Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Dec 06, 2022)

Date Submitted: Dec 5, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 5, 2022 - Dec 6, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Acceptability, Usability, and Credibility of a Mindfulness-Based Digital Therapeutic for Pediatric Concussion: A Mixed-Method Study

  • Veronik Sicard; 
  • Kiarah O'Kane; 
  • Olivier Brown; 
  • Lauren Butterfield; 
  • Rachel Kardish; 
  • Esther Choi; 
  • Katherine Healey; 
  • Noah D Silverberg; 
  • Andra Smith; 
  • Gary Goldfield; 
  • BecharaJ Saab; 
  • Clare Gray; 
  • Kristian Goulet; 
  • Peter Anderson; 
  • Craig Mackie; 
  • Sonja Roth; 
  • Martin H Osmond; 
  • Roger L Zemek; 
  • Molly Cairncross; 
  • AndrĂ©e-Anne Ledoux

ABSTRACT

Background:

A third of adolescents experiencing a concussion will suffer from persistent post-concussion symptoms lasting a month or beyond. The ability to cope with concussion symptoms, regulate emotions, and manage stress is an important determinant of risk for prolonged symptoms. Early psychological interventions, such as mindfulness-based interventions, might improve concussion recovery.

Objective:

This open-label mixed-methods pilot study assessed the acceptability and credibility of a mindfulness-based intervention delivered through a digital therapeutic (DTx; therapeutic smartphone app) for pediatric concussion.

Methods:

Participants aged 12-18 years were recruited from an emergency department within 48 hours of a concussion (acute cohort) or from a tertiary care clinic at least 1 month post-concussion (persistent symptom cohort). Participants completed a novel 4-week mindfulness-based intervention, for 10-15 min/day, at a minimum of 4 days/week. At 2 weeks post-concussion, participants completed a credibility questionnaire. At 4 weeks, participants completed questionnaires assessing satisfaction, usability, and working alliance, as well as a semi-structured phone interview.

Results:

10 participants completed the study outcomes, including 7 acute (5 females; median [IQR] age=14.73 [13.94,16.94] years and 3 persistent symptom patients (2 females; median [IQR] age=17.62 [17.48,17.86] years). Across cohorts, half-way through the intervention, the treatment expectation was moderate (median=6.00 [3.58,7.75], maximum possible=9.00). Moreover, the intervention was perceived as credible (median=6.50 [6.83,8.75], maximum possible=9.00). At 4 weeks, the DTx was considered usable (median=70.00 [55.00,82.50], maximum possible=100.00). Participants rated their satisfaction with the DTx (median=27.00 [24.50,29.50], maximum possible=32.00) and the working alliance with the digital mindfulness guides (median=3.92 [3.38-4.33], maximum possible=5.00) as high. Four themes were identified from the qualitative data: 1) positive attributes (including accessibility, ease of use, perceived effectiveness, variety of features, and meditation guides); 2) negative attributes (technical issues that acted as a barrier to use, and sounds and lights that were triggering headaches); 3) ideas for modifications; and 4) technical issues.

Conclusions:

Adolescents were very satisfied with a mindfulness-based intervention delivered via a smartphone app and considered it to be usable and credible. Results inform modifications to the DTx, instructions, and mindfulness intervention, and potential ways to increase adherence by leveraging positive attributes. A randomized control trial will assess the effectiveness of the DTx to decrease the risk of persistent symptoms and reduce the symptom burden following pediatric concussion. The present mixed-methods study and the iterative approach to intervention design we are using will ensure better translation and impact of interventions for adolescents with concussions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sicard V, O'Kane K, Brown O, Butterfield L, Kardish R, Choi E, Healey K, Silverberg ND, Smith A, Goldfield G, Saab B, Gray C, Goulet K, Anderson P, Mackie C, Roth S, Osmond MH, Zemek RL, Cairncross M, Ledoux AA

Acceptability, Usability, and Credibility of a Mindfulness-Based Digital Therapeutic for Pediatric Concussion: A Mixed-Method Study

JMIR Preprints. 05/12/2022:44757

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.44757

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44757

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement