestion phase, 23 interviews conducted with experts along with selected documents were coded and categorized based on comparative qualitative content analysis through an unstructured matrix. In the Development phase, the output of the Suggestion phase was reviewed and finalized by an expert panel consisting of 15 experts in the field of power electronic devices. In the Evaluation phase, the output of the Development phase was evaluated and confirmed by using three tools including evaluation of the appropriateness of the components, expert panel and trustworthiness of inquiry. In the Conclusion phase, based on the results, implications and suggestions of the research were proposed. The design of power electronic devices innovation ecosystems and providing policy implications and suggestions based on it.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Innovation
  • Innovation Ecosystems
  • Power Electronic Devices
  • New Public Governance

مراجع

[1] Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (Eds.). (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge University Press.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105337
[2] Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
[3] Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Holmström, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2020). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101850.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002
[4] Lynn, L. E. (2013). Innovation and reform in public administration: one subject or two? In Handbook of innovation in public services (pp. 29-43). Edward Elgar Publishing.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809740.00010
[5] Fuglsang, L. & Rønning, R. (2014). Introduction. Framing Innovation in Public Service Sectors: A Contextual Approach. In Fuglsang, L., Rønning, R. & Enquist, B. (Eds.): Framing Innovation in Public Service Sectors, pp. 1-17. Routledge, New York, USA.
[6] Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.‌ DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903
[7] Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public money and management, 25(1), 27-34.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
[8] Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. Routledge.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795958
[9] Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063166784
[10] Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18-29.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
[11] Oksanen, K., and Hautamäki, A. (2014). Transforming Regions Into Innovation Ecosystems: A Model for Renewing Local Industrial Structures. The Innovatio n Journal, 19(2), 1.‏ DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127520
[12] Iyawa, G. E., Herselman, M., and Botha, A. (2019, September). Building a Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem Framework through Design Science Research. In 2019 Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/NEXTCOMP.2019.8883650
[13] Battistoni, C., and Barbero, S. (2020). Design of an Ecosystem to Foster Systemic Eco-Innovation: Systemic Design For Autopoietic Local Economies. FORMakademisk, 13(2),1-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3408
[14] Mitra, S., Ashby, J., Muhumuza, A., Ndayishimiye, I., Wasserman, I., Santhirapala, V., Peters, A. W., Vervoort, D., Jacob, O. R., Gnanaraj, J., Ganesh, P., and  Afshar, S. (2020). Surgathon: a new Model for Creating a Surgical Innovation Ecosystem in Low-Resource Settings. BMJ Global Health, 5(2), e002162.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002162
[15] Aken, J. E. V., Berends, H., & Bij, H. V. D. (2007). Problem-solving in organizations: a methodological handbook for business students. Cambridge university press.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094351
[16] March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4), 251-266.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
[17] van Aken, J. E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2012). A design science approach to evidence-based management.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0003
[18] Dresch, A., Lacerda, D. P., Antunes Jr, J. A. V., Dresch, A., Lacerda, D. P., & Antunes, J. A. V. (2015). Design science research (pp. 67-102). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-07374-3_4
[19] Vaishnavi, V. K., & Kuechler, W. (2008). Improving and innovating information & communication technology: Design science research methods and patterns. Taylor Francis.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b18448
[20] Kuechler, W., & Vaishnavi, V. (2011). Promoting relevance in IS research: An informing system for design science research. Informing Science, 14, 125.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/1498
[21] Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT press.
[22] Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler Sr, W. L. (2007, May). Design [science] research in IS: a work in progress. In Proceedings of the second international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST 2007) (pp. 1-17).
[23] Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
[24] Tabrizi, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of dedctive and inductive approaches. Social Sciences, 138-105,(64) 21. {In Persian}.  DOI:  https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2014.344
[25] Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10(2), 141-163.‏  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241810100020
[26] Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
[27] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage.
[28] Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
[29] Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
[30] Silverman, D. (2000). Analyzing Talk and Text. Handbook of Qualitative Research. NK Denzin and YS Lincoln.
[31] McGinley, S., Wei, W., Zhang, L., & Zheng, Y. (2021). The state of qualitative research in hospitality: A 5-year review 2014 to 2019. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62(1), 8-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520940294
[32] Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human reproduction, 31(3), 498-501.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
[33] Akbari, M. (2018). Validation and quality assessment in QUAN, QUAL, and mixed method research. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(94), 23-45. {In Persian}. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2018.1448
[34] Spee, A. P., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2009). Strategy tools as boundary objects. Strategic organization, 7(2), 223-232.‌  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009102674
[35] Elyasi, M., & Malekifar, F. (2019). STI Policies to Augment Innovation Ecosystems. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 209-220. {In Persian}.
[36] Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387-420.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312890190030
[37] Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human reproduction, 31(3), 498-501.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
[38] Khosropour, H., Rahimi, A., & Ebrahimkhan, M. H. (2022). Recognition of the Critical Success Factors and Challenges of FinTech Regulatory Sandbox in Iran. Journal of Science & Technology. {In Persian}.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/jstp.2022.13914
 
 

فایل ها

همرسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار