نوع مقاله : نقد و بررسی کتاب
نویسنده
گروه پژوهشی باستان کاوی تیسافرن
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Cambyses II, following in the footsteps of Cyrus the Great, continued the Achaemenid policy of consolidating and expanding the empire’s territorial holdings. One of the strategic territorialization endeavors involved a campaign to Egypt, the preparations for which had been initiated during Cyrus’s reign and executed by Cambyses. This military campaign resulted in the annexation of Egypt to the vast Achaemenid Empire. To gain a more profound insight into the reciprocal cultural influences between the Achaemenids and Egypt, it is imperative to meticulously examine the extant archaeological evidence from this period, unearthed and studied by diverse archaeologists and scholars. This article aims to provide a critical assessment of the book Achaemenids in Egypt with a focus on archaeological evidence.
کلیدواژهها [English]
Introduction
Despite the plethora of books and articles addressing the Achaemenid Empire in recent years, this historical period still holds untapped research potential. Following the reign of Cyrus the Great, Cambyses II ascended to the throne of the Achaemenid Empire and continued to uphold the foundational principles of Cyrus’s rule, centered on the consolidation and expansion of the empire’s territorial boundaries. This article aims to critically assess the book titled Achaemenids in Egypt (based on archaeological evidence), authored by Shahin Mahyar and published by Jam-e Gol Publications in 2012, encompassing 126 pages.
The book’s initial chapter delves into the formation of the Achaemenid government, its political history, and ancient Egypt, including its geographical extent, deities, and Achaemenid interactions with Egypt. The second chapter introduces the archaeological findings in Egypt, the third chapter offers a summary of the book’s content, the fourth chapter comprises illustrations, and the work terminates with a bibliography.
The section pertaining to the Achaemenid Empire, divided into subheadings like formation, political history, significant events, and geographical expanse, is notably lacking in completeness. Given the book’s focus on the Achaemenid presence in Egypt, a comprehensive discussion of the Achaemenid monarchs involved in Egyptian affairs should have been explicitly addressed. However, this aspect has been overlooked, with only a few paragraphs dedicated to it. To enhance the book’s references and scholarly merit, the author could have drawn from prominent publications such as History of the Persian Empire by Olmstead (2001), and The Achaemenid Empire by Kurt (2000), and adopted an impartial and scholarly approach to Herodotus’s historical account in Histories (1960). Additionally, valuable sources in this field include Posener (1936), Roaf (1974), Mysliwiec (1997), and Jacobs (1994), among others, which could have enriched the book’s scholarly foundation.
Conclusion
This book offers an overview of the archaeology and history of the Achaemenid Empire in Egypt. A notable limitation of the reviewed book is its relatively limited utilization of scholarly sources authored by renowned experts in the field of Achaemenid studies. The author could have significantly strengthened their work by conducting a more in-depth examination of the Achaemenid presence in Egypt, drawing upon a broader array of well-established and contemporaneous sources. Additionally, a more rigorous and scientific approach to analyzing the archaeological evidence related to the Achaemenids in Egypt could have enhanced the book’s overall scholarly rigor and credibility.
🔓 © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Tissaphernes Archaeological Research Group, Tehran, Iran. Open Access. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The ethical policy of Ancient Iranian Studies is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and complies with International Committee of Ancient Iranian Studies Editorial Board codes of conduct. Readers, authors, reviewers and editors should follow these ethical policies once working with Ancient Iranian Studies. The ethical policy of Ancient Iranian Studies is liable to determine which of the typical research papers or articles submitted to the journal should be published in the concerned issue. For information on this matter in publishing and ethical guidelines please visit www.publicationethics.org.
)