Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 3, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 3, 2023 - Sep 28, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Smartphone-Based Hand Function Assessment: A Systematic Review

  • Yan FU; 
  • Yuxin Zhang; 
  • Bing Ye; 
  • Jessica Babineau; 
  • Yan Zhao; 
  • Zhengke Gao; 
  • Alex Mihailidis

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hand function assessment heavily relies on specific task scenarios, making it challenging to ensure validity and reliability. Additionally, the wide range of assessment tools, and limited and expensive data recording, and analysis systems, further aggravate the issue. However, the ubiquitous smartphones in our daily life, they provide a promising opportunity to address these challenges. Implementing the built-in high-efficiency sensors in smartphones can be used as effective tools for hand function assessment.

Objective:

This study aims to systematically evaluate existing studies on hand function evaluation using smartphones.

Methods:

An extensive database search was conducted by an Information Specialist. Two reviewers independently screened all studies, with a third reviewer involved in resolving discrepancies. The final included studies were rated according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). One reviewer extracted data on publication, demographic information, hand function types, sensors used for hand function assessment, and statistical or machine learning methods. Accuracy was checked by another reviewer. The data were synthesized and tabulated based on each of the four research questions.

Results:

46 studies were included. 11 types of hand dysfunction-related diseases were identified, such as Parkinson's Disease, wrist injury, stroke, and hand injury. Six types of hand dysfunctions were found including abnormal range of motion, tremors, bradykinesia, decline of fine-motor skills, hypokinesia, and non-specific dysfunction related to hand arthritis. Among all built-in smartphone sensors, the accelerometer was the most used, followed by the smartphone camera. Most studies used statistical methods for data processing, whereas machine learning (ML) algorithms were also applied for disease detection, disease severity evaluation, prediction, and feature aggregation. Limitations of the review include the nascent field of smartphone-based hand function assessment and the variability in literature quality.

Conclusions:

This systematic review highlights the potential of smartphone-based hand function assessment. The review suggests that a smartphone is a promising tool in hand function evaluation without the constant involvement of therapists. ML is a conducive method to classify levels of hand dysfunction by smartphones. Future research could (1) explore a gold standard for smartphone-based hand function assessment; (2) take advantage of smartphones' multiple built-in sensors to assess hand function comprehensively; (3) focus on developing ML methods for processing collected smartphone data and (4) focus on real-time assessment during rehabilitation training.


 Citation

Please cite as:

FU Y, Zhang Y, Ye B, Babineau J, Zhao Y, Gao Z, Mihailidis A

Smartphone-Based Hand Function Assessment: A Systematic Review

JMIR Preprints. 03/08/2023:51564

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.51564

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51564

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement