نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی )

نویسندگان

1 استادیار ،گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، بررسی نقش میانجی مکانیسم کامیابی در کار در تاثیرگذاری ویژگی­های شخصیتی بر خود رهبری با تاکید بر نقش تعدیل­گر شخصیت فعال می­باشد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش، توصیفی ـ همبستگی است. جامعه آماری (300 نفر) کارکنان کارخانه سپاهان باطری بوده که با روش تصادفی ساده و از طریق فرمول کوکران (169 نفر) انتخاب شدند. از پرسش‌نامه‌های اسنایدر و همکاران (1996)، اشریر و کارور (1985) که شامل ویژگی­های شخصیتی مثبت، پرسش­نامه گرسیا و همکاران (2012) در خود رهبری، پرسش­نامه پورث و همکاران (2012) در مکانیسم کامیابی در کار و همچنین پرسش­نامه جانسن و همکاران (2017) در شخصیت فعال، استفاده شد. روایی و پایایی پرسش‌نامه‌ها حاکی از آن بود که ابزارهای اندازه‏گیری از روایی (همگرا و واگرا) و پایایی (بار عاملی، ضریب پایایی مرکب، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ)، خوبی برخوردار هستند. نتایج حاصل از آزمون فرضیه‌ها توسط نرم‏افزار SMART-PLS و با استفاده از آماره آزمون t و ضرایب مسیر (β)، نشان دهنده آن است که ویژگی­های شخصیتی مثبت بر مکانیسم کامیابی در کار و بر خودرهبری تأثیر دارد، مکانیسم کامیابی در کار بر خود رهبری تأثیر دارد، در نهایت نقش میانجی مکانیسم کامیابی در کار ‏ و نقش تعدیل­گری شخصیت فعال تأیید شدند. با این اوصاف مدیران باید بتواند به منظور افزایش خود رهبری به ویژگی­های شخصیتی مثبت کارکنان توجه کنند. بدین منظور نیز می­توانند از مکانیسم کامیابی در کار به عنوان نقش میانجی در جهت این افزایش بهره جویند. هرچند باید مواظب کاهش سطح شخصیت فعال باشند چرا که منجر به کاهش این نوع رابطه می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The mediating role of success mechanism in work in the influence of positive personality traits on self-leadership with emphasis on the moderating role of active personality.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Peyman Akbari 1
  • Marzieh Dehghani Zadeh 2
  • Zolekha FasihMofrad 3

1 Assistant Professor Public Management, Payame Noor University. Tehran IRAN

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

3 Master of Public Management Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • The mechanism of success at work
  • Positive Personality Traits
  • Self-Leadership
  • Active Personality

The aim of this research is to investigate the mediating role of the mechanism of success at work in the influence of personality traits on self-leadership, emphasizing the moderating role of active personality. The current research is applicative in terms of purpose, and descriptive-correlative in terms of nature and method. The statistical population (300 people) was the employees of Sepahan Battery Factory, who were selected by simple random method and through Cochran's formula (169 people). The questionnaires of Snyder et al, (1996) and Scheier and Carver (1985), which include positive personality traits; the questionnaire of Prussia et al (1988) in self-leadership, the questionnaire of Porath et al (2012) in the mechanism of success; and also the questionnaire of Janssen et al (2017) in active personality were used. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires indicated that the measurement tools have good validity (convergent and divergent) and reliability (factor loading, composite reliability coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient). The results of hypothesis testing by SMART-PLS software and using t-test statistics and path coefficients (β) show that positive personality traits have an effect on the mechanism of success at work and on self-leadership, the mechanism of success in Work has an effect on self-leadership, finally, the mediating role of success mechanism in work and the moderating role of active personality were confirmed. With these words, managers should be able to pay attention to the positive personality traits of employees in order to increase self-leadership. For this purpose, they can take advantage of the mechanism of success at work as a mediator in this increase of self-leadership. However, they should be careful to reduce the level of active personality because it leads to the reduction of this type of relationship.

Extended abstract

Introduction

Sepahan Battery Company is one of the most successful companies in the field of production and employment, and has tried to use modern European systems to present its products and provide suitable services to them. However, several factors can hinder the sustainable development of this company. This company will attract the Iranian market by producing all kinds of industrial and automotive batteries. But the managers should think about giving importance to sustainable and permanent development. This matter might probably be paid attention by both the managers and the employees. Therefore, having an active personality in the employees and a pleasant feeling in them can contribute to the success of this company by creating a self-leadership discussion in each department and each person, and therefore, the increase in interest in creating self-leadership organizations in sustainable organizations increases research and attention of managers to the issue of company sustainability. Corporate sustainability is a factor defined by the concept of self-leadership development in sustainable organizations in the United Nations report: it is not possible to meet the needs and demands of the present without jeopardizing the ability to meet these needs in the future. Sustainability includes organizational efforts to achieve the triple satisfaction of economic, environmental and human performance. However, less attention has been focused on the human dimension of sustainability. For sustainability, it is imperative that organizations improve their ability to continuously identify factors that affect their long-term growth, develop their skill sets and knowledge on how to deal with adverse effects, and create changes effectively in a sustainable manner in themselves (Abid et al, 2020). Therefore, according to the above statements, it has been determined that self-leadership has a positive impact on a variety of attitudes and consequences at the individual level, such as absenteeism, job success, employee productivity, adaptive performance, ethical behaviors, job satisfaction, self-efficacy, creative work behavior along with team level results such as team management, team performance, and team sustainability and others. Although many studies on the accumulation of knowledge about leadership is under progress (Stewart et al, 2011) to be clear that the insight of the internal forces that guide self-leadership in different cultural contexts is limited. Therefore, the importance of domestic production in the conditions of oppressive sanctions requires sustainable development, and it should be mentioned to examine the possibly effective components in this field. Therefore, in this research, we will analyze the impact of positive personality traits on self-leadership, emphasizing the mediating role of success and the moderating role of active personality in Sepahan Battery Factory.

Theoretical Framework

This study, with a comprehensive review of the literature, investigates the effect of positive personality traits (optimism and hope) on self-leadership along with the evaluation of the intervention effect of a type of positive behavior "mechanism of success at work", and the moderation of active personality. In other words, the researchers in this article have tried to focus specifically on hope and optimism as previous variables that can have a positive effect on leadership in Sepahan Batari Company. By adopting a positive attitude in their company (in all departments) with the aim of developing hope and optimism, managers can increase the self-leadership abilities of employees, and managers, by adjusting the role of an active personality and mediating of the mechanism of success, can see how positive personality traits affect the self-leadership.

Methodology 

This research is "applicative" in terms of its purpose, and "descriptive-correlative with a survey" in terms of data collection. The statistical population (300 people) were the employees of Sepahan Battery Company, of which 169 people were selected using Cochran's formula by simple random method (in terms of gender: 24% male and 24% female; in terms of age: 63% less than 40 years and 27% more than 40 year; in terms of degree: 21% senior and above, 47% high school and 32% diploma; in terms of work experience, 33% less than 10 years, 67% more than 10 years). The positive personality traits questionnaire of Snyder et al (1996); Scheier and Carver (1985) consisting of 18 questions, self-leadership of Prussia et al (1998) consisting of 20 questions, the success mechanism in the work of Porath et al (2012) consisting of 12 questions, and finally the active personality of Janssen et al (2017) which consisted of 5 questions were used as a data collection tool, the basis of the measurement scale was the five-choice Likert spectrum questions. Three types of validity, "content, convergent validity, and divergent validity" were used to confirm validity; and three criteria (factor loadings, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and composite reliability coefficient) were used to confirm reliability. In Tables 1 and 2, the results of the reliability and validity of the measurement tool are given in full.

Research Findings

In order to investigate the hypotheses of the research, partial least squares structural equation modeling was used with the help of SMART-PLS software. The results of the first hypothesis indicated the effect of positive personality traits on the mechanism of success at work. The results of the second hypothesis also stated that positive personality traits have a significant effect on self-leadership. The results of the third hypothesis also stated that the success mechanism at work has a significant effect on self-leadership. The results of the fourth hypothesis also stated that the mechanism of success at work plays a mediating role in the influence of positive personality traits on self-leadership. At the end, the results of the fifth hypothesis also stated that active personality has a moderating role in the influence of positive personality traits on self-leadership.

Conclusion and Discussion

The purpose of this research was to investigate the mediating role of the mechanism of success at work in the influence of positive personality traits on self-leadership, emphasizing the moderating role of active personality. These studies are consistent with Nasiri and Salari (2020), and Nasr Esfahani et al, (2016), Salimi et al, (2006). In the end, considering the results of the structural equation model, the conceptual framework of the research can be considered as an experimental framework that can be a guide and a basis for future scientific and practical research. Therefore, practical suggestions in line with the research as follows will be fruitful. 1. In order to create a culture that can strengthen the sustainability of the organization, Sepahan Battery factory must invest significantly in employee training. Since both hope and optimism are adjustable, focused educational interventions to develop hope and optimism can not only help guide employees' self-motivation and perseverance to overcome obstacles to organizational sustainability, but also will increase the abilities of self-leadership in them. In the end, according to the mentioned results and suggestions, the limitations of the researchers in the form of future suggestions are as follows: In this study, the statistical population was the employees of Sepahan Battery Factory. Therefore, the results of the study may not be generalizable to other companies. A cross-sectional approach was used in this study; therefore, researchers are advised to use a longitudinal approach in future studies.

Abdolmaleki, H and Khorasanitaraghi, H., (2020). Presenting a model of the role of self-leadership strategies on the empowerment of physical education teachers with the mediation of intellectual capital. Sports Science Quarterly, 11(35). 73-88. 20.1001.1.20087624.1398.11.35.4.2. [in Persian].
Abid, G., Ahmed, S., Elahi, N.S., and Ilyas, S., (2020). Antecedents and mechanism of em- ployee well-being for social sustainability: a sequential mediation. Sustain. Prod. Consum, 24, 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.011.
Afzali, A.A., Miryousefi S.J, Nezadsajadi, SA. (2021). Explanation of The Mediating Role of Strategic Management of Human Resources in The Relationship Between Self-Leadership and Human Capital of Sports Science Departments of Public Universities. New Trends in Sport Management, 9 (34), 27-44. http://ntsmj.issma.ir/article-1-1547-en.html. [in Persian].
Asgharinia, F and Azadmard, S. (2016). the relationship between hope, optimism and source of control with self-efficacy of middle school students in Urmia city, the first international conference on psychology and educational sciences, Shiraz. [in Persian].
Ashouri, A., Mohammadzadeh, A., Najafi, M., and Zeraatkar, L. (2016). Relationship Between Personality Traits and Religious/Spiritual Well-Being with Schizotypal Traits. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 22(3), 230-238.  [in Persian].
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bansal, T. (2019). Sustainable development in an age of disruption. Academy of Management Discoveries. 5 (1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0001.
Birdi, K., Clegg, C., Patterson, M., Robinson, A., Stride, C.B., Wall, T.D., and Wood, S.J., (2008). The impact of human resource and operational management practiceson company productivity: a longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology. 61 (3), 467–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00136.x.
Cheaven, J.S., Heiy, J.E., Feldman, D.B., Benitez, C., and Rand, K.L., (2019). Hope, goals, and pathways: Further validating the hope scale with observer ratings. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 14 (4), 452–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484937.
Cheavens, J.S., Feldman, D.B., Gum, A., Michael, S.T., and Snyder, C.R., (2006). Hope therapy in a community sample: a pilot investigation. Social Indicators Research. 77, 61–78.
Chin, W. W. (2003). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Cohen, J.E. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Davari, A and Rezazadeh, A. (2018). Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Tehran: Academic Jihad Publishing Organization. [in Persian].
Ekrami Kivaj, M., Janani H., Barghi Moghadam, J., and Najafzadeh M.R. (2020). Develop a transformational leadership model and job performance with the moderating role of the proactive persolanity in country, s football staff. The Razi Journal of Medical Sciences (RJMS), 27, 197-208. [in Persian].
Frayne, C.A., and Latham, G.P. (1987). Application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 72 (3), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.387.
Furtner, M.R., Baldegger, U., and Rauthmann, J.F., (2013). Leading yourself and leading oth- ers: linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology. 22 (4), 436–449.
Hawro, T., Maurer, M., Hawro, M., Kaszuba, A., Cierpiałkowska, L., Królikowska, M., Zalewska, A., (2014). In psoriasis, levels of hope and quality of life are linked. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 306 (7), 661–666. doi: 10.1007/s00403-014-1455-9.
Hirschi, A., Abessolo, M., and Froidevaux, A. (2015). Hope as a resource for career exploration: examining incremental and cross-lagged effects. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 86, 38–47
Hodapour, A., Shahmive Sfhani, A., and Faramarzi, S. (2016). The effect of the role-playing method of optimism training on reducing depression in visually impaired girls. Exceptional people quarterly. 6 (21), 123–140. [in Persian].
Houghton, J.D., Bonham, T.W., Neck, C.P., and Singh, K. (2004). The relationship between self-leadership and personality.  Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410537963.
Houghton, J.D., and Jinkerson, D.L. (2004). Constructive thought strategies and job sat- isfaction: a preliminary examination. Paper presented at the 2004 Western Academy of Management Conference, Alyeska, AK.
Imani, H., Gholipour, A, and Seyed Javadin, S.R., (2016). Investigating the impact of Job Characteristics Model on thriving at work (Case Study: Bank Refah). Public Mnagement, 7(4), 783-802. 10.22059/JIPA.2015.51735. [in Persian].
Isazadegan, A., Micaeili, F, and Meroei Milan, F., (2015). The relationship between hope, optimism and meaning of education with academic performance in high school students. School and school psychology, 3(2), 137-152. [in Persian].
Janssen, A.B., Schultze, M., and Grotsch, A. (2017). Following the ants: development of short scales for proactive personality and supervisor support by Ant Colony optimization. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 33 (6), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000299.
Juntunen, C.L., Wettersten, K.B., (2006). Work hope: development and initial validation of a measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 53 (1), 94–106. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53. 1.94
Khodaparast., M. (2019). The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Learning Organization Development (Case Study: West-Mazandaran Universities of Applied Sciences), Journal of education management and perspective, 1(1), 31-43. [in Persian].
Kiafar, M.S., Kareshki, H., and Hashemi, F. (2014). The Role of Hope Components and Optimism on Academic Motivation of Graduate Students of Ferdowsi University and Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14 (6), 517-526. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-3159-en.html. [in Persian].
Kleine, A., Rudolph, C.W., and Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1002/jo
Lent, R.W., Ireland, G.W., Penn, L.T., Morris, T.R., and Sappington, R. (2017). Sources of self- -efficacy and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: a test of the social cognitive model of career self-management. J. Vocat. Behav. 99, 107–117.
Li, N., Liang, J., Crant, J.M., 2010. The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. 95 (2), 395. doi:10.1037/a0018079.
Marques-Quinteiro, P., Vargas, R., Eifler, N., and Curral, L. (2019). Employee adaptive per- formance and job satisfaction during organizational crisis: the role of self-lead- ership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 28 (1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1551882.
Massah, H., Oreyzi Samani, S.H.R and Kalantari, M. (2016). The Role of Work Engagement in Relation Between Thriving at Work with Teaching Commitment, Job Satisfaction And feeling of Belonging: Offering Bootstrapping Model. Career and Organizational Consulting Quarterly, 9(30), 48-72.
Mazari, E, and Zamani, M., (2017). The influence of psychological-behavioral mechanisms of self-development (Self-regulation, Self-management, Self-leadership and self-directed learning) on human capital. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 7(3), 39-54. 10.22059/JAPR.2016.58768. [in Persian].
Megheirkouni, M., (2018). Self-leadership strategies and career success: insight on sports organizations. Sport, Business and Management: An international Journal. 40, 393–409.
Mirkamali, S.M., Mazari, E., Khabareh, K., and Sedighi, I. (2013). Explaining the role of self-leadership on the human capital of employees of higher education centers: a case study about a university. Educational and School Studies Quarterly, 3(4), 9-29. 20.1001.1.2423494.1393.3.4.1.3. [in Persian].
Moeini Rudbali, Z., Mohammadi, H.A., and Safari, M.A. (2020), Comparison of personality traits of active and inactive people in recreational and leisure sports, Second International Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences and Humanities. [in Persian].
Mokhtari, A., Kajbaf, M B., and Abedi M. (2021). The effectiveness of intervention based on psychological capital on hope, optimism, resilience, and self-efficacy among patients with depression. Psychological sciences, 19, 1411-1422. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-804-en.html. [in Persian].
Moradi, M and Miralmasi, A., (2020). Pragmatic research method. (School of Quantitative and Qualitative Research). First Edition). Tehran. [in Persian].
Mullah Alizadeh Ghadim, A., (2020). Investigating the effect of job characteristics model on work success among physical education workers in Tehran province. The 3rd National Congress of Sports Science and Health Achievements. [in Persian].
Müller, T., and Niessen, C. (2019). Self-leadership in the context of part-time teleworking. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 40 (8), 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2371
Nasr Esfahani, A., Salehzadeh, R., and Rezaei, M.S., (2016). Investigating the relationship between personality traits and self-leadership strategies (case study: Isfahan University students). Clinical and Personality Psychology Quarterly, 14(2), 93-102. 10.22070/14.2.93. [in Persian].
Nasiri, F.L. and Salari, A. (2020). Predicting knowledge leadership with career success of medical university employees, New Approaches in Islamic Studies Quarterly, 2(5), 281-307. [in Persian].
Neck, C.P., Nouri, H., and Godwin, J.L. (2003). How self-leadership affects the goal-setting process. Human Resource Management Review. 13, 691–707. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.009.
Neck, C.P., and Houghton, J.D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: past developments, present trends, and future possibilities Journal of Managerial Psychology. 21 (4), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663097.
Mohebi Nooredinvand, M.H., Shahni Yilaq, M., and Sharifi, H.P. (2013). The relationship between psychological capital (hope, optimism, resilience and self-efficacy) with the goals of progress and academic performance of first-year students. Research in curriculum planning, 11(40), 61-79. [in Persian].
Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., and Garnett, F.G. (2012). Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 33 (2), 250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756.
Rajabpour, I., Hamidianpour., F., Hoseinieghbal, A and Setaremanesh, P. (2022). Identifying and analyzing the importance of the key factors of employees' ethical behavior by using the Swara Fazi approach. Ethical reflections, 3(2), 69-92. 20.1001.1.26764180.2022.3.2.4.8. [in Persian].
Rand, K.L., Shanahan, M.L., Fischer, I.C., and Fortney, S.K. (2020). Hope and optimism as predictors of academic performance and subjective well-being in college students. Learn. Individ. Diffe.
Ross, S. (2014). A conceptual model for understanding the process of self-leadership development and action-steps to promote personal leadership development. Journal of Management Development. 33 (4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2012-0147.
Farnam, A. (2016). The Effect of Positive Thinking Training in Enhancement of Quality and Hope of life among the Elderly. Research paper of positive psychology. 2 (1), 75– 88. [in Persian].
Salehi, R., and Mohammadi, N.E. (2022). investigating the role of positive personality traits in improving self-leadership in the organization, the fourth annual international conference on new developments in management, economics and accounting. [in Persian].
Salimi, S.H., Kerminia, R., Amiri, M., and Mirzmani, S.M. (2006). The relationship between personality traits and career success in senior managers of a government organization. Behavioral Science Research, 4 (1/2), 5-12. [in Persian].
Scheier, M.F., and Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: assessment andimplications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219.
Schneider, S.L. (2001). In search of realistic optimism. Am. Psychol. 56, 250–263
Snyder, C.R., Sympson, S.C., Ybasco, F.C., Borders, T.F., Babyak, M.A., and Higgins, R.L., (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321.
Sinha, S. (2017). Aspire to build an ethical and sustainable organization? Renew. Thyself. Strategic Direction. 433 (1), 7–9. DOI:10.1108/SD-08-2016-0126
Stewart, G.L., and Barrick, M.R. (2000). Team structure and performance: assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. The Academy of Management Journal. 43, 135–149. DOI:10.2307/1556372
Stewart, G.L., Courtright, S.H., and Manz, C.C. (2011). Self-leadership: a multilevel review. Journal Management. 37 (1), 185–222. DOI:10.1177/0149206310383911.
Tahmasabi, M. & Chenari, V., (2016). The effect of goal orientation and active personality and positive job attitude on the job adaptation of Refah Bank employees in Khuzestan province, the first scientific research conference on new findings of management, entrepreneurship and education sciences. [in Persian].
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., and Vinzi, V.E. (2004) A Global Goodness-of-Fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modelling. Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, 1, 739-742.
Warber, S.L., Ingerman, S., Moura, V.L., Wunder, J., Northrop, A., Gillespie, B.W., Rubenfire, M., (2011). Healing the heart: a randomized pilot study of a spiritual retreat for depression in acute coronary syndrome patients. Explore, 7 (4), 222–233.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., and Oppen, C.V. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly. 33(1), pp. 177-195. DOI:10.2307/20650284.
Woods, S.A., Napiersky, U., and Rivkin, W. (2021). Learning to self-lead: Examining self-leadership strategies, personality traits and learning attainment. Applied Psychology. 2022, 1–15. DOI:10.1111/apps.12422.