Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Oct 13, 2022)

Date Submitted: Jul 18, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 18, 2022 - Sep 12, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Preliminary assessment on data appropriateness of electronic health records for real world studies: a survey on hospitals in a developing region in China

  • Yuelin Yu; 
  • Wanqian Guo; 
  • Yuanyuan Chen; 
  • Yunjing Zhang; 
  • Lin Zhuo; 
  • Ruogu Meng; 
  • Ying Chen; 
  • Hongjing Shi; 
  • Zhi Lin; 
  • Siyan Zhan; 
  • Shengfeng Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Assessment of data appropriateness is a top priority before conducting real world studies (RWS). However, this evaluation on electronic health records (EHRs) from hospitals in developing regions has been long-term overlooked.

Objective:

This study aimed to preliminarily assess whether EHRs from hospitals in a developing region in China were appropriate enough to meet RWS purposes.

Methods:

All secondary and tertiary hospitals (n = 28) in Fuzhou, Jiangxi province, China, were recruited. Through face-to-face interviews with chief administrators of hospital EHR systems, the assessment was conducted via semi-quantitative questionnaire to evaluate three dimensions of EHR appropriateness (coverage, consistency, accessibility). Coverage and consistency were measured using 80 core variables compared with two well-established common data models (CDMs), the former focusing on the existence of relevant variables in targeted databases and the latter on data structuring, data types and standardized coding systems. Accessibility was measured by willingness to data sharing.

Results:

Structured EHRs restoration was accomplished in at least 15 hospitals. Variables on drug exposure were the least covered (of 75.0% databases), structured (of 53.6% databases), relatively inconsistent in data types (of 10.7-75.0% databases) and standardized coding systems (of 7.1% databases). Low willingness to data sharing was responded among 64.3% of local hospitals, over 50.0% due to administrative concerns.

Conclusions:

EHR databases from hospitals in the developing region showed favorable coverage of potentially relevant variables for RWS. However, poor consistency, including data structuring, data type and data coding on the preliminary level of variables, and low willingness to share data challenged RWD application.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yu Y, Guo W, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhuo L, Meng R, Chen Y, Shi H, Lin Z, Zhan S, Wang S

Preliminary assessment on data appropriateness of electronic health records for real world studies: a survey on hospitals in a developing region in China

JMIR Preprints. 18/07/2022:41181

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.41181

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/41181

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement