Currently submitted to: JMIR Serious Games
Date Submitted: Oct 10, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 10, 2023 - Dec 5, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Engagement in Serious Games and Impact of Game Design Choices:Systematic Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Serious games have attracted substantial attention in recent years due to their potential to stimulate and to engage players in education, healthcare and training. Player engagement is an essential factor in the effectiveness of serious games. The impact of serious game mechanisms (such as narrative, reward, interaction, feedback and challenge) on player engagement needs to be comprehensively reviewed. Identifying key factors that facilitate or hinder player engagement helps designers create more engaging and immersive gaming experiences.
Objective:
This study intends to conduct a comprehensive review of empirical studies concerning engagement within the realm of serious games. Our primary objective is to assess thoroughly the effectiveness of various game design factors in enhancing player engagement, focusing on three distinct dimensions: game mechanics, game incentives, and game connections. Furthermore, we aim to provide a concise overview of the methodologies and tools employed for evaluating engagement in the experiments conducted.
Methods:
We conducted a search on the Web of Science Core Collection online database for meticulously crafted academic papers published from June 2013 to June 2023, concentrating on the nexus of player engagement and game design. Our search encompassed research keywords like "serious games," "experience," and "engagement," among others, which yielded a substantial repository of 4,228 relevant articles. Following a meticulous screening process, we pinpointed a cohort of 68 quantitative studies that conformed to our review criteria. These articles underwent categorization using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) method.
Results:
Game design elements were categorized into game mechanics (31%), game incentives (38%), and game connections (31%). The measures employed encompassed standardized scales (22%), non-standardized scales (34%), mixed scales (6%), and multidimensional scales (38%). Notably, the predominant focus of research was directed towards narrative, virtual rewards, cooperation, and competition as the most frequently examined game elements. Within this paper, we conduct an in-depth examination and explication of the relationship between these elements and participant engagement within meta-analysis section.
Conclusions:
Results consistently affirm the positive influence of game narrative on engagement. Badges reign supreme in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) systems, outperforming rankings and points. However, PBL systems display initial success but grapple with sustaining long-term motivation, partially due to the "novelty" effect. Cooperation strongly correlates with elevated player engagement. The review underscores the absence of standardized engagement measurement methods in serious games research, often relying on observational data and custom scales. The conclusion of this paper can help designers to create more engaging and context-relevant serious game content.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.