Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 24, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 23, 2023 - Oct 18, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Brief Peer-Supported webSTAIR for Trauma-Exposed Veterans in the Community: Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Laura E. Ong; 
  • Sarah Speicher; 
  • Diana Villasenor; 
  • Jamie Kim; 
  • Adam Jacobs; 
  • Kathryn S. Macia; 
  • Marylene Cloitre

ABSTRACT

Background:

Peer-supported mobile health (mhealth) programs hold the promise of providing a low-burden approach to increasing access to care and improving mental health. While peer support has been shown to improve engagement into care, there is limited investigation about the impact of peers on symptom outcome. Trauma-exposed populations frequently suffer from co-occurring posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms as well as difficulties in day-to-day functioning. This study evaluated the potential benefits of a peer-supported transdiagnostic mhealth program on symptom outcomes and functioning.

Objective:

This randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of Brief Peer-Supported (BPS) webSTAIR, an abbreviated transdiagnostic online program derived from Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) compared to waitlist control in a community sample of Veterans who screened positive for either post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression.

Methods:

A total of 178 eligible Veterans were enrolled in the study using a 2:1 randomization scheme with 117 assigned to BPS webSTAIR and 61 assigned to the waitlist control. PTSD and depressive symptoms as well as emotion regulation, and psychosocial functioning were assessed via phone at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 8-week follow-up. Mixed-effects models were used to assess change in outcome measures across timepoints and evaluate the impact of module completion on outcomes. Exploratory analyses were conducted to determine whether number and type of peer interactions influenced outcomes.

Results:

Participants randomized to BPS webSTAIR reported significantly greater improvement on all outcome measures at posttreatment compared to the waitlist control (d=-0.48 to -0.64), and gains were maintained at 8-week follow-up. Those who completed more modules reported greater improvement on all outcomes (d=-0.64 to -0.83). An initial cohort of participants who were required to chat with a peer coach to progress exchanged more messages per module but were less likely to complete the program, compared to a later cohort for whom chatting was optional.

Conclusions:

BPS webSTAIR was effective in improving PTSD and depression symptoms, emotion regulation, and psychosocial functioning in Veterans. Peer-supported transdiagnostic mhealth programs may be a particularly efficient, effective, and low-burden approach to improving mental health among trauma-exposed populations. Future research should evaluate how best to deliver peer support, how much to deliver, and for whom the support benefits most. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04286165


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ong LE, Speicher S, Villasenor D, Kim J, Jacobs A, Macia KS, Cloitre M

Brief Peer-Supported webSTAIR for Trauma-Exposed Veterans in the Community: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Preprints. 24/08/2023:52130

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.52130

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52130

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement