Currently accepted at: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Sep 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Apr 8, 2024
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/53145
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Remote exercise training during COVID-19 pandemic-induced lockdown is feasible, stabilizes aerobic capacity, and alleviates depressive symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Societal measures to contain the outspread of COVID-19 (e.g., lockdown, contact restrictions) have been associated with decreased health and well-being. A multitude of pre-pandemic studies identified the beneficial effects of physical exercise on both physical and mental health.
Objective:
Here, we report on the feasibility of a remote physical exercise intervention and its stress-buffering potential in two untrained cohorts: a pre-COVID-19 cohort that completed the intervention in 2019 and a lockdown cohort that started the intervention shortly before pandemic related restrictions were implemented.
Methods:
In a randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to either an intervention group (IG, n_pre-COVID-19 = 7; n_lockdown = 9) or a control group (CG, n_pre-COVID-19 = 6; n_lockdown = 6). IG participants received weekly individualized training recommendations delivered via web-based support. The intervention period was initially planned for 8 weeks, which was adhered to in the pre-COVID-19 cohort (mean = 8.3 weeks, SD = 0.5) but was extended to on average 17.7 (SD = 2.0) weeks in the lockdown cohort. Participants’ health parameters were assessed pre- and post-intervention: Aerobic capacity was measured as peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Depressive symptoms were scored via the depression subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18.
Results:
Dropout rates were low in both cohorts in the IG (pre-COVID-19: 0%, lockdown: 16.7%) and the CG (pre-COVID-19: 0%, lockdown: 20%). The mean adherence to the training sessions of the IG for both cohorts was 84% (SDpre-COVID-19 = 5.5%, SDlockdown cohort = 11.6%). Multivariate analyses of variance in the lockdown cohort indicated deterioration of VO2peak and depressive symptoms from pre- to post-intervention in the CG but no longitudinal changes in the IG. Analyses in the pre-COVID-19 cohort revealed significant increases in VO2peak for the IG compared to the CG but no group effects on depressive symptoms.
Conclusions:
With low dropout rates and a high adherence, the remote intervention was feasible in healthy adults under regular conditions and in the face of pandemic-related stressors. Moreover, our results hint at a stress-buffering effect, as well as a buffering of a lockdown induced deconditioning of remote physical exercise interventions in the pandemic scenario, which can be used in future studies to overcome equally stressful periods of life. Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; DRKS00018078; October 2, 2019)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.